±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 357
Total: 357
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Downloads
02: Home
03: Home
04: Home
05: Home
06: Photo Gallery
07: Community Forums
08: News Archive
09: Home
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Photo Gallery
16: Home
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Home
25: Members List
26: Photo Gallery
27: Photo Gallery
28: Home
29: Home
30: Photo Gallery
31: Home
32: Members List
33: Downloads
34: Home
35: News Archive
36: Member Screenshots
37: Home
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Home
44: Home
45: Members List
46: Photo Gallery
47: Home
48: Home
49: Home
50: Statistics
51: Home
52: Home
53: Photo Gallery
54: Community Forums
55: Photo Gallery
56: Home
57: Downloads
58: Home
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: News Archive
64: Home
65: Home
66: Home
67: Home
68: Photo Gallery
69: Community Forums
70: Member Screenshots
71: Home
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Member Screenshots
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: Member Screenshots
81: Home
82: Home
83: News Archive
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Photo Gallery
88: Community Forums
89: Statistics
90: Community Forums
91: Member Screenshots
92: Home
93: Home
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Home
98: Home
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: News Archive
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Photo Gallery
105: Member Screenshots
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Home
111: Member Screenshots
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: News Archive
115: Member Screenshots
116: Community Forums
117: Member Screenshots
118: Member Screenshots
119: Home
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Home
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Member Screenshots
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: Member Screenshots
132: Community Forums
133: Photo Gallery
134: Member Screenshots
135: Home
136: Home
137: Home
138: Community Forums
139: Statistics
140: Home
141: News Archive
142: Home
143: Photo Gallery
144: Member Screenshots
145: Home
146: Home
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Home
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Home
154: News Archive
155: Community Forums
156: Photo Gallery
157: Home
158: News Archive
159: Home
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Photo Gallery
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Downloads
168: Home
169: Home
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Home
174: Community Forums
175: Member Screenshots
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Downloads
179: Photo Gallery
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Home
187: Member Screenshots
188: Photo Gallery
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Downloads
192: Photo Gallery
193: Home
194: Photo Gallery
195: Community Forums
196: Downloads
197: Home
198: Home
199: Home
200: Home
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Home
204: Downloads
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Home
208: Home
209: Home
210: Home
211: Community Forums
212: Photo Gallery
213: Photo Gallery
214: Photo Gallery
215: Home
216: Home
217: News Archive
218: Downloads
219: Statistics
220: Home
221: Downloads
222: Home
223: Your Account
224: Photo Gallery
225: Member Screenshots
226: Home
227: Home
228: Downloads
229: Home
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Photo Gallery
233: Home
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Downloads
241: Downloads
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Member Screenshots
245: Home
246: News
247: Home
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Photo Gallery
253: Community Forums
254: Member Screenshots
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Members List
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Members List
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Downloads
275: Members List
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Downloads
279: Member Screenshots
280: Member Screenshots
281: Community Forums
282: Home
283: Community Forums
284: Photo Gallery
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Home
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Downloads
291: Photo Gallery
292: Home
293: Home
294: Community Forums
295: Home
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Home
299: Community Forums
300: News Archive
301: Home
302: Downloads
303: Community Forums
304: Downloads
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Member Screenshots
310: Community Forums
311: Photo Gallery
312: Photo Gallery
313: Home
314: Community Forums
315: Home
316: Home
317: Statistics
318: Photo Gallery
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Home
323: Home
324: Home
325: Community Forums
326: Home
327: Home
328: Community Forums
329: Member Screenshots
330: Home
331: Community Forums
332: Downloads
333: Community Forums
334: Home
335: Home
336: Home
337: Home
338: Home
339: Community Forums
340: Photo Gallery
341: Statistics
342: Home
343: Community Forums
344: Home
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Photo Gallery
348: Community Forums
349: Downloads
350: Home
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: Home
357: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6258
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2069
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2069
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum