±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 297
Total: 297
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Your Account
04: Treasury
05: Community Forums
06: Downloads
07: Member Screenshots
08: Member Screenshots
09: Community Forums
10: Photo Gallery
11: Downloads
12: Member Screenshots
13: Community Forums
14: Downloads
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Home
19: Member Screenshots
20: Member Screenshots
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Photo Gallery
25: Community Forums
26: Member Screenshots
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Photo Gallery
30: Member Screenshots
31: Community Forums
32: Photo Gallery
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Photo Gallery
37: Member Screenshots
38: Downloads
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Photo Gallery
44: Home
45: Home
46: Member Screenshots
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Downloads
52: Community Forums
53: Member Screenshots
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Member Screenshots
58: Member Screenshots
59: Member Screenshots
60: Downloads
61: Member Screenshots
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Downloads
66: News Archive
67: Community Forums
68: Photo Gallery
69: News Archive
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: News Archive
73: Home
74: Home
75: News Archive
76: Your Account
77: Downloads
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: News Archive
88: Member Screenshots
89: Your Account
90: Statistics
91: Your Account
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: News Archive
96: Member Screenshots
97: Member Screenshots
98: Home
99: Home
100: Home
101: Member Screenshots
102: Home
103: Home
104: Home
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: News Archive
108: Home
109: Your Account
110: Member Screenshots
111: News Archive
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: News
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Home
120: Community Forums
121: News Archive
122: Home
123: Downloads
124: News
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Member Screenshots
129: Home
130: Photo Gallery
131: Member Screenshots
132: Community Forums
133: Downloads
134: Community Forums
135: Downloads
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Community Forums
140: Member Screenshots
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Photo Gallery
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Photo Gallery
150: Home
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Member Screenshots
156: Photo Gallery
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Member Screenshots
160: News
161: Photo Gallery
162: Home
163: Member Screenshots
164: Community Forums
165: Photo Gallery
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Photo Gallery
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Member Screenshots
173: Community Forums
174: News Archive
175: Member Screenshots
176: Member Screenshots
177: Community Forums
178: Home
179: Member Screenshots
180: Downloads
181: Photo Gallery
182: LinkToUs
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Photo Gallery
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: Member Screenshots
190: Community Forums
191: Photo Gallery
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Treasury
195: Home
196: Treasury
197: Community Forums
198: Photo Gallery
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Photo Gallery
203: Member Screenshots
204: Your Account
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: News Archive
210: News
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Your Account
214: Member Screenshots
215: Home
216: Downloads
217: Home
218: Home
219: Home
220: News Archive
221: Home
222: Member Screenshots
223: Downloads
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Member Screenshots
227: Home
228: Community Forums
229: Member Screenshots
230: Member Screenshots
231: News Archive
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Home
239: Home
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Member Screenshots
244: Community Forums
245: Downloads
246: Member Screenshots
247: Community Forums
248: News Archive
249: Community Forums
250: News Archive
251: Community Forums
252: Home
253: Community Forums
254: Downloads
255: News
256: Community Forums
257: Downloads
258: Community Forums
259: Home
260: Member Screenshots
261: Photo Gallery
262: LinkToUs
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Home
270: Member Screenshots
271: News
272: Community Forums
273: Member Screenshots
274: Home
275: Home
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Photo Gallery
279: Photo Gallery
280: Member Screenshots
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Supporters
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Member Screenshots
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Member Screenshots
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Schurzen Question
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Steve_Adamski
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 09, 2009
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 4:57 am
Post subject: Schurzen Question

I'm a little behind the times and only have recently been made aware of Thomas Jentz's assertion that schurzen were developed to protect against anti-tank rifles NOT hollow charge weapons as had been previously thought.

My main question for you all is regardless of original intention, wouldn't schurzen still provide protection against hollow charge weapons?

It seems to me that it would. Spaced armor should weaken the jet of hot material. I would expect that the Germans figured this out and that is why so many later war vehicles still carried the schurzen ... long after antitank rifles were able to do anything serious. The development of the more open spaced Thoma shields and the "bed-spring" kits for the Soviet T-34s seem to me to point in this direction.

Am I correct in this thinking? If they do weaken the penetrating ability, any idea by how much on average?

Thanks,

Steve
Back to top
View user's profile
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:41 am
Post subject: Re: Schurzen Question

It might or might not, depending on the optimal standoff of the weapon vs. the actual standoff. For a 2.36 inch bazooka, probably yes. For a later Panzerfaust, it probably would improve penetration.

German vehicles - especially the Panther - had very unbalanced armor protection. While the glacis was nearly impenetrable to Allied weapons the lower hull sides could be penetrated by ATRs at decent ranges. Consider that to the very end the Panther never mounted schurzen except to protect the armor between the suspension and the sponsons. If it was for shaped charge protection it would've made sense to protect the sponson and turret sides as the basic armor could be penetrated by existing shaped charges.

The Thoma screens were an effort to save steel. Same effect though.

The Soviets probably did not consult with the Germans on their bedspring kits, so it's a good bet they had different motivations for adopting them.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Steve_Adamski
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 09, 2009
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Schurzen Question

Thanks for the info and thoughts. This makes a lot more sense to me now.
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Schurzen Question

- Steve_Adamski
My main question for you all is regardless of original intention, wouldn't schurzen still provide protection against hollow charge weapons? It seems to me that it would. Spaced armor should weaken the jet of hot material.


They would. I'm not aware of any German tests suggesting that the Germans were aware of it*, but the British were looking into Schürzen as protection against HEAT weapons in 1944 and their results show that the German setup of Schüurzen on Panzers III and IV and StuG III and IV would likely defeat the 95mm HEAT shell fired from a gun and hits by the PIAT on most parts of the vehicle protected by Schürzen. But larger, un-spun HEAT rounds could probably bridge the gap, so to speak, and penetrate the main armour.

- Steve_Adamski
I would expect that the Germans figured this out and that is why so many later war vehicles still carried the schurzen ... long after antitank rifles were able to do anything serious.


The Schürzen protected the 30mm side armour of the German AFVs mentioned above and that armour remained 30mm right up to the end of the war, just as the Soviets continued to use large numbers of anti-tank rifles until the end of the war. Even the Panther had to wear a "miniskirt" to deal with the menace of the Soviet 14.5mm AT-rifle

Am I correct in this thinking? If they do weaken the penetrating ability, any idea by how much on average?


Judging from the British tests, it would appear that the PIAT with its 100mm armour penetration could defeat a 6mm skirting plate, 30cm of space and then 32mm of armour + 14mm of mild steel (target was a Centaur). It was soundly defeated by 6mm of skirting plate, 48cm of space and 32mm of armour plate with 14mm mild steel backing. With the same setup and 38cm of space, it would make a bulge in the main armour, but not penetrate.

Results would of course be different with thicker skirting plate, more or less space and thicker or thinner main armour, so finding an average based on this would be rather difficult Smile

Claus B

*They did test their own gun-fired HEAT against a 20mm armour plate spaced some 10-15cm from the main armour of a Panzer IV. It defeated the round, but the armour was shattered and broken, so it would've been a one-shot protection. Same thing with the 6mm plates in the British test - the gun-fired 95mm round made a complete mess of the plates but failed to penetrate the main armour. But with half the 6mm plate gone or knocked off its rails, it may not have worked well against the next round Smile
Back to top
View user's profile
Steve_Adamski
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 09, 2009
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Schurzen Question

Claus,

Thanks for the info. It was very helpful. I have never seen hard numbers before on this one.

Steve
Back to top
View user's profile
T26E4
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 14, 2006
Posts: 42

PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 8:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Schurzen Question

Another clue as to the ATR focus of German Shurzen: look at later war designs that used them. Kurt mentions how they protected the gap below the Panther sponsons. Note also the Jagdpanzer 38(t) Hetzers and Tiger IIs and Jagdtigers. Where was their shurzen? Above the tracks and below the sponsons- - weak areas that needed beefing up against ATR rounds.

I interviewed a German tanker who commanded Pz IIIs, Pz IVs and Stug IIIs and he was well aware that up to war's end, the Sov AT rifle bullet was a very dangerous threat.

(on a side note, in the PC online game "Red Orchestra" playing a Soviet AT rifleman is a very interesting role -- you really can pound German tanks -- you might get hosed w/their MG34s but it's still very fun)
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum