±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 435
Total: 435
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Home
07: Member Screenshots
08: Community Forums
09: Home
10: Downloads
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Photo Gallery
16: Downloads
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Member Screenshots
20: Home
21: News
22: Home
23: Home
24: Home
25: Community Forums
26: Downloads
27: Member Screenshots
28: News Archive
29: Community Forums
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Home
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Your Account
43: News Archive
44: Photo Gallery
45: Downloads
46: Home
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Home
53: Photo Gallery
54: Community Forums
55: Home
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: News Archive
59: Community Forums
60: Member Screenshots
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Downloads
65: Member Screenshots
66: Member Screenshots
67: Community Forums
68: News Archive
69: Home
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Photo Gallery
74: Supporters
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Member Screenshots
78: Community Forums
79: Contact
80: Downloads
81: News Archive
82: Member Screenshots
83: Tell a Friend
84: Photo Gallery
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: News Archive
93: Home
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: Photo Gallery
97: Home
98: Home
99: Home
100: Downloads
101: Member Screenshots
102: Community Forums
103: Photo Gallery
104: Community Forums
105: Photo Gallery
106: Home
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Home
111: Home
112: Home
113: Member Screenshots
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Downloads
118: Community Forums
119: News Archive
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Photo Gallery
123: Home
124: Photo Gallery
125: Community Forums
126: Photo Gallery
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Home
131: Community Forums
132: Home
133: Member Screenshots
134: Community Forums
135: Member Screenshots
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Home
140: Your Account
141: Home
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: News Archive
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Member Screenshots
172: Contact
173: Downloads
174: Community Forums
175: Member Screenshots
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Member Screenshots
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Photo Gallery
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Member Screenshots
192: Community Forums
193: Your Account
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Home
200: Member Screenshots
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Member Screenshots
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Downloads
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Home
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Photo Gallery
226: Member Screenshots
227: Member Screenshots
228: Community Forums
229: Downloads
230: Downloads
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Downloads
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Home
239: Community Forums
240: Home
241: Photo Gallery
242: Home
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Your Account
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Home
251: Downloads
252: Community Forums
253: Home
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Downloads
257: Community Forums
258: Home
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Photo Gallery
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Downloads
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Home
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: News
284: Home
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: News Archive
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Home
294: Home
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: LinkToUs
298: Downloads
299: Downloads
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Home
303: Community Forums
304: Search
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Home
309: Photo Gallery
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Your Account
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Photo Gallery
316: Home
317: News Archive
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Photo Gallery
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Home
326: Community Forums
327: Photo Gallery
328: Community Forums
329: Home
330: Community Forums
331: Home
332: Downloads
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Community Forums
340: Home
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Downloads
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Downloads
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Home
360: Home
361: Member Screenshots
362: Downloads
363: Community Forums
364: Home
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Home
369: Home
370: Community Forums
371: Photo Gallery
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Home
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Home
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Photo Gallery
381: Community Forums
382: News
383: Home
384: Community Forums
385: Photo Gallery
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Community Forums
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Home
394: Community Forums
395: Photo Gallery
396: Home
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Community Forums
402: Downloads
403: Downloads
404: Downloads
405: Your Account
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Home
410: Downloads
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Home
414: Home
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Home
418: Home
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: Member Screenshots
425: Member Screenshots
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Home
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Home
432: Home
433: Home
434: Community Forums
435: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum