±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 444
Total: 444
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Home
04: Member Screenshots
05: Home
06: Downloads
07: Home
08: Home
09: Home
10: Home
11: Home
12: Home
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Home
17: Home
18: Home
19: Home
20: Home
21: Home
22: Home
23: Home
24: Home
25: Home
26: Home
27: Home
28: Home
29: Member Screenshots
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Home
36: Home
37: Home
38: Home
39: Home
40: Home
41: Home
42: Home
43: Home
44: Home
45: Photo Gallery
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: News Archive
50: Home
51: Community Forums
52: Home
53: Home
54: Home
55: Community Forums
56: Home
57: Home
58: Home
59: Home
60: Home
61: Home
62: Home
63: Home
64: Home
65: Community Forums
66: Home
67: Home
68: Photo Gallery
69: Home
70: Community Forums
71: Photo Gallery
72: Downloads
73: Home
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Member Screenshots
78: Community Forums
79: Home
80: Home
81: Home
82: Home
83: Home
84: Home
85: Home
86: Home
87: Home
88: Home
89: Home
90: Home
91: Home
92: Home
93: Home
94: Home
95: Home
96: Home
97: Home
98: Home
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Photo Gallery
102: News Archive
103: Home
104: Home
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Home
109: Home
110: Home
111: Home
112: Home
113: Home
114: Home
115: Home
116: Home
117: Home
118: Home
119: Home
120: Home
121: Home
122: Home
123: Home
124: Home
125: Home
126: Home
127: Home
128: Home
129: Home
130: Home
131: Home
132: Home
133: Home
134: Home
135: Home
136: Home
137: Home
138: Home
139: Home
140: Home
141: Home
142: Community Forums
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Home
147: Home
148: Home
149: Home
150: Photo Gallery
151: Home
152: Photo Gallery
153: Downloads
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Home
162: Home
163: Home
164: Home
165: Home
166: Home
167: Home
168: Home
169: Home
170: Community Forums
171: Home
172: Home
173: Home
174: Home
175: Home
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Downloads
180: Home
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: News Archive
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Home
189: Home
190: Home
191: Home
192: Home
193: Home
194: Home
195: Home
196: Home
197: Home
198: Home
199: Home
200: Home
201: Home
202: Home
203: Home
204: Home
205: Home
206: Home
207: Home
208: Home
209: Home
210: Home
211: Home
212: Home
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Photo Gallery
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Home
223: Home
224: Home
225: Home
226: Home
227: Home
228: Home
229: Home
230: Home
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Home
236: Photo Gallery
237: Home
238: Photo Gallery
239: Home
240: Home
241: Community Forums
242: Home
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Home
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Member Screenshots
251: Home
252: Downloads
253: Home
254: Home
255: Home
256: Home
257: Home
258: Photo Gallery
259: Home
260: Home
261: Home
262: Home
263: Home
264: Home
265: Home
266: Community Forums
267: Home
268: Home
269: News Archive
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Home
273: Home
274: Home
275: Home
276: Home
277: Home
278: Home
279: Home
280: Photo Gallery
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Home
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: Home
292: Home
293: Home
294: Home
295: Home
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: Member Screenshots
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Home
302: Home
303: Home
304: Home
305: Home
306: Home
307: Home
308: Home
309: Home
310: Home
311: Home
312: Community Forums
313: Home
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: Home
317: Home
318: Photo Gallery
319: Home
320: Home
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Photo Gallery
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Photo Gallery
327: Home
328: Community Forums
329: Home
330: Home
331: Community Forums
332: Home
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Home
338: Photo Gallery
339: Community Forums
340: Downloads
341: Community Forums
342: Home
343: Community Forums
344: Home
345: Photo Gallery
346: Community Forums
347: Photo Gallery
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Home
352: Home
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Home
356: Community Forums
357: Home
358: Community Forums
359: Member Screenshots
360: Home
361: Photo Gallery
362: Home
363: Home
364: Home
365: Member Screenshots
366: Home
367: Community Forums
368: Treasury
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Home
375: Home
376: Home
377: Community Forums
378: Home
379: Home
380: Home
381: Home
382: Home
383: Home
384: Home
385: Home
386: Home
387: Home
388: Home
389: Home
390: Home
391: Home
392: Downloads
393: Photo Gallery
394: Member Screenshots
395: Home
396: Community Forums
397: Photo Gallery
398: Home
399: Home
400: News Archive
401: Home
402: Statistics
403: Home
404: Home
405: Home
406: Home
407: Home
408: Home
409: Home
410: Home
411: Home
412: Home
413: Photo Gallery
414: Home
415: News Archive
416: Home
417: Home
418: Home
419: Home
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Home
423: Downloads
424: Home
425: Home
426: Member Screenshots
427: Downloads
428: Home
429: Downloads
430: Home
431: Photo Gallery
432: Downloads
433: Community Forums
434: Home
435: Home
436: Home
437: Home
438: Home
439: Community Forums
440: Home
441: Photo Gallery
442: Community Forums
443: Downloads
444: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Any special request for Knox this weekend?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

Here's my XM800T pictures for good measure...







I think I have more, but they're not immediately handy / on photobucket.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

YEEEHAAAA!

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
A-109E
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 154
Location: Minneapolis
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi AJ2! Hi Folks!

- armyjunk2

Anyone have anything special they would like me to attempt to photograph this weekend, I'll do my best to do it, but no guarantees....


A 360 walk around of the XM800T would be great if you have the time AJ2.

Thanks,
Sgt, Scouts Out!


I'll add my shots of the XM 800 to AJ's excellent series, Roy, but in the continuing saga of "Ft. Knox scenes - pics #3". Was going to do this in a week or so but it seems topical now.

What's the story on this vehicle? I mean, beyond what I can read on the plaques.

--Bob Steinbrunn
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- A-109E
What's the story on this vehicle? I mean, beyond what I can read on the plaques.

--Bob Steinbrunn


Continnuing saga of the eternal struggle between wheeled vs. tracked proponents, especially vis-a-vis the recon role...so they built and tested both versions. In the end, neither offered significant mobility advantages over vehicles already in the inventory (like the M113) and represented a huge investment that would have diverted funds from other programs. It was fortunate that neither was pursued because the Bradley was not far over the horizon and this was money far better spent. Too little, too late for the returns.

This is why I maintain now that the Dutch YPR concept series should have been adopted as an interim vehicle instead of wasting money on schemes like this...proven, something we already had experience with. Basically a Product Improved M113A1 without the funky turret/hatch layout of our version that never got off the boards.

The wheeled version:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
A-109E
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 154
Location: Minneapolis
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Doug_Kibbey
- A-109E
What's the story on this vehicle? I mean, beyond what I can read on the plaques.

--Bob Steinbrunn


Continnuing saga of the eternal struggle between wheeled vs. tracked proponents, especially vis-a-vis the recon role...so they built and tested both versions. In the end, neither offered significant mobility advantages over vehicles already in the inventory (like the M113) and represented a huge investment that would have diverted funds from other programs. It was fortunate that neither was pursued because the Bradley was not far over the horizon and this was money far better spent. Too little, too late for the returns.

This is why I maintain now that the Dutch YPR concept series should have been adopted as an interim vehicle instead of wasting money on schemes like this...proven, something we already had experience with. Basically a Product Improved M113A1 without the funky turret/hatch layout of our version that never got off the boards.

The wheeled version:


Thanks for the history, Doug. And great action photos: Yeehaaah! times two!

--Bob
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

Doug, I think we continue to disagree on the subject, although I'll defer to your Armor Board knowledge. But if Hunnicutt's Bradley has any weight (page 244), it appears that the XM800T at least was superior than the M113:

"In comparing the two XM800 vehicles with the baseline M113A1, the test report concluded that the XM800T was superior to both the M113A1 and the XM800W in overal performance as an ARSV. The XM800W performed well on roads and its quiet operation and high road speed were goals to be achieved for future scout vehicles. However, its limited cross country capability and safety hazards associated with lateral instability and directional control made it less effective than the M113A1."

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Neil_Baumgardner
Doug, I think we continue to disagree on the subject, although I'll defer to your Armor Board knowledge. But if Hunnicutt's Bradley has any weight (page 244), it appears that the XM800T at least was superior than the M113:

"In comparing the two XM800 vehicles with the baseline M113A1, the test report concluded that the XM800T was superior to both the M113A1 and the XM800W in overal performance as an ARSV.
Neil


It was, but marginally so, the benefits primarily due to weight and size...but not nearly by enough to justify the cost to field it and the time it would have taken to get it there. See my comment "too little, to late". It would have been nearly 1980 by the time this thing could have been fielded in numbers and the Brad was well in the works by then...a choice had to be made and this wasn't it (even though the role of the Brad wasn't pure Scout, the concept was sacrificed for something the Army wanted more).

On balance, it was a worthwhile sacrifice, IMO.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

Okay, understood & granted. We're talking the age-old capability vs cost. Was a dedicated scout vehicle worth the cost.

However, I would point out that the abandonment of the ARSV led to both HMMWV and Bradley mounted scouts. And the Army has recently abandoned HMMWV mounted scout units as too vulnerable, leaving "scouting in a Winnebago" as the only mechanized scout capability (besides Stryker RSTA vehicles - which would probably be good scout vehicles across the board IMO).

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Neil_Baumgardner
Okay, understood & granted. We're talking the age-old capability vs cost. Was a dedicated scout vehicle worth the cost.

However, I would point out that the abandonment of the ARSV led to both HMMWV and Bradley mounted scouts. And the Army has recently abandoned HMMWV mounted scout units as too vulnerable, leaving "scouting in a Winnebago" as the only mechanized scout capability (besides Stryker RSTA vehicles - which would probably be good scout vehicles across the board IMO).

Neil

Neil,

After how many years? And only after the experience of Iraq and the IED's attendant thereto. Recall that the forerunner to the HMMWV, the X311, was a proposed wheeled scout vehicle at one time with substantial armament capabilty for the day and was seriously considered. Gotta' consider these things in the context of the times, not what is known today. Wink

D.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

True enough, although folks back then I believe knew that the HMMWV was too light for scouts and the Bradley was too heavy...

Certainly the Iraq IED issue exposed one big facet of HMMWV vulnerability in this role - but isnt that merely one aspect (albeit a new one) of an overall vulnerability & inadequacy in the scout role that has been known for some time?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 7:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

There is always a problem with the concept of a dedicated "Scout Vehicle"...if it's mobile/fast enough, it's necessarily vulnerable to all sorts of stuff....the converse situation is obvious. That's why I think a dedicated Scout vehicle (on land) is an anachronism and has been for a couple of decades. Scouting needs to be a combined operation itself...with a light arm and a backup. Not unlike the Cav units that combined tanks with lighter AFV's or even Sheridans for scouting. Bob (A 109 E) can probably relate to this, but I think of an analogy to the Air Cav "pink team"...the light scouting helicopter...nimble, but vulnerable, with a gunship (or two) in support. Something like a "mothership".

Increasingly, the need for this as a dedicated unit is probably diminished over what it was in the '70's, what with UAV's, other imaging, etc., but it's always nice to send somebody out there for a look-see without getting your a$$ shot off just for the effort. And it's nice if you can carry some guys with you, just in case. Three-man scout vehicle...I'm not sure the need still exists..., but that's just me.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

Here's the door that was 'unlocked'.


_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
A-109E
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 154
Location: Minneapolis
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:09 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Doug_Kibbey
Bob (A 109 E) can probably relate to this, but I think of an analogy to the Air Cav "pink team"...the light scouting helicopter...nimble, but vulnerable, with a gunship (or two) in support. Something like a "mothership".


I wonder if it's all relative, to wit: Sitting up here at 3000 ft. AGL with a fully-loaded XM-21 Weapons Sub-system seemed relatively safe. Stats bore this out. No one wanted to mess with the front end of this one.


On the other hand, we didn't particularly consider it safe to be down there despite the overhead cover of two gunships. There are two Loaches here and I ain't gonna tell you where they are. You hafta find 'em on your own, then calculate their survival quotient when their rotorwash uncovers a full NVA squad manning their 57mm AA gun.


I mean, it's a very serious situation.

_________________
--Bob Steinbrunn
BSteinIPMS at aol.com


Last edited by A-109E on Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:52 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- A-109E
There are two Loaches here and I ain't gonna tell you where they are. You hafta find 'em on your own,


One just right of center, one at 11o'clock...now you find mine... Mr. Green

(copy and paste "properties" for full size)

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:37 am
Post subject: Re: Any special request for Knox this weekend?

- Doug_Kibbey
There is always a problem with the concept of a dedicated "Scout Vehicle"...if it's mobile/fast enough, it's necessarily vulnerable to all sorts of stuff....the converse situation is obvious. That's why I think a dedicated Scout vehicle (on land) is an anachronism and has been for a couple of decades. Scouting needs to be a combined operation itself...with a light arm and a backup. Not unlike the Cav units that combined tanks with lighter AFV's or even Sheridans for scouting. Bob (A 109 E) can probably relate to this, but I think of an analogy to the Air Cav "pink team"...the light scouting helicopter...nimble, but vulnerable, with a gunship (or two) in support. Something like a "mothership".

Increasingly, the need for this as a dedicated unit is probably diminished over what it was in the '70's, what with UAV's, other imaging, etc., but it's always nice to send somebody out there for a look-see without getting your a$$ shot off just for the effort. And it's nice if you can carry some guys with you, just in case. Three-man scout vehicle...I'm not sure the need still exists..., but that's just me.


I agree that UAVs and other sensors are increasingly supplementing, possibly replacing conventional scouting and reconnaissance, but I think there is also still is a role for dedicated scout vehicles. These tend to come in two varieties: the 3-man versions as you mentioned, but now fitted out with lots of sensors; and the scout-team carrier variety. The Army sorely needs a sensor-equipped scout vehicle, especially one with a mast. I understand an NTC rotation a few years back was extremely jealous of the Canadian Army Grizzly (LAV III) recon vehicles that have a mast-mounted sensor. The US Army simply doesnt have this capability today. It was intended for FSCS/TRACER (ie the ARSV successor) and now the FCS MGV RSTA vehicle... The current question appears to be whether scout-team carriers are needed. Recent thinking seems to have shifted away from them, but I suspect Iraq may cause a rethink of this...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum