±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 386
Total: 386
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Member Screenshots
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Home
14: Downloads
15: Community Forums
16: News Archive
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Member Screenshots
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: News Archive
27: Photo Gallery
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: News Archive
31: Photo Gallery
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Photo Gallery
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Photo Gallery
41: Home
42: Home
43: Photo Gallery
44: Community Forums
45: Home
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: News
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Home
56: Community Forums
57: Member Screenshots
58: Photo Gallery
59: Member Screenshots
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Home
63: Home
64: Home
65: Home
66: Home
67: Home
68: Home
69: Home
70: Photo Gallery
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Member Screenshots
75: Community Forums
76: Downloads
77: Community Forums
78: Photo Gallery
79: Downloads
80: Member Screenshots
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Downloads
84: News Archive
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Community Forums
90: Member Screenshots
91: Photo Gallery
92: Photo Gallery
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Photo Gallery
99: Community Forums
100: Photo Gallery
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Member Screenshots
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Photo Gallery
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Photo Gallery
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Photo Gallery
118: Photo Gallery
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Photo Gallery
122: Member Screenshots
123: Home
124: Photo Gallery
125: Downloads
126: Photo Gallery
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Downloads
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Home
134: Photo Gallery
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Photo Gallery
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: Member Screenshots
148: Community Forums
149: Home
150: Downloads
151: Community Forums
152: Contact
153: Home
154: Member Screenshots
155: Photo Gallery
156: Member Screenshots
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Downloads
160: Home
161: News Archive
162: Photo Gallery
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Member Screenshots
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Photo Gallery
171: Photo Gallery
172: Photo Gallery
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: Photo Gallery
176: Photo Gallery
177: News Archive
178: Photo Gallery
179: Home
180: Downloads
181: Community Forums
182: Downloads
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Member Screenshots
187: Photo Gallery
188: Photo Gallery
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Photo Gallery
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Downloads
199: Community Forums
200: News Archive
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Photo Gallery
205: Photo Gallery
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Photo Gallery
209: Photo Gallery
210: News Archive
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: Member Screenshots
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Downloads
220: Member Screenshots
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Home
224: Photo Gallery
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Photo Gallery
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Photo Gallery
236: Community Forums
237: Downloads
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: News Archive
241: News Archive
242: News Archive
243: News Archive
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Home
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: News Archive
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: News Archive
254: Community Forums
255: Downloads
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Member Screenshots
262: Community Forums
263: Statistics
264: Downloads
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Home
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Photo Gallery
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Home
275: Home
276: Contact
277: Photo Gallery
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: News Archive
295: News Archive
296: Home
297: News Archive
298: Community Forums
299: Member Screenshots
300: Community Forums
301: News Archive
302: Photo Gallery
303: Downloads
304: Photo Gallery
305: Home
306: Photo Gallery
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Home
311: News Archive
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Photo Gallery
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: News
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Photo Gallery
323: Home
324: Community Forums
325: Search
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Photo Gallery
330: Home
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Downloads
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Home
338: Photo Gallery
339: Community Forums
340: Photo Gallery
341: Member Screenshots
342: Home
343: Photo Gallery
344: Community Forums
345: Home
346: Home
347: Photo Gallery
348: Home
349: Member Screenshots
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Home
353: Photo Gallery
354: Community Forums
355: Home
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Home
359: Downloads
360: Community Forums
361: Home
362: Community Forums
363: Home
364: News Archive
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Home
368: Member Screenshots
369: Downloads
370: Home
371: Community Forums
372: Home
373: Downloads
374: Home
375: Member Screenshots
376: News
377: Home
378: Home
379: Home
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Community Forums
383: Home
384: Photo Gallery
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM-734 in Vietnam
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 1:34 am
Post subject: XM-734 in Vietnam

XM734 ~ 1/5th Infantry "Bobcats" 25th Infantry Division "Tropic Lightning"
Track "C-35" , probably operation "Cedar Falls" , January 1967 /Robert C.Lafoon collection/.


_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:50 am
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

Never actually seen a pic of one of those there. Then again, I notice everybody is operating on or out the top and none of the ports are open, so it's being used just like any other ACAV there, but without the M60's. A lot of infantry unit M113's didn't have the full ACAV kit anyway (like the one just in front of it).

Looks like a case of "we have it and need to test it, so let's send it" regardless of actual utility in the theater to which it's been sent. (Recall that there was a proposal to send Sheridan's without main gun ammo in the beginning, but that idea was dropped)
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:07 pm
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

Hi Folks!

My first post Vietnam era unit at Hunter Ligget had ten of those vehicles. The word was they had been used over there and had been judged a failure. Like Doug noted the troops are up in the cargo hatch or on top. During my time, the major problem was land mines (now called IED's). The only troops who were inside were the drivers. The TC needed to kept all of his body above the turret ring. Those cupolas where known to pop off when a vehicle hit a mine.

Somehow the Army went from the gun port of the XM-734 which was made for the M-14 to poke out of, to the gun ports of the M2 Bradley IFV with it's Port Firing weapon.

In the end, it was all a waste of time after the Army up armored the Bradleys and covered over the firing ports.

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 4:36 pm
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

There is a pretty good collection of Vietnam photos on Flickr at:

www.flickr.com/search/...3895%40N04

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:54 am
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Folks!

My first post Vietnam era unit at Hunter Ligget had ten of those vehicles. The word was they had been used over there and had been judged a failure. Like Doug noted the troops are up in the cargo hatch or on top. During my time, the major problem was land mines (now called IED's). The only troops who were inside were the drivers. The TC needed to kept all of his body above the turret ring. Those cupolas where known to pop off when a vehicle hit a mine.

Somehow the Army went from the gun port of the XM-734 which was made for the M-14 to poke out of, to the gun ports of the M2 Bradley IFV with it's Port Firing weapon.

In the end, it was all a waste of time after the Army up armored the Bradleys and covered over the firing ports.

Sgt, Scouts Out!


Hi,

It's all a case of PC-envy. In the early 60's, the Soviets rocked the military world by introducing the BMP, which had firing ports and was now considered an Infantry Fighting Vehicle. Partly fueled by the armaments companies and partly by Cold War me-too-ism, the military world was quickly infatuated with the idea of infantry being able to fight from under armor on a nuclear battlefield. Like so many of this sort of idea, no one ever actually conducted honest tests to determine if this was even practical. All the tests that were conducted, were biased to show how great the capability was. The voices that said it wasn't that great an idea were either ignored or silenced.

The Army went through a series of vehicles (XM-734 was one of them) trying to incorporate firing ports into existing APCs. Fortunately, budget constraints and obvious shortcomings prevented large-scale adoption of any of them. After all of the programs were stone-dead, the money became available to develop the Bradley IFV from scratch, while trying to incorporate the lessons from the earlier program. Sadly, one of those lessons didn't include the futility of infantry fighting from within the vehicle. That lesson wasn't learned until the Bradley was widely fielded and everyone finally had to face the fact that the firing ports were useless for anything but wasting ammunition. Oddly enough the Soviets had quietly learned that lesson years before, but continued to use the feature to sell BMPs around the world!

Nothing new, but still a disheartening look into how wacky the acquisition of military vehicles can be.

What is funny is that for years after the Bradley showed up, commanders had to sign and re-sign for hundreds of the special Firing Port Weapons. In most cases the weapons sat locked in racks for the entire time they were in the possession of unit. Most Commanders and Senior NCOs considered that maintaining positive control of a single M16 was only barely within the abilities of most Soldiers, and had no desire to issue them a second weapon. I also know one former Company Commander who was signed for several hundred weapons for his entire command tour, two years after the unit had turned in it's last Bradley that still had firing ports.

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:31 am
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

- C_Sherman


Hi,

It's all a case of PC-envy. In the early 60's, the Soviets rocked the military world by introducing the BMP, which had firing ports and was now considered an Infantry Fighting Vehicle. Partly fueled by the armaments companies and partly by Cold War me-too-ism, the military world was quickly infatuated with the idea of infantry being able to fight from under armor on a nuclear battlefield. Like so many of this sort of idea, no one ever actually conducted honest tests to determine if this was even practical. All the tests that were conducted, were biased to show how great the capability was. The voices that said it wasn't that great an idea were either ignored or silenced.

The Army went through a series of vehicles (XM-734 was one of them) trying to incorporate firing ports into existing APCs.
C


Chuck,

The FMC proposed M765 and "Product Improved M113A1" also envisioned the inclusion of firing ports and an M139 20mm gun to make it even more BMP/IFV like (both had a reduced rear hull rather like the "M113 1/2 C&R" vehicle).

The "me too" think that imposed stuff like this (and the "swim ability") of the M551 Sheridan was not a proud era in U.S. AFV design.

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:20 pm
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

Hi,

Doug, that Product Improved M113 lives on today! The AIFV, still in service (and maybe production, too!) in a number of nations outside of the US, is externally almost identical to the advertising you posted. I'm sure that it has been updated internally since 1970. I've seen it in Dutch and Turkish service, and I'm sure I've seen it other places too.

I had the privilege of touring the FMC-licensed production facility outside of Ankara, Turkey in 2003. I was startled by the depth of the commonality with the M113-series vehicles I was familiar with. Up to about 1 meter off of the ground, it's almost indistinguishable. The M113 lives on, much more than we realize here in the US.

However, I did notice that the whole firing-port infatuation has faded. Some (all?) of the AIFVs I've seen...didn't have the firing ports anymore!

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:59 pm
Post subject: Re: XM-734 in Vietnam

- C_Sherman
Hi,

Doug, that Product Improved M113 lives on today! The AIFV, still in service (and maybe production, too!) in a number of nations outside of the US, is externally almost identical to the advertising you posted. I'm sure that it has been updated internally since 1970. I've seen it in Dutch and Turkish service, and I'm sure I've seen it other places too.

C


Chuck,
In Dutch service, it even lived on with the model number, but re-designated "YPR 765".

D.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum