±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 116
Total: 116
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Community Forums
03: News
04: Home
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Community Forums
09: Home
10: Community Forums
11: CPGlang
12: Community Forums
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Home
17: Home
18: Home
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Downloads
22: CPGlang
23: Downloads
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: CPGlang
33: Member Screenshots
34: Photo Gallery
35: Home
36: Your Account
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Photo Gallery
40: Downloads
41: Community Forums
42: News
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: CPGlang
46: Home
47: Photo Gallery
48: Downloads
49: Home
50: Photo Gallery
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Photo Gallery
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Downloads
63: Home
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: CPGlang
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Photo Gallery
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Downloads
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Home
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Member Screenshots
86: Home
87: CPGlang
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Photo Gallery
91: Home
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: CPGlang
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Home
99: Home
100: Member Screenshots
101: Community Forums
102: Photo Gallery
103: Home
104: Home
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Downloads
108: Photo Gallery
109: Community Forums
110: Home
111: Community Forums
112: CPGlang
113: Photo Gallery
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Downloads

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
M60 Rolling Fork MS
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Thu May 07, 2009 4:43 am
Post subject: M60 Rolling Fork MS

Checked out the M60 at the Mississippi ARNG Armory, Detachment 1, 1387th Quartermaster Company, in Rolling Fork on the way to Louisiana yesterday,

SN 156, RN 9B3269.

Rolling Fork MS

Location: 32.900320, -90.874755


What's interesting is the TACOM register lists an M60 SN 156 at Six Lakes MI.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Thu May 07, 2009 12:24 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 Rolling Fork MS

Another one with the original air cleaners! These seem pretty rare. Nice shot.

Gary
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Thu May 07, 2009 1:44 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 Rolling Fork MS

Gary,

What's really cool is she had been in service a very long time and kept the old first GEN air cleaners. I surmised this since she was equipped with an M68A1 tube (M1) with the bevel and cut for an MRS. Wouldn't be surprised if she was finally retired whenever the 155th AR BDE got their M60A3's (Late 80's early 90's), giving her a service life of close to 30 years with no major upgrades Shocked .

Ya think Uncle Sam got his moneys worth with her???

BTW, She was assigned to 1-108 Cavalry.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Maple_Leaf_Eh
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 517

PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 1:54 am
Post subject: Re: M60 Rolling Fork MS

Were you wandering around in public with that long pole of yours?

As for the upgrade history, how does a centrally controlled fighting vehicle escape all the important changes? I'd expect there would be a scheduled recall and rolling replacement procedure to keep these things evenly distributed across the fleet. Or is my innocence showing?
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 1:12 pm
Post subject: Re: M60 Rolling Fork MS

Good question,

From 1986-87 I was in an M60A1 tank platoon at Fort Riley KS. Of our 5 tanks (We had the CO's tank assigned for maintenance and admin) not one was outfitted the same, ran from an A1 AOS to A1RISE/Passive and all in between with different mods. Oldest having an 1790-A engine, newest having a C with VDES air cleaners. Two had grenade launchers installed and we had VSS-1, 2 and 3 searchlights with either IR or Passive sights. Used to do the passive shuffle during gunnery, handing the gunner's sight from tank to tank at night, since there were only 4 or 5 passive tanks in the company. This was an Active duty unit in the 1st ID.

Was told that we were last on funds list and were due for M1's, so money wasn't to be spent on old tanks. They did swap to M1's fall of '87. Only thing I could guess as to why we had such a diversity of models was as the old M60s wore out, caught fire, or destroyed in accidents over time, they were floated out. Replacement tanks that came in were newer models or came from units who transitioned to M1's since that's all that was available. Some of our tanks in the Battalion had old Fort Hood bumper numbers.

Guard tanks are maintained and owned by the state, so it's up to them what to spend on them. The state gets X amount of federal funding a year to maintain whatever forces they have. How the state disperses the funds is their business. Since most of their tanks sit idle in MATES sites, it's real easy to skip upgrades (as long as they are not safety related) and use the funds elswhere. "If it ain't broke, don't spend money on it"

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum