±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 1
Visitors: 387
Total: 388
Who Is Where:
 Members:
01: Shadow_Bshwackr > Community Forums
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Member Screenshots
03: Community Forums
04: Photo Gallery
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Member Screenshots
08: Photo Gallery
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Home
14: Home
15: Photo Gallery
16: Your Account
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Photo Gallery
20: Your Account
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: CPGlang
24: Community Forums
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Downloads
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Photo Gallery
35: Community Forums
36: Photo Gallery
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: Downloads
40: Home
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Your Account
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Home
55: Photo Gallery
56: Home
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Home
67: Home
68: Photo Gallery
69: Photo Gallery
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Photo Gallery
75: Member Screenshots
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Downloads
79: Community Forums
80: Home
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: CPGlang
93: Community Forums
94: Photo Gallery
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Home
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Home
105: Community Forums
106: Downloads
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Home
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Member Screenshots
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: CPGlang
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Photo Gallery
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: CPGlang
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Photo Gallery
135: Photo Gallery
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Downloads
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Home
151: Home
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Statistics
160: Community Forums
161: Downloads
162: Community Forums
163: News Archive
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Member Screenshots
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Downloads
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Photo Gallery
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: LinkToUs
190: Home
191: Photo Gallery
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Your Account
196: Community Forums
197: Photo Gallery
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Member Screenshots
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Your Account
207: Photo Gallery
208: Photo Gallery
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: Downloads
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Your Account
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Home
227: Community Forums
228: Photo Gallery
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: CPGlang
233: Photo Gallery
234: Downloads
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Photo Gallery
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Statistics
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Home
251: Photo Gallery
252: Home
253: Photo Gallery
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Your Account
258: Community Forums
259: Photo Gallery
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Photo Gallery
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Home
269: Community Forums
270: Photo Gallery
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Photo Gallery
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: CPGlang
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Home
290: Your Account
291: Downloads
292: Statistics
293: Community Forums
294: Home
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Photo Gallery
298: Community Forums
299: Photo Gallery
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Community Forums
303: Home
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Photo Gallery
311: Photo Gallery
312: Home
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Photo Gallery
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Home
321: Your Account
322: Home
323: Home
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Photo Gallery
332: Photo Gallery
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Home
340: Home
341: Community Forums
342: Photo Gallery
343: Your Account
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Photo Gallery
347: Community Forums
348: CPGlang
349: Community Forums
350: Photo Gallery
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Home
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Home
360: Member Screenshots
361: Community Forums
362: Photo Gallery
363: Community Forums
364: Downloads
365: Home
366: Community Forums
367: Downloads
368: Photo Gallery
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Home
373: Community Forums
374: Photo Gallery
375: Photo Gallery
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Home
380: Community Forums
381: Photo Gallery
382: Home
383: Community Forums
384: Home
385: Photo Gallery
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums

Staff Online:
01: PM Shadow_Bshwackr
M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 3:05 am
Post subject: M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com

Can anyone identify the exact model?

www.waymarking.com/way...Antonio_TX



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:35 am
Post subject: Re: M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com

Neil,

M48, or as many say "M48A0" Smile

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:38 am
Post subject: Re: M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com

Just to argue I believe it could possibly be an M48C the mild steel hull version of the M48. I know they existed and I beleive all were non cupola vehicles (Which would make them the visual equivilant of the A0)

I'm also not sure if they were acytually 'mistakes' as the 'Training Tank only' M60s were or if there was some reason that they were purposely produced with mild steel (Once someone told me that the production process was intentionally sped up by not having the Hulls 'hardened' in order to get vehicles out to training units sooner)

But in general I agree with it being an M48 aka M48A0

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:42 pm
Post subject: Re: M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com

I remember the stories that the M48C was based on tanks with problems in the hull castings. As far as getting vehicles into the training units, the M48 was rushed to production and then hundreds went from the factories right into storage as there were so many problems to iron out in these tanks. I don't remember if it made it into the book, but when I was researching M48 photos for the Squadron book that ended up as Mesko's "M48 In Action" ( I was a good gatherer but lousy at deadlines) I had a shot of about a hundred brand new M48s sitting outside the Ford plant.

Gary
Back to top
View user's profile
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:29 pm
Post subject: Re: M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com

The sign says "M48" so that backs up Joe D's ID.

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 3:30 pm
Post subject: Re: M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com

Bob,

I don't believe She could be a "C" model because it appears the drivers hatch has been been equipped with the T41 (M24) IR sight opening. Only intermediate small and late model large hatch hulls had this feature, M48C's were early production.

The ballistic deficiency with the pilot tanks and the first 120 now called M48C's was actually centered on the drivers position around the periscopes, where the required thickness was not to specs. Since this was considered a critical area (frontal arc), all these castings were considered unfit for service and marked Non-Ballistic. The steel used was the same as with the standard castings. Protection every where else would be the same as a standard M48.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:56 pm
Post subject: Re: M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com

- MarkHolloway
The sign says "M48" so that backs up Joe D's ID.


Although I agree with this (I wouldn't really argue with Joe on M48/M60 questions) How many times have we all seen signs on monuments be wrong. Mr. Green

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:57 pm
Post subject: Re: M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com

Dissent and constructive criticism are good,

I welcome it because there is always more info out there. Sometimes I go through my notes from 4-5 years ago and cringe. But with research a lot has been either dis proven or confirmed. Most of the time it just creates a new unanswered question. On rare occasions I get a rude shock when I find out what was an accepted and well known fact published in numerous books turns out to be false.

Here's a good one.

What Models of the US M48 required the commanders weapon to be loaded from the outside?

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:08 pm
Post subject: Re: M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com

Joe

Does the M48A5E1 count??? Wink



Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:32 pm
Post subject: Re: M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com

That's one, although "Only One" and not a group Laughing

I'm looking more along the lines of, "Which of these apply"

M48
M48A1
M48A2 and A2C
M48A3
M48A5

You can throw in the the two M48A4's and M48A5E1 if you like, although only the A5E1 survives to my knowledge.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:40 pm
Post subject: Re: M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com

Assuming there is some 'trick' in this question Wink

I know the M48A1, A2, andA3 had a cupola mounted 50 cal. But could it be that there was not enough clearance to LOAD the weapon when buttoned up?

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:27 pm
Post subject: Re: M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com

After checking a few things,.....

My guess would be the M48(A0) & the M48A5. Both have external MG mounts for the 'flex' M2 .50cal.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:07 pm
Post subject: Re: M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com

- Dontos
After checking a few things,.....

My guess would be the M48(A0) & the M48A5. Both have external MG mounts for the 'flex' M2 .50cal.

Don


That is the obvious answer which makes me wonder what fact he has up his sleeve Mr. Green

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:11 pm
Post subject: Re: M48 Patton at Fort Sam Houston thanks to waymarking.com

Actually,

All except the later model M48A5's with the "Israeli" style cupola could be loaded while inside.

The M48 with the Chrysler M1 cupola could be Aimed, Fired, and loaded by the crew while inside the turret. All civilian books I've seen would state the commander would have to expose himself to reload. I believed this to be fact for a long time until I started researching early M48's. Got my hands on a TM from 1954 and was surprised.

First, the Loader would have to open his hatch. Then the TC would take a handle stowed inside the turret and disconnect the .50 cal cradle. Next he'd rotate the cupola until it aligned with a couple of arrows marked inside, positioning it over the Loaders hatch. Then using the same crank, he'd attach it to the cupola pivot crank shaft. Turning this would position the weapon correctly so the loader could reload while inside the turret. Once complete, you'd reverse the process to return the gun into firing status.

Kinda a "Rube Goldberg" invention to me, and I doubt very many crews used this feature in training, but......, the capability was there for a crew to reload the M2 with reasonable protection from small arms. Something the M1 still lacks.

"Now you know the rest of the story" Smile

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum