±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 624
Total: 624
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Your Account
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: News Archive
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Member Screenshots
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Statistics
14: Member Screenshots
15: Home
16: Home
17: Community Forums
18: Photo Gallery
19: Downloads
20: Member Screenshots
21: Community Forums
22: News Archive
23: Community Forums
24: Home
25: Your Account
26: Member Screenshots
27: Home
28: Home
29: Home
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Home
34: Community Forums
35: Home
36: News Archive
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Treasury
40: Photo Gallery
41: Community Forums
42: Photo Gallery
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Statistics
46: News Archive
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Home
50: Photo Gallery
51: Community Forums
52: Home
53: Community Forums
54: News Archive
55: Your Account
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: News Archive
61: Community Forums
62: Home
63: Member Screenshots
64: Photo Gallery
65: News Archive
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: News Archive
69: Community Forums
70: Downloads
71: Photo Gallery
72: Community Forums
73: Photo Gallery
74: Community Forums
75: News Archive
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Downloads
80: News Archive
81: Your Account
82: Member Screenshots
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Home
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: News
92: News Archive
93: Home
94: Downloads
95: Photo Gallery
96: Photo Gallery
97: Photo Gallery
98: Member Screenshots
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Downloads
104: Home
105: Home
106: Downloads
107: Community Forums
108: Member Screenshots
109: Downloads
110: Member Screenshots
111: Member Screenshots
112: Member Screenshots
113: Community Forums
114: Member Screenshots
115: News Archive
116: Downloads
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: Your Account
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Photo Gallery
124: Home
125: Community Forums
126: News
127: Community Forums
128: Member Screenshots
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Member Screenshots
132: Home
133: Member Screenshots
134: Downloads
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Photo Gallery
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Downloads
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: News Archive
148: Photo Gallery
149: News Archive
150: Home
151: Home
152: Member Screenshots
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Community Forums
156: Member Screenshots
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Home
160: Your Account
161: Community Forums
162: Photo Gallery
163: News Archive
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Downloads
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: News Archive
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Your Account
178: Community Forums
179: Downloads
180: Downloads
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Member Screenshots
184: Community Forums
185: Home
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Home
197: Member Screenshots
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Photo Gallery
206: Community Forums
207: Your Account
208: Community Forums
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: Member Screenshots
212: Statistics
213: News
214: Home
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Downloads
221: LinkToUs
222: Statistics
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Home
227: Community Forums
228: News
229: Photo Gallery
230: Home
231: Downloads
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Member Screenshots
235: Statistics
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: News Archive
239: Home
240: Community Forums
241: Home
242: Your Account
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Home
251: Home
252: Downloads
253: Community Forums
254: News
255: Member Screenshots
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Home
259: News Archive
260: News
261: Search
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Member Screenshots
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Home
272: Home
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Member Screenshots
277: Downloads
278: Photo Gallery
279: Community Forums
280: Photo Gallery
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Downloads
284: Member Screenshots
285: Community Forums
286: Home
287: Downloads
288: Community Forums
289: Downloads
290: Home
291: Photo Gallery
292: Member Screenshots
293: News Archive
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: LinkToUs
298: Home
299: Statistics
300: News Archive
301: Home
302: Community Forums
303: Member Screenshots
304: Home
305: Photo Gallery
306: Community Forums
307: Home
308: Member Screenshots
309: Photo Gallery
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Home
314: Photo Gallery
315: Home
316: Photo Gallery
317: Community Forums
318: News Archive
319: Photo Gallery
320: Photo Gallery
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Home
326: Home
327: Member Screenshots
328: News Archive
329: Home
330: Home
331: Community Forums
332: Home
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Member Screenshots
340: Statistics
341: Member Screenshots
342: Your Account
343: Photo Gallery
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: Home
349: Members List
350: Downloads
351: Member Screenshots
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Home
357: Home
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: News Archive
361: Member Screenshots
362: Community Forums
363: News Archive
364: Photo Gallery
365: Member Screenshots
366: News Archive
367: Community Forums
368: Home
369: Member Screenshots
370: Downloads
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Photo Gallery
374: News Archive
375: Community Forums
376: Photo Gallery
377: Member Screenshots
378: Member Screenshots
379: Photo Gallery
380: Community Forums
381: Home
382: Community Forums
383: Member Screenshots
384: Member Screenshots
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Member Screenshots
388: Downloads
389: Community Forums
390: Member Screenshots
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Member Screenshots
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Downloads
402: News Archive
403: Member Screenshots
404: Member Screenshots
405: Photo Gallery
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Your Account
410: Photo Gallery
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Photo Gallery
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Home
419: News Archive
420: Photo Gallery
421: Home
422: Community Forums
423: News
424: Member Screenshots
425: Member Screenshots
426: Treasury
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: News Archive
430: Member Screenshots
431: Community Forums
432: Member Screenshots
433: News Archive
434: Community Forums
435: Photo Gallery
436: Home
437: News Archive
438: Home
439: Downloads
440: Member Screenshots
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Member Screenshots
444: Community Forums
445: Community Forums
446: Photo Gallery
447: News
448: Photo Gallery
449: Community Forums
450: Member Screenshots
451: Community Forums
452: Community Forums
453: Home
454: Downloads
455: Downloads
456: News
457: Member Screenshots
458: News Archive
459: Community Forums
460: News Archive
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Member Screenshots
464: Member Screenshots
465: Downloads
466: Community Forums
467: Member Screenshots
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: Photo Gallery
471: News Archive
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Photo Gallery
475: Downloads
476: Community Forums
477: Photo Gallery
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Downloads
481: Home
482: Downloads
483: Community Forums
484: Member Screenshots
485: Member Screenshots
486: Contact
487: Community Forums
488: Community Forums
489: Community Forums
490: News
491: Community Forums
492: Photo Gallery
493: Community Forums
494: Community Forums
495: Photo Gallery
496: Member Screenshots
497: Member Screenshots
498: Community Forums
499: News Archive
500: Community Forums
501: Home
502: Community Forums
503: Contact
504: Community Forums
505: Home
506: Member Screenshots
507: Community Forums
508: Community Forums
509: Statistics
510: Home
511: Member Screenshots
512: Community Forums
513: Community Forums
514: Home
515: Member Screenshots
516: Downloads
517: Member Screenshots
518: Downloads
519: Home
520: Community Forums
521: Home
522: Home
523: Community Forums
524: Photo Gallery
525: Home
526: Photo Gallery
527: Community Forums
528: Home
529: Photo Gallery
530: Community Forums
531: Home
532: Community Forums
533: Community Forums
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Home
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: Home
541: Home
542: Home
543: Community Forums
544: Home
545: Community Forums
546: Home
547: Home
548: Downloads
549: Home
550: Community Forums
551: News Archive
552: Member Screenshots
553: Community Forums
554: Community Forums
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Photo Gallery
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Home
561: Community Forums
562: Community Forums
563: Downloads
564: Downloads
565: Member Screenshots
566: Community Forums
567: Photo Gallery
568: Home
569: Community Forums
570: Home
571: Home
572: Community Forums
573: Community Forums
574: News
575: Member Screenshots
576: Community Forums
577: News Archive
578: Your Account
579: Home
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: News
583: Community Forums
584: News Archive
585: Community Forums
586: Home
587: Home
588: News
589: Home
590: Photo Gallery
591: Community Forums
592: Home
593: Community Forums
594: Member Screenshots
595: Home
596: Photo Gallery
597: Home
598: Member Screenshots
599: Member Screenshots
600: Home
601: Community Forums
602: Home
603: Home
604: Home
605: Home
606: Downloads
607: Your Account
608: Community Forums
609: Community Forums
610: Home
611: Home
612: Community Forums
613: Community Forums
614: Community Forums
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Community Forums
618: Home
619: Community Forums
620: Member Screenshots
621: News Archive
622: Community Forums
623: Community Forums
624: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:22 am
Post subject: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Found this data sheet while digging thru the Archives, some time ago. Just 'rediscovered' the entire data sheet.

(Let the debate begin.... Mr. Green )

[img][/img]


Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:37 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

What's to debate?....By the time it could have been fielded, it couldn't keep up with the forces it was expected to defend and couldn't hit anything even if it had.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:50 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

The glacis in the top photo is straight like an M60. Doesn't show the modified rear deck cover. I think Ford Aerospace had this contract. They disappeared after this failure. They would have done just as well, or better, to have upgraded the Duster.

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:53 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

- Doug_Kibbey
What's to debate?....By the time it could have been fielded, it couldn't keep up with the forces it was expected to defend and couldn't hit anything even if it had.


Agreed, but when I first posted just the hull diagrams, there seemed to be doubts in the information and I wasn't able to produce the entire data page.

Amazing that the M48 Hull system is used, instead of an Abrams or lighter AGS or even sheridan hull system.

The Division level Air Defense asset (hence the title DIVAD Gun) should have been developed with the future speed element foremost in the concept process.

JMHO
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:11 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Don Said:

Amazing that the M48 Hull system is used, instead of an Abrams or lighter AGS or even sheridan hull system.


I think it was a matter of necessity, Remember at this time M1 production was just ramping up (1985) and Detroit had to be used until Lima could get fully on line. Priority one was fielding the M1 Tank and no hulls could be diverted for other special projects at the time. As far as using the AGS or M551 hulls, I think again it was a matter of physics and cost. Both systems are very light and would be way underpowered to move/ power the electricity sucking turret of the DIVAD system. Also at this time the M60A3's being replaced by M1's were replacing the M48A5's in the Guard, creating a surplus of M48 hulls that logistically were easy to support verses the M551 or AGS whose parts were very limited.

If, and I say big if, the system performed as required, the hull could have been easily up graded with a more powerful engine and better suspension to keep up with the M1's. Both had already been developed for the M60 series but not implemented due to the M1 fielding. Applying them to an M48 hull would be very simple.

That DD 672-1 looks like part of a request for the DoD to provide M48A5 hulls with the necessary equipment. That might explain why the drawing is not of the actual M247 hull.

Thanks for sharing Don

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

As I remember it (always dangerous) The Divad was a knee jerk reaction to the concerns with air defense in Europe based on observations in the Yom Kippur war ( The success of the zsu-23 and the smaller missles) and counting the number of aircraft the Soviets had to throw at the European front. I believe it was felt that they could save time (and money) by using an existing chassis. They didn't want to buy the Gepard but wanted a similar vehicle. It was thought that it was a low risk quick turnaround development effort. Then they started adding capabilities and it grew and stretched out in development time

I don't think an M551 chassis could have handled the recoil forces of twin automatic 35 or 40 mm weapons, especially when firing at low angle to the side

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Jens_O_Mehner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 511
Location: Giessen, Germany
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

- MarkHolloway
The glacis in the top photo is straight like an M60.


Nope,

it certainly is not, as evidenced by the round sections on the lower hull- those would not be there on a straight glacis, which would show up as a rectangle on this type of drawing. Cool



Jens O.
Back to top
View user's profile
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 6:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

VIDEO www.youtube.com/watch?...re=related

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
GaryKato
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 07, 2006
Posts: 39

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

I seem to recall it was supposed to be low risk: Known hull, known gun, known radar (from F-16 if I remember).
Back to top
View user's profile
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

- GaryKato
I seem to recall it was supposed to be low risk: Known hull, known gun, known radar (from F-16 if I remember).


That's what I remember, too. Also the twin 40mm guns from the Duster. Should have been reliable. Should have....

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Gary said;

I seem to recall it was supposed to be low risk: Known hull, known gun, known radar (from F-16 if I remember).


All systems were proven, but in regards to the Radar, I don't think it was for ground use Rolling Eyes .

Therein lies the major problem. Something that is designed to work in the relatively clean environment of the sky does not automatically guarantee it'll work in a AFV. Not to mention the stress and shock it undergoes. Another problem from what I can remember was the inability to sort out all the clutter it experienced. IIRC the system was supposed to hone in on the tell tale signature of a helicopter rotor. Unfortunately it was easily confused and locked on such inordinate things like ventilator fans. It didn't help that during testing the targets were rigged to self destruct, a safety requirement, that ended up being a big controversy with the media when accusations were made that they were never effectively struck. The stink was that they supposedly faked the ability to hit by detonating the targets on cue.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
tommyarizona
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Posts: 9
Location: Lake Havasu City Arizona
PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 1:14 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Fella’s
I just happened across this.
I was the design engineer for the gunfights on divad.
Prior to this I spent a month working on the rear deck you are questioning.
The Mod on the chassis was brought about with the addition of a 135 Hp turbine engine as an auxiliary power unit. Also the addition of better air filtration for both main and aux engines.
The M248 chassis would have not been my first pick either.
But they were plentiful.
The Guns
40s were chosen over 30s for many reasons, these are the ones I know of,
At the time the 40mm round came in a number of flavors mainly a Proximity round the 30 did not.
Ford Aeronutronic had just bid another project using a 30mm cannon and lost the bid.
Also lets not forget that Ford Aeronutronic was the maker of ammunition 20, 30, 40mm.
I believe using the 40 was also a business decision $$$$.
Lastly
Ford actually scored less direct hits in the initial shoot off with GD who was using twin 30's.
But because Ford was using a prox round there near misses were counted as hits.
One other thing to point out.
GD (General Dynamics) went light with its turret, it was all aluminum better suited for the 30s

I don’t know ware you are going with this topic.
So let me say this.
Nothing you read about this system, (on the Net or in the public news agencies) is the truth.
The cancellation of this system was purely political and had nothing to do with its performance.
I have been the senior Designer Engineer on many systems for the military.
To this day I am bitter about the cancellation of Divad.
One can not say, that if it worked as advertised(and it did)
We don’t badly need this system today.
Not to mention the if it was in our arsenal today it would be a matured system with all the advances in technology we have made since.
Had it not been canceled Katusha's would have never hit the ground in Israel.

Remember
The claim was that the system could not reach the stand off distance of the Russian Hind helicopter.
But the question as to weather it could shoot down the missiles fired by the Hind was never brought up or tested.
A BIG MISTAKE.

In the end...
The Missile loopiest won.
and there associates got all the gold $$$$$


Please
Feel free to visit my website for Ref www.tmaengineering.net
Click Defense tab

Peace
Tom

Peace
Tom
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 2:05 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Tom

WOW!! WELCOME!

I have contributed to a number of discussions on the Sgt York, but mainly from the aspect of an AFV historical aspect.

I remember DIVAD mainly due to a family members involvement in ADA during those days, and a possible after-service career at a 'proposed' DIVAD production facility in El Paso Tx. Your assertions to the testing is along the same lines as my family members.

Our big 'deal' is attempting to properly ID a vehicle based off of vehicle features. Sometimes it can be quite a 'dog-eat-dog' discussion. The primary goal is to exchange ideas and information in the hopes of historical accuracy.

Thanks for the information.
Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
tommyarizona
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Posts: 9
Location: Lake Havasu City Arizona
PostPosted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:56 am
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Hello Don/All
Yep this one hits a nerve.
And good old Elpaso does too.
Fort Bliss
2 years 3rd Cav as an artillery surveyor.
Not complaining, I was young and dumb and wanted to go to Nam.
The God send was that the war ended wile I was in AIT, and I got stuck at Fort Bliss.
Didn’t seem fair at time, but I thank my lucky star’s today.
I grew a brain. Razz

If I can help with Divad let me know.
The only historical thing I can think of is that Divad was the first military system to go from concept to production in 5 years
(this included building the assembly ficility)
It was to be the model program for development of future military systems like it.
I use to have a top assy outline drawing but I have not seen it in a wile.I will look.
I have to mention,
When the government closes a program they make sure its gone for good.
I didn’t see them crush vheicales, but I saw them crush everything else.
All I can say is they make sure know one can change there mind.

Cheers
Tom
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Sgt York (DIVAD Gun) Information

Tommy,

When were you at Bliss and what squadron? I was in 'B' Troop 72-73 and 'I' Troop 76-79.

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 4
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum