±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 432
Total: 432
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Photo Gallery
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Community Forums
19: Home
20: Home
21: Home
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Home
26: Home
27: Community Forums
28: Home
29: News
30: Community Forums
31: Your Account
32: Community Forums
33: Home
34: News
35: Home
36: Home
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Photo Gallery
40: News Archive
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Member Screenshots
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: Search
52: Photo Gallery
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Photo Gallery
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Downloads
60: Community Forums
61: News
62: Home
63: Home
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: Home
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: Home
73: News
74: Home
75: Downloads
76: Home
77: Downloads
78: Photo Gallery
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Home
83: Home
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Member Screenshots
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Downloads
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Member Screenshots
100: Home
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: Community Forums
111: Downloads
112: Home
113: Home
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Home
118: Home
119: Home
120: Community Forums
121: Home
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Home
125: Community Forums
126: Home
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Home
131: Community Forums
132: Downloads
133: Home
134: Community Forums
135: Photo Gallery
136: Home
137: Member Screenshots
138: Downloads
139: Home
140: Home
141: Home
142: Home
143: Home
144: Downloads
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Home
148: Photo Gallery
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Member Screenshots
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Downloads
160: Home
161: Home
162: Downloads
163: Home
164: Community Forums
165: Home
166: Downloads
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Home
170: Your Account
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Home
174: Home
175: Member Screenshots
176: Community Forums
177: Downloads
178: News Archive
179: News
180: Home
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Downloads
185: Home
186: Home
187: Downloads
188: Home
189: Home
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Home
197: Downloads
198: Home
199: Home
200: Photo Gallery
201: Community Forums
202: Home
203: Home
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Home
207: Downloads
208: Home
209: Photo Gallery
210: Community Forums
211: Downloads
212: Home
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Your Account
220: Member Screenshots
221: Community Forums
222: Downloads
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Home
227: LinkToUs
228: Downloads
229: Photo Gallery
230: Home
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Home
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Statistics
237: Downloads
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Photo Gallery
241: Home
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: Your Account
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Member Screenshots
249: Community Forums
250: Statistics
251: Home
252: Home
253: Home
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: Your Account
260: Downloads
261: Home
262: Downloads
263: Community Forums
264: Photo Gallery
265: Member Screenshots
266: Home
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Photo Gallery
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Home
276: Home
277: Your Account
278: Home
279: Home
280: Community Forums
281: Downloads
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Photo Gallery
285: Community Forums
286: Home
287: Home
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Home
291: Home
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Home
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Member Screenshots
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Home
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: News Archive
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Photo Gallery
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Home
314: Home
315: Home
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Home
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Home
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Home
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Home
328: Home
329: Community Forums
330: Photo Gallery
331: Community Forums
332: Home
333: Photo Gallery
334: Community Forums
335: Home
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: Your Account
342: Photo Gallery
343: Home
344: Home
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Photo Gallery
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Home
352: Home
353: Community Forums
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: Home
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Home
363: Community Forums
364: Home
365: Community Forums
366: Photo Gallery
367: Community Forums
368: Downloads
369: Community Forums
370: Home
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: News
376: Home
377: Home
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Home
383: Home
384: Downloads
385: Community Forums
386: Home
387: Home
388: Community Forums
389: Home
390: Home
391: Treasury
392: Home
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Downloads
396: Community Forums
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Home
400: Home
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Member Screenshots
405: Home
406: Downloads
407: Home
408: Home
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Statistics
412: Downloads
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Home
417: Community Forums
418: Photo Gallery
419: Community Forums
420: Home
421: Home
422: Home
423: Member Screenshots
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: News
427: Home
428: Home
429: Home
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
3.7in AP Shot
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:23 am
Post subject: 3.7in AP Shot

Here are some photos of a 3.7in gun being test fired on the ranges in Valcartier Quebec in Feb. 1943. The round being loaded into the gun appears to be painted black indicating that it is AP shot. This appears to be a setup to measure muzzle velocity. Note that the 3.7in AA Gun has a much lower profile when in a horizontal firing position, then the German 8.8cm Flak guns










Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:48 am
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

Zooming in on the 'loading' image reveals a projectile with a flat nose - its more than likely a proof round used to test the gun after manufacture.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
A2_Prius
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 112

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:06 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7 in.

Was the 3.7 in. ever employed in the AT role fulfilled by the 8.8 cm.? By '43 the Allies were well acquainted with the latter's "dual role" capability, and it seems to me that the 3.7 in. gun probably had the same potential.
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:55 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

No I've read it was specifically not fitted with ground sites when issued to units so that it could not be diverted from it's primary role as an AA gun.

Especially in the desert the role of protecting the base area around the Suez Canal was considered too critical to allow it to be diverted. Between use there and in UK based AA units production could barely keep up with demand

I assume the 17pdr was considered adequate. I also read recently that the 32pdr At gun that was being developed at the end of the war was based on the 3.7" but the towed version of that gun was a monster to move around. I think in the 32 pdr form it was used in the Tortoise (The British vehicle similar to the T28)

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:38 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

According to the regimental history of the 2nd Cdn HAA Regt. their 3.7in AA guns were fitted with sights to engage ground targets both by direct and indirect fire. Besides the AA role their training also involved anti-tank drills and artillery shoots.

Looking at the photo closer it dose look like the round is a Flathead. Since these are also solid shot they would be painted black like the AP Shot.



Below are diagrams of the three main types of ammo for the 3.7in AA Guns. First the 3.7in AP Shot Mk 3T, the 3.7in HE Shell and the 3.7in Shrapnel shell.





Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:46 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7 in.

- A2_Prius
Was the 3.7 in. ever employed in the AT role fulfilled by the 8.8 cm.? By '43 the Allies were well acquainted with the latter's "dual role" capability, and it seems to me that the 3.7 in. gun probably had the same potential.


Several books mention that they were used against tanks during the fall of Tobruk - the regiment responsible for the air defence of the harbour held off rommels panzers for several hours until they ran out of ammunition. The ammunition in question was unfuzed HE (normal HE round with transit plug fitted in place of fuze) apparently...

The unit in question IIRC was 68 HAA Regt RA and I think the Peter Cochrane book mentions it.

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:03 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

- bsmart
No I've read it was specifically not fitted with ground sites when issued to units so that it could not be diverted from it's primary role as an AA gun.

Especially in the desert the role of protecting the base area around the Suez Canal was considered too critical to allow it to be diverted. Between use there and in UK based AA units production could barely keep up with demand.


There were different models of the 3.7in AA gun going up to the Mark 6. There were both static and mobile types. It sounds like the guns sighted along the Suez Canal may have been static types. The 2Cdn.HAA Regimental states that “…in Africa; the gunners with the 8th Army had also on occasion used their 3.7 guns against enemy columns and concentrations.�

In NWE the 3.7in AA guns were most often used in the field artillery role, especially for counter battery and counter mortar shoots. I have heard one report that the British had used their 3.7in AA guns to snipe at German tanks across the Rhine River in 1945.

Note that 3.7in AA guns were also manufactured in Canada and Australia during the war.
Back to top
View user's profile
David_Clark
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 16, 2006
Posts: 36

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:48 am
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

Field Marshall Sir Alan Brooke's memoirs include several mentions of visits to demonstrations of 3.7" guns in the anti-tank role. If I remember correctly, the demonstrations mainly took place prior to the introduction of the 17pdr.

Perhaps while the anti-tank potential of the 3.7" gun was evident, the introduction of the 17pdr eliminated the operational requirement for the 3.7" gun to be used against ground targets.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 8:21 am
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

The introduction of the proximity fuze also made them effect against dug-in infantry and they were used in this role in NWE and Burma.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roger_Lucy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:11 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

[quote="J.McGillivray"]Here are some photos of a 3.7in gun being test fired on the ranges in Valcartier Quebec in Feb. 1943. The round being loaded into the gun appears to be painted black indicating that it is AP shot. This appears to be a setup to measure muzzle velocity. Note that the 3.7in AA Gun has a much lower profile when in a horizontal firing position, then the German 8.8cm Flak guns

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In July 1942 the Canadian Army Technical Development Board commisioned a one-off 3.7 inch SP on a Ram chassis. The gun used was a Mk.II 3.7-inch anti-aircraft gun, on a Mk.III mounting (less its wheels, predictor and other parts below the roller race) made by General Electric in Peterborough Ont. Aside from the standard AA sights it had both a No.9 dial sight for indirect fire and a modified No.33 anti-tank sight.
In trials in the UK the Ram 3.7 inch SP was not terribly effective in either an AA or in-direct fire role, but tests carried out on 23 March, 1943 at the Combined Operations School in Poole, showed it performed very well in a direct fire role.

Paper studies were then carried out to look at the feasibility of mounting either a 17-pounder or a 3.7 inch AA gun on the Ram Sexton chassis. The 3.7 inch was deemed to offer marginally (5mm) superior armour penetration out to 1,000 yards, and significantly better beyond that range. A paper study was also done for a 3.7 inch as an assault gun mounted on an M4 chassis, for use against beach fortifications. Neither of these studies got beyond the drawing board but do show that the 3.7 inch AA gun was seen as potentially ahighly effective direct fire weapon.
For more details on these projects see my "Secret Weapons of the Canadian Army" Service Publications 2006.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:50 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

[quote="Roger_Lucy"]
- J.McGillivray

For more details on these projects see my "Secret Weapons of the Canadian Army" Service Publications 2006.


I'm waiting for the film version Wink

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roger_Lucy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

I'm waiting for the film version ;-)

8)[/quote]
I wish! There are lots of references to films being taken of various equipment trials, but all that seems to have survived are a few stills- such as this one of the Ram 3.7 inch SP wading ashore during the 23 March 1943 trials at Poole.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:16 am
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

In this article in US Field Artillery Magazine from Jan. 1943 there are references to the British 3.7in AA gun being used in the anti-tank role like the German 8.8cm Flak gun.
sill-www.army.mil/FAMA..._25_27.pdf
Source
sill-www.army.mil/FAMA...chives.htm
Back to top
View user's profile
warddw
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:05 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

I have a nice example of the 3.7" AP Ammunition in my collection...let me know if you want a picture posted...
Back to top
View user's profile
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:56 pm
Post subject: Re: 3.7in AP Shot

It would be nice to see a photo of the 3.7in AP shot.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum