±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 306
Total: 306
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Home
07: Community Forums
08: Photo Gallery
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Downloads
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Statistics
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Community Forums
19: Home
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Downloads
25: Community Forums
26: Photo Gallery
27: Downloads
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Home
44: Community Forums
45: Photo Gallery
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Home
53: Member Screenshots
54: Home
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Home
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Home
70: Photo Gallery
71: News Archive
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: News
89: Community Forums
90: Photo Gallery
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Member Screenshots
99: Community Forums
100: Member Screenshots
101: Downloads
102: Member Screenshots
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Member Screenshots
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Photo Gallery
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: News Archive
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Downloads
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Photo Gallery
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Community Forums
126: Home
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Search
134: Photo Gallery
135: Member Screenshots
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Home
141: Home
142: Community Forums
143: News Archive
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Home
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Member Screenshots
157: Community Forums
158: Downloads
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Statistics
170: Photo Gallery
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Downloads
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Photo Gallery
192: News
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: News Archive
204: Home
205: Member Screenshots
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: News Archive
210: News Archive
211: Home
212: Home
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Home
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: News Archive
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Home
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Member Screenshots
227: Home
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Member Screenshots
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Downloads
237: News Archive
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Photo Gallery
242: Photo Gallery
243: Home
244: Home
245: Photo Gallery
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Photo Gallery
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Home
259: Home
260: Photo Gallery
261: Home
262: Home
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Home
266: Community Forums
267: News Archive
268: Home
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Downloads
272: Downloads
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: News
276: Photo Gallery
277: Member Screenshots
278: Home
279: Home
280: Home
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Member Screenshots
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Downloads
294: Community Forums
295: Photo Gallery
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Downloads
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Home
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Friday in Richardson MP
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 10:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

- Kurt_Laughlin
Do the turrets have the same P/N cast into them?

KL


Kurt

I did happen to photograph a cast # on the T29 turret roof.

Ser 7
HTNO 2285

Not sure about the T30, but I can check on that on next visit.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
panamadan
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:37 am
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

Was the XM6000T planned to be a scout vehicle?
Dan
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:55 am
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

- panamadan
Was the XM6000T planned to be a scout vehicle?
Dan


Yes, it was one of two proposals for a scout vehicle, the other being the XM800W wheeled version with which it was tested in parallel.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
panamadan
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:07 am
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

Doug,
How/Why did this lose out to the Bradley/M3?
Dan
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:37 am
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

- panamadan
Doug,
How/Why did this lose out to the Bradley/M3?
Dan


Basically, it preceded that design and was deemed too dedicated a vehicle (limited role) to divert resources (funding) that could better be applied to a more flexible multi-role vehicle. In essence, a choice had to be made and the more important vehicle designed and produced.

There was considerable sensitivity at the time regarding appropriations for armored vehicles given the legacy of the MBT-70 and, to an extent, the M60A2. Armored vehicle proposals came under more critical scrutiny than had been the case prior to the '70's.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
TrevorLarkum
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 1596
Location: Northampton, England
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:03 am
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

All photo's online and entries updated at PTC:

Unique ID 1276: Fort Knox T29

Unique ID 1274: Fort Knox T29E3

Unique ID 1277: Fort Knox T30

I have also added links to ArmorForTheAges to the T29 and T30 entries.

Finally I have added a new entry for the XM800 ARSV-T, with my old photo's and Don's new ones:

Unique ID 1282: Fort Knox XM800

Don, do you have dates (at least estimates) for the transfer of the XM800 and T29E3 (and ideally T34) to RMP?

_________________
Trevor

Dr Trevor Larkum
Preserved Tanks: PreservedTanks.com
Armour Archive: ArmourArchive.co.uk
EVs
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

Trevor

Th XM800T, XM803 were moved from around Brooks Field to RMP on 4 Aug 2010.

The T29 & T30 were moved from in front of Marshall Hall to RMP on 4 Aug 2010.

The T29E3, XM1, M48A2C, M113A1, T26E3, M24, M31, M32, M41, and XM551 were moved from Keyes Park area (around the Museum) to RMP, the second week of July 2010.

The T34 Heavy Tank had been in RMP for several years. It was moved due to construction of the buildings around Serio Hall. As I recll it was in 2007 or 2008.

BTW: The photo of the T29E3 being moved was on 6 Aug when it was being relocated within RMP, as a reorganization effort of newly arrived vehicles.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
panamadan
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

- Doug_Kibbey
- panamadan
Doug,
How/Why did this lose out to the Bradley/M3?
Dan


Basically, it preceded that design and was deemed too dedicated a vehicle (limited role) to divert resources (funding) that could better be applied to a more flexible multi-role vehicle. In essence, a choice had to be made and the more important vehicle designed and produced.

There was considerable sensitivity at the time regarding appropriations for armored vehicles given the legacy of the MBT-70 and, to an extent, the M60A2. Armored vehicle proposals came under more critical scrutiny than had been the case prior to the '70's.

Do you think that this has something to do also with the Cav not having a Branch like Armor or Inf? Dan
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

Dan

I don't think it has to do with that. Remember, technically Cavalry was a branch, generations before tanks were invented.

The problem with the XM800T is its size and limited role in a budget restrictive time.

The Bradley was designed with muli-purpose roles as not only a 'battle taxi' (troop carrier) but also able to provide various mission support roles with onboard weapon systems.

The Scout / Cav side was a secondary benefit / secondary role. It became the best 'bang for the buck' eventhough there were some serious questions during development.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
panamadan
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 174

PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

Don,
I don't remeber itthat way-I thought Armor officers were assigned to a Cav unit and sewed on the Cav collar patch, but only received Armor training, not "Cavalry" training. Only being a enlisted man, I never paid that much attention about it in the end.
I always wondered how much "sneaking and peeking" one could do in a vehicle that was taller that a M1...
Dan
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

Yeah, the Cavalry branch was around long before the Armor branch, but it ceased being a branch in its own right around 1950 or so...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

The Cavalry Branch lost any hope for it's future when the senior officers (including the Chief of Cavalry) insisted that the horse was the central focus of Cavalry and that motorization was NOT to be encouraged

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 7:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

- Doug_Kibbey
- Dontos

The XM800 T:





Don



As there are separate driver's and fighting compartment hatches, I wonder what the primary purpose was in having the side access door...might it have been something intended as useful during test phase only and not to be included on production vehicles? Most other vehicles do their ammo loading through the top hatches, and this was just what, 20mm?


Doug

On the right side access door there is a stowage basket for BII. This door is welded closed with the locking handle removed. The photo is taken thru the turret.



I would say the side access doors were for alternate entrance / exit as well as for reloading / uploading ammo.

Needless to say, this vehicle is cramped. It truely is a 'Mini-Bradley', with little or no spare room to speak of.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 7:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

Here are a few more views of stowage areas.





Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 7:46 pm
Post subject: Re: Friday in Richardson MP

- Dontos


Needless to say, this vehicle is cramped. It truely is a 'Mini-Bradley', with little or no spare room to speak of.

Regards
Don


Which is why I never thought it was worth the effort. Basically an M114 with the cross-country mobility kinks worked out.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 5
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum