±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 182
Total: 182
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Member Screenshots
05: Home
06: Member Screenshots
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Photo Gallery
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Your Account
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Home
17: Member Screenshots
18: Home
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Home
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Community Forums
31: Photo Gallery
32: Member Screenshots
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Member Screenshots
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Photo Gallery
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: Home
50: Home
51: Photo Gallery
52: Home
53: Community Forums
54: News
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Home
61: Downloads
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Home
65: Home
66: Downloads
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Home
70: Home
71: Member Screenshots
72: Downloads
73: Home
74: Downloads
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Home
78: Search
79: Home
80: Home
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Home
85: Home
86: Downloads
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Home
94: Home
95: Home
96: Supporters
97: Home
98: Home
99: Downloads
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Photo Gallery
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: Home
108: Home
109: Home
110: Home
111: Community Forums
112: Home
113: Home
114: Home
115: Home
116: Home
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Home
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Home
126: Home
127: News Archive
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Statistics
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Home
146: Member Screenshots
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Home
150: Home
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: News
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Photo Gallery
158: Photo Gallery
159: Home
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Downloads
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Photo Gallery
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Home
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Downloads
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 10:00 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I think there is a case of saying either. Since is it a newer design, I would say digital camo. The larger block pattern is similiar to that of the old 'urban camo', in the pre-digital age.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Fri May 14, 2010 7:08 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- WimD
Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?


The Leo 2 PSO was only build as an trial vehicle by Krauss Maffei Wegmann to show the German army and other users an Leo 2 configuration suited for urban warfare

So that would make this camouflage urban

Thanks to:
defense-update.com/pro...rd-PSO.htm

Is the British urban camo ever been used on an large scale with the British Berlin Brigade?
Or are there now more survivors with urban camo then there ever have been in reality Wink

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum