±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 394
Total: 394
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Member Screenshots
02: Community Forums
03: Photo Gallery
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Member Screenshots
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Photo Gallery
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: News Archive
17: Member Screenshots
18: Community Forums
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Photo Gallery
24: Home
25: Your Account
26: Community Forums
27: Downloads
28: Photo Gallery
29: Photo Gallery
30: Community Forums
31: Photo Gallery
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Member Screenshots
37: News Archive
38: Community Forums
39: Photo Gallery
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Home
43: Photo Gallery
44: News Archive
45: Downloads
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Member Screenshots
49: Community Forums
50: Photo Gallery
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Member Screenshots
54: Photo Gallery
55: Home
56: Photo Gallery
57: Community Forums
58: Photo Gallery
59: Member Screenshots
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: News Archive
69: Your Account
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Member Screenshots
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Downloads
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Member Screenshots
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Member Screenshots
83: News Archive
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Downloads
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Downloads
91: News Archive
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Downloads
97: Member Screenshots
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Member Screenshots
107: Your Account
108: Community Forums
109: News Archive
110: Home
111: Member Screenshots
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Home
115: Member Screenshots
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Photo Gallery
120: Downloads
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Member Screenshots
130: Member Screenshots
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Community Forums
140: Member Screenshots
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: News Archive
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Your Account
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: News Archive
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Downloads
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Statistics
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Downloads
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Member Screenshots
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Member Screenshots
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Member Screenshots
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Your Account
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Photo Gallery
194: Photo Gallery
195: Home
196: Photo Gallery
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Downloads
200: Photo Gallery
201: Photo Gallery
202: Community Forums
203: News Archive
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Member Screenshots
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Photo Gallery
217: Member Screenshots
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Photo Gallery
221: Community Forums
222: Your Account
223: Community Forums
224: Photo Gallery
225: Photo Gallery
226: Member Screenshots
227: Home
228: Home
229: Member Screenshots
230: Home
231: Downloads
232: Statistics
233: Community Forums
234: Downloads
235: Photo Gallery
236: Photo Gallery
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Member Screenshots
240: Home
241: News Archive
242: Photo Gallery
243: Photo Gallery
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: News Archive
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Home
254: Community Forums
255: Your Account
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Member Screenshots
261: News
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Home
266: Community Forums
267: Member Screenshots
268: Community Forums
269: Home
270: Community Forums
271: News Archive
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Photo Gallery
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Home
279: Downloads
280: Downloads
281: Community Forums
282: Photo Gallery
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Photo Gallery
287: News Archive
288: Community Forums
289: Your Account
290: Member Screenshots
291: Your Account
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Member Screenshots
296: Your Account
297: Home
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Member Screenshots
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Downloads
304: Community Forums
305: Downloads
306: Member Screenshots
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Photo Gallery
311: News Archive
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: News Archive
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: News Archive
322: Community Forums
323: Home
324: News Archive
325: Community Forums
326: News Archive
327: Member Screenshots
328: News Archive
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Photo Gallery
332: Community Forums
333: Home
334: Community Forums
335: Photo Gallery
336: Your Account
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: News Archive
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Downloads
347: Photo Gallery
348: Community Forums
349: News
350: Community Forums
351: Member Screenshots
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Home
357: Home
358: Home
359: Home
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Home
363: Community Forums
364: Member Screenshots
365: Community Forums
366: Home
367: Community Forums
368: Home
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Your Account
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Member Screenshots
380: Community Forums
381: Home
382: Home
383: Community Forums
384: Member Screenshots
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Photo Gallery
388: Community Forums
389: Member Screenshots
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum