±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 295
Total: 295
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Member Screenshots
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Member Screenshots
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Home
34: Community Forums
35: Home
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Member Screenshots
48: Downloads
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Home
57: Your Account
58: Home
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Home
63: Community Forums
64: Photo Gallery
65: Community Forums
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Downloads
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: News Archive
74: Home
75: News Archive
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Home
80: Home
81: Community Forums
82: Photo Gallery
83: Community Forums
84: Home
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: News Archive
90: News
91: Your Account
92: Community Forums
93: News
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Home
100: Home
101: Statistics
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Photo Gallery
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Downloads
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: Home
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Member Screenshots
119: Home
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: News
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: News Archive
132: Home
133: Treasury
134: Your Account
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Community Forums
150: Home
151: Home
152: Home
153: Home
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Home
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Your Account
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Search
164: Home
165: Photo Gallery
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Downloads
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: News Archive
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Photo Gallery
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Photo Gallery
192: Home
193: Photo Gallery
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Your Account
197: Community Forums
198: Photo Gallery
199: Community Forums
200: Photo Gallery
201: Home
202: Home
203: News
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: Downloads
207: Home
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Photo Gallery
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: News
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Downloads
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Home
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: Home
227: Home
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Home
231: Your Account
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Home
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Member Screenshots
243: News Archive
244: Downloads
245: News
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Photo Gallery
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Tell a Friend
257: Downloads
258: Home
259: Community Forums
260: Downloads
261: Home
262: Photo Gallery
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Your Account
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Home
275: Home
276: Downloads
277: Photo Gallery
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Downloads
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Home
288: Home
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Treasury
293: Home
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Friday in Richardson MP
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 10:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

- Kurt_Laughlin
Do the turrets have the same P/N cast into them?

KL


Kurt

I did happen to photograph a cast # on the T29 turret roof.

Ser 7
HTNO 2285

Not sure about the T30, but I can check on that on next visit.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
panamadan
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:37 am
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

Was the XM6000T planned to be a scout vehicle?
Dan
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:55 am
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

- panamadan
Was the XM6000T planned to be a scout vehicle?
Dan


Yes, it was one of two proposals for a scout vehicle, the other being the XM800W wheeled version with which it was tested in parallel.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
panamadan
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:07 am
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

Doug,
How/Why did this lose out to the Bradley/M3?
Dan
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:37 am
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

- panamadan
Doug,
How/Why did this lose out to the Bradley/M3?
Dan


Basically, it preceded that design and was deemed too dedicated a vehicle (limited role) to divert resources (funding) that could better be applied to a more flexible multi-role vehicle. In essence, a choice had to be made and the more important vehicle designed and produced.

There was considerable sensitivity at the time regarding appropriations for armored vehicles given the legacy of the MBT-70 and, to an extent, the M60A2. Armored vehicle proposals came under more critical scrutiny than had been the case prior to the '70's.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
TrevorLarkum
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 1596
Location: Northampton, England
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:03 am
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

All photo's online and entries updated at PTC:

Unique ID 1276: Fort Knox T29

Unique ID 1274: Fort Knox T29E3

Unique ID 1277: Fort Knox T30

I have also added links to ArmorForTheAges to the T29 and T30 entries.

Finally I have added a new entry for the XM800 ARSV-T, with my old photo's and Don's new ones:

Unique ID 1282: Fort Knox XM800

Don, do you have dates (at least estimates) for the transfer of the XM800 and T29E3 (and ideally T34) to RMP?

_________________
Trevor

Dr Trevor Larkum
Preserved Tanks: PreservedTanks.com
Armour Archive: ArmourArchive.co.uk
EVs
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

Trevor

Th XM800T, XM803 were moved from around Brooks Field to RMP on 4 Aug 2010.

The T29 & T30 were moved from in front of Marshall Hall to RMP on 4 Aug 2010.

The T29E3, XM1, M48A2C, M113A1, T26E3, M24, M31, M32, M41, and XM551 were moved from Keyes Park area (around the Museum) to RMP, the second week of July 2010.

The T34 Heavy Tank had been in RMP for several years. It was moved due to construction of the buildings around Serio Hall. As I recll it was in 2007 or 2008.

BTW: The photo of the T29E3 being moved was on 6 Aug when it was being relocated within RMP, as a reorganization effort of newly arrived vehicles.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
panamadan
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

- Doug_Kibbey
- panamadan
Doug,
How/Why did this lose out to the Bradley/M3?
Dan


Basically, it preceded that design and was deemed too dedicated a vehicle (limited role) to divert resources (funding) that could better be applied to a more flexible multi-role vehicle. In essence, a choice had to be made and the more important vehicle designed and produced.

There was considerable sensitivity at the time regarding appropriations for armored vehicles given the legacy of the MBT-70 and, to an extent, the M60A2. Armored vehicle proposals came under more critical scrutiny than had been the case prior to the '70's.

Do you think that this has something to do also with the Cav not having a Branch like Armor or Inf? Dan
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

Dan

I don't think it has to do with that. Remember, technically Cavalry was a branch, generations before tanks were invented.

The problem with the XM800T is its size and limited role in a budget restrictive time.

The Bradley was designed with muli-purpose roles as not only a 'battle taxi' (troop carrier) but also able to provide various mission support roles with onboard weapon systems.

The Scout / Cav side was a secondary benefit / secondary role. It became the best 'bang for the buck' eventhough there were some serious questions during development.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
panamadan
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

Don,
I don't remeber itthat way-I thought Armor officers were assigned to a Cav unit and sewed on the Cav collar patch, but only received Armor training, not "Cavalry" training. Only being a enlisted man, I never paid that much attention about it in the end.
I always wondered how much "sneaking and peeking" one could do in a vehicle that was taller that a M1...
Dan
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

Yeah, the Cavalry branch was around long before the Armor branch, but it ceased being a branch in its own right around 1950 or so...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

The Cavalry Branch lost any hope for it's future when the senior officers (including the Chief of Cavalry) insisted that the horse was the central focus of Cavalry and that motorization was NOT to be encouraged

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 7:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

- Doug_Kibbey
- Dontos

The XM800 T:





Don



As there are separate driver's and fighting compartment hatches, I wonder what the primary purpose was in having the side access door...might it have been something intended as useful during test phase only and not to be included on production vehicles? Most other vehicles do their ammo loading through the top hatches, and this was just what, 20mm?


Doug

On the right side access door there is a stowage basket for BII. This door is welded closed with the locking handle removed. The photo is taken thru the turret.



I would say the side access doors were for alternate entrance / exit as well as for reloading / uploading ammo.

Needless to say, this vehicle is cramped. It truely is a 'Mini-Bradley', with little or no spare room to speak of.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 7:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

Here are a few more views of stowage areas.





Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 7:46 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

- Dontos


Needless to say, this vehicle is cramped. It truely is a 'Mini-Bradley', with little or no spare room to speak of.

Regards
Don


Which is why I never thought it was worth the effort. Basically an M114 with the cross-country mobility kinks worked out.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 5
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum