Com-Central.net

Observations: MICV 65
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.

Forum Index › AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

Dontos
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY

Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:00 pm Post subject: Observations: MICV 65
I found this photo while in the Library, a few days ago. I picked up on some differences, having taken a few photos of 'our' MICV 65. It makes me wonder if there were different floatation 'packages'. Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Don

Dontos
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY

Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:09 pm Post subject: Re: Observations: MICV 65
This is my modification to the first picture to the appearent differences. Exhibit D: Don

JimWeb
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond

Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 2:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Observations: MICV 65

MICV-65 was actually the program name that encompassed various vehicles being developed as a replacement for the bog standard steel box apc. Besides the vehicles Don has imaged others in the program included the XM734

I have these particular vehicles listed as the XM701 (original vehicle with footsteps), XM701E1 (with flat sides & sideskirt) and XM701E2 (with additional flotation)

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************

JimWeb
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond

Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 2:42 pm Post subject: Re: Observations: MICV 65
Here's Don's machine in better times... _________________ TTFN Jim If your not a member of JED then your not serious about anything military.. ********************* www.jedsite.info JED Military Equipment *********************

Dontos
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:06 pm Post subject: Re: Observations: MICV 65
Found this today while taking interior photos.... Don

MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:27 pm Post subject: Re: Observations: MICV 65
I wonder why it had no idler wheel in the back? "Pacific Car & Foundry" PACCAR makes Kenworth and Peterbilt trucks today. _________________ "TUMBLEWEED"

TrevorLarkum
Power User

Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 1596
Location: Northampton, England

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:40 pm Post subject: Re: Observations: MICV 65
Might be like that restrospective mod they did to the Pz I - gives maximum stability in a short length (to reduce 'bucking'). _________________ Trevor Dr Trevor Larkum Preserved Tanks: PreservedTanks.com Armour Archive: ArmourArchive.co.uk EVs

Joe_D
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2069
Location: Razorback Country

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:57 pm Post subject: Re: Observations: MICV 65
Or maybe they borrowed the concept (and some parts) from the M107/110/578 series of vehicles. Those road wheels look very familiar. _________________ Joe_D

tanker2010
Power User

Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:22 am Post subject: Re: Observations: MICV 65
- MarkHolloway I wonder why it had no idler wheel in the back? "Pacific Car & Foundry" PACCAR makes Kenworth and Peterbilt trucks today. Well since Pacific Car & Foundry made the M107/110/578, like Joe said they used parts off of them.

Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:21 pm Post subject: Re: Observations: MICV 65
- Dontos Found this today while taking interior photos.... The SN given is a little unusual. Its known to be pilot number 5. Typically SNs are pretty literal - 105 would mean the 105th one built... In this case I know that's not the case... Neil

Joe_D
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2069
Location: Razorback Country

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:26 pm Post subject: Re: Observations: MICV 65
Might explain some of the High SN's seen on T-114 data plates, Although I think that Tennessee "Lingle" with the the "T" Data plate affixed outside is a local creation. _________________ Joe_D

Dontos
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:36 pm Post subject: Re: Observations: MICV 65
There was a question IRT the rear firing ports, so I did some exploring and came up with this. Don

Forum Index › AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1

All times are GMT - 6 Hours

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Select Language

Login

`±`Recent Visitors

`±`User Info-big

Com-Central.net

Select Language

Login

±Recent Visitors

±User Info-big

`±`Recent Visitors

`±`User Info-big