±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 432
Total: 432
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Community Forums
03: Photo Gallery
04: Community Forums
05: Photo Gallery
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Downloads
13: Downloads
14: Community Forums
15: Photo Gallery
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: News Archive
19: Community Forums
20: Photo Gallery
21: Community Forums
22: Downloads
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Home
27: Community Forums
28: Home
29: Photo Gallery
30: Photo Gallery
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Downloads
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Photo Gallery
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Photo Gallery
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Downloads
43: Member Screenshots
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: CPGlang
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Member Screenshots
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Photo Gallery
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Photo Gallery
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Downloads
61: Community Forums
62: Downloads
63: Photo Gallery
64: Photo Gallery
65: Photo Gallery
66: Home
67: CPGlang
68: Community Forums
69: Downloads
70: Community Forums
71: Photo Gallery
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Downloads
78: Community Forums
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: Member Screenshots
82: Community Forums
83: Photo Gallery
84: Downloads
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Photo Gallery
90: Photo Gallery
91: Community Forums
92: CPGlang
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Photo Gallery
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Photo Gallery
105: Photo Gallery
106: Downloads
107: Photo Gallery
108: Community Forums
109: Member Screenshots
110: Downloads
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Member Screenshots
117: Photo Gallery
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Member Screenshots
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Home
126: Community Forums
127: CPGlang
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Home
131: Photo Gallery
132: Downloads
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Home
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Member Screenshots
141: Member Screenshots
142: Member Screenshots
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Photo Gallery
150: Photo Gallery
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Photo Gallery
160: CPGlang
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Home
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Home
172: Community Forums
173: Photo Gallery
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Home
179: Community Forums
180: News Archive
181: Community Forums
182: News
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: Home
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Member Screenshots
194: Home
195: Community Forums
196: Member Screenshots
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Photo Gallery
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: CPGlang
210: Photo Gallery
211: Member Screenshots
212: Home
213: Community Forums
214: Photo Gallery
215: Photo Gallery
216: Photo Gallery
217: Photo Gallery
218: Downloads
219: Community Forums
220: Photo Gallery
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: CPGlang
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Photo Gallery
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: CPGlang
233: Photo Gallery
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Home
237: Community Forums
238: Downloads
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Home
242: Photo Gallery
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: Downloads
246: Downloads
247: Community Forums
248: Statistics
249: Community Forums
250: Home
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Home
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Home
266: News
267: Member Screenshots
268: Home
269: Community Forums
270: CPGlang
271: Home
272: Photo Gallery
273: Community Forums
274: Home
275: Downloads
276: Community Forums
277: Photo Gallery
278: Home
279: Member Screenshots
280: Community Forums
281: Photo Gallery
282: Member Screenshots
283: Member Screenshots
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Photo Gallery
288: Photo Gallery
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: Photo Gallery
292: Community Forums
293: CPGlang
294: Statistics
295: Downloads
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: Community Forums
299: Photo Gallery
300: Photo Gallery
301: Photo Gallery
302: Community Forums
303: CPGlang
304: Community Forums
305: Photo Gallery
306: Community Forums
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Photo Gallery
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Member Screenshots
313: Community Forums
314: Photo Gallery
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Photo Gallery
318: Home
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Photo Gallery
323: Community Forums
324: Photo Gallery
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Photo Gallery
334: Community Forums
335: CPGlang
336: Community Forums
337: News Archive
338: Community Forums
339: Photo Gallery
340: Photo Gallery
341: Community Forums
342: Photo Gallery
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Photo Gallery
348: Photo Gallery
349: CPGlang
350: Member Screenshots
351: Community Forums
352: CPGlang
353: Community Forums
354: Downloads
355: Photo Gallery
356: Community Forums
357: Photo Gallery
358: Community Forums
359: Downloads
360: Downloads
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Photo Gallery
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Photo Gallery
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Member Screenshots
370: Photo Gallery
371: Home
372: Photo Gallery
373: Photo Gallery
374: Photo Gallery
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Photo Gallery
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: CPGlang
383: Photo Gallery
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Photo Gallery
390: Home
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Photo Gallery
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Photo Gallery
397: Photo Gallery
398: Home
399: Photo Gallery
400: Photo Gallery
401: Photo Gallery
402: Community Forums
403: Photo Gallery
404: CPGlang
405: Home
406: Member Screenshots
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Home
411: Home
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Downloads
415: Community Forums
416: Photo Gallery
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Photo Gallery
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Photo Gallery
424: Photo Gallery
425: Photo Gallery
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Home
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Member Screenshots
432: CPGlang

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
"Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:41 am
Post subject: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

Back in '05 (on the old board) I posted about an encounter with a couple of "Blackhorse" (11th Armored Cav, of which Roy and I are "alumni" from a distant past Rolling Eyes ) troopers in DFW airport who commented to me about maybe taking their VISMOD OSV's from the National Training Center, Ft. Irwin on their deployment to Iraq as armed vehicles. Then, I never heard anymore about this and obviously, it never happened from what I saw (and heard) from my reunion dinner with the unit in 2006 upon their return. Never came up again and I didn't happen to ask about it on that occasion as it clearly never occurred.

Yesterday, I stumbled onto this interesting page on the 'net by a "C" Trooper with that unit who happened to illuminate that issue retrospectively (as well as some other matters regarding "G" Troop). As his "space" encompasses some nineteen pages and covers ground from NTC-Korea-Iraq (and is slow to load), I've taken the liberty of downloading two pics of the "experimental" OSV that was modified into a "combat" vehicle before the concept was rejected to present here, along with the poster's commentary, but I'll provide the link for your review since his site is interesting and the pics are not my own (nor the commentary) and he should get the credit (I'm just afraid you guys on dial-up will NEVER see it otherwise...and even my work computer had to lay on extra memory to load the page).

So, here ya' go...the "Combat OSV" that wasn't:

uplink.space.com/showf...;fpart=all

While we were training up for our deployment there was a lot of news about a lack of armored vehicles in Iraq. Because of this someone came up with the "brilliant" idea to modify the OSTs with a real .50 cal. machine gun in the place of the sewar pipe for us to use in Iraq.

However, in the end there were several factors that doomed the program. Apparently, it came out in tests that the elevation motor was insuficient to raise the .50 cal. Also, there were questions about the effectiveness of the armor on the turret. After all, the hull may have been a regular '113, but the "armor" on the turret was purely to protect the crew in the turret from rollovers and not designed to take a blast. Furthermore, most of us had a big issue with the fact that the ammo for the .50 cal. could only be re-loaded from the outside of the vehicle, exposing the crew in a firefight. With a growing laundry list of problems that kept pushing back it's development schedule, coupled with its redundancy due to the rapidly increasing number of up-armored humvees in Iraq, the program was canceled with only a single prototype produced.

This, ladies and gentlemen, is the one and only prototype of a "combat capable" OST:

This is a close-up of the .50 cal. mount. The two pins that would hold the machine gun in place are visible, with the ammo can on the far side of the mount. The .50 cal. was aimed via a fire-controll system adopted from a Bradley Armored Fighting Vehicle.

One of my favorite comments about the concept came from Chapell, one of the guys in my platoon: "They do realise that these are toy tanks, don't they?"

Thank God we didn't have to use these things in Iraq.




Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:06 pm
Post subject: Re: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

The driver's hatch looks like the type used on the M-901 Improved TOW and the FIST-V. Those things are a pain in the ass and I'd like to sock the engineer that came up with it!

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:10 pm
Post subject: Re: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

Hi Mark! Hi Folks!

- MarkHolloway
The driver's hatch looks like the type used on the M-901 Improved TOW and the FIST-V.


There is NO looks like to it, those vehicles are EX-M901/FIST-V hulls.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Sabot
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 380
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:16 pm
Post subject: Re: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

They are Ex-M901 ITVs and not ex-M981 FIST-Vs.

_________________
RobG
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:10 pm
Post subject: Re: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

So, further to this discussion (and related to the "Abrams and strange .50 cal. mount" thread) I have been in touch with Jonathon Payne, a veteran of 1/11th Cav in Iraq back in '05 and one of those who was at the dinner it was my privilege to attend upon their return in Bakersfield in early '06. Jonathon has visited the forum here and looked at the thread mentioned above and had some addtional thoughts regarding the "Combat OSV" and sent along a couple of pics with the following remarks that I'll post below. I think he's on to something here...

The existence of the modified OSV was somewhat of a shock to me because up to that point the combat OSV was nothing more than a rumor and I was beginning to wonder if it even existed.

Since that day I have been looking all over the Internet for more pictures of it and maybe some additional information on it because, for some reason, the vehicle fascinates me. Until today, however, I was convinced that the pictures I had took were the only ones to be had. This was until you gave me the link to your message board. I was browsing through the forum and found a thread titled "Abrams and strange 50cal mount". I clicked on it and instantly recognized the CSAMM mount as the same kind of mount on the modified OSV. I clicked on the link to the manufacturers web site, found their photo gallery and sure enough there were two very high resolution photos of the OSV with an M2 in the mount on the Tank and AFV gunnery range at Ft. Irwin. I am including these photos as an attachment.

The manufacturer's web site is: www.gunmasters.com

In hindsight I doubt that if the rumor that the elevation motor couldn't handle the .50 cal. were true that this is the reason the program was canceled. Most likely it was the fact that while the modification was being tested, armor kits as well as purpose built up-armor humvees were rapidly being fielded to Iraq. In the end, the need for the modification was outpaced by other outside events.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 12:39 am
Post subject: Re: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

Hi Folks!

Very interesting!

Those OSVs were new rebuilds, lighter that Bradleys, a bit smaller which would help get though build up areas, and more armor that the current Hummer at that time.

Sounds like it might have had some good possiblies if funding had been available and someone was asking for M113 based vehicles.

Thanks for the info guys!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:01 pm
Post subject: Re: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

What's wrong with this picture???

It's a standard M2 HB Flex. How's it Fire???? Some poor soul laid stradling behind it exposed on the butterfly??? Mr. Green

They probably didn't have a M2 TT available to mount. Most likely a display only and was not actually fired. M1117's us the M2 electrically fired and charged. Probably something similar was planed for this set up.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:17 pm
Post subject: Re: "Combat" OSV's (OST's) from NTC in Iraq...

YO! Blast from the past from the old board, courtesy of Archive.org...here's the old discussion on this topic..and even the links work!

web.archive.org/web/20...read/59433
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum