±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 476
Total: 476
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Home
04: Home
05: News Archive
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Home
10: Home
11: Home
12: Member Screenshots
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Downloads
16: Home
17: Community Forums
18: Photo Gallery
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Home
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Home
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Downloads
28: Photo Gallery
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Photo Gallery
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: Member Screenshots
39: Home
40: Home
41: Home
42: Home
43: Home
44: Downloads
45: Community Forums
46: Downloads
47: Community Forums
48: Photo Gallery
49: Photo Gallery
50: Community Forums
51: Photo Gallery
52: Home
53: Home
54: Photo Gallery
55: Home
56: Member Screenshots
57: Photo Gallery
58: Community Forums
59: Photo Gallery
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Home
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: Community Forums
69: Member Screenshots
70: Member Screenshots
71: Home
72: Community Forums
73: Home
74: Home
75: Home
76: Home
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Home
81: Home
82: Home
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Home
87: Photo Gallery
88: Community Forums
89: Photo Gallery
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Downloads
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Home
99: Home
100: Member Screenshots
101: Home
102: Home
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Home
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Home
113: Statistics
114: Member Screenshots
115: Home
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: Downloads
121: Home
122: Photo Gallery
123: Home
124: Photo Gallery
125: Home
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Downloads
129: Member Screenshots
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: News Archive
136: Home
137: Community Forums
138: Downloads
139: Community Forums
140: Photo Gallery
141: Photo Gallery
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Home
148: Photo Gallery
149: Home
150: Photo Gallery
151: Community Forums
152: Downloads
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Home
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Downloads
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Home
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Member Screenshots
167: Statistics
168: Home
169: Member Screenshots
170: Home
171: Home
172: Downloads
173: Home
174: Home
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Home
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Home
186: Community Forums
187: Member Screenshots
188: Home
189: Member Screenshots
190: Member Screenshots
191: Home
192: Home
193: Home
194: Photo Gallery
195: Photo Gallery
196: Photo Gallery
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Downloads
203: Home
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Member Screenshots
210: Home
211: Home
212: Member Screenshots
213: Photo Gallery
214: Search
215: Home
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Member Screenshots
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Home
223: Community Forums
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Photo Gallery
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Home
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: News Archive
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Photo Gallery
239: Community Forums
240: Home
241: Community Forums
242: Photo Gallery
243: News Archive
244: Home
245: Photo Gallery
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Home
251: Photo Gallery
252: Downloads
253: Statistics
254: Community Forums
255: Photo Gallery
256: Photo Gallery
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Photo Gallery
261: Downloads
262: Home
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Downloads
268: Home
269: Home
270: Home
271: Home
272: Home
273: Home
274: Home
275: Community Forums
276: Downloads
277: Member Screenshots
278: Home
279: Downloads
280: Statistics
281: Home
282: News
283: Member Screenshots
284: Home
285: Home
286: Photo Gallery
287: Home
288: Community Forums
289: Photo Gallery
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Statistics
294: Home
295: Home
296: Home
297: Photo Gallery
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Downloads
304: Home
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Your Account
312: Home
313: Photo Gallery
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: Home
317: News Archive
318: Community Forums
319: Member Screenshots
320: Home
321: Community Forums
322: Photo Gallery
323: Community Forums
324: Downloads
325: Home
326: Member Screenshots
327: Photo Gallery
328: Home
329: Community Forums
330: Home
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Home
335: Home
336: Downloads
337: Downloads
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Home
343: Photo Gallery
344: Home
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Home
348: Home
349: Home
350: Treasury
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Downloads
356: Home
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Photo Gallery
360: Community Forums
361: Downloads
362: Community Forums
363: News Archive
364: Statistics
365: Home
366: Home
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Member Screenshots
374: Home
375: Home
376: Home
377: News
378: Home
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: News Archive
382: Downloads
383: Community Forums
384: Home
385: Home
386: Community Forums
387: Member Screenshots
388: Home
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Photo Gallery
394: Home
395: Home
396: Home
397: Home
398: Home
399: Home
400: Member Screenshots
401: Community Forums
402: Member Screenshots
403: Community Forums
404: Downloads
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Photo Gallery
408: Photo Gallery
409: Member Screenshots
410: Home
411: Your Account
412: Community Forums
413: Member Screenshots
414: Home
415: Community Forums
416: News Archive
417: Community Forums
418: Photo Gallery
419: Home
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: News Archive
425: Community Forums
426: Home
427: Statistics
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Downloads
432: Community Forums
433: Home
434: Community Forums
435: Home
436: Home
437: Home
438: Photo Gallery
439: Photo Gallery
440: Home
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Photo Gallery
445: Member Screenshots
446: Home
447: Community Forums
448: Home
449: Home
450: Community Forums
451: Home
452: Home
453: Member Screenshots
454: Community Forums
455: Home
456: Community Forums
457: Home
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Downloads
461: Photo Gallery
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Photo Gallery
466: Member Screenshots
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Photo Gallery
472: Home
473: Home
474: Home
475: News Archive
476: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:32 am
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

- Kurt_Laughlin
To be honest, if the choice was between providing free daycare for the children of soldiers; or free internet connections so the deployed could talk with their families more often; or putting the cheapest possible roof over my favorite tanks; I would let the tanks rust.


Kurt,

I don't think it's a problem of choosing between a better "soldiercare" and a better "old-tanks-care". For me, money was already spent (wasted?) to restore some of the tanks, to move them from Knox to Benning and from Aberdeen to Lee, and now everything is stopped.

It's just like starting to build a house and not having the money to build the roof. The weather will damage the interior and walls of the house. In this case, it would have been better not to build the house at all.

Moreover, the tanks can't be viewed by the public, so everyone has something to loose with this situation. Better not having done anything or having done the whole thing... not just the half of it.

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

Fyi, some of the political background on this proposal: The House Appropriations Committee is proposing another continuing resolution to cover the remaining seven months of FY11 - instead of actually passing an FY11 appropriations bill. This is why the museum funding - among $100 billion in other projects would be cut. The museum funding is only in the President's FY11 request (it doesn't look like any funding was requested for FY12).

So unfortunately right now the museums are being held hostage to this bigger political game. Obama said he would veto the House Appropriations proposal, and anything will have to pass both the Republican House and Democratic Senate. There is some possibility they could just keep passing continuing resolutions and not pass an actual FY11 spending bill, but from what I understand that would be fairly unprecedented. Like i said, this is just the first salvo.
Back to top
View user's profile
ShermanWasRight
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Posts: 165
Location: Central Ohio/Northern Kentucky
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

Is military museum funding usually part of defense spending, or is it presented separately? If it's the former, at least I can mildly understand it (although it's still missing the point), and if it's presented separately, it's entirely missing the point...


edit: I just want to say, this thread is reminding me of one of the reasons why I like this board: Polite discussion about political issues, free of hyperbole. On a certain warbird board I also post on, things tend to be the exact opposite.
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

Sherman,
Actually I dont know where military museum funding is "usually." This is the first time, since I've been tracking the subject, that Army museums have moved - I think its certainly the most significant change in the Army museum system in 30 years, if not 60 years. In the past they didnt move, and a new one was built only every several decades... Only possible frame of reference I have is the last Ordnance Museum building effort in the late 1960s/early 1970s. There was an effort then to get everything undercover, but the military was very unpopular due to the Vietnam War - whether they couldnt get funding from the government, or raise enough privately, the Ordnance Museum only got a small building at APG. Often, such as the new Marine Corps Museum, the funds are raised privately. But this is a case where the museums have been uprooted because of BRAC - and in two out of three cases from fairly good existing museum facilities - and forced to move elsewhere, so this is also very different in that regard.

In this specific instance, the museum funding is located in the Military Construction and Veterans Bill - not in the Defense Appropriations Bill. But caught up in the broader Appropriations for _all_ departments. Right now the House Appropriations Committee doesnt want to pass new FY11 Appropriations for any department, but simply fund the government through continuing resolutions that would continue the FY10 spending levels (with no funding for new FY11 projects like the museums and a raft of other projects).
Back to top
View user's profile
Garry_Redmon
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 398
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

The Patton Museum was built over several years in phases, the funding of which came from private donations through the Patton Museum Foundation. It was then signed over to the Army.

My impression, correct or not, is that the new National Armor and Cavalry Museum at Benning will have to be built the same way, through donations collected by the National Armor and Cavalry Museum Foundation. See link.

www.armorcavalrymuseum.org/

I don't think that any public funds, except for staff salaries, building maintenance and the land it will be built on, will be used.

Garry

_________________
armorfortheages.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

- Garry_Redmon
The Patton Museum was built over several years in phases, the funding of which came from private donations through the Patton Museum Foundation. It was then signed over to the Army.

My impression, correct or not, is that the new National Armor and Cavalry Museum at Benning will have to be built the same way, through donations collected by the National Armor and Cavalry Museum Foundation. See link.

www.armorcavalrymuseum.org/

I don't think that any public funds, except for staff salaries, building maintenance and the land it will be built on, will be used.

Garry


Which amounts to quite a burn for the people/organizations who donated thinking they were funding a legacy institution only to see the major part of it relocated. I wonder how many of them will be eager to donate again to support the re-creation of facility they thought was paid for?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Garry_Redmon
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 398
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

That's a good point Doug. It's going to be a tough sell for the Patton Museum Foundation to get more donations to "stay in business" so to speak. The current infrastructure improvements to the building are being funded by Accessions Command and Fort Knox and I hope they continue to financially support the museum when it is needed.

Garry

_________________
armorfortheages.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

- Garry_Redmon

My impression, correct or not, is that the new National Armor and Cavalry Museum at Benning will have to be built the same way, through donations collected by the National Armor and Cavalry Museum Foundation. See link.

[SNIP]

I don't think that any public funds, except for staff salaries, building maintenance and the land it will be built on, will be used.



Garry, if that's the case, I dont know what the $32 million in the FY11 MILCON request for a "Museum Operations Support Building" at Fort Benning is for - particularly the part below: "This project is required to provide an adequate, secure storage area and training facility for US Army owned artifacts related to relocation of the Armor School to Fort Benning, GA. This facility will serve as a historical knowledge base for the evolution of armor and weapons systems that can be used as part of the Maneuver Center’s training curriculum."

See page 141 here comptroller.defense.go...011_c1.pdf

The details are on page No. 115 here asafm.army.mil/Documen...fh-hoa.pdf

ITEM UM (M/E) QUANTITY UNIT COST COST ($000)
PRIMARY FACILITY 2 3 , 1 7 3
Museum Operations Support Bldg m2 (SF) 9,848 ( 106,000) 2,167 (21,338)
Special Foundations LS -- -- (488)
IDS Installation LS -- -- (71)
EMCS Connections LS -- -- (196)
SDD and EPAct05 LS -- -- (436)
Total from Continuation page (644)
SUPPORTING FACILITIES 4 , 9 7 4
Electric Service LS -- -- (374)
Water, Sewer, Gas LS -- -- (232)
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters LS -- -- (1,014)
Storm Drainage LS -- -- (402)
Site Imp( 2,811) Demo( ) LS -- -- (2,811)
Information Systems LS -- -- (81)
Antiterrorism Measures LS -- -- (60)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST 28,147
C O N T I N G E N C Y ( 5 . 0 0 % ) 1,407
SUBTOTAL 29,554
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (5.70%) 1,685
D E S I G N / B U I L D - D E S I G N C O S T 1,182
TOTAL REQUEST 32,421
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 32,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP ()
10 . Description of Proposed Construction
Construct a climate controlled storage facility with high bay. Project will
include museum operations support building, intrusion detection system (IDS) installation, energy monitoring and control system (EMCS) connections, antiterrorism measures and buildng information
systems. Supporting facilities include: water, sewer, and natural gas
services, parking, curbs and gutters, security lighting, exterior
communications, fire protection, storm sewer system, sidewalks, site
preparation, erosion control/grassing, landscaping, signage, cultural and
wetland mitigation at the site. Provide necessary antiterrorism measures.
Heating and air conditioning will be provided by self contained units.
Comprehensive building and furnishings related interior design services are required. Access for persons with disabilities will be provided. Sustainable Design and Development (SDD) and Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct05) features will be provided. Air Conditioning (Estimated 1,319 kWr/375 Tons).

9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
Unit Cost
Item UM (M/E) QUANTITY COST ($000)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
Antiterrorism Measures LS -- -- (436)
B u i l d i n g I n f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m s L S - - - - (208 )
Total 644

REQUIREMENT: This project is required to provide an adequate, secure storage area and training facility for US Army owned artifacts related to relocation of the Armor School to Fort Benning, GA. This facility will serve as a historical knowledge base for the evolution of armor and weapons systems that can be used as part of the Maneuver Center’s training curriculum.

CURRENT SITUATION: Currently, there are no existing facilities on Fort
Benning that can be utilized to accommodate relocation of these systems to the
installation.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: If this project is not provided, there will be no
facilities at Fort Benning to receive, store, and maintain Army artifacts that
are to be sent to Fort Benning.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been explored during project development. This project is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available for use by other components. A parametric cost estimate based upon project engineering design was used to develop this budget estimate. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.

A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
( a ) D a t e D e s i g n S t a r t e d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . APR 2008
( b ) P e r c e n t C o m p l e t e A s O f J a n u a r y 2 0 1 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.00
( c ) D a t e 3 5 % D e s i g n e d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MAR 2011
( d ) D a t e D e s i g n C o m p l e t e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MAY 2011
( e ) P a r a m e t r i c C o s t E s t i m a t i n g U s e d t o D e v e l o p C o s t s YES
(f) Type of Design Contract: Design-build
(a) Standard or Definitive Design: NO
(3) Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e): ($000)
( a ) P r o d u c t i o n o f P l a n s a n d S p e c i f i c a t i o n s . . . . . . . . . . 762
( b ) A l l O t h e r D e s i g n C o s t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 457
( c ) T o t a l D e s i g n C o s t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,219
( d ) C o n t r a c t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 762
( e ) I n - h o u s e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 457
( 4 ) C o n s t r u c t i o n C o n t r a c t A w a r d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JAN 2011
( 5 ) C o n s t r u c t i o n S t a r t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MAR 2011
( 6 ) C o n s t r u c t i o n C o m p l e t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SEP 2012
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 1:28 am
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

I spoke to a Congressional staffer on the subject this afternoon:

Bad News: This House Appropriations Committee proposal may well stand... If it gets to the Senate, they can basically only vote it up or down. Museum funding could not be put back in because that would be considered an "earmark," which they have done away with... If that happens, and the President signs it, no FY11 funding for the new museums. But, we could see the funding in the FY12 appropriations (or FY13, etc).

Good News: The small silver lining is that there are people aware of this issue on the Capitol. I was surprised how familiar he was with the subject... Apparently this has been discussed by various Congressmen (or their staff), which was further surprising to me...

So I will continue to watch this and see what happens. At the same time, I'm going to start asking questions about what the public can do...

Side Comment: Basically, the funding for the museums was requested at the worst possible time - in the transition from the control of Congress from the Democrats to the Republicans. If it has been in the FY10 request, construction would likely be underway now... Unfortunately, the Army waited until the end of the BRAC period (all BRAC moves are supposed to be done by the end of FY11) to request the museum funding...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Garry_Redmon
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 398
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:18 am
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

Like I said, it's my impression, correct or not. This impression comes from unsubstantiated rumors and such floating around. Wink

The NACM Foundation says on their site that the museum will cost $50 million and on another page says $75 million and that part of that money will be from donations. It also says that the foundation is prepared to raise the entire funding if needed. With the deficit reduction plans flying around, possible cuts to entitlements being proposed, I just don't know.

Maybe one reason that some Congress critters are aware of the museum funding comes from the local, state and federal denizens in that region of Georgia wanting what they thought they would be getting by now . . . a huge tourist draw.

Don't get me wrong, I really, really do hope that the appropriation is approved and a new museum is built as quick as possible. Sand Hill is not an appropriate place to store historic vehicles. My two cents.

Garry

_________________
armorfortheages.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
vagabond
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 05, 2009
Posts: 1388
Location: Constantly moving across US
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:26 am
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

Neil,

Please let us know what we can to do to try to get this addressed.
I'll be glad to write/call Congressmen and anyone else that it might help to contact.

Maybe we can even talk the powers that be into building facilities with decent lighting - speaking as a member of the Photography Lobby!
Back to top
View user's profile
Massimo_Foti
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 5397
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 9:49 am
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

By the time the buildings will be ready our cameras will work just fine at ISO 6400. Camera makers will work faster than the public administrations Smile

Massimo
Back to top
View user's profile
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 1:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

I think Bob Smart's initials cover the whole situation completely

_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
ShermanWasRight
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Posts: 165
Location: Central Ohio/Northern Kentucky
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 5:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

- vagabond
Neil,

Please let us know what we can to do to try to get this addressed.
I'll be glad to write/call Congressmen and anyone else that it might help to contact.

Maybe we can even talk the powers that be into building facilities with decent lighting - speaking as a member of the Photography Lobby!


tell that to the USAF museum (ba-zing)
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 10:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

- vagabond
Neil,

Please let us know what we can to do to try to get this addressed.
I'll be glad to write/call Congressmen and anyone else that it might help to contact.

Maybe we can even talk the powers that be into building facilities with decent lighting - speaking as a member of the Photography Lobby!


VB,
Thanks for your thoughts - glad to hear that. I am starting to think it's time for some sort of action on this, perhaps even an organization or foundation of some sort (FYI, the old Ordnance Museum Foundation has recharted itself as the "Aberdeen Military Museum Foundation" to support the new APG Museum). I'm starting to float this idea with several people...

If and when anything comes of this, I will definitely let everyone know.

FYI, one more bit of news I just learned, is that the museum funding did not make it into the FY11 authorization (which was already passed) - so unfortunately it looks like its a bit of a dead issue for this fiscal year... FY12, etc is the big question now...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum