Com-Central.net

blair · ***Power User*** Offline Joined: Jan 24, 2006 Posts: 87

izismile.com/2009/05/2..._pics.html

Rikard_Hufschmied · Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 6:57 am Post subject: Re: interesting diorama

Too many chronological errors, equipment both out of time and place, to count for a Stalingrad battle diorama. A lot of effort on the build but zip on research and chronological accuracy. No thought IMO has gone into the display other than "let's see how much stuff I can cram in here", it's just too cluttered.

No, sorry I don't like it.

west-front · Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 9:33 am Post subject: Re: interesting diorama

I agree, I can appreciate the modellers work & committment, but think that perhaps all that effort could have been directed towards modelling an actual WW2 event or battle, and not cramming everything into such a small space.

piney · Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 11:41 am Post subject: Re: interesting diorama

I too, agree, way to much unrealistic blood and numerous chronological impossibilities. I am always saddened by some one who puts forth a tremendous amount of their time, talent and significant expense but fails to do the basic reasearch to make sure their presentation is historically correct, my two cents

Piney

JWB2 · ***Power User*** Offline Joined: Jan 25, 2006 Posts: 199

I agree with all the above. Once i saw the Tiger I figured the artist is a show off amateur.

rynoki · Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 9:36 am Post subject: Re: interesting diorama

I like it.
Historically inacurate but if you get over that it's appealing.
The over the top blood and gore and "all in" feel of the diorama I find great.
I think if the modeller changed the title of his/her piece to something like, " Eastern front carnage" it would be more widely accepted.

Com-Central.net

Select Language

Login

`±`Recent Visitors

`±`User Info-big

Com-Central.net

Select Language

Login

±Recent Visitors

±User Info-big

`±`Recent Visitors

`±`User Info-big