±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 412
Total: 412
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Your Account
04: Community Forums
05: Member Screenshots
06: Home
07: Home
08: Downloads
09: Downloads
10: Photo Gallery
11: Member Screenshots
12: Photo Gallery
13: Downloads
14: Photo Gallery
15: Photo Gallery
16: Photo Gallery
17: Photo Gallery
18: Home
19: Member Screenshots
20: Photo Gallery
21: Downloads
22: Photo Gallery
23: Home
24: Photo Gallery
25: Photo Gallery
26: Community Forums
27: Downloads
28: Home
29: Home
30: Community Forums
31: Photo Gallery
32: Photo Gallery
33: Home
34: Photo Gallery
35: Statistics
36: Photo Gallery
37: Photo Gallery
38: Downloads
39: Home
40: Photo Gallery
41: Home
42: Photo Gallery
43: Downloads
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Home
48: Member Screenshots
49: Photo Gallery
50: Photo Gallery
51: Photo Gallery
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Photo Gallery
55: Community Forums
56: Photo Gallery
57: Photo Gallery
58: Member Screenshots
59: Home
60: Downloads
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: Photo Gallery
64: Member Screenshots
65: Community Forums
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Photo Gallery
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Downloads
74: Home
75: Home
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: Member Screenshots
79: Downloads
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Member Screenshots
83: Community Forums
84: Member Screenshots
85: Member Screenshots
86: Community Forums
87: Downloads
88: Statistics
89: Statistics
90: Photo Gallery
91: Home
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Member Screenshots
95: Home
96: Statistics
97: Home
98: Home
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Member Screenshots
102: Home
103: Member Screenshots
104: Home
105: Photo Gallery
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Photo Gallery
114: Photo Gallery
115: Photo Gallery
116: Community Forums
117: Photo Gallery
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Home
121: Photo Gallery
122: Contact
123: Photo Gallery
124: Community Forums
125: Home
126: Home
127: Photo Gallery
128: Photo Gallery
129: Photo Gallery
130: Home
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Photo Gallery
134: Photo Gallery
135: Home
136: Home
137: Home
138: Photo Gallery
139: Photo Gallery
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Photo Gallery
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: Photo Gallery
148: Community Forums
149: Member Screenshots
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Home
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: News
157: Home
158: Photo Gallery
159: Member Screenshots
160: Photo Gallery
161: Downloads
162: Home
163: Home
164: Photo Gallery
165: Downloads
166: Statistics
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Member Screenshots
170: Photo Gallery
171: Home
172: Home
173: Downloads
174: Downloads
175: Member Screenshots
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Downloads
180: Home
181: Home
182: Photo Gallery
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: News
186: Home
187: Community Forums
188: Photo Gallery
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: Downloads
194: Home
195: Photo Gallery
196: Member Screenshots
197: Downloads
198: Member Screenshots
199: Downloads
200: Home
201: Home
202: Photo Gallery
203: Home
204: Home
205: Home
206: Home
207: News Archive
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Home
211: Community Forums
212: Photo Gallery
213: Your Account
214: Member Screenshots
215: Home
216: Photo Gallery
217: Photo Gallery
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: News
223: News Archive
224: Community Forums
225: Photo Gallery
226: Photo Gallery
227: Home
228: Photo Gallery
229: Home
230: Member Screenshots
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Home
234: Community Forums
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Downloads
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Home
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Photo Gallery
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Your Account
253: Home
254: Community Forums
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Photo Gallery
259: Home
260: Photo Gallery
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Photo Gallery
264: Home
265: Home
266: Member Screenshots
267: Home
268: Photo Gallery
269: Home
270: Home
271: Community Forums
272: Downloads
273: Community Forums
274: Home
275: Home
276: Home
277: Downloads
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Downloads
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Downloads
288: Photo Gallery
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Home
292: Photo Gallery
293: Home
294: Home
295: Member Screenshots
296: Member Screenshots
297: Community Forums
298: Member Screenshots
299: Member Screenshots
300: Home
301: Home
302: Home
303: Photo Gallery
304: Photo Gallery
305: Home
306: Downloads
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Home
311: Home
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Home
315: Photo Gallery
316: Home
317: Community Forums
318: Downloads
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Downloads
322: Community Forums
323: Statistics
324: News
325: Community Forums
326: Home
327: Home
328: Home
329: Home
330: Home
331: Community Forums
332: Member Screenshots
333: Home
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Community Forums
340: Photo Gallery
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Photo Gallery
344: Community Forums
345: News Archive
346: Member Screenshots
347: Photo Gallery
348: Community Forums
349: Home
350: Photo Gallery
351: Home
352: Photo Gallery
353: Home
354: Community Forums
355: Home
356: Home
357: Community Forums
358: Your Account
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Member Screenshots
363: Photo Gallery
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Home
367: Community Forums
368: Photo Gallery
369: Home
370: Community Forums
371: Home
372: Home
373: Home
374: Community Forums
375: Downloads
376: Community Forums
377: Home
378: News
379: News Archive
380: Downloads
381: Home
382: Community Forums
383: Home
384: Photo Gallery
385: Home
386: Member Screenshots
387: Photo Gallery
388: Community Forums
389: Home
390: Home
391: Home
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Home
395: Home
396: Photo Gallery
397: Home
398: Photo Gallery
399: Home
400: Community Forums
401: News Archive
402: Home
403: Member Screenshots
404: Home
405: Tell a Friend
406: Photo Gallery
407: Home
408: Photo Gallery
409: Home
410: Member Screenshots
411: Home
412: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
M113 #1?????
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:12 am
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

- bsmart
I'm gpoing to disagree with you here. "Quantity has a quality all it's own"

Within a class of weapons the ability to deploy enough items so that it is effective is important. The Sherman/T34 v Panther is a very good example of this. While neither one can match the Panther one on one they were able to compete because both could be produced in volume and deployed and supported so that they were always available in useful quantities while Panthers were never available in enough quantity to keep the units up to strength


The question is whether the qantity factor reflects qualities of the vehicle (ease of manufacture) or the production system building it. I'd guess that the US tank plants could build Panthers at about the same rate as they could build Shermans and vice-versa.

cbo
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:51 pm
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

- clausb

The question is whether the qantity factor reflects qualities of the vehicle (ease of manufacture) or the production system building it. I'd guess that the US tank plants could build Panthers at about the same rate as they could build Shermans and vice-versa.

cbo


I'm not sure about that. From what I've read there were many parts of the panther that were desiigned to be 'massaged' into place. Also much of it was assembed as piecework.

The Sherman during it's development was worked over by automotive production engineers to tweak it for high volume series production. Everything from parts standardization to having a well developed 'Change Order' system for introducing changes to the production line had been well developed by the high volume production system used by the American automobile industry.

The big difference between the American and the European tank production was that The Americans decided that 35 ton tanks could be built on a true assembly line like passenger cars instead of by heavy engineering firms that were used to building locomotives and other heavy equipment.

It would have been interesting to see what a 'production engineered Panther' would have looked like after the American assembly line specialists had gotten done with it. It would also be interesting to see what a Panther fitted with some of the advanced features of the Sherman would have been (Like the constant speed hydraulic turret drive) but it would have been a much different beast that the standard Panther

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:18 pm
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

- bsmart
I'm not sure about that. From what I've read there were many parts of the panther that were desiigned to be 'massaged' into place. Also much of it was assembed as piecework.

The Sherman during it's development was worked over by automotive production engineers to tweak it for high volume series production. Everything from parts standardization to having a well developed 'Change Order' system for introducing changes to the production line had been well developed by the high volume production system used by the American automobile industry.

The big difference between the American and the European tank production was that The Americans decided that 35 ton tanks could be built on a true assembly line like passenger cars instead of by heavy engineering firms that were used to building locomotives and other heavy equipment.


You could be right about the design not being as fit for massproduction as the Sherman, but it seems that it was a good deal better than for earlier German tanks (which may not say much Smile )

I think the bottom line is that the number and types of parts that goes into a WWII tank of a given size are about the same. It needs an engine, transmission, armoured hull etc. What really governs output is access to rawmaterials, machinery, manpower etc. And here Germany was lagging behind the US. Add to that the fact that US plants, transport, etc. wasn'øt bombed every other day. In the bigger picture, improving the design for production may make some gain, but it cannot do much to change the basic production system and its flaws.

It would have been interesting to see what a 'production engineered Panther' would have looked like after the American assembly line specialists had gotten done with it. It would also be interesting to see what a Panther fitted with some of the advanced features of the Sherman would have been (Like the constant speed hydraulic turret drive) but it would have been a much different beast that the standard Panther


I think one problem would be that the Germans did not have the materials needed to make some of the features of the Sherman. The Sherman turret traverse, for example, used an electric motor for power and that togetherwith the required wiring might not have fitted well with Germanys precarious raw material situation. The mechanical-hydraulic system used in the Panther and Tiger used only steel.

cbo
Back to top
View user's profile
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 2:37 am
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

hello roy,
it may not seem like much, but much respect to you and doug for serving on/in the track. thank you. my dads war photos dont paint a nice combat picture of the track. i think there must be alot of comparisons of the M4 in WW2 to the M113 in Nam.
when i called it a frig, i mean cause it was made by FMC (Food Machinery Corp., they made refrigators){M2/M3 also made by FMC}. i work in an aluminum fab shop and i wouldnt place AL between myself and bullets no how (unless it is moved by pratt & whitney).
it justed seems that good praise and all, that the, say "bad" qualities as told by my dad, by roy, by doug, others combat vets, hang heavy over that track thus hindering it being that close to the top of the list. you had to sandbag the interior, you woudnt ride inside (let alone fight from inside it-- ifv??), you wouldnt hang your limps inside or outside of the thing, you pretty much just rode on top... (please, please forgive me, but this doesnt make me feel confident in this thing). all of the pics dad has from nam that show damaged tracks, it isnt like they were lost in a european armored conflict. (they were lost to some of the best light infantry the world has seen).
we took AL plate out to the range, it dont stop .308, .223, unless you stack it up pretty thick... we spaced it (hell, that made it worse). it melts much more so than steel...

the M2/M3 is AL with steel plates hanging all over it...
arent the improved armor upgrades for the current M113 basically along the same lines?
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:37 pm
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

Hi Shawn! Hi Folks!

The following post is done in the spirt of showing those who may not know there is more to the story.
Before I started hanging out here, I have a VERY bad impression of the Sherman tank during it's use in NWE. Thanks to others who have pointed out facts I didn't think about before, I now feel that tank was the right vehicle, for the right time, and POSSIBLE the best that could be fielded at that time.

- SHAWN

my dads war photos dont paint a nice combat picture of the track.


How's this Shawn for a bad picture? All four of us survived hitting a large land mine. I think my right gunner died later of pneumonia in a hospital on Oklinawa. My right gunner/Platoon Leader was returned to the field after a check up and an overnight stay at the 93rd Evac Hospital, my driver returned to the field after a month of light duty. I returned to duty after three months of light duty.


There is more to the story than bad pictures. What counts (to me anyway) is the number of people who survived after their AFV has been hit by something. In the case of my first ACAV, most of that damage happiened AFTER we were able to get out of and off of it.

Look at a picture of an Iraqi T72 that has been burned out (like my 1st ACAV) with it's turret blown off. One has to ask, was the crew able to get out after the first hit and before the secondary fire set off the remaining main gun ammo? Both pictures show you a burn out and total destoryed AFV. However they do not tell the story of the crew. It's the crew that counts, not the vehicle and how well it does or does not survive a hit.

- SHAWN

when i called it a frig, i mean cause it was made by FMC (Food Machinery Corp., they made refrigators){M2/M3 also made by FMC}. i work in an aluminum fab shop and i wouldnt place AL between myself and bullets no how (unless it is moved by pratt & whitney).


Don't forget, FMC also made the LVTP7/AAV7. I have never heard the armored vehicle department of FMC call "Frig" before.
Anyway, I am sure that the AFV plant was not the same one that made refrigators.

- SHAWN

it justed seems that good praise and all, that the, say "bad" qualities as told by my dad, by roy, by doug, others combat vets, hang heavy over that track thus hindering it being that close to the top of the list.


Name something, anything that is prefect.

- SHAWN

you had to sandbag the interior,


Not very crew did that. You could if you wanted to but there was no unit SOP requiring it. Nether one of my two ACAVs where sandbaged. In the case of the first one, sandbags would NOT have helped due to the size of the mine. That is just like the Sherman crews of WWII who put sandbags on the outside of their tanks just because they thought and hoped it MIGHT help. I for one didn't care for the idea of dirt being driven into my skin by an explosion.

- SHAWN

you woudnt ride inside (let alone fight from inside it-- ifv??)


The driver rode inside. Sure some units modified the driving controls so the driver could set on top of his hatch and above the armor. During my 18 months with the Army, I never saw a M113 modified like that.

As for fighting inside, the M60 gunner's had to get inside to fire their guns.

The difference is what the vehicle is doing.
If moving, the main threat was land mines under the vehicle. (Name a IFV/APC that IS prof against landmines) Therefore the best protection was riding on top the vehicle with both the bottom armor and the top armor between you and that landmine. It's a good thing the M113 had a top that had room for the M60 gunners to ride on top.

When contact was made, the vehicles stopped, ending the threat of land mines. The M60 gunner's then dropped inside the hull to take cover behind the side armor to operate their weapons. The driver of my second AFV came up with an SOP. When he saw a 50 cal ammo fly over the front of the hull, he came up out of his compartment and started firing his M16 to the front of the vehcile. When he saw the lid of a 50 cal ammo can fly over the front of the vehicle, he dropped back down inside. What was that all about? I was reloading the M2. The crew firing weapons while inside the vehicle? Sounds like an IFV to me.

- SHAWN

you wouldnt hang your limps inside or outside of the thing, you pretty much just rode on top...


When the main threat is landmine under a vehicle, you don't hang limps off the side of ANY, let me say that again ANY, AFV. That is not a problem with the vehicle or it's armor, it a problem with the blast wave moving up the side of the AFV that set it off.


- SHAWN

(please, please forgive me, but this doesnt make me feel confident in this thing).


Having never been there, no problem. As one who has had an ACAV blown apart under me, I for one, think very highly of the M113 and the FMC plant that build them.

- SHAWN

all of the pics dad has from nam that show damaged tracks, it isnt like they were lost in a european armored conflict. (they were lost to some of the best light infantry the world has seen).


It was a very good vehicle for the time and the threat is faced. It was used many times to do things it was never build to do. One example, used as a recovery vehicle to tow combat loaded Sheridans, estimated weight 25 tons, using a trailier hitch mounted in an aluminum ramp that was only rated at 7.5 tons for towing. Towed a number of Sheridans, never broke the hitch or the ramp it was mounted in.

- SHAWN

we took AL plate out to the range, it dont stop .308, .223, unless you stack it up pretty thick... we spaced it (hell, that made it worse).


Was that aluminum plate from refrigerators? Or was it 5083 aluminum alloy rolled armored plate?

Get yourself a M113 and shoot at it with your .308 and .223. I think you will find it will stop those rounds because the protection level it was designed for is a bit higher that those rounds.

- SHAWN

it melts much more so than steel...


True. So what?
No body is going to stay inside a burning AFV if it is at all possble to get out. The melting happiens long after the crew is out or dead, so it's doesn't matter one way or the other. This is just another one of those 'IT'S BAD' claims that has no merit in the real world of crew survival.

- SHAWN

the M2/M3 is AL with steel plates hanging all over it...
arent the improved armor upgrades for the current M113 basically along the same lines


Yes, the Bradleys and the M113s (the few that are being used) have been upgraded with steel armor.

You are however forgetting the threats that the original designs were layed out for, the threats in Vietnam that most M113s faced, and the current threats the vehicles face today. They are not the same and upgrades that help protect the crews against the current types of threat have been added.

Shawn, you feel the M113 is not a good vehicle. OK what would you suggest the U.S. Army have used during Vietnam in place of the M113? Keep in mind that the Army had no plans to use the M113 in Vietnam to start with.

Maybe the Army could have used the USMC's LVTP5s. That was about the only other Infantry carrier in the inventory at that time and they were made out of steel and not aluminum armor. Asks Older Top, I am sure he can tell a bunch of good and possible even more bad stories about those steel boxes.

Again, I say, I might not rate it as the best IFV/APC ever, but it would be very close.

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum