±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 390
Total: 390
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Downloads
03: Member Screenshots
04: Photo Gallery
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Home
10: News
11: Community Forums
12: Member Screenshots
13: Community Forums
14: News Archive
15: Home
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Downloads
19: Home
20: Home
21: Member Screenshots
22: Home
23: News Archive
24: Home
25: Community Forums
26: Home
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Home
34: Photo Gallery
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Home
38: Home
39: Member Screenshots
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: News Archive
43: Community Forums
44: Your Account
45: Community Forums
46: News Archive
47: Community Forums
48: News Archive
49: News Archive
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Home
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Member Screenshots
59: Your Account
60: Community Forums
61: News
62: Member Screenshots
63: Community Forums
64: Home
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Downloads
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Photo Gallery
73: Home
74: Statistics
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: Member Screenshots
82: Community Forums
83: Photo Gallery
84: Photo Gallery
85: Downloads
86: Community Forums
87: News Archive
88: Photo Gallery
89: News Archive
90: Member Screenshots
91: Member Screenshots
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Member Screenshots
95: Member Screenshots
96: Downloads
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Member Screenshots
100: Community Forums
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: News Archive
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Photo Gallery
110: News Archive
111: Home
112: Downloads
113: Member Screenshots
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Photo Gallery
118: Downloads
119: Community Forums
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Member Screenshots
126: Your Account
127: Member Screenshots
128: Photo Gallery
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Downloads
138: Home
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: News
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Member Screenshots
146: Your Account
147: Your Account
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Member Screenshots
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Home
155: Photo Gallery
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Member Screenshots
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Member Screenshots
165: Community Forums
166: Member Screenshots
167: News Archive
168: News Archive
169: Home
170: Community Forums
171: Member Screenshots
172: Home
173: Community Forums
174: Member Screenshots
175: Member Screenshots
176: Community Forums
177: Downloads
178: Photo Gallery
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Photo Gallery
182: Community Forums
183: Member Screenshots
184: Member Screenshots
185: Home
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Home
189: Downloads
190: Community Forums
191: Downloads
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Member Screenshots
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Member Screenshots
201: Community Forums
202: Home
203: Home
204: Member Screenshots
205: News
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Treasury
211: Community Forums
212: News Archive
213: Downloads
214: Home
215: Community Forums
216: News Archive
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Photo Gallery
220: Community Forums
221: Home
222: Member Screenshots
223: Home
224: Community Forums
225: Downloads
226: Community Forums
227: Home
228: Home
229: Home
230: Member Screenshots
231: Downloads
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: News Archive
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Home
239: Member Screenshots
240: News Archive
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Photo Gallery
245: Community Forums
246: Member Screenshots
247: Community Forums
248: Member Screenshots
249: Downloads
250: News Archive
251: Home
252: Home
253: Community Forums
254: Member Screenshots
255: Photo Gallery
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Member Screenshots
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Home
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Home
266: Photo Gallery
267: Community Forums
268: Home
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Your Account
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Member Screenshots
276: Home
277: Community Forums
278: Home
279: Home
280: Community Forums
281: Photo Gallery
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: News Archive
285: Home
286: Your Account
287: Community Forums
288: Member Screenshots
289: Downloads
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Home
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Photo Gallery
297: Community Forums
298: Home
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: News Archive
303: Home
304: Member Screenshots
305: Photo Gallery
306: Statistics
307: Home
308: Your Account
309: Community Forums
310: News Archive
311: Home
312: Downloads
313: Downloads
314: Home
315: Photo Gallery
316: Community Forums
317: Member Screenshots
318: Community Forums
319: Member Screenshots
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Home
325: Member Screenshots
326: Member Screenshots
327: Community Forums
328: Your Account
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: News Archive
332: Community Forums
333: Photo Gallery
334: Photo Gallery
335: Member Screenshots
336: Community Forums
337: News Archive
338: Photo Gallery
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: Home
342: Downloads
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Home
346: Member Screenshots
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Member Screenshots
350: Community Forums
351: Member Screenshots
352: Community Forums
353: News Archive
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Home
357: Member Screenshots
358: Community Forums
359: Member Screenshots
360: Home
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Your Account
364: Home
365: Community Forums
366: Your Account
367: Member Screenshots
368: Home
369: Community Forums
370: Member Screenshots
371: Community Forums
372: Home
373: Your Account
374: Photo Gallery
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Home
379: Home
380: Member Screenshots
381: Community Forums
382: Photo Gallery
383: Member Screenshots
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Member Screenshots
389: Downloads
390: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Schurzen Question
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Steve_Adamski
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 09, 2009
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 4:57 am
Post subject: Schurzen Question

I'm a little behind the times and only have recently been made aware of Thomas Jentz's assertion that schurzen were developed to protect against anti-tank rifles NOT hollow charge weapons as had been previously thought.

My main question for you all is regardless of original intention, wouldn't schurzen still provide protection against hollow charge weapons?

It seems to me that it would. Spaced armor should weaken the jet of hot material. I would expect that the Germans figured this out and that is why so many later war vehicles still carried the schurzen ... long after antitank rifles were able to do anything serious. The development of the more open spaced Thoma shields and the "bed-spring" kits for the Soviet T-34s seem to me to point in this direction.

Am I correct in this thinking? If they do weaken the penetrating ability, any idea by how much on average?

Thanks,

Steve
Back to top
View user's profile
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:41 am
Post subject: Re: Schurzen Question

It might or might not, depending on the optimal standoff of the weapon vs. the actual standoff. For a 2.36 inch bazooka, probably yes. For a later Panzerfaust, it probably would improve penetration.

German vehicles - especially the Panther - had very unbalanced armor protection. While the glacis was nearly impenetrable to Allied weapons the lower hull sides could be penetrated by ATRs at decent ranges. Consider that to the very end the Panther never mounted schurzen except to protect the armor between the suspension and the sponsons. If it was for shaped charge protection it would've made sense to protect the sponson and turret sides as the basic armor could be penetrated by existing shaped charges.

The Thoma screens were an effort to save steel. Same effect though.

The Soviets probably did not consult with the Germans on their bedspring kits, so it's a good bet they had different motivations for adopting them.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Steve_Adamski
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 09, 2009
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Schurzen Question

Thanks for the info and thoughts. This makes a lot more sense to me now.
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Schurzen Question

- Steve_Adamski
My main question for you all is regardless of original intention, wouldn't schurzen still provide protection against hollow charge weapons? It seems to me that it would. Spaced armor should weaken the jet of hot material.


They would. I'm not aware of any German tests suggesting that the Germans were aware of it*, but the British were looking into Schürzen as protection against HEAT weapons in 1944 and their results show that the German setup of Schüurzen on Panzers III and IV and StuG III and IV would likely defeat the 95mm HEAT shell fired from a gun and hits by the PIAT on most parts of the vehicle protected by Schürzen. But larger, un-spun HEAT rounds could probably bridge the gap, so to speak, and penetrate the main armour.

- Steve_Adamski
I would expect that the Germans figured this out and that is why so many later war vehicles still carried the schurzen ... long after antitank rifles were able to do anything serious.


The Schürzen protected the 30mm side armour of the German AFVs mentioned above and that armour remained 30mm right up to the end of the war, just as the Soviets continued to use large numbers of anti-tank rifles until the end of the war. Even the Panther had to wear a "miniskirt" to deal with the menace of the Soviet 14.5mm AT-rifle

Am I correct in this thinking? If they do weaken the penetrating ability, any idea by how much on average?


Judging from the British tests, it would appear that the PIAT with its 100mm armour penetration could defeat a 6mm skirting plate, 30cm of space and then 32mm of armour + 14mm of mild steel (target was a Centaur). It was soundly defeated by 6mm of skirting plate, 48cm of space and 32mm of armour plate with 14mm mild steel backing. With the same setup and 38cm of space, it would make a bulge in the main armour, but not penetrate.

Results would of course be different with thicker skirting plate, more or less space and thicker or thinner main armour, so finding an average based on this would be rather difficult Smile

Claus B

*They did test their own gun-fired HEAT against a 20mm armour plate spaced some 10-15cm from the main armour of a Panzer IV. It defeated the round, but the armour was shattered and broken, so it would've been a one-shot protection. Same thing with the 6mm plates in the British test - the gun-fired 95mm round made a complete mess of the plates but failed to penetrate the main armour. But with half the 6mm plate gone or knocked off its rails, it may not have worked well against the next round Smile
Back to top
View user's profile
Steve_Adamski
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 09, 2009
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Schurzen Question

Claus,

Thanks for the info. It was very helpful. I have never seen hard numbers before on this one.

Steve
Back to top
View user's profile
T26E4
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 14, 2006
Posts: 42

PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 8:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Schurzen Question

Another clue as to the ATR focus of German Shurzen: look at later war designs that used them. Kurt mentions how they protected the gap below the Panther sponsons. Note also the Jagdpanzer 38(t) Hetzers and Tiger IIs and Jagdtigers. Where was their shurzen? Above the tracks and below the sponsons- - weak areas that needed beefing up against ATR rounds.

I interviewed a German tanker who commanded Pz IIIs, Pz IVs and Stug IIIs and he was well aware that up to war's end, the Sov AT rifle bullet was a very dangerous threat.

(on a side note, in the PC online game "Red Orchestra" playing a Soviet AT rifleman is a very interesting role -- you really can pound German tanks -- you might get hosed w/their MG34s but it's still very fun)
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum