±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 466
Total: 466
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: News
04: Community Forums
05: Photo Gallery
06: Member Screenshots
07: Home
08: Downloads
09: Member Screenshots
10: Photo Gallery
11: Member Screenshots
12: Community Forums
13: Home
14: Home
15: Photo Gallery
16: Home
17: Home
18: Home
19: Member Screenshots
20: Member Screenshots
21: Supporters
22: Home
23: Photo Gallery
24: Member Screenshots
25: News Archive
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Member Screenshots
29: Home
30: Home
31: Member Screenshots
32: Member Screenshots
33: Photo Gallery
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Member Screenshots
39: News Archive
40: Home
41: Community Forums
42: Home
43: Home
44: Photo Gallery
45: News Archive
46: Home
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Home
57: Home
58: Home
59: Photo Gallery
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Member Screenshots
65: Home
66: Home
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Home
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Downloads
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Home
76: Statistics
77: News Archive
78: Photo Gallery
79: Downloads
80: Community Forums
81: Photo Gallery
82: Community Forums
83: Photo Gallery
84: News Archive
85: Downloads
86: Photo Gallery
87: Photo Gallery
88: Home
89: Downloads
90: Photo Gallery
91: Downloads
92: Downloads
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: News Archive
99: Home
100: Tell a Friend
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: News Archive
104: Home
105: Home
106: Home
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: Downloads
111: Member Screenshots
112: Member Screenshots
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Your Account
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Downloads
120: Statistics
121: Photo Gallery
122: Community Forums
123: Member Screenshots
124: Community Forums
125: Downloads
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Photo Gallery
135: Community Forums
136: Member Screenshots
137: News Archive
138: News Archive
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Photo Gallery
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Member Screenshots
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Home
150: Home
151: Home
152: Member Screenshots
153: Home
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Member Screenshots
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Home
165: Home
166: Member Screenshots
167: Community Forums
168: Photo Gallery
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Home
172: Home
173: Home
174: Home
175: Photo Gallery
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Photo Gallery
181: Photo Gallery
182: News Archive
183: News Archive
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Downloads
188: Community Forums
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: Community Forums
194: News Archive
195: Community Forums
196: Photo Gallery
197: Community Forums
198: Photo Gallery
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Member Screenshots
210: Home
211: Home
212: Photo Gallery
213: Community Forums
214: Photo Gallery
215: Member Screenshots
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: News Archive
224: Member Screenshots
225: Home
226: Home
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Home
230: Community Forums
231: Home
232: Home
233: Member Screenshots
234: Downloads
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Member Screenshots
239: Member Screenshots
240: Photo Gallery
241: Community Forums
242: Home
243: Home
244: Photo Gallery
245: Downloads
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Downloads
249: Community Forums
250: Photo Gallery
251: Home
252: Downloads
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Downloads
259: Downloads
260: Home
261: Community Forums
262: Home
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Member Screenshots
267: Home
268: News Archive
269: Community Forums
270: Your Account
271: Home
272: Home
273: Home
274: Home
275: Home
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Photo Gallery
279: Member Screenshots
280: Home
281: Community Forums
282: Photo Gallery
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Home
287: Photo Gallery
288: Photo Gallery
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: Photo Gallery
292: Photo Gallery
293: Home
294: Community Forums
295: Home
296: Member Screenshots
297: Home
298: Home
299: Photo Gallery
300: Community Forums
301: Statistics
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Photo Gallery
305: Home
306: Home
307: Member Screenshots
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Member Screenshots
311: Home
312: Member Screenshots
313: Community Forums
314: Home
315: Home
316: Member Screenshots
317: Photo Gallery
318: Member Screenshots
319: News Archive
320: Member Screenshots
321: Community Forums
322: Home
323: Photo Gallery
324: Member Screenshots
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Home
328: Home
329: Home
330: Member Screenshots
331: Downloads
332: Member Screenshots
333: Home
334: Member Screenshots
335: Photo Gallery
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Your Account
339: Community Forums
340: Downloads
341: Downloads
342: Home
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Downloads
346: Community Forums
347: Member Screenshots
348: Photo Gallery
349: Home
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Photo Gallery
354: Photo Gallery
355: News Archive
356: Downloads
357: Home
358: Home
359: Community Forums
360: Photo Gallery
361: Community Forums
362: Member Screenshots
363: Home
364: Member Screenshots
365: Home
366: Home
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Member Screenshots
373: Member Screenshots
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Home
380: Community Forums
381: Member Screenshots
382: Member Screenshots
383: Photo Gallery
384: Statistics
385: Member Screenshots
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Community Forums
389: Member Screenshots
390: News Archive
391: Member Screenshots
392: Community Forums
393: Home
394: Community Forums
395: Photo Gallery
396: Community Forums
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Downloads
400: Community Forums
401: Home
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Home
405: Home
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Photo Gallery
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Home
415: Member Screenshots
416: Home
417: Home
418: Community Forums
419: Home
420: Home
421: Home
422: News
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Home
426: Photo Gallery
427: Downloads
428: Home
429: Community Forums
430: News
431: Community Forums
432: Home
433: Home
434: News Archive
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Home
438: Home
439: Member Screenshots
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Home
444: Home
445: Home
446: Home
447: Home
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Home
451: Community Forums
452: Home
453: Community Forums
454: Downloads
455: Home
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: News Archive
463: Home
464: Photo Gallery
465: Home
466: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2068
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2068
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum