±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 295
Total: 295
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Downloads
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Photo Gallery
09: Member Screenshots
10: Community Forums
11: Member Screenshots
12: Community Forums
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Member Screenshots
17: Downloads
18: Community Forums
19: Tell a Friend
20: Member Screenshots
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: News Archive
24: Community Forums
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Home
29: Community Forums
30: Member Screenshots
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: News Archive
34: Community Forums
35: Home
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: News Archive
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Member Screenshots
42: Community Forums
43: Photo Gallery
44: Home
45: Downloads
46: Community Forums
47: News
48: Downloads
49: Member Screenshots
50: Downloads
51: Member Screenshots
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Home
59: Home
60: Home
61: Home
62: Home
63: Member Screenshots
64: Member Screenshots
65: Home
66: Downloads
67: Home
68: Home
69: Home
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Downloads
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Downloads
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Home
79: Photo Gallery
80: Home
81: Home
82: Home
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Your Account
87: Member Screenshots
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Member Screenshots
92: Community Forums
93: Member Screenshots
94: Member Screenshots
95: Community Forums
96: News Archive
97: Community Forums
98: Member Screenshots
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Member Screenshots
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Photo Gallery
109: Community Forums
110: Member Screenshots
111: Community Forums
112: Photo Gallery
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Member Screenshots
116: Home
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Member Screenshots
123: Member Screenshots
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Photo Gallery
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: Downloads
133: Photo Gallery
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Member Screenshots
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Downloads
140: Member Screenshots
141: Photo Gallery
142: Home
143: Downloads
144: Member Screenshots
145: Photo Gallery
146: Member Screenshots
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Photo Gallery
153: Member Screenshots
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Member Screenshots
159: Community Forums
160: News Archive
161: Member Screenshots
162: Member Screenshots
163: Downloads
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Photo Gallery
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Home
172: Member Screenshots
173: Community Forums
174: Member Screenshots
175: News Archive
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Downloads
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Member Screenshots
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Downloads
188: Home
189: News Archive
190: Community Forums
191: Downloads
192: Member Screenshots
193: Member Screenshots
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Member Screenshots
197: Home
198: Community Forums
199: Member Screenshots
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Community Forums
203: Home
204: Member Screenshots
205: Your Account
206: Downloads
207: Downloads
208: Community Forums
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Home
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Statistics
219: Downloads
220: Photo Gallery
221: Community Forums
222: Home
223: Home
224: Member Screenshots
225: Community Forums
226: Member Screenshots
227: Downloads
228: Member Screenshots
229: Home
230: Home
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Member Screenshots
236: Member Screenshots
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Home
242: Community Forums
243: Downloads
244: Photo Gallery
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Member Screenshots
248: Downloads
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Member Screenshots
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Home
256: Home
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Home
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Your Account
266: Home
267: Community Forums
268: Photo Gallery
269: Home
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Downloads
276: Downloads
277: Member Screenshots
278: Member Screenshots
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: News
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Downloads
286: News Archive
287: Home
288: Downloads
289: Downloads
290: Community Forums
291: Home
292: Community Forums
293: Downloads
294: Member Screenshots
295: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Tank Casualties
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TimRoyall
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 201
Location: Holland
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 12:05 pm
Post subject: Tank Casualties

I was recently watching the 1969 film "Battle of Britain" and the post combat discussions between pilots and squadron staff about who or what was responsible for shooting down a particular plane and it got me thinking about tanks.

For example, does anyone know what the generally accepted/estimated figures are for the percentage of tanks knocked out by other tanks as oposed to antitank guns, infantry weapons, artillery fire, aircraft or self disablement to avoid capture? The old saying used to be that the best antitank weapon was another tank but is that borne out by the numbers?

Also does anyone know what the most successful tank was/is in numerical terms of actually destroying the most other tanks. Presumably Sherman or T34 based on WW2, Korea, Middle East?
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Tank Casualties

I would think that the T-34, in one form or another, would have accumulated the most "tank" kills through out its service.
I have a book on Rommel, in which the author credits the German Mark IV as having the most "tank" kills.

Good topic, many answers... I would think it would need to be more specific pertaining to the time and practice and conflict. Conclusions as diverse as the conflicts themselves. WW2 saw a different role for tanks than say Korea, Vietnam, Europe Cold War, and even now between the 1st and 2nd Gulf Wars. The Middle East has seen rapid changes in the use of armor-- 1973 being a turning point for the IDF.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roger_Lucy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Tank Casualties

- TimRoyall
I

For example, does anyone know what the generally accepted/estimated figures are for the percentage of tanks knocked out by other tanks as oposed to antitank guns, infantry weapons, artillery fire, aircraft or self disablement to avoid capture? The old saying used to be that the best antitank weapon was another tank but is that borne out by the numbers?


There are some 21 Army Group Operational Research studies which give some clues. One study of Sherman which brewed-up in Normandy between 6 June and 10 July, 1944 showed that 89% were due to AP shot, 9% to mines and 2% to unknown causes. Of the AP hits 82% were 75mm, 18% 88mm. Unfortunately it does not state (largely because it would be almost impossible to tell) what portion of these shots were fired by tanks, SPs or towed A/Tk guns (generally however SPs on both sides were far more effective than their towed equivalents.) As the NW European campaign progressed the proportion of tank losses caused by infantry hollow-charge weapons (i.e. Panzerfaust, Panzerschrek) increased from 6% in Normandy to 34% after the Rhine crossing. This reflects both the increasingly lavish issue of these weapons,and the decreasing numbers of German tanks, SPs and towed A/Tk guns

An analysis of German tank wrecks in Normandy between 6 June and 7 August, showed that of a sample of 53 tanks: 48% were destroyed by AP shot, 7% by hollow charge projectiles, 1% by mines, 6% by aircraft rockets and 3% by aircraft cannon, another 10% were abandoned or destroyed by their crew and 17% lost to unknown causes.

In the period 8 to 31 August, of a sample of 39 tanks the proportion lost to AP shot fell to 11%, those lost to air attack to less than 5% and the proportion destroyed by their crew or abandoned rose to 76%. Discounting the tanks destroyed by their crew or abandoned, the proportion lost to AP fire was 65% in the first phase and 63% in the second; and the proportion destroyed by air attack rose from 13% to 25%.

Following up Air Force claims for the destruction of 413 AFVs between 17 December and 16 January) an Operational Research group located 101 German wrecks (5 Tiger II, 47 Panther, 5 Pz.IV, 18 SPs and 26 "light armour") in the Ardennes. They found 7 possibly lost to air attack, 36 to AP shot, 8 to HE rounds (of which 5 were SPs or light armour, the other 3 Panthers disguised as M-10s); 39 demolished or abandoned and 12 lost to other or unknown causes.

A tally of AP strikes on destroyed Pz.Vs and VIs showed the following proportion of hits which resulted in penetrations (these are of course tanks which did not survive) 6-pounder APCBC achieved 90%, the 17-pounder 84%, the M-10 with a 3-inch gun 77%: 6-pounder discarding sabot 69% and the 75mm on the M4 38%.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 11:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Tank Casualties

Hi,

One difficulty to interpreting the data presented above is that only seems to include 'brewed up' tanks. This leaves out the statistics on non-catastrophic kills. Particularly Allied tanks were frequently repaired and returned to service, as documented in several books drawing from contemporary sources. I recently read "Iron Knights" (66th Armor Regiment in WWII), and the book repeatedly documents non-catastrophic kills and the repair-and-return-to-service of US tanks. Since offensive operations tend to support this type of activity, it is likely that some of the statistics may be skewed as regards Allied tanks.

That said, the data above seems to support the tank-vs.-tank hypothesis. It also illustrates the enduring myth of air-to-ground anti-tank effectiveness.

Chuck

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
VonForhud
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Posts: 162

PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Tank Casualties

Of course this does not include the mighty T34 which saw active service until the late 80s.

The sheer number of T34s produced should indicate that this tank stood for most kills since its arrival in 1941.

Its estimated that tank production in 1945 in Russia was 40.000 units, many of which were T34s.

I personally think that the Tommy Cooker Shermans would be no match for T34s until the later versions, and even then the Sherman has a much higher profile and no sloped armor.

_________________
hvasnakkerduom.blogspo...wagen.html
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum