±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 438
Total: 438
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Downloads
03: Home
04: Contact
05: Member Screenshots
06: Home
07: Community Forums
08: Member Screenshots
09: Photo Gallery
10: Community Forums
11: Member Screenshots
12: Community Forums
13: Member Screenshots
14: Member Screenshots
15: Community Forums
16: Member Screenshots
17: Home
18: Member Screenshots
19: Member Screenshots
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Member Screenshots
23: Member Screenshots
24: Home
25: News Archive
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Member Screenshots
29: Member Screenshots
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Member Screenshots
34: Community Forums
35: Home
36: Downloads
37: Member Screenshots
38: Community Forums
39: Member Screenshots
40: Member Screenshots
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Your Account
44: Member Screenshots
45: News
46: Home
47: Member Screenshots
48: Home
49: Photo Gallery
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Downloads
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Home
57: Member Screenshots
58: Member Screenshots
59: Home
60: Home
61: Member Screenshots
62: Community Forums
63: Your Account
64: Member Screenshots
65: Home
66: Home
67: Your Account
68: Member Screenshots
69: News
70: Photo Gallery
71: News Archive
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Member Screenshots
75: Member Screenshots
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Photo Gallery
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Home
83: Member Screenshots
84: Tell a Friend
85: News Archive
86: Photo Gallery
87: Member Screenshots
88: Home
89: Home
90: Member Screenshots
91: Member Screenshots
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Member Screenshots
96: Member Screenshots
97: Community Forums
98: Home
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Member Screenshots
103: Photo Gallery
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Member Screenshots
108: Home
109: News Archive
110: News Archive
111: Downloads
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Downloads
115: Photo Gallery
116: Your Account
117: News Archive
118: News Archive
119: Home
120: Downloads
121: News Archive
122: Home
123: Downloads
124: Home
125: News Archive
126: Community Forums
127: Member Screenshots
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: News Archive
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Member Screenshots
139: Community Forums
140: Downloads
141: Downloads
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: News Archive
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Member Screenshots
154: Community Forums
155: Home
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Downloads
159: Community Forums
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Member Screenshots
163: Member Screenshots
164: News Archive
165: Photo Gallery
166: Photo Gallery
167: Photo Gallery
168: Member Screenshots
169: Downloads
170: Member Screenshots
171: Member Screenshots
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: News Archive
183: News
184: Downloads
185: Member Screenshots
186: Community Forums
187: News Archive
188: Member Screenshots
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Statistics
196: News Archive
197: Member Screenshots
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Member Screenshots
202: Member Screenshots
203: News
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Home
207: Home
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Photo Gallery
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Downloads
217: Home
218: Member Screenshots
219: Community Forums
220: Downloads
221: Downloads
222: Member Screenshots
223: Community Forums
224: Downloads
225: Community Forums
226: News Archive
227: Community Forums
228: News
229: News Archive
230: Your Account
231: Community Forums
232: News Archive
233: Downloads
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Home
239: News Archive
240: Home
241: Photo Gallery
242: Downloads
243: Community Forums
244: Home
245: Photo Gallery
246: Member Screenshots
247: Member Screenshots
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Member Screenshots
251: Community Forums
252: Downloads
253: Member Screenshots
254: Community Forums
255: Member Screenshots
256: Downloads
257: Community Forums
258: Photo Gallery
259: Home
260: Community Forums
261: Statistics
262: Community Forums
263: Member Screenshots
264: Community Forums
265: Home
266: Member Screenshots
267: Photo Gallery
268: Home
269: Member Screenshots
270: Downloads
271: Photo Gallery
272: News Archive
273: Photo Gallery
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Home
277: Photo Gallery
278: Photo Gallery
279: Member Screenshots
280: Community Forums
281: Member Screenshots
282: Community Forums
283: Member Screenshots
284: News Archive
285: Community Forums
286: News Archive
287: Contact
288: Community Forums
289: Home
290: Member Screenshots
291: News
292: News Archive
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Home
297: Member Screenshots
298: Photo Gallery
299: Member Screenshots
300: Home
301: Photo Gallery
302: Search
303: Community Forums
304: Member Screenshots
305: Member Screenshots
306: Community Forums
307: Member Screenshots
308: Photo Gallery
309: Community Forums
310: Statistics
311: Member Screenshots
312: Member Screenshots
313: News Archive
314: Home
315: Member Screenshots
316: Community Forums
317: News Archive
318: Home
319: News Archive
320: Member Screenshots
321: Community Forums
322: Photo Gallery
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Photo Gallery
327: Home
328: Community Forums
329: Member Screenshots
330: Home
331: Home
332: Community Forums
333: Member Screenshots
334: Member Screenshots
335: Downloads
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Home
340: Statistics
341: Community Forums
342: News Archive
343: Home
344: News Archive
345: Member Screenshots
346: Home
347: Community Forums
348: Member Screenshots
349: Home
350: Photo Gallery
351: Home
352: Photo Gallery
353: Community Forums
354: News Archive
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Search
359: Photo Gallery
360: News Archive
361: News Archive
362: Community Forums
363: Home
364: Community Forums
365: Member Screenshots
366: Contact
367: Member Screenshots
368: Member Screenshots
369: Downloads
370: Statistics
371: Home
372: Community Forums
373: Downloads
374: Downloads
375: Community Forums
376: Home
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Downloads
380: Home
381: Home
382: Community Forums
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Member Screenshots
387: Community Forums
388: Downloads
389: Home
390: Home
391: Member Screenshots
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Member Screenshots
395: Community Forums
396: Photo Gallery
397: Community Forums
398: News Archive
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Home
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Home
405: Home
406: News Archive
407: Community Forums
408: Member Screenshots
409: Member Screenshots
410: Community Forums
411: Home
412: Member Screenshots
413: Member Screenshots
414: Member Screenshots
415: Member Screenshots
416: Downloads
417: Community Forums
418: Home
419: Community Forums
420: Photo Gallery
421: Community Forums
422: Member Screenshots
423: Photo Gallery
424: Downloads
425: Member Screenshots
426: Tell a Friend
427: Photo Gallery
428: Member Screenshots
429: Your Account
430: Member Screenshots
431: Member Screenshots
432: Home
433: Community Forums
434: Home
435: Community Forums
436: Member Screenshots
437: Home
438: Your Account

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
1st Armored Division News from Ft. Bliss, Texas
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 1:05 am
Post subject: 1st Armored Division News from Ft. Bliss, Texas

Hi Folks!

I was driving home from work this morning when I noticed a convoy of AFVs pulling out of the 5th BCT, 1st AD's motor pool. I found a spot to get off Fred Wilson Blvd and pulled my old camera out of the glove box.

Checks this out folks!


and


I took nine pictures, but that is my old camera and I can not see anything through it. These two are about the best of the bunch. I talked with a SFC would was guarding a gate where the convoy was passing from Briggs Field back onto Ft. Bliss. He told me he had just came from the 11th ACR at the NTC and this group of vehicles are now part of the 5th BCT of the 1st AD.

On another item of news. the 4th BCT, Longknives, 1st Cav. Division has passed into the history books. The BCT stood up on May 6, 2006, did one tour in Iraq, and has stood down on March 4, 2008.

Personel and equipment then stood up as the 4th BCT of the 1st Armored Division. 1st AD now has two BCTs at Ft. Bliss.

Back when the new FCS test BCT started standing up, the first units carried the markings of the 1st BCT (which in Iraq) and the 1st Bn, 36th Infantry (also in Iraq). Those two units have disappeared from the local news here and have been replaced by the 5th BCT with the 1st and 2nd CABs. (Combined Arms Battalions).

I had noticed during three different displays of 1st AD vehicles that the brigade part of the bumper markings had been taped over. I am now guessing that tape is covering up the old 1st BCT and 1st/36th Inf/CAB markings.

Spot Reports!
Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 1:23 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Armored Division News from Ft. Bliss, Texas

Hi Roy...

Gee, just think. It's not altogether unlikely that those very vehicles appear in some photos I took "over here" and posted some time ago. Laughing

Small world....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 1:33 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Armored Division News from Ft. Bliss, Texas

The old 'shell' game..... A lot of that occurred in the early 90's with the 'Clinton cutbacks'.

moves, shifts, designations, redesignations, reflaggings,....

Trying to keep track of it was a bit of a nightmare.

Nice to hear that good ole Ft Bliss, is getting some of the benifets to all the troop shuffling.

(BTW: I have many good memories of the Tank trail between Biggs & The Airport,..... Shocked Cool Rolling Eyes Mr. Green

Been to Hueco Tanks lately, .....Use to be one hell of a party place... Mr. Green
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:21 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Armored Division News from Ft. Bliss, Texas

"Shell Game"

Boy doesn't that say it all. Up to 2003 I had a pretty good handle on where tank and cavalry units were/existed. Once I got away from tanking (NOT MY CHOICE) it seemed I woke up one morning and realized I knew nothing about who was where and even the make up of these units. It took me by surprise when I encountered Tanks with Infantry Battalion markings, although it was a good surprise. I am a big supporter of these combined arms battalions and wished they had done this many years earlier. Now they need to roll the tankers and scouts back into the fold of 11 series MOS. Tankers for way too long have avoided and lacked some very critical combat skills that our Infantry have. Hell, as a 19E I never touched an M16 until I got to my first unit and did a Miessau gaurd rotation Shocked .

Change is good.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:45 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Armored Division News from Ft. Bliss, Texas

- Joe_D
"Shell Game"

Boy doesn't that say it all. Up to 2003 I had a pretty good handle on where tank and cavalry units were/existed. Once I got away from tanking (NOT MY CHOICE) it seemed I woke up one morning and realized I knew nothing about who was where and even the make up of these units. It took me by surprise when I encountered Tanks with Infantry Battalion markings, although it was a good surprise. I am a big supporter of these combined arms battalions and wished they had done this many years earlier. Now they need to roll the tankers and scouts back into the fold of 11 series MOS. Tankers for way too long have avoided and lacked some very critical combat skills that our Infantry have. Hell, as a 19E I never touched an M16 until I got to my first unit and did a Miessau gaurd rotation Shocked .

Change is good.

Joe D



JOE...!!?? DUDE...!!! WTF!!!???? Shocked

You are hereby requested to return your 'Order of St George' Shocked , Your MG certification Laughing , your ceremonial spurs Rolling Eyes , burn your 'Dahners' Shocked and your stetson Mr. Green ....

You seem to have crossed sides by believing the dribble that tankers were/are less capable soldiers than 'Gods gift to Warfare' the Infantry...

BULL M****R F*****G S**T

".....THE HORROR,....!!!"

'NUFF SAID'
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Tanklord
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 817
Location: Louisiana
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:18 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Armored Division News from Ft. Bliss, Texas

(JOE...!!?? DUDE...!!! WTF!!!???? Shocked

You are hereby requested to return your 'Order of St George' Shocked , Your MG certification Laughing , your ceremonial spurs Rolling Eyes , burn your 'Dahners' Shocked and your stetson Mr. Green ....

You seem to have crossed sides by believing the dribble that tankers were/are less capable soldiers than 'Gods gift to Warfare' the Infantry...

BULL M****R F*****G S**T

".....THE HORROR,....!!!")

Medic! We got a man down! Get him a beer! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Yahoo Messenger
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:38 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Armored Division News from Ft. Bliss, Texas

Hi Doug! Hi Folks!

- Doug_Kibbey
Hi Roy...

Gee, just think. It's not altogether unlikely that those very vehicles appear in some photos I took "over here" and posted some time ago. Laughing

Small world....


Small world indeed! I was thinking the best I would ever do was see pictures of those OpFor VisMod M113s. To lay eyes on was a big surpise!

That made my day yesterday!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:58 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Armored Division News from Ft. Bliss, Texas

Hi Dontos! Hi Folks!

- Dontos
The old 'shell' game.....

moves, shifts, designations, redesignations, reflaggings,....

Don


Back when that BCT stood up as a element of the 1st CD, the plan was to reflag them as a 1st AD unit later. Why do that? Why not just make them a BCT of the 1st AD for the start?

I have an idea that might possible be the reason for this shell game.

It's a funding shell game! 1st CD is high on the transformation list for funding. By standing up a 1st CD BCT, they received the newest equipment. Newly rebuild M2A3 Bradleys and newly rebuild M1A2 Seps with one cav troop receiving the remote weapons station upgrade. All those vehicles went to Iraq. I have yet to see vehicles return. So far only the troops have.

The last I have read is the 1st AD along with the 1st ID are not yet on the funding list for transformation.

I am watching for the vehicles to show up. I will be surpised if they are the original ones (a lot of units leave the best behind for the next unit to use) but if M1A2 Seps and M2A3s show up then the 1st AD will have it's first upgraded BCT. Either way, the 1st AD will have a BCT with the new TOE. Something they are not yet on the list to receive.


Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Sabot
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 380
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:27 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Armored Division News from Ft. Bliss, Texas

The unit was stood up as part of 1CD because of the proximity of the division HQs and the support the new brigade receives from the division staff. Since the 1AD was in Germany and the 1CD at Hood, they could receive personnel and a cadre to assist in standing up the unit.

_________________
RobG
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 4:00 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Armored Division News from Ft. Bliss, Texas

Ouch, Ouch, Ouch, Don, quit it, ouch, ouch, ouch.

I knew someone would get a little offended by my comments, Let me clarify..

I never implied the Tanker was less a soldier than the Grunt. I just dis- agreed with how we allowed a combat arms branch get too wrapped around specializing. All combat arms soldiers should be able to fall back on being an Infantryman. Tankers seemed to get away from this more than our other Combat arms brothers. I've always admired the Marines with their "All Marines are Riflemen first". Infantry is Infantry. The most basic and fundemental fighting. You are not going to make tankers (or any other branch) as effective as our 11B's when it comes to their trade because that's all they do. Tankers still have to master their beast, which is not the simplest thing. But they should also be able to form up with an Infantry squad and possess enough skill to function effectively. This current world we are in can't allow us to be one dimensional, especially if your in a Combat MOS. It took me about 15 years of being a tanker to realize this. The current war has definately re-enforced it. Now think of the uphill battle it will be to get service and support soldiers up to snuff Neutral .

Now to address the order from Dontos Smile .

1. Order of Saint George, don't have one and don't want one. Was offered a few times but the biggest sticking point was I wasn't a subscriber to Armor Magazine (A Pre-requisite from what I'm told). Seen to many clowns who couldn't spell tank get them because they did nothing but complete Company Command Evil or Very Mad .

2. Master Gunner Certification, OK, got that but again, the 1059/ Certification don't mean much. It's those NCOER's showing you actually done the Job successfully. Kinda like wearing a Ranger Tab and never being in a Ranger Battalion. Admirable to have completed the course but doing it is the difference. BTW, Ranger Tab you can wear, Master Gunner Badge is not recognized Shocked .

3. Spurs, got 'em, earned 'em. But it's not like an EIB or EFMB. Everywhere the standard is different. Since we don't have a Combat Tankers Badge and got the consolation prize, the Combat Action Badge, maybe we need an equivelant peace time badge, Expert Soldier Badge comes to mind. Maybe our Sergeants Majors can come up with the standard. BTW, whens the last time you've seen a "Tank Weapons" qualification bar for your Bolo badge awarded. That kinda went away Crying or Very sad .

4. Dahners??? You mean those extra tall boots with pointy toes so you can find the stirrup easier Wink . Those, Sir are Cavalry boots. I am a Tanker, I wear the stubby round toe strap boots when tanking. Although they really suck to do any dis-mounted activity in them (Hence, Tanker Boots, never get off the tank). BTW, IAW AR 670-1, they are officially now called CVC boots and are issued/authorized to all soldiers who operate armored vehicles. Not just tankers. Seen a NBC LT wear them with NOMEX on her FOX NBC recon vehicle in Korea Shocked .

5. Stetson???? I know, it's a Cavalry thing, I always tend to equate them with Air CAV Confused . What I remember when I was a young tanker was seeing the unit photo's on the hall ways where everyone in the Squadron wore black Berets. That to me at the time was a tanker, Later, after wearing one for two years in the Mojave, I realized they sucked when it came to the field, but it beat wearing a helmet Mr. Green .

I y'am what I y'am, a Tanker man. Just some of my belief's are not in line with the "Cold War Tanker" mentality.


Joe D

BTW Don, Yambo asked how you're doing the other day. He's in Fort Stewart running a live fire shoot house.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:26 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Armored Division News from Ft. Bliss, Texas

- Joe_D
Ouch, Ouch, Ouch, Don, quit it, ouch, ouch, ouch.

I knew someone would get a little offended by my comments, Let me clarify..

I never implied the Tanker was less a soldier than the Grunt. I just dis- agreed with how we allowed a combat arms branch get too wrapped around specializing. All combat arms soldiers should be able to fall back on being an Infantryman. Tankers seemed to get away from this more than our other Combat arms brothers. I've always admired the Marines with their "All Marines are Riflemen first". Infantry is Infantry. The most basic and fundemental fighting. You are not going to make tankers (or any other branch) as effective as our 11B's when it comes to their trade because that's all they do. Tankers still have to master their beast, which is not the simplest thing. But they should also be able to form up with an Infantry squad and possess enough skill to function effectively. This current world we are in can't allow us to be one dimensional, especially if your in a Combat MOS. It took me about 15 years of being a tanker to realize this. The current war has definately re-enforced it. Now think of the uphill battle it will be to get service and support soldiers up to snuff Neutral .


RESPONSE PART ONE:


Well okay, I WAS is a terrible mood the other day, and I vented on you, (a bit too much actually).

Your use of the Marine Corps is both good & bad. Although I will probably get 'flamed' for this of being critical of the Corps, but not having been IN the Corps, but its a view taken from research into Ontos History.

All Marines ARE indeed basically Infantry, as they are all required to complete 'BOOT CAMP' (Army 'BASIC TRAINING' morphed from BASIC COMBAT TRAINING, and has evolved back do to current situations.)

Marines leaving BOOT CAMP get there specialization training (if not being assigned as basic Infantryman) and this is where the polarization begins. The 'unofficial' state of mind that if your anything other than a grunt, you're 'sub-par' or 'not a good marine'. This, as I learned, was (or is) also true of the Officer Corps.

I was commissioned a Second Lieutenant in December and completed The Basic School (also at Quantico) the following June. Prior to graduation from TBS I was selected for an 0302, infantry officer, MOS and assigned to the 1st Marine Brigade in Hawaii.
Upon arriving at the old Honolulu airport after my flight from Travis Air Force base near San Francisco in early 1963, I was picked up by a 1st Lieutenant from the Brigade's Ontos company. He informed me that I had been assigned to B Anti Tank Company.
I do not recall having had any previous knowledge of the Ontos when I reported in to B ATs company commander. In fact I don't think it was never mentioned at Quantico. I had been selected for infantry and I expected to assigned to an infantry unit, so I was a initially a bit disappointed....

The only formal training I had was a correspondence course from the Marine Corps Institute. I still have the manual from that course and in the preface it states the following; "This manual was written for the Infantryman who has had no previous experience with tracked vehicles. It is realized that for an infantryman to become proficient in the operation and maintenance of the Ontos, the greater part of his training will have to come from actual duty with an antitank company; but by thorough study of the material contained herein, the Marine will be better able to perform his duties as an Ontos crew member. He will have gained a substantial foundation on which to build his operational and tactical knowledge of this, the most potent weapon of the antitank assaultman." The course was intended for prospective crew members not platoon commanders, but it gave me the basics about the weapon I would be commanding...."

"How was it viewed by the other officers outside of ATs? There was
little understanding of the capabilities of the Ontos among the infantry
units. It had not yet been proved in combat and they did not know how
to utilize it; even though they understood that it carried an incredible amount of firepower. To my knowledge there were absolutely no manuals or papers written regarding the tactical employment of the Ontos. It was assumed that in combat it would be used as intended as an anti-tank weapon."

"From the perspective of an officer intending to make a career as a
Marine Corps infantry officer, it would not have been considered a good
assignment; unless that is, it was fairly brief and followed on the heels
of having been in a rifle company for a more extended period of time."


Well okay long winded but felt someone might enjoy it. Rolling Eyes

Don

Mr. Green
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum