±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 378
Total: 378
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Photo Gallery
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Photo Gallery
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Photo Gallery
11: Member Screenshots
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Member Screenshots
15: News Archive
16: News Archive
17: Photo Gallery
18: Community Forums
19: Photo Gallery
20: Community Forums
21: Photo Gallery
22: News Archive
23: Member Screenshots
24: Community Forums
25: News Archive
26: Photo Gallery
27: Photo Gallery
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: News Archive
35: Community Forums
36: Photo Gallery
37: Home
38: Photo Gallery
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Photo Gallery
44: Treasury
45: Photo Gallery
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Photo Gallery
54: Photo Gallery
55: News Archive
56: Downloads
57: News Archive
58: Photo Gallery
59: Home
60: Photo Gallery
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: Downloads
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: Photo Gallery
67: Community Forums
68: Downloads
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Downloads
76: Home
77: Downloads
78: Home
79: Photo Gallery
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Member Screenshots
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Photo Gallery
93: Home
94: Home
95: Downloads
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Member Screenshots
99: Home
100: Downloads
101: Downloads
102: Community Forums
103: News Archive
104: Photo Gallery
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: News Archive
108: Member Screenshots
109: Photo Gallery
110: News
111: News
112: Downloads
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Photo Gallery
116: News Archive
117: Photo Gallery
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Photo Gallery
121: Community Forums
122: Photo Gallery
123: Photo Gallery
124: Photo Gallery
125: Photo Gallery
126: Photo Gallery
127: Photo Gallery
128: News Archive
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: News
134: News Archive
135: Your Account
136: Photo Gallery
137: News Archive
138: Photo Gallery
139: News Archive
140: Community Forums
141: News Archive
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Member Screenshots
149: News Archive
150: Photo Gallery
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: News Archive
154: Community Forums
155: Member Screenshots
156: Home
157: Downloads
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Photo Gallery
166: Community Forums
167: Photo Gallery
168: Home
169: Home
170: Community Forums
171: Home
172: News
173: Home
174: Home
175: Photo Gallery
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Photo Gallery
184: Photo Gallery
185: Photo Gallery
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Photo Gallery
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Photo Gallery
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Statistics
198: Photo Gallery
199: Community Forums
200: Member Screenshots
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Member Screenshots
204: Community Forums
205: News Archive
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Photo Gallery
212: News Archive
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Home
220: Photo Gallery
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Photo Gallery
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: Photo Gallery
227: Community Forums
228: News Archive
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Photo Gallery
232: News Archive
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: News Archive
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Your Account
239: Community Forums
240: Supporters
241: News Archive
242: Downloads
243: Community Forums
244: Photo Gallery
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Photo Gallery
248: Photo Gallery
249: Member Screenshots
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: News Archive
256: Home
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Photo Gallery
260: Photo Gallery
261: Photo Gallery
262: News Archive
263: News
264: Photo Gallery
265: News Archive
266: Home
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Search
271: Member Screenshots
272: Home
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: News Archive
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: News Archive
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Member Screenshots
288: Community Forums
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Photo Gallery
295: Downloads
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: News Archive
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Photo Gallery
303: Community Forums
304: Home
305: Member Screenshots
306: Photo Gallery
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Photo Gallery
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Home
313: Photo Gallery
314: Community Forums
315: Downloads
316: Community Forums
317: News Archive
318: Community Forums
319: Home
320: Community Forums
321: Home
322: Community Forums
323: Downloads
324: Home
325: Home
326: Home
327: News
328: Community Forums
329: Home
330: Photo Gallery
331: Home
332: Your Account
333: Downloads
334: Home
335: Member Screenshots
336: Community Forums
337: Statistics
338: Home
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Home
344: Home
345: Community Forums
346: Member Screenshots
347: Community Forums
348: Member Screenshots
349: Community Forums
350: Photo Gallery
351: Community Forums
352: Member Screenshots
353: Community Forums
354: Photo Gallery
355: Photo Gallery
356: Photo Gallery
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: News Archive
361: Photo Gallery
362: Community Forums
363: Member Screenshots
364: Photo Gallery
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Downloads
370: Photo Gallery
371: Community Forums
372: Photo Gallery
373: Home
374: Photo Gallery
375: Home
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM-734 in Vietnam
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 1:34 am
Post subject: XM-734 in Vietnam

XM734 ~ 1/5th Infantry "Bobcats" 25th Infantry Division "Tropic Lightning"
Track "C-35" , probably operation "Cedar Falls" , January 1967 /Robert C.Lafoon collection/.


_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:50 am
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

Never actually seen a pic of one of those there. Then again, I notice everybody is operating on or out the top and none of the ports are open, so it's being used just like any other ACAV there, but without the M60's. A lot of infantry unit M113's didn't have the full ACAV kit anyway (like the one just in front of it).

Looks like a case of "we have it and need to test it, so let's send it" regardless of actual utility in the theater to which it's been sent. (Recall that there was a proposal to send Sheridan's without main gun ammo in the beginning, but that idea was dropped)
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:07 pm
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

Hi Folks!

My first post Vietnam era unit at Hunter Ligget had ten of those vehicles. The word was they had been used over there and had been judged a failure. Like Doug noted the troops are up in the cargo hatch or on top. During my time, the major problem was land mines (now called IED's). The only troops who were inside were the drivers. The TC needed to kept all of his body above the turret ring. Those cupolas where known to pop off when a vehicle hit a mine.

Somehow the Army went from the gun port of the XM-734 which was made for the M-14 to poke out of, to the gun ports of the M2 Bradley IFV with it's Port Firing weapon.

In the end, it was all a waste of time after the Army up armored the Bradleys and covered over the firing ports.

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 4:36 pm
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

There is a pretty good collection of Vietnam photos on Flickr at:

www.flickr.com/search/...3895%40N04

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:54 am
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Folks!

My first post Vietnam era unit at Hunter Ligget had ten of those vehicles. The word was they had been used over there and had been judged a failure. Like Doug noted the troops are up in the cargo hatch or on top. During my time, the major problem was land mines (now called IED's). The only troops who were inside were the drivers. The TC needed to kept all of his body above the turret ring. Those cupolas where known to pop off when a vehicle hit a mine.

Somehow the Army went from the gun port of the XM-734 which was made for the M-14 to poke out of, to the gun ports of the M2 Bradley IFV with it's Port Firing weapon.

In the end, it was all a waste of time after the Army up armored the Bradleys and covered over the firing ports.

Sgt, Scouts Out!


Hi,

It's all a case of PC-envy. In the early 60's, the Soviets rocked the military world by introducing the BMP, which had firing ports and was now considered an Infantry Fighting Vehicle. Partly fueled by the armaments companies and partly by Cold War me-too-ism, the military world was quickly infatuated with the idea of infantry being able to fight from under armor on a nuclear battlefield. Like so many of this sort of idea, no one ever actually conducted honest tests to determine if this was even practical. All the tests that were conducted, were biased to show how great the capability was. The voices that said it wasn't that great an idea were either ignored or silenced.

The Army went through a series of vehicles (XM-734 was one of them) trying to incorporate firing ports into existing APCs. Fortunately, budget constraints and obvious shortcomings prevented large-scale adoption of any of them. After all of the programs were stone-dead, the money became available to develop the Bradley IFV from scratch, while trying to incorporate the lessons from the earlier program. Sadly, one of those lessons didn't include the futility of infantry fighting from within the vehicle. That lesson wasn't learned until the Bradley was widely fielded and everyone finally had to face the fact that the firing ports were useless for anything but wasting ammunition. Oddly enough the Soviets had quietly learned that lesson years before, but continued to use the feature to sell BMPs around the world!

Nothing new, but still a disheartening look into how wacky the acquisition of military vehicles can be.

What is funny is that for years after the Bradley showed up, commanders had to sign and re-sign for hundreds of the special Firing Port Weapons. In most cases the weapons sat locked in racks for the entire time they were in the possession of unit. Most Commanders and Senior NCOs considered that maintaining positive control of a single M16 was only barely within the abilities of most Soldiers, and had no desire to issue them a second weapon. I also know one former Company Commander who was signed for several hundred weapons for his entire command tour, two years after the unit had turned in it's last Bradley that still had firing ports.

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:31 am
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

- C_Sherman


Hi,

It's all a case of PC-envy. In the early 60's, the Soviets rocked the military world by introducing the BMP, which had firing ports and was now considered an Infantry Fighting Vehicle. Partly fueled by the armaments companies and partly by Cold War me-too-ism, the military world was quickly infatuated with the idea of infantry being able to fight from under armor on a nuclear battlefield. Like so many of this sort of idea, no one ever actually conducted honest tests to determine if this was even practical. All the tests that were conducted, were biased to show how great the capability was. The voices that said it wasn't that great an idea were either ignored or silenced.

The Army went through a series of vehicles (XM-734 was one of them) trying to incorporate firing ports into existing APCs.
C


Chuck,

The FMC proposed M765 and "Product Improved M113A1" also envisioned the inclusion of firing ports and an M139 20mm gun to make it even more BMP/IFV like (both had a reduced rear hull rather like the "M113 1/2 C&R" vehicle).

The "me too" think that imposed stuff like this (and the "swim ability") of the M551 Sheridan was not a proud era in U.S. AFV design.

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:20 pm
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

Hi,

Doug, that Product Improved M113 lives on today! The AIFV, still in service (and maybe production, too!) in a number of nations outside of the US, is externally almost identical to the advertising you posted. I'm sure that it has been updated internally since 1970. I've seen it in Dutch and Turkish service, and I'm sure I've seen it other places too.

I had the privilege of touring the FMC-licensed production facility outside of Ankara, Turkey in 2003. I was startled by the depth of the commonality with the M113-series vehicles I was familiar with. Up to about 1 meter off of the ground, it's almost indistinguishable. The M113 lives on, much more than we realize here in the US.

However, I did notice that the whole firing-port infatuation has faded. Some (all?) of the AIFVs I've seen...didn't have the firing ports anymore!

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:59 pm
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

- C_Sherman
Hi,

Doug, that Product Improved M113 lives on today! The AIFV, still in service (and maybe production, too!) in a number of nations outside of the US, is externally almost identical to the advertising you posted. I'm sure that it has been updated internally since 1970. I've seen it in Dutch and Turkish service, and I'm sure I've seen it other places too.

C


Chuck,
In Dutch service, it even lived on with the model number, but re-designated "YPR 765".

D.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum