Com-Central.net

M109A6 PIM - Bradley based!
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.

Forum Index › AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

Jared
Power User

Offline
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Wherever the army sends me

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:43 am Post subject: M109A6 PIM - Bradley based!

Joe_D
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 12:08 pm
Post subject: Re: M109A6 PIM - Bradley based!

Makes sense to me since the MLRS is also Bradley based.

At least some one has decided the lighter tracked common chassis will be M2 based, I doubt if the heavy will ever be M1, with the exception of the few "Wolverine" AVLB's the M48/M60 series seems to be filling that role and will be for some time with the M88 and older AVLB's. Any theories why??

BTW, that kinda looks like M1A2 T-158 track. Probably explains the outrigger/hull extensions.

Joe D

bsmart
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:10 pm
Post subject: Re: M109A6 PIM - Bradley based!

- Joe_D

Makes sense to me since the MLRS is also Bradley based.

At least some one has decided the lighter tracked common chassis will be M2 based, I doubt if the heavy will ever be M1, with the exception of the few "Wolverine" AVLB's the M48/M60 series seems to be filling that role and will be for some time with the M88 and older AVLB's. Any theories why??

$$$$$$$$$$$$

Remember it wasn't long ago when the statements were made that heavy forces were a thing of the past. Since heavy forces were dead why spend any money on next generation support vehicles based on the latest tank. Just have the older designs soldier on. After all they are all going to be retired soon. After all heavy forces are a thing of the past

But then things changed. But now the need is immediate and there is no time to develop new systems based on a newer chassis. Just do the minimum neccesary to make the old ones work. Oh and because operational costs are up there is no money for developing anything that can't be deployed right away

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])

MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:01 pm Post subject: Re: M109A6 PIM - Bradley based!
That track must me similar to the new double-pin track they developed for the M113 FOV. _________________ "TUMBLEWEED"

Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:23 pm Post subject: Re: M109A6 PIM - Bradley based!
- bsmart After all heavy forces are a thing of the past The tank is dead, Bob..has been for quite some time...don't tell me you're only now getting the memo?!

Dontos
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 4:27 am
Post subject: Re: M109A6 PIM - Bradley based!

- Joe_D

Makes sense to me since the MLRS is also Bradley based.

At least some one has decided the lighter tracked common chassis will be M2 based, I doubt if the heavy will ever be M1, with the exception of the few "Wolverine" AVLB's the M48/M60 series seems to be filling that role and will be for some time with the M88 and older AVLB's. Any theories why??

BTW, that kinda looks like M1A2 T-158 track. Probably explains the outrigger/hull extensions.

Joe D

Yeah but T-158 unsupported?? (ie no support rollers...ouch!!)

I hope this is a spin-off (lighter weight) of the T-158.

Don

Joe_D
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:01 am
Post subject: Re: M109A6 PIM - Bradley based!

Don,

I know what you mean, I'm sure if it is it's the later (lighter) T158, If you look closely you can just make out the hollow center guides.

Bob,

$$$$$$$ is one main reason but another is that turbine, I'm sure it's one of the less quoted reasons why the M88 was upgraded instead of going with the M1 based version similar to the Leopard series. Can't be out recovering tanks when you gotta run in all the time for fuel. Those recovery guys log some serious miles. Besides, that's money too, especially now with oil almost 100 bucks a barrel.

Doug,

Noooooo !!!!! Never !!!!!!!!! , it's the turbine that's dead.

Joe D

Forum Index › AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1

All times are GMT - 6 Hours

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Select Language

Login

`±`Recent Visitors

`±`User Info-big

Com-Central.net

Select Language

Login

±Recent Visitors

±User Info-big

`±`Recent Visitors

`±`User Info-big