±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 276
Total: 276
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Member Screenshots
02: Community Forums
03: Home
04: News
05: News Archive
06: News Archive
07: Supporters
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Photo Gallery
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Community Forums
19: Home
20: Home
21: Tell a Friend
22: Community Forums
23: Downloads
24: Home
25: Downloads
26: Home
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Member Screenshots
31: Community Forums
32: Photo Gallery
33: News
34: Photo Gallery
35: Home
36: Home
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Home
40: Home
41: Community Forums
42: Home
43: Downloads
44: Home
45: Home
46: Downloads
47: News Archive
48: Community Forums
49: Downloads
50: Community Forums
51: Downloads
52: Downloads
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Your Account
57: Home
58: Photo Gallery
59: Downloads
60: Home
61: Downloads
62: Statistics
63: Downloads
64: Community Forums
65: Member Screenshots
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Search
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: Downloads
81: Community Forums
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: News
87: Downloads
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Home
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Search
98: Photo Gallery
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Downloads
105: Photo Gallery
106: Member Screenshots
107: Community Forums
108: Downloads
109: Community Forums
110: Downloads
111: Statistics
112: Home
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Downloads
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Home
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Photo Gallery
131: Member Screenshots
132: Community Forums
133: Photo Gallery
134: News Archive
135: Photo Gallery
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Downloads
139: Community Forums
140: Downloads
141: Downloads
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: Home
148: Statistics
149: Member Screenshots
150: Home
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Downloads
156: Member Screenshots
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Photo Gallery
165: Home
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Home
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Downloads
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Downloads
183: Community Forums
184: Photo Gallery
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Contact
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Downloads
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Photo Gallery
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Photo Gallery
197: Home
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Member Screenshots
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Photo Gallery
205: Downloads
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Downloads
209: Downloads
210: Home
211: Community Forums
212: Downloads
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Home
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Home
219: Home
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Member Screenshots
223: Home
224: Photo Gallery
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Your Account
228: Community Forums
229: Downloads
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Member Screenshots
233: Community Forums
234: Downloads
235: Community Forums
236: Home
237: Home
238: Home
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Home
242: Community Forums
243: Statistics
244: Home
245: Downloads
246: Home
247: Downloads
248: Photo Gallery
249: Photo Gallery
250: Home
251: Home
252: Home
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: Home
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Photo Gallery
264: Photo Gallery
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Home
269: Member Screenshots
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Downloads
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Downloads

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Tank Casualties
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TimRoyall
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 201
Location: Holland
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 12:05 pm
Post subject: Tank Casualties

I was recently watching the 1969 film "Battle of Britain" and the post combat discussions between pilots and squadron staff about who or what was responsible for shooting down a particular plane and it got me thinking about tanks.

For example, does anyone know what the generally accepted/estimated figures are for the percentage of tanks knocked out by other tanks as oposed to antitank guns, infantry weapons, artillery fire, aircraft or self disablement to avoid capture? The old saying used to be that the best antitank weapon was another tank but is that borne out by the numbers?

Also does anyone know what the most successful tank was/is in numerical terms of actually destroying the most other tanks. Presumably Sherman or T34 based on WW2, Korea, Middle East?
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Tank Casualties

I would think that the T-34, in one form or another, would have accumulated the most "tank" kills through out its service.
I have a book on Rommel, in which the author credits the German Mark IV as having the most "tank" kills.

Good topic, many answers... I would think it would need to be more specific pertaining to the time and practice and conflict. Conclusions as diverse as the conflicts themselves. WW2 saw a different role for tanks than say Korea, Vietnam, Europe Cold War, and even now between the 1st and 2nd Gulf Wars. The Middle East has seen rapid changes in the use of armor-- 1973 being a turning point for the IDF.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roger_Lucy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Tank Casualties

- TimRoyall
I

For example, does anyone know what the generally accepted/estimated figures are for the percentage of tanks knocked out by other tanks as oposed to antitank guns, infantry weapons, artillery fire, aircraft or self disablement to avoid capture? The old saying used to be that the best antitank weapon was another tank but is that borne out by the numbers?


There are some 21 Army Group Operational Research studies which give some clues. One study of Sherman which brewed-up in Normandy between 6 June and 10 July, 1944 showed that 89% were due to AP shot, 9% to mines and 2% to unknown causes. Of the AP hits 82% were 75mm, 18% 88mm. Unfortunately it does not state (largely because it would be almost impossible to tell) what portion of these shots were fired by tanks, SPs or towed A/Tk guns (generally however SPs on both sides were far more effective than their towed equivalents.) As the NW European campaign progressed the proportion of tank losses caused by infantry hollow-charge weapons (i.e. Panzerfaust, Panzerschrek) increased from 6% in Normandy to 34% after the Rhine crossing. This reflects both the increasingly lavish issue of these weapons,and the decreasing numbers of German tanks, SPs and towed A/Tk guns

An analysis of German tank wrecks in Normandy between 6 June and 7 August, showed that of a sample of 53 tanks: 48% were destroyed by AP shot, 7% by hollow charge projectiles, 1% by mines, 6% by aircraft rockets and 3% by aircraft cannon, another 10% were abandoned or destroyed by their crew and 17% lost to unknown causes.

In the period 8 to 31 August, of a sample of 39 tanks the proportion lost to AP shot fell to 11%, those lost to air attack to less than 5% and the proportion destroyed by their crew or abandoned rose to 76%. Discounting the tanks destroyed by their crew or abandoned, the proportion lost to AP fire was 65% in the first phase and 63% in the second; and the proportion destroyed by air attack rose from 13% to 25%.

Following up Air Force claims for the destruction of 413 AFVs between 17 December and 16 January) an Operational Research group located 101 German wrecks (5 Tiger II, 47 Panther, 5 Pz.IV, 18 SPs and 26 "light armour") in the Ardennes. They found 7 possibly lost to air attack, 36 to AP shot, 8 to HE rounds (of which 5 were SPs or light armour, the other 3 Panthers disguised as M-10s); 39 demolished or abandoned and 12 lost to other or unknown causes.

A tally of AP strikes on destroyed Pz.Vs and VIs showed the following proportion of hits which resulted in penetrations (these are of course tanks which did not survive) 6-pounder APCBC achieved 90%, the 17-pounder 84%, the M-10 with a 3-inch gun 77%: 6-pounder discarding sabot 69% and the 75mm on the M4 38%.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 11:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Tank Casualties

Hi,

One difficulty to interpreting the data presented above is that only seems to include 'brewed up' tanks. This leaves out the statistics on non-catastrophic kills. Particularly Allied tanks were frequently repaired and returned to service, as documented in several books drawing from contemporary sources. I recently read "Iron Knights" (66th Armor Regiment in WWII), and the book repeatedly documents non-catastrophic kills and the repair-and-return-to-service of US tanks. Since offensive operations tend to support this type of activity, it is likely that some of the statistics may be skewed as regards Allied tanks.

That said, the data above seems to support the tank-vs.-tank hypothesis. It also illustrates the enduring myth of air-to-ground anti-tank effectiveness.

Chuck

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
VonForhud
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Posts: 162

PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Tank Casualties

Of course this does not include the mighty T34 which saw active service until the late 80s.

The sheer number of T34s produced should indicate that this tank stood for most kills since its arrival in 1941.

Its estimated that tank production in 1945 in Russia was 40.000 units, many of which were T34s.

I personally think that the Tommy Cooker Shermans would be no match for T34s until the later versions, and even then the Sherman has a much higher profile and no sloped armor.

_________________
hvasnakkerduom.blogspo...wagen.html
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum