±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 239
Total: 239
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Downloads
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Home
09: Photo Gallery
10: Downloads
11: Photo Gallery
12: Search
13: Downloads
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Photo Gallery
18: Member Screenshots
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Downloads
22: Community Forums
23: Downloads
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Downloads
29: Community Forums
30: Home
31: Downloads
32: Photo Gallery
33: Community Forums
34: Downloads
35: Home
36: Home
37: Your Account
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Home
42: Photo Gallery
43: Downloads
44: Your Account
45: Home
46: Home
47: Member Screenshots
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Home
51: Community Forums
52: Home
53: Community Forums
54: Home
55: Home
56: Home
57: Downloads
58: Community Forums
59: Photo Gallery
60: Photo Gallery
61: Community Forums
62: Home
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Member Screenshots
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Community Forums
70: Downloads
71: Downloads
72: Photo Gallery
73: Community Forums
74: Search
75: Community Forums
76: Downloads
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Photo Gallery
83: Community Forums
84: Photo Gallery
85: Your Account
86: Community Forums
87: Home
88: Community Forums
89: Tell a Friend
90: Your Account
91: Photo Gallery
92: Downloads
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Your Account
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: Home
104: Photo Gallery
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Your Account
111: Community Forums
112: Photo Gallery
113: Photo Gallery
114: Community Forums
115: Member Screenshots
116: Member Screenshots
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Photo Gallery
120: Community Forums
121: Home
122: Home
123: Home
124: Home
125: Home
126: Home
127: Photo Gallery
128: Your Account
129: Member Screenshots
130: Home
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Photo Gallery
134: Community Forums
135: Member Screenshots
136: Photo Gallery
137: Photo Gallery
138: Home
139: Community Forums
140: Home
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Your Account
144: Home
145: Photo Gallery
146: Photo Gallery
147: Community Forums
148: Contact
149: Community Forums
150: Downloads
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Member Screenshots
154: Photo Gallery
155: Photo Gallery
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Photo Gallery
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Downloads
164: Home
165: Photo Gallery
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Community Forums
174: Member Screenshots
175: Community Forums
176: Your Account
177: Community Forums
178: Home
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Photo Gallery
182: Community Forums
183: Downloads
184: Community Forums
185: Downloads
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Photo Gallery
190: Your Account
191: Community Forums
192: Photo Gallery
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Home
197: Your Account
198: Downloads
199: Member Screenshots
200: Community Forums
201: Photo Gallery
202: Home
203: Member Screenshots
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Your Account
211: Downloads
212: Photo Gallery
213: Home
214: Home
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: Downloads
222: Photo Gallery
223: News
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Photo Gallery
227: Home
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Member Screenshots
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Your Account
234: Community Forums
235: Photo Gallery
236: Home
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:02 pm
Post subject: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

Apparently a LAV replacement... So much for the old Expeditionary Family of Fighting Vehicles (EFFV - not to be confused with the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle EFV) that was to replace the Corps' Abrams & LAVs...

But I cant help wonder if this might be a crack in the EFV program's armor? Especially the reference to being used by infantry battalions? Perhaps they will back away from using Amtracs once you cross the beach and go to more traditional APCs? And so much for the Marines saying C-130 deployability was pointless for them...

In fact, this brief (slides 33-43) say the AAV doctrine will be used as the basis for the MPC:
www.mccdc.usmc.mil/fea.../Gap_9.ppt

"USMC doctrine for its existing personnel carrier, the AAV, can serve as a waypoint in the the development of MPC doctrine."

Looks like from other documents they plan to equip 6 infantry battalions with the MPC:
www.dtic.mil/descripti...06623M.pdf

Looks like some of the usual Piranha & LAV candidates are being considered...

Neil


contracting.tacom.army...pc/mpc.htm

Marine Personnel Carrier

Program Synopsis

This website has been established to provide information on the Marine Personnel Carrier (MPC). Strategic Planning Guidance (SPG) directed the Marine Corps to propose an appropriate mix of ground combat vehicles to support irregular warfare (IW) operations. The MPC program is an outgrowth of the Ground Mobility Initiative that answers the SPG tasking.

The MPC will possess a balance between performance, protection and payload and embody the following attributes:
- Scalable ballistic and mine protection
- Capacity for 2 crew and 10 passengers
- Operational and tactical mobility equivalent to the Light Armored Reconnaissance (LAR) Battalion
- C-130 aircraft transportability

The MPC will increase Infantry Battalion protected mobility and LAR Battalion striking power. It will also serve as a balanced expeditionary armored personnel carrier optimized for IW, but effective across the range of military operations.
The MPC is a family of approximately 500 vehicles that provide the following mission capabilities:
- Personnel Carrier
- Vehicle recovery and repair
- Logistics and resupply
- Command and control
- Weapon overwatch

This is the first posting related to the MPC program. Check back frequently as updated information will be posted as it becomes available.
Back to top
View user's profile
buglerbilly
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:05 am
Post subject: Re: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

Marines, for their part, are not only purchasing MRAP in large numbers but they also intend to acquire a new armored personnel carrier. The so-called Marine personnel carrier, or MPC, is not part of JLTV but rather a stopgap for the troubled Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle. The Corps had planned on buying as many as 1,000 EFVs, which are tracked armored vehicles that run on the ground and in the water. But the program may not survive the latest round of cost overruns and performance failures. Marine officials asked to redirect some of its EFV funds to a new personnel carrier. The goal is to buy 600 vehicles between 2012 and 2016, said Conant. The Corps is considering buying an upgraded version of its light armored vehicle or possibly the same Stryker personnel carriers that the Army currently operates.

“We don’t need to buy top-end stuff to survive,� Conant said. The MPC would give Marines a “cheap solution� while the EFV sorts out its troubles. At the same time, it would give the Corps a much needed fast combat vehicle before JLTV arrives, said Conant.


Taken from an article in NDM on JLTV and linked to another discussion on MRAP....................See links below.............

www.nationaldefensemag...ehicle.htm

www.nationaldefensemag...ration.htm

Regards,

BUG
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 10:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

I saw a Lockheed Martin - Patria AMV headed south on I-95 as I was driving back to DC. Unfortunately it was raining, and it was headed the other way, so I didnt get any pics - but I'm very sure it was an AMV sans turret. Very distinctive headlights.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patria_AMV

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 3:56 am
Post subject: Re: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

Neil

Got an unexpected surprize today. A good look at the AVB,....TALK ABOUT COOL!!

Photos to follow

D
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 9:53 am
Post subject: Re: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

AVB???

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 3:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

Excuse me ...ABV




Assault Breeching Vehicle

Photos pending

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 11:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

Where's the 165mm Demolition Gun (or equivelent) ??????

Still no replacement for that CEV capability. Looks like they used the M1A1 cupola so at least the TC can fire the .50 buttoned up. Can't wait for the rest of the pictures.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 11:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

Ssshhh... There's a conspiracy theory that abounds regarding the absence of 165mm guns on M728 CEVs on display... Not for ABV technically though...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum