±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 358
Total: 358
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Supporters
04: Community Forums
05: Member Screenshots
06: Member Screenshots
07: Home
08: Member Screenshots
09: News Archive
10: Community Forums
11: Member Screenshots
12: Member Screenshots
13: Member Screenshots
14: Member Screenshots
15: Downloads
16: Community Forums
17: Photo Gallery
18: News Archive
19: Photo Gallery
20: Home
21: Home
22: Home
23: Home
24: Community Forums
25: Your Account
26: Home
27: Photo Gallery
28: Member Screenshots
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Downloads
32: Member Screenshots
33: Community Forums
34: Member Screenshots
35: Member Screenshots
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Photo Gallery
42: Photo Gallery
43: Community Forums
44: Member Screenshots
45: Photo Gallery
46: Your Account
47: Member Screenshots
48: Community Forums
49: Member Screenshots
50: News Archive
51: Member Screenshots
52: Photo Gallery
53: Community Forums
54: Downloads
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Photo Gallery
59: Community Forums
60: Home
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: News Archive
64: News Archive
65: Community Forums
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: Photo Gallery
69: Home
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Downloads
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Downloads
77: Photo Gallery
78: Community Forums
79: Photo Gallery
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Member Screenshots
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Home
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Member Screenshots
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Member Screenshots
120: Home
121: Downloads
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Community Forums
126: Downloads
127: Community Forums
128: Statistics
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: Downloads
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Member Screenshots
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Search
142: Photo Gallery
143: Home
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Photo Gallery
149: Member Screenshots
150: Home
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: News Archive
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Member Screenshots
157: Member Screenshots
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: Home
161: Photo Gallery
162: News Archive
163: Community Forums
164: Home
165: News Archive
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: News Archive
170: Community Forums
171: Downloads
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Photo Gallery
178: Photo Gallery
179: Community Forums
180: News Archive
181: Member Screenshots
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: News Archive
187: Member Screenshots
188: Community Forums
189: Home
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: Photo Gallery
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Member Screenshots
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Downloads
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Photo Gallery
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Downloads
214: Member Screenshots
215: News
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Photo Gallery
220: Photo Gallery
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Member Screenshots
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Member Screenshots
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Home
247: Member Screenshots
248: Community Forums
249: News Archive
250: Your Account
251: Member Screenshots
252: News
253: Community Forums
254: Downloads
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Photo Gallery
258: Photo Gallery
259: Statistics
260: News Archive
261: Community Forums
262: Photo Gallery
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Downloads
268: Member Screenshots
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Community Forums
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: News
276: Community Forums
277: Member Screenshots
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Home
281: Community Forums
282: Home
283: Member Screenshots
284: Your Account
285: Home
286: Photo Gallery
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Home
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Member Screenshots
293: Community Forums
294: News Archive
295: Community Forums
296: News Archive
297: Photo Gallery
298: Home
299: Statistics
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: News Archive
305: Member Screenshots
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: News Archive
313: Community Forums
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Photo Gallery
319: Home
320: Photo Gallery
321: Community Forums
322: Downloads
323: Community Forums
324: Downloads
325: Member Screenshots
326: Member Screenshots
327: Photo Gallery
328: Community Forums
329: Member Screenshots
330: Community Forums
331: Home
332: Member Screenshots
333: Community Forums
334: Downloads
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Home
340: Downloads
341: Community Forums
342: Member Screenshots
343: Home
344: News Archive
345: Home
346: Home
347: Downloads
348: Member Screenshots
349: News Archive
350: Community Forums
351: Photo Gallery
352: Home
353: Community Forums
354: Member Screenshots
355: Your Account
356: Home
357: Photo Gallery
358: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM-734 in Vietnam
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 1:34 am
Post subject: XM-734 in Vietnam

XM734 ~ 1/5th Infantry "Bobcats" 25th Infantry Division "Tropic Lightning"
Track "C-35" , probably operation "Cedar Falls" , January 1967 /Robert C.Lafoon collection/.


_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:50 am
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

Never actually seen a pic of one of those there. Then again, I notice everybody is operating on or out the top and none of the ports are open, so it's being used just like any other ACAV there, but without the M60's. A lot of infantry unit M113's didn't have the full ACAV kit anyway (like the one just in front of it).

Looks like a case of "we have it and need to test it, so let's send it" regardless of actual utility in the theater to which it's been sent. (Recall that there was a proposal to send Sheridan's without main gun ammo in the beginning, but that idea was dropped)
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:07 pm
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

Hi Folks!

My first post Vietnam era unit at Hunter Ligget had ten of those vehicles. The word was they had been used over there and had been judged a failure. Like Doug noted the troops are up in the cargo hatch or on top. During my time, the major problem was land mines (now called IED's). The only troops who were inside were the drivers. The TC needed to kept all of his body above the turret ring. Those cupolas where known to pop off when a vehicle hit a mine.

Somehow the Army went from the gun port of the XM-734 which was made for the M-14 to poke out of, to the gun ports of the M2 Bradley IFV with it's Port Firing weapon.

In the end, it was all a waste of time after the Army up armored the Bradleys and covered over the firing ports.

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 4:36 pm
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

There is a pretty good collection of Vietnam photos on Flickr at:

www.flickr.com/search/...3895%40N04

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:54 am
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Folks!

My first post Vietnam era unit at Hunter Ligget had ten of those vehicles. The word was they had been used over there and had been judged a failure. Like Doug noted the troops are up in the cargo hatch or on top. During my time, the major problem was land mines (now called IED's). The only troops who were inside were the drivers. The TC needed to kept all of his body above the turret ring. Those cupolas where known to pop off when a vehicle hit a mine.

Somehow the Army went from the gun port of the XM-734 which was made for the M-14 to poke out of, to the gun ports of the M2 Bradley IFV with it's Port Firing weapon.

In the end, it was all a waste of time after the Army up armored the Bradleys and covered over the firing ports.

Sgt, Scouts Out!


Hi,

It's all a case of PC-envy. In the early 60's, the Soviets rocked the military world by introducing the BMP, which had firing ports and was now considered an Infantry Fighting Vehicle. Partly fueled by the armaments companies and partly by Cold War me-too-ism, the military world was quickly infatuated with the idea of infantry being able to fight from under armor on a nuclear battlefield. Like so many of this sort of idea, no one ever actually conducted honest tests to determine if this was even practical. All the tests that were conducted, were biased to show how great the capability was. The voices that said it wasn't that great an idea were either ignored or silenced.

The Army went through a series of vehicles (XM-734 was one of them) trying to incorporate firing ports into existing APCs. Fortunately, budget constraints and obvious shortcomings prevented large-scale adoption of any of them. After all of the programs were stone-dead, the money became available to develop the Bradley IFV from scratch, while trying to incorporate the lessons from the earlier program. Sadly, one of those lessons didn't include the futility of infantry fighting from within the vehicle. That lesson wasn't learned until the Bradley was widely fielded and everyone finally had to face the fact that the firing ports were useless for anything but wasting ammunition. Oddly enough the Soviets had quietly learned that lesson years before, but continued to use the feature to sell BMPs around the world!

Nothing new, but still a disheartening look into how wacky the acquisition of military vehicles can be.

What is funny is that for years after the Bradley showed up, commanders had to sign and re-sign for hundreds of the special Firing Port Weapons. In most cases the weapons sat locked in racks for the entire time they were in the possession of unit. Most Commanders and Senior NCOs considered that maintaining positive control of a single M16 was only barely within the abilities of most Soldiers, and had no desire to issue them a second weapon. I also know one former Company Commander who was signed for several hundred weapons for his entire command tour, two years after the unit had turned in it's last Bradley that still had firing ports.

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:31 am
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

- C_Sherman


Hi,

It's all a case of PC-envy. In the early 60's, the Soviets rocked the military world by introducing the BMP, which had firing ports and was now considered an Infantry Fighting Vehicle. Partly fueled by the armaments companies and partly by Cold War me-too-ism, the military world was quickly infatuated with the idea of infantry being able to fight from under armor on a nuclear battlefield. Like so many of this sort of idea, no one ever actually conducted honest tests to determine if this was even practical. All the tests that were conducted, were biased to show how great the capability was. The voices that said it wasn't that great an idea were either ignored or silenced.

The Army went through a series of vehicles (XM-734 was one of them) trying to incorporate firing ports into existing APCs.
C


Chuck,

The FMC proposed M765 and "Product Improved M113A1" also envisioned the inclusion of firing ports and an M139 20mm gun to make it even more BMP/IFV like (both had a reduced rear hull rather like the "M113 1/2 C&R" vehicle).

The "me too" think that imposed stuff like this (and the "swim ability") of the M551 Sheridan was not a proud era in U.S. AFV design.

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:20 pm
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

Hi,

Doug, that Product Improved M113 lives on today! The AIFV, still in service (and maybe production, too!) in a number of nations outside of the US, is externally almost identical to the advertising you posted. I'm sure that it has been updated internally since 1970. I've seen it in Dutch and Turkish service, and I'm sure I've seen it other places too.

I had the privilege of touring the FMC-licensed production facility outside of Ankara, Turkey in 2003. I was startled by the depth of the commonality with the M113-series vehicles I was familiar with. Up to about 1 meter off of the ground, it's almost indistinguishable. The M113 lives on, much more than we realize here in the US.

However, I did notice that the whole firing-port infatuation has faded. Some (all?) of the AIFVs I've seen...didn't have the firing ports anymore!

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:59 pm
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

- C_Sherman
Hi,

Doug, that Product Improved M113 lives on today! The AIFV, still in service (and maybe production, too!) in a number of nations outside of the US, is externally almost identical to the advertising you posted. I'm sure that it has been updated internally since 1970. I've seen it in Dutch and Turkish service, and I'm sure I've seen it other places too.

C


Chuck,
In Dutch service, it even lived on with the model number, but re-designated "YPR 765".

D.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum