±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 839
Total: 839
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Your Account
02: Home
03: Photo Gallery
04: Home
05: Community Forums
06: Member Screenshots
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Photo Gallery
11: News Archive
12: Downloads
13: Home
14: Photo Gallery
15: Downloads
16: Photo Gallery
17: Community Forums
18: Member Screenshots
19: Statistics
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: News Archive
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Member Screenshots
26: Home
27: Photo Gallery
28: News
29: Member Screenshots
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Home
33: Home
34: Community Forums
35: Home
36: Community Forums
37: Photo Gallery
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Photo Gallery
41: Photo Gallery
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Downloads
45: Photo Gallery
46: Downloads
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Home
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Statistics
54: Home
55: Home
56: Downloads
57: Community Forums
58: Photo Gallery
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Downloads
62: Member Screenshots
63: Photo Gallery
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Photo Gallery
67: Home
68: Photo Gallery
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Photo Gallery
73: Photo Gallery
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Member Screenshots
77: Photo Gallery
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: News Archive
82: Photo Gallery
83: Home
84: Photo Gallery
85: Photo Gallery
86: Downloads
87: Home
88: Photo Gallery
89: Photo Gallery
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Member Screenshots
93: Photo Gallery
94: Community Forums
95: Member Screenshots
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Member Screenshots
99: Community Forums
100: Downloads
101: Your Account
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Home
105: Community Forums
106: Photo Gallery
107: Community Forums
108: Downloads
109: Community Forums
110: Photo Gallery
111: Home
112: Photo Gallery
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Photo Gallery
125: Photo Gallery
126: Home
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Photo Gallery
130: Home
131: Photo Gallery
132: Photo Gallery
133: Home
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: News
137: Photo Gallery
138: Photo Gallery
139: Photo Gallery
140: News Archive
141: Home
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Photo Gallery
145: Photo Gallery
146: Photo Gallery
147: Home
148: Home
149: Community Forums
150: Home
151: Downloads
152: Home
153: Home
154: Community Forums
155: News
156: Photo Gallery
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: News
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Downloads
163: Community Forums
164: Downloads
165: Home
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Photo Gallery
171: Home
172: Home
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: Photo Gallery
176: Downloads
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Downloads
180: Community Forums
181: News Archive
182: Community Forums
183: Photo Gallery
184: Member Screenshots
185: News Archive
186: Home
187: Community Forums
188: Home
189: News
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Downloads
193: News Archive
194: Photo Gallery
195: Home
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: News Archive
201: Photo Gallery
202: Home
203: Home
204: Photo Gallery
205: Community Forums
206: Home
207: Downloads
208: Home
209: Home
210: Photo Gallery
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: Home
214: Downloads
215: Home
216: Member Screenshots
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: News Archive
221: Photo Gallery
222: Home
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Your Account
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Downloads
231: Community Forums
232: Photo Gallery
233: Home
234: Home
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Home
239: Home
240: Photo Gallery
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Downloads
245: Downloads
246: Photo Gallery
247: Home
248: Home
249: Photo Gallery
250: Photo Gallery
251: Home
252: Photo Gallery
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Photo Gallery
257: Home
258: Photo Gallery
259: Home
260: Home
261: Community Forums
262: Home
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: News Archive
268: News
269: News
270: Downloads
271: Home
272: Home
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: Photo Gallery
276: Downloads
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Photo Gallery
280: Home
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Home
285: Photo Gallery
286: Community Forums
287: Home
288: Community Forums
289: Home
290: Home
291: Member Screenshots
292: Community Forums
293: Home
294: Photo Gallery
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Home
299: Downloads
300: Home
301: Photo Gallery
302: Home
303: Community Forums
304: Home
305: Home
306: Home
307: Community Forums
308: Home
309: Community Forums
310: Home
311: Home
312: Downloads
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Downloads
316: Community Forums
317: Home
318: Photo Gallery
319: Photo Gallery
320: Home
321: Photo Gallery
322: Home
323: Home
324: Home
325: Photo Gallery
326: Statistics
327: Your Account
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Photo Gallery
331: Home
332: Home
333: Photo Gallery
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Photo Gallery
339: Photo Gallery
340: Community Forums
341: Home
342: Downloads
343: Community Forums
344: Photo Gallery
345: Photo Gallery
346: Home
347: Community Forums
348: Downloads
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Photo Gallery
352: Community Forums
353: Photo Gallery
354: Photo Gallery
355: Member Screenshots
356: Home
357: Downloads
358: Home
359: News
360: Community Forums
361: Home
362: Statistics
363: Photo Gallery
364: Home
365: Community Forums
366: Your Account
367: Photo Gallery
368: Home
369: Home
370: Photo Gallery
371: Community Forums
372: Home
373: Home
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Home
378: Photo Gallery
379: Home
380: Home
381: Downloads
382: Photo Gallery
383: Downloads
384: Photo Gallery
385: Downloads
386: Community Forums
387: Photo Gallery
388: Statistics
389: Home
390: Home
391: Home
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: News
395: Downloads
396: Photo Gallery
397: Photo Gallery
398: Home
399: Photo Gallery
400: Members List
401: Photo Gallery
402: Statistics
403: Home
404: Community Forums
405: Home
406: Community Forums
407: Photo Gallery
408: Home
409: Downloads
410: Home
411: News Archive
412: Photo Gallery
413: Photo Gallery
414: Photo Gallery
415: Community Forums
416: Home
417: Photo Gallery
418: Home
419: Home
420: Member Screenshots
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Downloads
424: Community Forums
425: Home
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Home
429: Photo Gallery
430: Photo Gallery
431: Home
432: Community Forums
433: Home
434: Home
435: Home
436: Home
437: Home
438: Home
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Photo Gallery
444: Community Forums
445: Home
446: Downloads
447: Home
448: Home
449: Photo Gallery
450: Community Forums
451: Home
452: Photo Gallery
453: Home
454: Photo Gallery
455: Home
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Home
461: Community Forums
462: Downloads
463: Home
464: Home
465: Home
466: Home
467: Photo Gallery
468: Downloads
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Home
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Community Forums
475: Home
476: Community Forums
477: Photo Gallery
478: Downloads
479: Community Forums
480: Photo Gallery
481: Home
482: Home
483: Photo Gallery
484: Photo Gallery
485: Home
486: Home
487: Home
488: Home
489: Community Forums
490: Home
491: Home
492: Photo Gallery
493: Home
494: Your Account
495: Photo Gallery
496: Downloads
497: Home
498: Photo Gallery
499: Home
500: Photo Gallery
501: News
502: Home
503: Photo Gallery
504: Statistics
505: Home
506: Photo Gallery
507: Community Forums
508: Home
509: Home
510: Community Forums
511: Downloads
512: Photo Gallery
513: Community Forums
514: Home
515: Downloads
516: Home
517: Photo Gallery
518: Community Forums
519: Photo Gallery
520: Home
521: Community Forums
522: Home
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Photo Gallery
527: Community Forums
528: Photo Gallery
529: Community Forums
530: Home
531: Community Forums
532: Member Screenshots
533: Home
534: Home
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Photo Gallery
538: Home
539: Home
540: Photo Gallery
541: Photo Gallery
542: Member Screenshots
543: Home
544: Community Forums
545: Community Forums
546: Home
547: Home
548: Photo Gallery
549: Downloads
550: Photo Gallery
551: Photo Gallery
552: Home
553: Community Forums
554: Photo Gallery
555: Community Forums
556: Home
557: Photo Gallery
558: Statistics
559: Home
560: Community Forums
561: Home
562: Photo Gallery
563: Community Forums
564: Photo Gallery
565: Photo Gallery
566: Home
567: Community Forums
568: Home
569: Home
570: Community Forums
571: Community Forums
572: Statistics
573: Community Forums
574: Home
575: Home
576: Community Forums
577: Home
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: Home
581: Community Forums
582: Community Forums
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Photo Gallery
586: Photo Gallery
587: Home
588: Home
589: News Archive
590: Home
591: Home
592: Community Forums
593: Statistics
594: Community Forums
595: Home
596: Home
597: Home
598: Community Forums
599: Home
600: Photo Gallery
601: Home
602: Community Forums
603: Photo Gallery
604: Home
605: Home
606: Photo Gallery
607: Home
608: Community Forums
609: Community Forums
610: Home
611: Community Forums
612: Community Forums
613: Home
614: Home
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Community Forums
618: Community Forums
619: Community Forums
620: Home
621: Home
622: Downloads
623: Community Forums
624: Community Forums
625: Photo Gallery
626: Photo Gallery
627: Community Forums
628: Home
629: Downloads
630: Community Forums
631: Statistics
632: Community Forums
633: Community Forums
634: Home
635: Photo Gallery
636: Community Forums
637: Photo Gallery
638: Community Forums
639: Photo Gallery
640: Home
641: Home
642: Community Forums
643: Home
644: Community Forums
645: Home
646: Community Forums
647: Photo Gallery
648: Photo Gallery
649: Home
650: News
651: News Archive
652: Home
653: Photo Gallery
654: Community Forums
655: Community Forums
656: Statistics
657: Community Forums
658: Photo Gallery
659: Home
660: Community Forums
661: Photo Gallery
662: Home
663: Photo Gallery
664: Home
665: Home
666: Photo Gallery
667: Home
668: Community Forums
669: Home
670: Community Forums
671: Community Forums
672: Home
673: Home
674: News
675: Photo Gallery
676: Home
677: Home
678: Community Forums
679: Community Forums
680: Downloads
681: Home
682: Home
683: Home
684: Home
685: Home
686: Your Account
687: News Archive
688: Home
689: Downloads
690: Home
691: Home
692: Photo Gallery
693: Downloads
694: Community Forums
695: Home
696: News Archive
697: Home
698: Community Forums
699: Member Screenshots
700: News Archive
701: Photo Gallery
702: Photo Gallery
703: Home
704: Home
705: Community Forums
706: Home
707: Downloads
708: Photo Gallery
709: Home
710: Photo Gallery
711: Home
712: Community Forums
713: Home
714: Photo Gallery
715: Downloads
716: Home
717: Community Forums
718: Photo Gallery
719: Photo Gallery
720: Home
721: Photo Gallery
722: Home
723: Home
724: Community Forums
725: Home
726: Home
727: Home
728: Community Forums
729: Photo Gallery
730: Member Screenshots
731: Community Forums
732: Home
733: Photo Gallery
734: Home
735: Home
736: Home
737: Community Forums
738: Home
739: Home
740: Home
741: Photo Gallery
742: Downloads
743: Community Forums
744: Community Forums
745: Home
746: Home
747: Home
748: Home
749: Home
750: Community Forums
751: Community Forums
752: Photo Gallery
753: Community Forums
754: Community Forums
755: Community Forums
756: Community Forums
757: Downloads
758: Community Forums
759: Photo Gallery
760: Home
761: Member Screenshots
762: Community Forums
763: Community Forums
764: Home
765: Community Forums
766: Community Forums
767: Home
768: Home
769: Home
770: Community Forums
771: Home
772: Home
773: Home
774: Community Forums
775: Home
776: Home
777: Home
778: Community Forums
779: Home
780: Community Forums
781: Member Screenshots
782: Member Screenshots
783: Community Forums
784: Community Forums
785: Community Forums
786: Community Forums
787: Home
788: Home
789: Community Forums
790: Home
791: Community Forums
792: Community Forums
793: Member Screenshots
794: Home
795: Home
796: Home
797: Community Forums
798: Downloads
799: Community Forums
800: Photo Gallery
801: Home
802: Photo Gallery
803: Member Screenshots
804: Home
805: Home
806: Home
807: Home
808: Home
809: Home
810: Community Forums
811: Photo Gallery
812: Community Forums
813: Photo Gallery
814: Home
815: Downloads
816: Home
817: Member Screenshots
818: Community Forums
819: Home
820: Community Forums
821: Community Forums
822: Home
823: Home
824: Community Forums
825: Home
826: Community Forums
827: Downloads
828: Downloads
829: Photo Gallery
830: Home
831: Community Forums
832: Community Forums
833: Downloads
834: Home
835: Community Forums
836: Photo Gallery
837: Home
838: Photo Gallery
839: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Sherman Firefly
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 6:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Hi folks,

well I think that the TD may not have been blocking the introduction of an more powerfull gun, officially
However I also think they where not to happy with the idea and mostlikly when asked they wouldn't have said that it would be an good option
From what I know about the US TD branch, at the beginning of WW2 they where not even keep on putting there AT gun on track's
Only after complaints of the frontline that the AT guns good not keep pace with the rest of the army, they started shift to SP versions

- bsmart
And yes I like discussions like this. We used to have them more often , maybe they will come back


Let's hope so

Some-one else has something to discuss ?
I'm open to all points concerning AFV's, except one thing: paint colors


About mixing them up
After the war the Dutch army also used the 3 different gun sizes, however I dont know how these tanks where mixed together

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 6:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss
Hi folks,

....I'm open to all points concerning AFV's, except one thing: paint colors

Michel


I think you're going to fit right in here. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:22 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Hi,

For all of the 'old' AFV News site alumnus, we had a fairly long discussion about this on 'ye olde borde'. That discussion was mainly focused on the delays in fielding the 90mm guns, but I recall a good deal of good information regarding the differences between the 17 pdr and the 76mm.

There was some fairly well reasoned and documented arguments that involved the poor performance (nonavailability?) of the 17 pdr HE rounds. The War Department placed a good deal of importance on the availability of the HE rounds, partly because of lingering traces of doctrine emphasizing the infantry-support aspects of armor tactics. I seem to recall some knowledgeable assertions that British industry simply couldn't supply adequate numbers of the 17 pdr guns and ammunition without shorting their own forces. Apparently the 76mm gun was actually in development well before it was deemed necessary for installation in Sherman tanks, and it was relatively simple to ramp production up and supply conversion kits that would exactly match the existing chassis.

I believe that "shatter gap" played a role, somehow, in ways that I'm apparently too thick to grasp. At least I THINK that is what he was trying to say... Shocked Rolling Eyes Smile

I'm not sure if any of that was archived, but I though it was interesting that the discussion isn't really new for some of us! Welcome Wink

Chuck

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JWB2
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 199

PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 6:49 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Here is a tech paper abstract on shatter gap.
oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&...=ADA284904

If you more just Google. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 11:45 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

C. Sherman brings up memories of the old discussions (We all looked at the elephant from slightly different angles)

I believe that some of the folks that complain about the choices made for equiping American forces in WWII minimize the effort and time required in making a change. The Northwest European campaign was actually fairly short (only 11 months from D-Day to V-E day) and equipment being used had been produced in some case 2 years before and stockpiles built up in preperation for the high consumption rates of an active campaign. At the same time the priorities of this campaign were only a few of the many competing priorities of a global war. Once the Army decided where it's priorities were for 75mm, 76mm, 90mm, etc they had to present those priorities to 'War Production Boards' that had similar information from the Navy, Air Force, Industrial Production, Allied Procurement. The allocation of 'machine shop' resources had to balance out the various needs. Shutting down a plant to convert it from 'outmoded' 3" AA guns to 76mm or 17pdr guns would probably be fought by the Navy which wanted more medium AA guns for the Pacific Fleet, Allied Procurement that would rather have production continue because the 3" was acceptable to the Chinese who were just starting to recieve shipments after the higher priority needs had been met and the Industrial Production folks who want to use the machine tools to make more machine tools so they can give you twice as many 76mm in six months once they build the machines to equip two more factories.

Then the 'doctrine' arguments come in to play. The well known ones (because it is generally accepted it was flawed) like TDs v Tanks as well as lessor thought of ones that decided that tanks would probably spend more time in infantry support than in killing other tanks (Yes I know the two are related but everything is related eventually) If you accept the need to equip the tanks to handle multiple tasks like infantry support you have to make a doctrinal decision on how to balance the roles. The U.S. Army settled on a 'jack of all trades' doctrine that set a broad doctrine that the main armament had to do an adequate job of handling H.E. type (bursting) targets as well as penetrating (Tank Killing) targets. The British leaned much further towards the main tank gun as being a penetrating weapon. In the pre and early war years it lead to two versions of each tank. One (the primary production model) had a higher velocity wepon that fired solid shot to penetrate. The other (in much lower production and deployment) was equiped with a howitzer that fired smoke and H.E. rounds. In Brazen Chariots robert Crisp laments the fact they did not have a good weapon to counter their nemesis the AT gun. Even after the British moved to the larger guns (6pdr and 75mm) they retained the diachotomy of penetrating and bursting weapons. While the American AP rounds were designed with a bursting charge in them rounds supplied to the British were not filled with the HE filler.

The U.S. recognized the need for a multipurpose weapon and early on settled on the medium velocity 75mm. At the time it had good penetration and good bursting capability. As opposing tanks got thicker skins the penetraing capability quickly went down to 'barely adequate' While a partial solution was in the pipeline with the 76mm I think they correctly saw the need for a balanced weapon that continued to provide a good bursting capability. How much evaluation went into deciding which would be used the most I don't know but I think they got the balance right. More use was actually made of the tank gun as a bursting (i.e. H.E. delivery) weapon than as a tank killing weapon. I think that if they had had the foresight to step up to a 90mm class weapon earlier we wouldn't even be having this discussion but I don't think that spending a lot of effort in adapting a foreign specialist weapon would have been the right way to go.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2069
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 2:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

I feel I have just opened up a time warp to the old pre spam bot site Laughing

It's nice to have a discussion like this happening again. I learn quite a bit from these.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 5:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Let's start up the fire an little higher Twisted Evil

After the US invasion of Northern Africa, operation Torch 1942-11, it was already clear that the Sherman lacked behind in fire power
However in 1944-06 there was little to no change in this

In the meantime:
- The German army switched from the 75mm on the Pz IV to the even more deadly 75mm on the Pz 5
- The Russian army had changed from the T34/76 to the T34/85
- The British army had changed from Crusaders to Churchill. I know they classified their tanks different, however they tried to do something

So why was it clear to al nations to upgrade their weapons to an more powerful type of weapon
And the US did not, untill the last month of the war??

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss


So why was it clear to al nations to upgrade their weapons to an more powerful type of weapon
And the US did not, untill the last month of the war??

Michel


The short answer is logistics (and inertia in the system). The domestic war machine production lines were humming along nicely, the outcome of the conflict was not really in question, and there were constraints to what could be changed in a period of time that would affect the outcome when what was already being done was working (looking at the overall). New guns, bigger tanks (M26) all incur delays and other complications (production, shipping, support) when the numbers were working for the allies with what they had.

Fair to the crews? Probably not.
Effective in the end result? Outcome speaks for itself.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Doug_Kibbey
The short answer is logistics (and inertia in the system). The domestic war machine production lines were humming along nicely, the outcome of the conflict was not really in question, and there were constraints to what could be changed in a period of time that would affect the outcome when what was already being done was working (looking at the overall). New guns, bigger tanks (M26) all incur delays and other complications (production, shipping, support) when the numbers were working for the allies with what they had


That's an interresting point of view, logistic's
However development on the Sherman follow-up, being the M26, already started beginning 1942
And this development was dropped, later on in 1942, to an absolute minimum effort because command decided that the Sheman was still adéquat
At that periode of time the outcome of the war was not decided
An positive outcome became possible in 1943

Command already knew in 1942 that the Sherman was no match for the Tiger 1 or the long barreled 75mm Pz IV
They had that experienced in Africa and the other allies (being UK and Russia) told them that Germany was developing new weapons

The logistic point of shipping is also interresting
Why was it possible to ship complete steam locomtives, however not an heavier tank?

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 10:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss


That's an interresting point of view, logistic's
However development on the Sherman follow-up, being the M26, already started beginning 1942
And this development was dropped, later on in 1942, to an absolute minimum effort because command decided that the Sheman was still adéquat
At that periode of time the outcome of the war was not decided
An positive outcome became possible in 1943

Command already knew in 1942 that the Sherman was no match for the Tiger 1 or the long barreled 75mm Pz IV
They had that experienced in Africa and the other allies (being UK and Russia) told them that Germany was developing new weapons

The logistic point of shipping is also interresting
Why was it possible to ship complete steam locomtives, however not an heavier tank?

Michel


1. Development is not production, it takes quite a while to convert prototype models and adapt existing lines to mass production....and assumes the product is even ready. The M26 wasn't and there were a number of unsatisfactory reports coming out of the evaluations board that revealed deficiencies that needed correction. Short version, as presented in the '42-'43 timeframe, the vehicle was unacceptable.

2. Logistics is more than altering load plans on transport ships. It's having a pool of replacement parts, trained crews, adequate supplies of ammo, and infrastructure to support transport on the other side of the pond. Engineers, for example, objected mightily to the weight and width of the M26 as it exceeded the capacity of the bridging that was correctly foreseen as necessary for European operations. Parking places on Liberty Ships are perhaps not the least of the problems, but they certainly don't end there.

Could things have been done better or more expediently? Sure.
Was the solution set adequate to the task at hand? Apparently so.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 11:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Although the US Army had known of the Tiger and Panther in 1942-1943, they were rarely encountered and presumed to be heavy tanks, not the main weapons of the panzer divisions. While a difficult foe, it was thought that the Germans would continue to field the Pz IV as their main weapon. This was the tank we expected to fight. (And I'm not certain that the Pz IV *wasn't* the tank most commonly seen in the ETO after all.) The realization that there was something bigger out there *that we would have to fight regularly* didn't come until June/July 1944.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 12:18 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

I'll chime in here

1) "After the US invasion of Northern Africa, operation Torch 1942-11, it was already clear that the Sherman lacked behind in fire power
However in 1944-06 there was little to no change in this"

In Nov 42 The Sherman was 'state of the art' In fact deliveries were in short supply because of the ones that were rushed to 8th Army in Egypt ( A long trip all the way around Africa) The first shipment was sunk and had to be replaced at the last minute. The Convoy left the east coast US at the end of July and arrived in Egypt Sept 2.
www.usmm.org/seatraintexas.html

(This was one of two very special ships that was designed to haul heavy rail equipment and perfect for hauling tanks. 70 ton crains and high clearance heavy duty decks)

With all this being sent to the British the Americans in TORCH had to keep their M3 Lees. Somewhere else said that in '42 they should have known that the Sherman was inferior to the Tiger. I think the Tiger didn't debut until Mid 43 (about the same time as the Panther) So until they came out in Mid 43 (not 42) There was no direct proof that the Sherman was outclassed.. Yes it could be expected and work was being done on larger tanks but there was no direct evidence.

So IF at the immediate appearance of the Tiger in North Africa (May 43?) a rush effort was started to modify a Sherman with a larger gun there would be a year to develop, test, build train and deploy the new version to have it ready for D-Day. This MAY have been possible if everyone would have agreed it was neccesary but with the end user not seeing it as a major emergency it didn't get the priority it would have needed. As it was the 76mm version went into production in Feb '44 and was starting to appear in units at D-Day. That was a pretty good job

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:31 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

I usually don't get into these type discussions since my Sherman knowledge is lacking.

However, I do think that there is one 'exception'. Case in point is the M4A3E2. The earliest 'mention' to the idea is Feb 44, limited production in May/June/July 44, Shipment beginning in Sept 44, and in the hands of the Troops beginning in Sept 44. Now thats fast, even by todays standards......

BUT doesn't really prove anything except there is always one exception to any case......

I'll shut up & try to learn somemore from this kniowledgable panel. A very deep discussion that is an excellent read.

Thanks
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2069
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:48 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

But Don,

It actually proves the opposite,

Specialty vehicle made specifically for ETO and then dropped like a hot potato when the war ended. The one advantage was she did use the 75mm and later 76mm gun so ammo wouldn't be an issue like the 17pdr.

I'll shut up & try to learn somemore from this kniowledgable panel


I feel the same way on this one but I don't use the "Bugs Bunny" vernacular
kniowledgable
Laughing

Eagerly awaiting more on this subject

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:17 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Joe

Actually I was sorta leaning to the 'concept to combat' in general. I don't know of any other Armored Vehicle that bridged that gap so quickly,....EVER!

But since the M4A3E2 was only a modified M4A3, able to use onhand items or supplies there really wasn't any changes to the 'LOG trail'. Although it did present some transportation issues.

Of course with the whole Sherman issue (or more properly Medium tank...), I see it as a 'good enough' solution and became more of a Mass production issue of 'Quantity over Quality'. (Not implying that it wasn't a well built machine, but definitely not the 'Wunder Waffe' that the German Heavy Tanks was termed)

Just my 2 cents
Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 5
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum