±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 456
Total: 456
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Member Screenshots
05: Photo Gallery
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Downloads
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Member Screenshots
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Home
17: Member Screenshots
18: Home
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Home
22: Home
23: Photo Gallery
24: Photo Gallery
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Downloads
31: Photo Gallery
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: LinkToUs
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Home
44: Downloads
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Downloads
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Home
56: Community Forums
57: Photo Gallery
58: Community Forums
59: Downloads
60: Community Forums
61: Member Screenshots
62: Downloads
63: News
64: Home
65: Photo Gallery
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Your Account
70: Community Forums
71: Member Screenshots
72: Home
73: Member Screenshots
74: Community Forums
75: Home
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Member Screenshots
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Downloads
87: Home
88: Community Forums
89: Member Screenshots
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Downloads
93: Downloads
94: Photo Gallery
95: Community Forums
96: Photo Gallery
97: Community Forums
98: Your Account
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Downloads
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Downloads
105: Downloads
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Your Account
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Downloads
113: Community Forums
114: Home
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Downloads
124: Community Forums
125: Your Account
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Photo Gallery
131: Downloads
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Downloads
139: Home
140: Member Screenshots
141: Community Forums
142: Downloads
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Photo Gallery
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Member Screenshots
150: Community Forums
151: Member Screenshots
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Photo Gallery
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Downloads
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Photo Gallery
165: Photo Gallery
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Home
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Photo Gallery
179: Photo Gallery
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: Home
184: Photo Gallery
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: Downloads
190: News
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Downloads
197: Member Screenshots
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: News
203: Statistics
204: Photo Gallery
205: Home
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Downloads
211: Home
212: Downloads
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Photo Gallery
218: Member Screenshots
219: Community Forums
220: Photo Gallery
221: Downloads
222: Home
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: News
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Home
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: News
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Photo Gallery
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Home
247: Downloads
248: Downloads
249: Search
250: Home
251: Photo Gallery
252: Photo Gallery
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Member Screenshots
257: Downloads
258: Home
259: Home
260: Home
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Photo Gallery
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Your Account
273: Photo Gallery
274: Community Forums
275: Your Account
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Photo Gallery
279: Downloads
280: Community Forums
281: Downloads
282: Photo Gallery
283: Community Forums
284: Member Screenshots
285: Home
286: Home
287: Home
288: Photo Gallery
289: Photo Gallery
290: Photo Gallery
291: Community Forums
292: Treasury
293: Home
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Member Screenshots
297: Downloads
298: Home
299: Home
300: Home
301: Downloads
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Photo Gallery
307: Community Forums
308: Statistics
309: Community Forums
310: Home
311: Home
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: Supporters
317: Your Account
318: Member Screenshots
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Photo Gallery
323: Photo Gallery
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Home
327: Downloads
328: Community Forums
329: Home
330: Community Forums
331: Home
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Home
336: Home
337: News Archive
338: News Archive
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Photo Gallery
343: Community Forums
344: Home
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: Home
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Home
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Downloads
355: Home
356: Home
357: Home
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Photo Gallery
363: Home
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: News Archive
367: News Archive
368: Downloads
369: Photo Gallery
370: Home
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: News Archive
379: Community Forums
380: Downloads
381: Your Account
382: Statistics
383: Home
384: Community Forums
385: Downloads
386: Photo Gallery
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Community Forums
390: Photo Gallery
391: Community Forums
392: Photo Gallery
393: Downloads
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Community Forums
398: Home
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: Your Account
404: Community Forums
405: Member Screenshots
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Home
409: Your Account
410: Community Forums
411: Downloads
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Home
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Home
420: Statistics
421: Treasury
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: Photo Gallery
425: Home
426: Community Forums
427: Home
428: News
429: Community Forums
430: Home
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Home
434: Community Forums
435: Downloads
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: News
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Downloads
449: Downloads
450: Home
451: Community Forums
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Home
455: Community Forums
456: News Archive

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:30 pm
Post subject: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

From Stars & Stripes. Love the quote at the end: “For soldiers who haven’t been on a tank in two to three years it (the hybrid threat exercise) is good because we get back to doing the job we enlisted in the Army for,” he said.

www.stripes.com/news/a...s-1.112354
Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'
By Seth Robson
Stars and Stripes
Published: July 26, 2010
Image_12043445.jpg
M1A1 Abrams tanks from 1-72nd Armor Regiment line up in preparation to assault a town during Warrior Focus, a training exercise at the Combined Arms Collective Training Facility at Rodriguez Live Fire Complex, South Korea. The Army has directed its commanders to start training its soldiers on hybrid threats, which means soldiers will now prepare not only for counterinsurgencies, but for conventional wars as well.
Christen Best/U.S. Army

GRAFENWÖHR, Germany — After nearly a decade of fighting insurgents, the Army is shifting its training to focus more on “hybrid threats” — in which an enemy uses a combination of conventional and unconventional warfare.

Since the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan began, Army units have been training for counterinsurgency operations, according to a Joint Multinational Training Command newsletter. But with the U.S. preparing to withdraw its combat troops from Iraq, Army leaders are directing their commanders to conduct “full-spectrum” field exercises, which would include tanks, artillery and the other conventional equipment that has not been used much in the current wars.

Col. Frank Zachar, commander of the Grafenwöhr-based 172nd Infantry Brigade, described a hybrid threat as an enemy with a greater capability than the insurgents U.S. forces have been battling in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Army Secretary Gen. George Casey said a good example of a hybrid threat is Hezbollah, the Lebanese militia whose aim is to eject Israeli forces from the occupied territories in Israel.

“It’s a mix of conventional, irregular, terrorist and criminal capabilities that are organized and employed asymmetrically. That’s what we’re going to see,” Casey said during a speech in May at the African Land Forces Summit.

Michael O’Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution specializing in defense and foreign policy, said a hybrid conflict in a place such as Iran or North Korea might mix insurgency with conventional forces and even weapons of mass destruction.

And while the Army must continue to focus on training soldiers for deployments to Afghanistan, “our military overall does not have the luxury of ignoring other possible threats and concerns.”

“We haven’t really trained for this kind of conflict, ever,” O’Hanlon said.

Yet, one Defense Department official said, America’s dominance in conventional warfare is an incentive for its enemies to use nontraditional tactics to undermine U.S. strengths and exploit its weakness.

“Preparing for this operating environment will pull the Army, and the military writ large, in two very different directions,” said Michele Flournoy, undersecretary of defense for policy.

On the one hand, the United States must be ready for irregular warfare, in which combatants blend in with civilian populations and use roadside bombs, suicide bombs and similar tactics, she said at an Army Leader Forum at the Pentagon last year, according to a DOD release.

Meanwhile, she said, the U.S. must remain prepared to deal with high-end threats, too.

To illustrate this concept, Flournoy described a scenario in which rising regional powers and rogue states use highly sophisticated technologies to deny U.S. access to critical regions and to thwart its operations. These tactics range from anti-satellite capabilities, anti-air capabilities and anti-ship weapons to weapons of mass destruction and cyber attacks.

The 172nd Infantry Brigade has been ordered by the Army to devote some of its current dwell time between combat deployments to conduct these “hybrid threat” field exercises, Zachar said.

To that end, the Joint Multinational Training Command in Hohenfels is retraining its trainers, known as the opposing forces, to “replicate the entire span of threats required” for such an exercise, according to the newsletter.

The 172nd’s public affairs officer, Maj. Joseph Buccino, said a hybrid warfare exercise would likely involve enemies comprised of a simulated conventional force equipped with tanks and artillery as well as insurgents blending into a population of civilian role-players.

The soldiers in the 172nd are excited about the training, Zachar said.

“We’re looking forward to a threat that will span the entire spectrum of conflict,” he said of the exercise. “The exciting part of this is we are going to be able to operate as a heavy brigade using all our offensive and defensive capabilities.”

The 172nd has units that can fight as either light or heavy forces, he said.

The soldiers, who spent their last deployment training Iraqi security forces and patrolling in heavily armored Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles, are ready to climb back in their tanks and Humvees.

“Many of our soldiers who came into the Army to be a tanker or an artilleryman relish the opportunity to train and operate on these systems,” he said.

Sgt. Maurice Mack, 26, of Trenton, N.J., a tanker serving with 172’s Company C, 3rd Battalion, 66th Armor Regiment, said he spent two deployments to Iraq patrolling in a Humvee as a light infantryman but did intensive tank training while serving in South Korea from 2007 to 2008.

“For soldiers who haven’t been on a tank in two to three years it (the hybrid threat exercise) is good because we get back to doing the job we enlisted in the Army for,” he said.
Back to top
View user's profile
toadmanstankpictures
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

And I thought the article was going to be about combatting Toyota Prius VBIED's!

_________________
Chris "toadman" Hughes
www.toadmanstankpictures.com
www.cafepress.com/toad...ksandstuff
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

I have some very heated comments I could make on how we got to this point,

But without going into detail, all I can say is "It's about time"

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:05 am
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

- Joe_D
I have some very heated comments I could make on how we got to this point,

But without going into detail, all I can say is "It's about time"


Amen Brother !!


A novel concept,.....Armor crewmen training on Tanks ?! Shocked

I'll bet someone got a 'bullit comment' on his OER for THAT ONE !!! ?? Rolling Eyes

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

Like our old company motto said " Death before Dismount".
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:49 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

- tanker2010
Like our old company motto said " Death before Dismount".


An armored crewman who expressed that attitude in my outfit would have been considered worse than useless.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

"Death before Dismount" was the Mantra of Tank Battalions for most of my career and at times I subscribed to it. Unfortunately it is what created those tankers that were not even trained/Qualified on M16's which led to the "TWAT" nickname.

Tanker Without A Tank = Useless.

Cold War and the Post '73 conflict caused a major rethinking of the amount of Armored forces needed, so in order to build them up rapidly we created "Armor Specialists". Troops with no basic Infantry/Rifleman Skills. I was one of those troops and if it wasn't for being assigned to a CAV unit after graduating, I would've kept that mentality(Never touched an M16 until then). During the 80's/90's, especially after "Desert Storm" , the prevalent thinking was Mechanized/Armored was the way to go. That's how the Infantry got stuck with 11M's, or as we called them (So did the 11B's) Baby/Wanna be tankers. Guys who because of the "M" ID forgot what it was to be a "Grunt". School House at Benning recognized this and eventually eliminated that MOS, Remember, 19E was 11E at one time, so unlike many on this forum, I supported the merging of the Armor School with Infantry at Benning, but 8 years ago I would've never said that. Nothing wrong with being "True" to your calling. I am a "Tanker" first, always have been, always will. But I recognized that having those basic infantry skills made me a much better tanker, especially after OIF (First hand experience/eye opener). Much like having mechanical skills beyond -10 level do. My troops/peers would give me strange looks when I would extol the benefits of knowing basic infantry skills as a PSG, but this was pre 9/11.

My biggest fear was the Armored forces would now forget how to tank, since the pendulum started swinging way to far the other way. I saw this first hand when talking with former troops of mine, many of whom haven't been on a tank for more than 2 years other than the check the block gunnery and FTX. Requirements to make promotion (Tank Commander Time/PSG time) were waived, since many would be unfairly bypassed through no fault of their own because of mission requirements. This in the past would keep you from getting promoted. Ask many former detailed recruiters (Worst job in the Army IMO). I can honestly say that as far as tanking skills go, I had much more experience with my first 2 years than many SSG's have today, just the way things are with the current world situation. Unfortunately there is a vacuum now in the NCO corp as far as intimate knowledge of their mount, with the guys who "Tanked for Sam" during the pre OIF days leaving and others being promoted up and out of the line units. Rare are the platoons that have troops who remember conducting 2-3 gunnery and 4-5 FTX's a fiscal year actually using tanks, let alone their own. In a perfect world, tankers would maintain their lethal proficiency with their mounts but able to function as Infantry squads effectively when called upon. Hopefully the powers that be can make this happen. This "Stars and Stripes" article is seems to be a step in the right direction.

Pulled my soap box out again, sorry guys , now it's time to shove it back under the bed.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

I do not, and never have, understood the mentality behind the phrase "Death Before Dismount". It implies that an armored crewman is unwilling or unable to be of meaningful service apart from his vehicle. When I was in AIT on M48's, we were trained on how to secure the M37 coax for ground use and fight on in case the vehicle needed to be abandoned.

In Vietnam, dismounted patrols and dismounted ambushes were a daily requirement and any crewman who had dared refuse such an assignment (I know not of one even having been ordered to go) would have been spoken of in most unflattering terms by his fellow troopers.

I would note that no one was considered above this duty, and that on Jan 10, 1972, G Troop suffered two KIA's on a dismounted patrol....Roger Kojetin (KIA on the spot) and William Marshall Clark, the Troop CO, who succumbed to his wounds from that engagement a few weeks later.

What Was The Most Dangerous Job In Vietnam?

Armor Crewman
(MOS 11E)
27% KIA
Source: Combat Area Casualty File 11/93 Nat'l Archives

Many of those performing dismounted operations did so even as assigned to an armored vehicle. And many an 11E found himself assigned as an 11D and in other than an armor unit (as I found out myself). On a personal level, I find the phrase offensive and unrepresentative of those with which I served in two units.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

It was a friggen joke. Lighten up, Francis.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

- tanker2010
It was a friggen joke. Lighten up, Francis.


I"m glad you find it funny.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 8:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Army training to focus more on 'hybrid threats'

Guys, lets keep it civil please. Needless to say, different experiences from different eras.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum