±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 376
Total: 376
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Downloads
04: Home
05: Photo Gallery
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Photo Gallery
09: LinkToUs
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Photo Gallery
13: CPGlang
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Photo Gallery
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Search
20: Downloads
21: Search
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Photo Gallery
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Photo Gallery
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: CPGlang
31: Community Forums
32: Member Screenshots
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Photo Gallery
36: Member Screenshots
37: Community Forums
38: Downloads
39: Photo Gallery
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Home
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Photo Gallery
46: Downloads
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Downloads
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Home
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Downloads
60: Community Forums
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: CPGlang
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Statistics
71: CPGlang
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: CPGlang
78: Community Forums
79: Downloads
80: Member Screenshots
81: Photo Gallery
82: Community Forums
83: Photo Gallery
84: Home
85: CPGlang
86: Community Forums
87: Member Screenshots
88: Photo Gallery
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: CPGlang
93: Downloads
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: CPGlang
97: Community Forums
98: Photo Gallery
99: Home
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: CPGlang
103: Downloads
104: Community Forums
105: Photo Gallery
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Photo Gallery
110: Photo Gallery
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Downloads
115: Home
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Photo Gallery
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Statistics
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: News
129: Contact
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Home
136: Your Account
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Photo Gallery
142: Downloads
143: Photo Gallery
144: Downloads
145: Photo Gallery
146: Community Forums
147: Member Screenshots
148: Community Forums
149: Home
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Photo Gallery
154: Photo Gallery
155: Member Screenshots
156: Community Forums
157: CPGlang
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Photo Gallery
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Member Screenshots
168: Downloads
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Member Screenshots
176: Community Forums
177: Photo Gallery
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Downloads
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Photo Gallery
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Photo Gallery
201: Photo Gallery
202: Photo Gallery
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Home
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: Photo Gallery
214: Photo Gallery
215: Member Screenshots
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Photo Gallery
219: Photo Gallery
220: Photo Gallery
221: Community Forums
222: Statistics
223: Community Forums
224: Photo Gallery
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: CPGlang
233: CPGlang
234: Statistics
235: Statistics
236: Home
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: CPGlang
240: Home
241: Home
242: Downloads
243: Home
244: Photo Gallery
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: News Archive
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Home
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: News Archive
255: Member Screenshots
256: Community Forums
257: Downloads
258: Home
259: Downloads
260: Home
261: Community Forums
262: Photo Gallery
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Search
266: Community Forums
267: Photo Gallery
268: Home
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: CPGlang
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Downloads
275: Photo Gallery
276: Home
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Photo Gallery
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Photo Gallery
284: Member Screenshots
285: Community Forums
286: Home
287: Supporters
288: Photo Gallery
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Member Screenshots
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: CPGlang
295: Downloads
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Home
299: Photo Gallery
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Photo Gallery
303: CPGlang
304: Community Forums
305: Photo Gallery
306: Member Screenshots
307: Community Forums
308: Downloads
309: Community Forums
310: Photo Gallery
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Home
314: News
315: Photo Gallery
316: Photo Gallery
317: Photo Gallery
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Photo Gallery
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Statistics
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Photo Gallery
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Photo Gallery
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: CPGlang
340: Home
341: Photo Gallery
342: Community Forums
343: Member Screenshots
344: Community Forums
345: Home
346: CPGlang
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Home
350: Community Forums
351: Member Screenshots
352: Community Forums
353: Photo Gallery
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: CPGlang
357: News Archive
358: Photo Gallery
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Photo Gallery
363: Home
364: Search
365: Community Forums
366: Downloads
367: CPGlang
368: Community Forums
369: Member Screenshots
370: Community Forums
371: Downloads
372: CPGlang
373: Community Forums
374: Photo Gallery
375: Community Forums
376: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:22 am
Post subject: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Below is a 1942 GPW (Ford Script) Jeep. It belongs to a Captain here at Ft Hood and he was sent my way by the 4ID museum director to possibly assist in its identification. It's serial number from the dash plate says 12078, built 4 April 1942 at the Ford plant in Dallas. He bought the jeep in the past year from a man that lived just east of Dallas. The previous owner said it had been there since 1989 but he knew nothing else about the jeep. The Captain has sanded the jeep down and revealed these markings but knows little about them. Can this esteemed board of experts lend a hand?










_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 8:59 am
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Hi Jeff,

Good post! I'm going to guess the top number is "C4" but the botttom one looks pretty long to be an Army bumper number. Could it be a registration number? I guess there's a chance it came from Camp Hood. Wish my 'photo shop' had sandpaper mode so I could dig a little deeper. Wink

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:37 pm
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Looks like he may need to sand a bit more.....

Too cool, I have GPW 15170 built in Dallas in April 13 42 ! You have my jeep's slightly older brother here.

You should have him add this jeep to the S/N number list on G503.com if he has not already done so.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:00 pm
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

I think the 2nd bumper has an "AB" in the top row, but I'm not sure what this would relate to in Army terms. I beleive he's already afraid he may have sanded too much already. He sand a little and then photographs, sands some more, etc... He is already a memeber of G503 and that's where these pictures came from. I have yet to meet this Captain in person but he lives only about 15-20 minutes from me in Harker Heights, TX. We have communicated via phone and e-mail thus far.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:05 pm
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

- SFC_Jeff_Button
I think the 2nd bumper has an "AB" in the top row.


Any chance it's 82AB? That would be the 82nd Airborne.

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:24 pm
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

I think there's a good chance you might be right about the 82nd Airborne. I found this photo of a restored 82nd Jeep. It had pictures from WWII as well and this could be it. However I still need to try and decipher the lower lettering. This one belonged to the 320th Field Artillery.

[img][/img]

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Dennis_Smith
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 192

PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 7:18 pm
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Wikepedia shows a chart with all the units in 82nd Division (modern day). Towards the bottom of the page shows the structure during WW2. It may help with deciphering.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...ed_States)

Of interest, it shows 320F as artillery delivered by gliders!
Back to top
View user's profile
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:47 pm
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Yes, I found the 320th did come in on gliders with the 82nd.
I tried various unit numbers and did come up with what might be one close match. Prehaps the bottom number below the 82nd says; 899TD, for the 899th Tank Destroyer Battalion. They were a separate Battalion that was attached to the 82nd for a few days, (16-18 Jun 1944), and Charlie company would match what was on the other bumperette.
Since the 899th was a Separate Battalion, they went where needed every few days. Below is what I am tracking;

A period of training in the Algerian desert followed the Tunisian campaign and on 1 November 1943 the 899th departed North Africa and landed in Italy on 10 November 1943. A short time later, the Battalion was withdrawn and embarked for England to train in preparation for D-Day invasion at Normandy.

Company “A� and Company “C� landed on Utah Beach on D-Day, with the remainder of the 899th arriving D plus 4 and 5. The 899th, the first TD Bn to land in France, teamed with four infantry divisions, including the Fourth Infantry Division, until D plus 11, when it was attached to the Ninth Infantry Division. objective Cherbourg.


Attachments of Independent Tank Destroyer Battalions and Groups to Infantry, Armored, and Airborne Divisions in the ETO

4th Infantry Division
Cos A&C, 899th TD Bn (SP) 9-13 Jun 44

82d Airborne Division
Co C, 899th TD Bn (SP) 16-18 Jun 44

90th Infantry Division
Co B 899th TD Bn (SP) 17-19 Jun 44

9th Infantry Division
899th TD Bn (SP) (- 2 cos) 19-20 Jun 44
899th TD Bn (SP) 20-24 Jul 44

3rd Armored Division
Co C, 899th TD Bn (SP)(Support of 47th Inf Regt)6-10 Sep 1944
Co C, 899th TD Bn (SP)(Part of 47th RCT) 25Oct – 10Nov 1944

I also found an article where the 899th Commander commented that of all the units the 899th was attached to, the 82nd AirBorne was the Battalions favorite due to the soldiers ferocity and tenacity with the enemy.
Prehaps this is the unit I have been looking for. If not, at least I did learn alot about tank destroyer units in WWII.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Jens_O_Mehner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 511
Location: Giessen, Germany
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Before you get too carried away...

The 899TD would have kept the higher command markings they were assigned to and would not have changed them for a couple of days with the 82nd. IIRC, TD battalions were independent Army or Corps assets, so the first combination would have been that, then 899TD, then individual vehicle on the other side, if in fact they even put the highest command on there, many independent tank and tank destroyer battalions only had their own codes on the vehicles.

A lot of Jeeps assigned to airborne units show no bumper markings at all in contemporary photos in theater, not because they have been censored, but because they a) were not painted on in the first place due to opsec or b) the original ones were overpainted because the vehicles were, ah, appropriated, from their original units. The airborne divisions did have less Jeeps assigned to them than for instance infantry divisions, most of their movement was done on foot, by air, on semitrailers or by rail in the good old "8 or 40"s.

Many, if not most, vehicles remained in theatre and were either used by the Army of occupation, allied nations, UNRRA and other rebuilding efforts, MDAP etc. etc., many of them ended up either in collector's hands over here, many more were scrapped, some of them had a second or third life in Africa or Asia Minor.

There is a good chance that this 1942 Ford GPW never left CONUS, but it may have been assigned to the 82nd when they returned after the war or to a stateside ABN training element during the war.

What about the front bumper? The codes should have been painted on that one as well, maybe those could be recovered more easily? I also recommend tracing them with a piece of paper and a pencil- you know, the old trick every PI and detective uses in a gazillion of movies... Wink



Jens O.

_________________
Information not shared is information lost.
"Don't order the Schnitzel, they're using Schnauzer."
Back to top
View user's profile
Dennis_Smith
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 192

PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:14 am
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

The first digit looks like a "G" instead of a number. WW2 regiments had 12 companys, A-M skipping J. I wonder if the number might mean G company, xxx regiment?

This site shows all the airborne divisions and their regiments. (None that fit very well, though)...


www.militaryhistoryonl...valry.aspx
Back to top
View user's profile
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:52 am
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

The front bumper was one of the few pieces that were not with this mostly original vehicle.
I agree that Tank Destroyer bit was a bit much to hope for, but once I got into the research of the unit, I got a little bit carried away since it was all new to me.
Once I get some more time, I will research / check out the stateside 82nd AB units and try to find a match. I still need to see this vehicle in person which I hope to do within the next week or two. Thanks to all that have helped.
I have an Ontos here in Texas I need to visit as well with the "hook-up" from Dontos as an assist.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:41 am
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

I found out that the jeeps hood had "2066837" painted on as its Registration / USA number. I sent this number to a friend for research but does anyone else know how this number might assist in deciphering this jeeps unit history?

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:30 am
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

The USA number won't help you much in tracing unit history.
Tom Wobolt on G503 is the guy to ask if that hood number seems right for that GPW.
Was the number painted in White or in Blue drab?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 1:31 am
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Blue Drab was on the hood numbers. This Captain is part of G503 and I know he posts there quite often.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 1:58 am
Post subject: Re: ID 1942 GPW bumper markings...

Thats too cool to have the original Blue Drab numbers!
If he has put this same info on the Gee, I'm sure that he has been talking with Tom.
I wish I could have found my original hood numbers, I am sooo jealous
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum