±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 425
Total: 425
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: News Archive
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Downloads
07: Member Screenshots
08: Community Forums
09: Home
10: News Archive
11: Downloads
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Member Screenshots
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: Home
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Photo Gallery
31: Photo Gallery
32: Community Forums
33: Home
34: Home
35: Downloads
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Community Forums
42: Home
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Photo Gallery
47: Home
48: Statistics
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Photo Gallery
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: News
55: Community Forums
56: Member Screenshots
57: Community Forums
58: Supporters
59: News Archive
60: Community Forums
61: Your Account
62: Photo Gallery
63: Downloads
64: Member Screenshots
65: Downloads
66: Community Forums
67: Downloads
68: Home
69: Home
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Photo Gallery
75: Supporters
76: Community Forums
77: News Archive
78: Photo Gallery
79: Community Forums
80: Home
81: Search
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Home
88: Home
89: Home
90: Home
91: Contact
92: Home
93: Member Screenshots
94: Community Forums
95: Downloads
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Home
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: News
104: Your Account
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Statistics
109: Downloads
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Home
113: Photo Gallery
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Member Screenshots
117: Home
118: Home
119: Home
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Downloads
124: Community Forums
125: Member Screenshots
126: Community Forums
127: Downloads
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Home
131: Community Forums
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Member Screenshots
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Home
140: Home
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Member Screenshots
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Home
152: Community Forums
153: Member Screenshots
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Member Screenshots
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Member Screenshots
162: Member Screenshots
163: Member Screenshots
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Downloads
170: Statistics
171: Community Forums
172: Downloads
173: Downloads
174: Home
175: Home
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Photo Gallery
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Home
184: Member Screenshots
185: Community Forums
186: Home
187: Home
188: Home
189: Home
190: Home
191: News
192: Community Forums
193: Your Account
194: Home
195: Community Forums
196: Photo Gallery
197: Community Forums
198: Photo Gallery
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Downloads
203: Community Forums
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: News Archive
207: Community Forums
208: News
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Home
212: Home
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: Home
227: Photo Gallery
228: Downloads
229: Photo Gallery
230: Home
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Member Screenshots
240: News
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Statistics
244: Your Account
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Home
253: Member Screenshots
254: Downloads
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Photo Gallery
262: Community Forums
263: Downloads
264: Downloads
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Community Forums
268: Statistics
269: Community Forums
270: Statistics
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Member Screenshots
274: Photo Gallery
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Downloads
279: Community Forums
280: Home
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: LinkToUs
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: News Archive
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Home
301: Home
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Member Screenshots
314: Community Forums
315: Downloads
316: Community Forums
317: Home
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Home
322: Home
323: Downloads
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: News
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Home
335: Community Forums
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Member Screenshots
339: Search
340: Member Screenshots
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: News
346: News
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Downloads
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Home
356: Your Account
357: Home
358: Home
359: Photo Gallery
360: Photo Gallery
361: Supporters
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Downloads
367: Community Forums
368: Home
369: News Archive
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Home
374: Home
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Home
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Member Screenshots
383: Home
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Community Forums
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Home
392: Community Forums
393: Home
394: Downloads
395: Community Forums
396: Photo Gallery
397: Downloads
398: Home
399: News Archive
400: Community Forums
401: Community Forums
402: Home
403: Home
404: Community Forums
405: Member Screenshots
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Home
409: Community Forums
410: Home
411: Home
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Home
415: Photo Gallery
416: Community Forums
417: Downloads
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Home
423: Downloads
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Type 59 or Type 69?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:17 am
Post subject: Type 59 or Type 69?

Hi,

Question for the experts: How do you tell the difference between a Type 56 and a Type 69?

I took pics today of a tank that is labeled as am Iraqi Type 59 from the Gulf War (ODS). But comparing with other pics from both the same time frame and from the later OIF time frame, it seems identical to others identified as Type 69 . The only difference I could discern was some had the dozer mounts on the front glacis and others didn't, but it didn't seem to be consistent.

Can someone help me? I'm so confused...

Chuck

PS...here's a taste:


_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Type 59 or Type 69?

- C_Sherman
Hi,

Question for the experts: How do you tell the difference between a Type 56 and a Type 69?


I presume you mean Type 59 & 69 - headlight location is the answer.

glacis = Type 59
fenders/catwalks = Type 69

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Type 59 or Type 69?

The headlights are not the best ID feature. Some Iraqi Type59s had that style of headlights. The main ID feature would be the rear hull. The Type69 has a fan housing like a T62. The Iraqis also added some of the Chicom stuff like the Boom Shield armor and skirts to T55s. If you can get a shot of the rear hull, you can't go wrong with the fan housing.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
toadmanstankpictures
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 4:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Type 59 or Type 69?

Hey Chuck,
Did you take this pic at Ft. Lewis? If so, it's a Type69. I took pics of the same tank in either '93:

Type69

_________________
Chris "toadman" Hughes
www.toadmanstankpictures.com
www.cafepress.com/toad...ksandstuff
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:49 pm
Post subject: Re: Type 59 or Type 69?

- toadmanstankpictures
Hey Chuck,
Did you take this pic at Ft. Lewis? If so, it's a Type69. I took pics of the same tank in either '93:

Type69


Yup, that's the one. It's placarded in two places as a Type 59, but like I said, I have a number of other pictures of very similar tanks IDed as Type 69s.

@ tanker2010: By T62-style fan housing, do you mean the type with the bump for the upper edge of the fan? This has that, and if that is what you mean it must be a Type 69.

What is Boom Shield armor? Is that the slat-type in the pictures, or is that the (presumably) reactive armor in the boxes?

I took a bunch of walk-around/crawl-over pics, because I have a long-stalled project to build one and I needed more info for the slat armor/stowage racks. If anyone is interested, I can put more them up.

For those who have seen this vehicle, is it normal for the turret to appear out-of-place when it is turned to one side or the other? I ask because I noticed that the base of the turret hangs several inches over the hull extensions on one side, and is well inside the hull extension on the other. If the turret is eccentric I can see this being possible, but this case appears to be a bit extreme for only about 45 degrees of turret rotation. my first impulse was that the turret was not actually attached to the hull, and was just set on top slightly out of kilter.

Chuck

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:03 am
Post subject: Re: Type 59 or Type 69?

I guess you're not familiar with ID features on a T62 either. When I say fan housing I'm talking about a rather large bulge on the bottom of the rear hull wall. Yes, Boom Shield armor is the slat type armor on the turret.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:44 am
Post subject: Re: Type 59 or Type 69?

When y'all say "Boom Shield Armor", I assume you mean the 'T55 w/KTO armor'...?



I don't think the armor was ever intended to house any 'special metals' (ie DU,..) it is very basically hollow to add armor protection 'stand off'. I imagine it could have been filled with sand or water to add to the protective properties, but seriously don't think DU was ever an intended 'filler'.

As for Type 69, this is what I know as the Type 69:


Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Type 59 or Type 69?

- tanker2010
The headlights are not the best ID feature. Some Iraqi Type59s had that style of headlights. The main ID feature would be the rear hull. The Type69 has a fan housing like a T62. The Iraqis also added some of the Chicom stuff like the Boom Shield armor and skirts to T55s. If you can get a shot of the rear hull, you can't go wrong with the fan housing.


The fan housing is a good ID point but people rarely take images of the rear of a vehicle for some strange reason. As regards Iraqi (and that was what we were talking about) Type 59 & Type 69 I have been going through the various technical intelligence documents I have access to and it appears the Iraqis received very few of the Type 59 versions with the headlights on the fenders/catwalks. The number varies, depending on what you read, between 2 - 8 all of which appear to have not survived (though undoubtedly one will turn up somewhere). Nearly all the vehicles identified as Type 59 with the fender headlights are misidentified Type 69 apparently.

The modified T-55s are a good point and AFAIR they were mostly used as command vehicles and have been referred to as T-55 QM

These vehicles really need someone to research them in depth and if anyone has any additional images available I would appreciate them and throw together some sort of guide.

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Type 59 or Type 69?

- Dontos
When y'all say "Boom Shield Armor", I assume you mean the 'T55 w/KTO armor'...?



I don't think the armor was ever intended to house any 'special metals' (ie DU,..) it is very basically hollow to add armor protection 'stand off'. I imagine it could have been filled with sand or water to add to the protective properties, but seriously don't think DU was ever an intended 'filler'.



Boom Shield are those large gauge meat baskets around the back of the tuttet and, sometime, the metal fence around the frontal portions of the turret.

That isn't KTO armour in the image. Its something the Iraqi Army created - the vehicles are generally referred to as T-55 Enigma despite the fact there are versions based on the Type 59 & 69 as well. The panels were usually filled with sand though baffle plates were also noticed in some.

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Type 59 or Type 69?

Just when I was about to report that the Type 59 with fender headlights (You know the ones that are unlikely to have survived) up pops this image courtesy of Don..

- Dontos




Rapidly flicking thru the images on JED I came across this one at Duxford..



According to info received from Fort Huachuca the Iraqi Type 59 with fender headlights were delivered with only one set of headlights and the Iraqis fitted a second set with a locally produced square edge protective cover on the other side.

No flaming me if this spoils your or anyone else's preconceived notions of these vehicles please!

I'll be back in a couple of weeks..

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Type 59 or Type 69?

Nearly all the vehicles identified as Type 59 with the fender headlights are misidentified Type 69 apparently.


Guess you proved your own point. Can't tell because of the tarp on the first pic, but the second is a Type69. You can tell by the square gunner's site. The Type59 had a periscope like the one in front of the loaders position and not the square type site. As I stated before, Boom Shield armor is the slat type as on the Type69 Chuck took pics of.

Type69 turret



Type59 turret



Type69 rear hull

Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:03 am
Post subject: Re: Type 59 or Type 69?

- JimWeb

The fan housing is a good ID point but people rarely take images of the rear of a vehicle for some strange reason.


We'll there's Hertz, and there's not exactly.... I'm "people" and I usually happen to take pictures of the backs of vehicles (does that make me a tank-pervert?):





So this is clearly a T-69, not a T-59 as it is placarded.

More pics:

The serial number on the front plate.


The square sight on the turret.


Casting marks on the back of the turret, which I presume include the manufacture date.


So, there you go.

Chuck

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:05 am
Post subject: Re: Type 59 or Type 69?

So this is clearly a T-69, not a T-59 as it is placarded.


No, it's a Type69. Chicom vehicles are called Type59, Type69, whatever. Russian vehicles are Ts, T54, T55, so on and so forth. Maybe it's a nit picky point but there is a vey big difference in say a Type62 and a T62. So if you were looking for info on the Chicom Type62 and asked people about the Chicom T62 you'd be told they didn't build any.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:08 am
Post subject: Re: Type 59 or Type 69?

- tanker2010
So this is clearly a T-69, not a T-59 as it is placarded.


No, it's a Type69. Chicom vehicles are called Type59, Type69, whatever. Russian vehicles are Ts, T54, T55, so on and so forth. Maybe it's a nit picky point but there is a vey big difference in say a Type62 and a T62. So if you were looking for info on the Chicom Type62 and asked people about the Chicom T62 you'd be told they didn't build any.


Gee. Thanks.

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Smashy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 05, 2010
Posts: 112

PostPosted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 7:36 am
Post subject: Re: Type 59 or Type 69?

- tanker2010
So this is clearly a T-69, not a T-59 as it is placarded.


No, it's a Type69. Chicom vehicles are called Type59, Type69, whatever. Russian vehicles are Ts, T54, T55, so on and so forth. Maybe it's a nit picky point but there is a vey big difference in say a Type62 and a T62. So if you were looking for info on the Chicom Type62 and asked people about the Chicom T62 you'd be told they didn't build any.


Russian ones are T-54, T-62 and so on. T54, T55. T64 are all american experimental vehicles

_________________
Smashy
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum