±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 670
Total: 670
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: News Archive
05: Home
06: Your Account
07: Search
08: Member Screenshots
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Member Screenshots
15: Home
16: Member Screenshots
17: Community Forums
18: News
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Home
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: Community Forums
27: Supporters
28: Home
29: Home
30: Home
31: Member Screenshots
32: Member Screenshots
33: Home
34: Home
35: Home
36: Your Account
37: Supporters
38: Home
39: Photo Gallery
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Downloads
43: Contact
44: Community Forums
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: Home
50: Home
51: Member Screenshots
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: News
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Home
63: Home
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Downloads
67: Downloads
68: Photo Gallery
69: Home
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: Photo Gallery
73: Home
74: Home
75: Search
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Statistics
79: Home
80: Home
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Member Screenshots
84: Home
85: Photo Gallery
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Photo Gallery
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Your Account
95: Member Screenshots
96: Statistics
97: Downloads
98: Member Screenshots
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Downloads
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Member Screenshots
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Treasury
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Home
116: LinkToUs
117: Home
118: Home
119: Home
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Your Account
124: Community Forums
125: Member Screenshots
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Home
134: Photo Gallery
135: Community Forums
136: Home
137: Home
138: LinkToUs
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Member Screenshots
147: Downloads
148: Home
149: Community Forums
150: Downloads
151: Home
152: Community Forums
153: Search
154: Home
155: Photo Gallery
156: Your Account
157: Community Forums
158: Your Account
159: Home
160: Downloads
161: Contact
162: Community Forums
163: Photo Gallery
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Your Account
168: Member Screenshots
169: Community Forums
170: Member Screenshots
171: Home
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Photo Gallery
177: Community Forums
178: Search
179: Home
180: Home
181: Home
182: Home
183: Member Screenshots
184: Home
185: Home
186: Community Forums
187: Photo Gallery
188: Community Forums
189: Member Screenshots
190: Home
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Downloads
195: News
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Home
203: Photo Gallery
204: Photo Gallery
205: Member Screenshots
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Home
213: Your Account
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Member Screenshots
217: Home
218: Home
219: Home
220: Community Forums
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Member Screenshots
224: Community Forums
225: Statistics
226: Community Forums
227: Home
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Your Account
231: Community Forums
232: Downloads
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Home
239: Downloads
240: Member Screenshots
241: LinkToUs
242: Home
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: News
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Home
252: Member Screenshots
253: Home
254: Home
255: Home
256: Home
257: Home
258: Home
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Member Screenshots
267: News Archive
268: Community Forums
269: Downloads
270: Member Screenshots
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Downloads
274: Home
275: Home
276: Home
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Home
280: Home
281: Home
282: News Archive
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: Treasury
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Home
303: Member Screenshots
304: Member Screenshots
305: Downloads
306: Home
307: Your Account
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Member Screenshots
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Member Screenshots
316: Downloads
317: Home
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Home
323: Photo Gallery
324: Community Forums
325: Downloads
326: Community Forums
327: Home
328: Home
329: Photo Gallery
330: Home
331: News
332: Community Forums
333: Downloads
334: Community Forums
335: Downloads
336: Member Screenshots
337: News Archive
338: Community Forums
339: Photo Gallery
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Home
343: Community Forums
344: Member Screenshots
345: Photo Gallery
346: Community Forums
347: Home
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Treasury
351: Home
352: Community Forums
353: Home
354: Community Forums
355: Member Screenshots
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Member Screenshots
359: Home
360: Downloads
361: Member Screenshots
362: Community Forums
363: Home
364: Community Forums
365: Member Screenshots
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Home
370: News Archive
371: Home
372: Photo Gallery
373: Community Forums
374: Home
375: Community Forums
376: Member Screenshots
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Home
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Home
383: News
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Member Screenshots
387: Community Forums
388: Downloads
389: Member Screenshots
390: Home
391: Home
392: Home
393: Community Forums
394: News Archive
395: Member Screenshots
396: Community Forums
397: Home
398: Home
399: Photo Gallery
400: Community Forums
401: Home
402: Community Forums
403: Home
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Home
409: Home
410: News Archive
411: Photo Gallery
412: Home
413: Your Account
414: Home
415: Home
416: Photo Gallery
417: Community Forums
418: Downloads
419: Community Forums
420: Home
421: Community Forums
422: Search
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Home
426: Member Screenshots
427: Home
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Downloads
432: Photo Gallery
433: Home
434: Photo Gallery
435: Member Screenshots
436: Home
437: Home
438: Home
439: Community Forums
440: Home
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Home
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Downloads
448: Home
449: Home
450: Photo Gallery
451: Member Screenshots
452: Community Forums
453: Home
454: Member Screenshots
455: Community Forums
456: Home
457: Home
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Downloads
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Photo Gallery
465: Community Forums
466: Photo Gallery
467: Home
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: Member Screenshots
471: Home
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Home
475: Community Forums
476: Home
477: Home
478: Member Screenshots
479: Community Forums
480: Home
481: Community Forums
482: Community Forums
483: Photo Gallery
484: Community Forums
485: Home
486: Community Forums
487: Community Forums
488: Photo Gallery
489: Community Forums
490: Home
491: Community Forums
492: Home
493: Community Forums
494: Community Forums
495: Your Account
496: Community Forums
497: Community Forums
498: Home
499: Community Forums
500: Home
501: Community Forums
502: Home
503: Community Forums
504: Home
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Home
508: Community Forums
509: Home
510: Community Forums
511: Home
512: Home
513: Home
514: Community Forums
515: Photo Gallery
516: Home
517: Community Forums
518: Home
519: Member Screenshots
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Downloads
523: Downloads
524: Home
525: Community Forums
526: Home
527: Member Screenshots
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: Member Screenshots
531: Community Forums
532: Community Forums
533: Home
534: Community Forums
535: Home
536: Home
537: Community Forums
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: Downloads
541: Home
542: Community Forums
543: Photo Gallery
544: Home
545: Contact
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Home
549: Community Forums
550: Member Screenshots
551: Tell a Friend
552: Community Forums
553: News
554: Community Forums
555: Community Forums
556: Home
557: Community Forums
558: Your Account
559: Community Forums
560: Home
561: Community Forums
562: Downloads
563: Home
564: Community Forums
565: Member Screenshots
566: Community Forums
567: Community Forums
568: Photo Gallery
569: Home
570: Community Forums
571: Community Forums
572: Community Forums
573: Photo Gallery
574: Community Forums
575: Community Forums
576: Member Screenshots
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: Photo Gallery
581: Community Forums
582: News Archive
583: Home
584: Photo Gallery
585: Community Forums
586: Home
587: Community Forums
588: Home
589: Community Forums
590: Community Forums
591: Community Forums
592: Photo Gallery
593: Downloads
594: Community Forums
595: Home
596: Home
597: Community Forums
598: Home
599: Community Forums
600: Community Forums
601: Community Forums
602: Community Forums
603: Community Forums
604: Home
605: Photo Gallery
606: Community Forums
607: Home
608: Community Forums
609: Home
610: Your Account
611: Home
612: Community Forums
613: Home
614: Photo Gallery
615: Community Forums
616: Photo Gallery
617: Home
618: Community Forums
619: Community Forums
620: Home
621: Home
622: Home
623: Community Forums
624: Community Forums
625: Community Forums
626: Home
627: Downloads
628: Community Forums
629: Home
630: Community Forums
631: Community Forums
632: Home
633: Community Forums
634: Community Forums
635: Home
636: Community Forums
637: Home
638: Community Forums
639: Photo Gallery
640: Home
641: Home
642: Home
643: Home
644: Community Forums
645: Downloads
646: Community Forums
647: Community Forums
648: Community Forums
649: Home
650: Community Forums
651: Community Forums
652: Community Forums
653: Community Forums
654: Home
655: Downloads
656: Community Forums
657: Member Screenshots
658: Community Forums
659: Community Forums
660: Member Screenshots
661: Photo Gallery
662: Community Forums
663: Home
664: Community Forums
665: Community Forums
666: Community Forums
667: Community Forums
668: Home
669: Community Forums
670: Member Screenshots

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Sherman Firefly
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:58 pm
Post subject: Sherman Firefly

Hi folks

I'm reading an book (yes I'm already old enough to know what that is) called "Sherman at war"

And in the book they dicuss the history of the Sherman and it's variants, including the British 17pdr (Firefly) version

At the end of the Firefly description it tells that there are records showing that the US army had, at 1 point during WW2, about 100 Sherman's armed with British 17pdr available

Also that it is not clear what has happened to these tanks after the war

Does some of you know more about this story?

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 10:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Rolling Eyes Michel, how old are you?

I've never heard of such a thing called "a book"...

P-O

26 y-o

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

35 years and 3 month's young Cool

An book is an bunch of printed e-mails however both sides of the paper is used Laughing

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

This is the only information I know about them
freespace.virgin.net/s...usnew.html
and it's little.
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:20 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

I wonder if any of these were among the stock of "Fireflys" acquired by Argentina and upgraded as "repotendiados" or if all of those vehicles came from exclusively European stocks (which had been my understanding)?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

These tanks probably went immediately from the depot to surplus. The unit(s) that were undergoing conversion training to the 17-pounder were probably told to immediately turn in their vehicles. The 17 poounder project was stopped just as the ETOUSA was near to having operational Fireflys, but since the gun with its associated parts and ammo were non-standard they were dropped like a hot rock. I imagine that the US Army "Fireflys" were either scrapped or merged into the stocks of tanks that were provided to European armies. The primary features seem to be the US vision cupola for the commander and a variation in the radio box design. There have been questions about any use of HVSS or wet stowage hulls. Otherwise a "US" M4 with 17 pounder would be functionally like the British ones. THe M4A3s would have been unique, but except for a possible one found on a firing range, there haven't been any sightings of an M4A3 "Firefly".
Back to top
View user's profile
warddw
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Mark Hayward's book on the sherman firefly has some documented US usage in Italy - recommended - a good read exclusively devoted to the firefly...

Back to top
View user's profile
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Hi folks,

thanks all, for the info

Concerning the dropping of the 17pdr because of being non-standard in the US army... Rolling Eyes

Indeed it woud make more sense developing an complete new 76mm gun with new ammo for the 76mm Sherman Twisted Evil
Instead of using an proven gun design

For what I could find about the history of the Firefly there was another main reason the US army did not want to use the 17pdr gun

Concerning teh book about the Firefly, I have that
It's an the pile of books, still to read

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss
Hi folks,

thanks all, for the info

Concerning the dropping of the 17pdr because of being non-standard in the US army... Rolling Eyes

. . .

For what I could find about the history of the Firefly there was another main reason the US army did not want to use the 17pdr gun

. . .

Michel


Michel - I'm curious, what was the other reason the U.S. did not want to use the 17pdr? Or am I reading something into your comment that isn't there

The reasons I have heard over the years (And I'm not saying which I believe, I'm just listing theone I remember being suggested)

1) Supply constraints - All possible production was being used by the British units. A variation of this is that even if there were enough guns 17pdr ammo was a constant shortage item

2) Command did not see the need for a more powerful gun

3) The very poor performance of 17pdr HE ammo

4) NIH [ Not Invented Here ]

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Bob,

the ones you listed are the ones I know also, only in an different line-up

1) NIH [ Not Invented Here ] (especially true with-in some locations of US army command)

2) Command did not see the need for a more powerful gun
The "more" powerful 76mm was developed for the Sherman, so there was need for an more powerful gun according some one's idea.
Also certain part of command thought there there was no need because there was an special branche in the US army called the tank destroyers.


3) Supply constraints - All possible production was being used by the British units. A variation of this is that even if there were enough guns 17pdr ammo was a constant shortage item

The US industry made ammunition and all kinds of other stuff for the British army
The US air force had the (British) Rolce-Royce Merlin engine made in license to put them in the P-51 Mustang
The navy copied the (British) all steel flight deck on the aircraft carriers to replace the wooden fligth decks
The US army could not copy the 17pdr design...........
Confused

4) The very poor performance of 17pdr HE ammo
The 76mm gun was developed to deal with the German Pz 5 and Pz 6 armour
Also the 76mm HE ammo wasn't know in the service for it's good performance either
In the field the 75mm was prefered for HE because of it's better performance


Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:24 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

I think between the tanks not being fielded in time for ETO and the need for commonality after the War these tanks were destined for surplus.

Commonality for the 75mm and 76mm would not be a problem since US wartime production of this ammo would last a long time after hostilities ceased. We have (more like had) an amazing capability to produce large amounts of munitions during the war. Once peacetime kicked in everything ceased and munitions were stockpiled. I was still firing WWII manufactured API and API-T in Iraq for my .50 cal back in 2007. With the 17pdr a new production line would be needed and since the war ended why continue making ammo when you don't really need it. I imagine this would have been a major factor in it's demise

The M26 was coming on line and the Army had pretty much decided the 90mm was the gun of choice for tanks. So much so that when they made the higher velocity 90mm for the M47 they made sure it could still fire the older rounds but tapered the newer rounds near the forcing cone to prevent their accidental use in the older tanks.

Fielding a new gun in peacetime is not that hard, having ample munitions for it is another story. When the M60 came on line there was a serious shortage of 105mm ammo for her. This led to the M48A3 not receiving the 105mm gun. Priority for 105mm was in Europe to counter the T55 and T62's. They figured the 90mm was plenty for other areas, and were proven correct in Vietnam.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:51 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Michel
I wasn't putting them in any particular order but going with your order

1) There is no way NIH can be discussed or defended it is a 'religious issue'.

2) Tank Destroyers are a doctrine issue separate from the weapon issue itself. It does play into the discussion but I'm going to avoid it just because I don't even want to try to justify the decision based on it. Yes it had an affect. Given the overall offensive role of the U.S. Army in NW Europe it could be considered a flawed doctrine. But if the U.S. had been tasked with a primary defensive role (As the Germans were at the time) it may not have been seen that way. I believe the doctrine that had tank battalions outside the Infantry division structure and only attached them 'as needed' (Which ended up being almost all the time) was at least as much of a doctrinal flaw that can be laid back at the feet of Gen McNair as the TD doctrine can.

3) Yes the U.S,. did supply a lot of ammunition to the British. But except for small arms ammo I believe the great majority was for American spec weapons. The lead time was fairly extensive. The best example of ammo interchangability is the 6pdr/57mm which was used in both armies in large numbers. I believe it took over a year for the 6pdr gun to be put in production in the U.S. as the 57 mm. A lot of that time was spent changing detail drawings to American Standards that could be released to US manufacturers for production use.

The Merlin engine had the same issue in being set up for U.S. production. There were enough differences in the Rolls Royce and Packard engines that Lancaster bombers were given different Mark numbers based on the engines installed and engines from the different manufacturing pools could not be interchanged.

The difference I see with the 17pdr is the time frame that some 17pdr proponents think the adoption could have been made in. Given the time it would have taken to adopt the 17pdr as a standard there were two other solutions coming along. Th e76mm in the short and mid term and the 90mm gun tank in the long term. I think if the effort had been put into rushing an increase in 90mm gun production and adapting the T23 turret to handle it, or pushing the T26 turret forward faster and installing it on the Sherman there would have been no discussion of a 17pdr Sherman for the U.S. Army.

The steel flight deck was adopted for other reasons (Jet exhausts) If you mean the armored flight deck we will have to move that to a different forum. I believe that argument makes the Sherman discussion look simple and straight forward. Rolling Eyes

4) I used to have a comparison of the various HE rounds (It was from a message on the old AFV news) Yes the 75mm was the best the 76mm was less effective and the 17pdr was at least twice that far below the 76mm. Only when the tank gun is stepped up to the 90mm did a tank gun equal or exceed the 75mm
In my amateur opinion I see the difference as being directly related to the muzzle velocity of the gun. As the MV increased it was necessary to increase the thickness of the shell wall to handle the increased stresses. This cuts the size of the HE filler down. Some people will say 'so what the higher MV makes it a better AT round. The problem comes when the uses the tanks were put to is examined. While tanks had to be prepared to fight other tanks they spent most of their time fighting non-tank targets where HE was the preferred round. Even the British didn't use the 17pdr in all tanks in a unit.

I have also heard that there was another problem with the 17pdr in the Sherman. I remember reading that the 17pdr had some elevation restrictions in teh Sherman and could not be fired at 'certain elevations' because the gun could not recoil the full way at those elevations (I seem to remember that it was at elevations where the turret ring interfered with the full recoil)

I was curious if you had some other factors that I hadn't heard of over the years

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Hi Bob,

I thought you had them in an particular order, so.. Mr. Green

1) concerning the NIH I have to agree on that, there are an lot of people who already tried to discuss or defend that

2) I mentioned the TD branch because that was an reason to block an capable AT gun in the Sherman. If they had put the 17pdr or 90mm in an Sherman it would have made the TD branch an sort of ... obsolete

3) Concenring the ammo, if I remember correcty the US also produced bigger ammo then only small arms ammo
For sure the US produced the fuzes used for British artillery shells, according British spec's
They also produced ammo for non-US spec small arms, for an example the US .303 rifle ammo was made for the Bren MG. However because it was not according British spec, the cartridges got bended and they got stuck in the MG. After this the US .303 cartridge was only allowed to be used for the British Lee-Enfield rifles

I only mentioned the Merlin engine and the metal Wink flight deck to illustrate the fact that they where willing to incorporated already existing better solutions, instead of inventing something new

4) Concerning the performance of the HE rounds. The 76mm was primarily developed for dealing with the armour of the German Pz 5 and Pz 6 tanks. The performance of the HE round was not the main reason to develope an new 76mm gun.
The 76mm was based on an 76mm AA gun with an high MV. They redesigned the cartridge to make it suitable for handling it inside an tank turret, however keeping the same performance as the AA round. After the first protoype's they decided to shorten the barrel, because it was sticking to far out Shocked
However with the shortening of the barrel the AT performance of the gun dropped, because the MV dropped

Concerning the 17pdr breech sticking out to far, that was only true on the first versions. Latter versions had an redesigned shorter breech.
The British had one 17pdr armed Sherman on every four tanks, so they had the HE performance and the AT performance combined

About the MV of an shell to knock-out an enemy tank
There are 2 type's of shell suited to take an tank out;
1) it has an high MV, giving it high impact energy
2) the shell is big enough, no matter what type of shell it is. The Russian 152mm HE shell of the ISU-152 was big enough to take out an German Pz 5 or Pz 6, only because of it's size

Nothing new to ad Wink

Nice such an discussion, should we do more often


Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 12:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Some interesting side points

Yes we produced fuses to British specs. In fact my mother in law worked in a factory in Elkton MD that produced fuses. They hated it when they did fuses destined for British stocks. They had quotas and when doing British spec fuses it took much longer to produce the same number of fuses.

I don't think it was a case of the TD branch blocking the good gun in the Sherman. I think it was a case of once the TD doctrine was established it was impossible at the highest levels to justify the better gun

Armor Branch Officer - We need a better gun to kill German tanks
Staff Officer - You aren't supposed to be killing tanks, that is the job of TDs
A O - but sometimes we run across German tanks
S O - Then call for TD support
A O - (shaking head) The Germans won't wait for the TDs to show up, They kill our tanks and move on

I just had an interesting thought
Actually deployment of the Firefly was actually just taking the TD doctrine down to the platoon/troop level. If the U.S. had made a tank platoon two M36 TDs and three 75mm Shermans you would have the same thing as the British had without having to add a new weapon to the system.

and yes big shells have a capability all their own. Beldon Cooper mentions using M12 self propelled 155mm guns as AT weapons. In that case you had large caliber and high MV Shocked

And yes I like discussions like this. We used to have them more often , maybe they will come back

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Massimo_Foti
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 5397
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Actually deployment of the Firefly was actually just taking the TD doctrine down to the platoon/troop level. If the U.S. had made a tank platoon two M36 TDs and three 75mm Shermans you would have the same thing as the British had without having to add a new weapon to the system.

In post-war years, once a larger amount of tanks was available, the italian army tried to mix Shermans with 17pdr and 76mm with Shermans with 105mm at the smaller unit level possible. I guess they came to similar conclusions
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 5
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum