±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 568
Total: 568
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Home
04: Home
05: Home
06: Home
07: Home
08: Home
09: Home
10: Home
11: Home
12: Home
13: Home
14: Home
15: Home
16: Home
17: Home
18: Home
19: Home
20: Home
21: Home
22: Home
23: Home
24: Home
25: Home
26: Home
27: Home
28: Home
29: Home
30: Home
31: Home
32: Home
33: Home
34: Home
35: Home
36: Home
37: Home
38: Home
39: Home
40: Home
41: Home
42: Home
43: Home
44: Home
45: Home
46: Home
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Downloads
50: Photo Gallery
51: Community Forums
52: Your Account
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Member Screenshots
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Home
61: Downloads
62: Home
63: Your Account
64: Home
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: Home
69: Home
70: Home
71: Home
72: Home
73: Home
74: Home
75: Home
76: Home
77: Home
78: Home
79: Home
80: Home
81: Home
82: Home
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Home
87: Home
88: Home
89: Home
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Photo Gallery
93: Home
94: Home
95: Home
96: Home
97: Home
98: Home
99: Home
100: Home
101: Home
102: Home
103: Home
104: Home
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Your Account
109: Community Forums
110: Downloads
111: Home
112: Home
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Photo Gallery
116: Home
117: Community Forums
118: Photo Gallery
119: Community Forums
120: Home
121: Home
122: Home
123: Home
124: Home
125: Home
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: Home
129: Home
130: Home
131: Home
132: Home
133: Home
134: Home
135: Home
136: Home
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Community Forums
140: Member Screenshots
141: Community Forums
142: Photo Gallery
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Home
147: Home
148: Home
149: Home
150: Photo Gallery
151: Home
152: Home
153: Home
154: Home
155: Home
156: Home
157: Home
158: Home
159: Home
160: Home
161: Home
162: Home
163: Home
164: Home
165: Home
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Downloads
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: Downloads
176: Photo Gallery
177: Home
178: Home
179: Community Forums
180: Photo Gallery
181: Photo Gallery
182: Your Account
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Home
186: Community Forums
187: Downloads
188: Home
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Photo Gallery
195: Member Screenshots
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Community Forums
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Community Forums
203: Home
204: Photo Gallery
205: Home
206: Photo Gallery
207: Downloads
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Home
211: Home
212: Home
213: Community Forums
214: Downloads
215: Photo Gallery
216: Home
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Home
220: Member Screenshots
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Home
224: Home
225: Home
226: Home
227: Home
228: Home
229: Home
230: Home
231: Photo Gallery
232: Home
233: Home
234: Home
235: Home
236: Home
237: Home
238: Home
239: Home
240: Home
241: Home
242: Home
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Home
247: Home
248: Home
249: Home
250: Home
251: Home
252: Home
253: Home
254: Home
255: Home
256: Home
257: Downloads
258: Home
259: Home
260: Home
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Home
264: Home
265: Home
266: Home
267: Home
268: Home
269: Home
270: Home
271: Home
272: Home
273: Home
274: Photo Gallery
275: Home
276: Home
277: Downloads
278: Member Screenshots
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Home
282: Home
283: Member Screenshots
284: Home
285: Home
286: Home
287: Home
288: Community Forums
289: Home
290: Home
291: Home
292: Home
293: Home
294: Home
295: Home
296: Home
297: Home
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Home
302: Home
303: Home
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Member Screenshots
308: Home
309: Home
310: Home
311: Home
312: Home
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Home
317: Home
318: Home
319: Photo Gallery
320: Home
321: Home
322: Community Forums
323: Home
324: Home
325: Home
326: Home
327: Home
328: Home
329: Home
330: Home
331: Home
332: Home
333: Home
334: Home
335: Home
336: Home
337: Home
338: Home
339: Photo Gallery
340: Home
341: Home
342: Home
343: Home
344: Home
345: Community Forums
346: Photo Gallery
347: Community Forums
348: Your Account
349: Photo Gallery
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Home
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Home
356: Home
357: Community Forums
358: Photo Gallery
359: Home
360: Community Forums
361: Home
362: Home
363: Member Screenshots
364: Home
365: Member Screenshots
366: Community Forums
367: Member Screenshots
368: Community Forums
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Photo Gallery
372: Photo Gallery
373: Your Account
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Your Account
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Photo Gallery
381: Community Forums
382: Home
383: Photo Gallery
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Home
389: Home
390: Photo Gallery
391: Home
392: Your Account
393: Home
394: Home
395: Home
396: Home
397: Community Forums
398: Home
399: Photo Gallery
400: Downloads
401: Home
402: Home
403: Photo Gallery
404: Home
405: Photo Gallery
406: News Archive
407: Community Forums
408: Photo Gallery
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Photo Gallery
414: Home
415: Community Forums
416: Home
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Photo Gallery
422: Community Forums
423: Home
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Home
430: Community Forums
431: Home
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: Community Forums
436: Home
437: Downloads
438: Home
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Photo Gallery
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Downloads
448: Photo Gallery
449: Photo Gallery
450: Community Forums
451: Community Forums
452: Community Forums
453: Home
454: Photo Gallery
455: Photo Gallery
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: News Archive
461: Community Forums
462: Home
463: Your Account
464: Community Forums
465: Member Screenshots
466: Home
467: Home
468: Member Screenshots
469: News
470: Community Forums
471: Community Forums
472: Photo Gallery
473: Your Account
474: Community Forums
475: Home
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Home
479: Community Forums
480: Photo Gallery
481: Community Forums
482: Home
483: Home
484: Home
485: Community Forums
486: Community Forums
487: Community Forums
488: Home
489: Home
490: Home
491: Home
492: Home
493: Home
494: Home
495: Home
496: Community Forums
497: Home
498: Community Forums
499: Community Forums
500: Home
501: Home
502: Home
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Photo Gallery
506: Community Forums
507: Community Forums
508: Home
509: Community Forums
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: News Archive
514: Home
515: Home
516: Home
517: Photo Gallery
518: Community Forums
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Your Account
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Downloads
526: Community Forums
527: Home
528: Home
529: Community Forums
530: Home
531: Downloads
532: Home
533: Home
534: Community Forums
535: Home
536: Home
537: Photo Gallery
538: Home
539: Community Forums
540: Photo Gallery
541: Home
542: Community Forums
543: Photo Gallery
544: Home
545: Home
546: Community Forums
547: Downloads
548: Home
549: Community Forums
550: Statistics
551: Home
552: Community Forums
553: Home
554: Your Account
555: Community Forums
556: Photo Gallery
557: Home
558: Home
559: Home
560: Home
561: Downloads
562: Home
563: Photo Gallery
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Member Screenshots
567: Community Forums
568: Member Screenshots

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:32 am
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

- Kurt_Laughlin
To be honest, if the choice was between providing free daycare for the children of soldiers; or free internet connections so the deployed could talk with their families more often; or putting the cheapest possible roof over my favorite tanks; I would let the tanks rust.


Kurt,

I don't think it's a problem of choosing between a better "soldiercare" and a better "old-tanks-care". For me, money was already spent (wasted?) to restore some of the tanks, to move them from Knox to Benning and from Aberdeen to Lee, and now everything is stopped.

It's just like starting to build a house and not having the money to build the roof. The weather will damage the interior and walls of the house. In this case, it would have been better not to build the house at all.

Moreover, the tanks can't be viewed by the public, so everyone has something to loose with this situation. Better not having done anything or having done the whole thing... not just the half of it.

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

Fyi, some of the political background on this proposal: The House Appropriations Committee is proposing another continuing resolution to cover the remaining seven months of FY11 - instead of actually passing an FY11 appropriations bill. This is why the museum funding - among $100 billion in other projects would be cut. The museum funding is only in the President's FY11 request (it doesn't look like any funding was requested for FY12).

So unfortunately right now the museums are being held hostage to this bigger political game. Obama said he would veto the House Appropriations proposal, and anything will have to pass both the Republican House and Democratic Senate. There is some possibility they could just keep passing continuing resolutions and not pass an actual FY11 spending bill, but from what I understand that would be fairly unprecedented. Like i said, this is just the first salvo.
Back to top
View user's profile
ShermanWasRight
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Posts: 165
Location: Central Ohio/Northern Kentucky
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

Is military museum funding usually part of defense spending, or is it presented separately? If it's the former, at least I can mildly understand it (although it's still missing the point), and if it's presented separately, it's entirely missing the point...


edit: I just want to say, this thread is reminding me of one of the reasons why I like this board: Polite discussion about political issues, free of hyperbole. On a certain warbird board I also post on, things tend to be the exact opposite.
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

Sherman,
Actually I dont know where military museum funding is "usually." This is the first time, since I've been tracking the subject, that Army museums have moved - I think its certainly the most significant change in the Army museum system in 30 years, if not 60 years. In the past they didnt move, and a new one was built only every several decades... Only possible frame of reference I have is the last Ordnance Museum building effort in the late 1960s/early 1970s. There was an effort then to get everything undercover, but the military was very unpopular due to the Vietnam War - whether they couldnt get funding from the government, or raise enough privately, the Ordnance Museum only got a small building at APG. Often, such as the new Marine Corps Museum, the funds are raised privately. But this is a case where the museums have been uprooted because of BRAC - and in two out of three cases from fairly good existing museum facilities - and forced to move elsewhere, so this is also very different in that regard.

In this specific instance, the museum funding is located in the Military Construction and Veterans Bill - not in the Defense Appropriations Bill. But caught up in the broader Appropriations for _all_ departments. Right now the House Appropriations Committee doesnt want to pass new FY11 Appropriations for any department, but simply fund the government through continuing resolutions that would continue the FY10 spending levels (with no funding for new FY11 projects like the museums and a raft of other projects).
Back to top
View user's profile
Garry_Redmon
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 398
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

The Patton Museum was built over several years in phases, the funding of which came from private donations through the Patton Museum Foundation. It was then signed over to the Army.

My impression, correct or not, is that the new National Armor and Cavalry Museum at Benning will have to be built the same way, through donations collected by the National Armor and Cavalry Museum Foundation. See link.

www.armorcavalrymuseum.org/

I don't think that any public funds, except for staff salaries, building maintenance and the land it will be built on, will be used.

Garry

_________________
armorfortheages.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 9:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

- Garry_Redmon
The Patton Museum was built over several years in phases, the funding of which came from private donations through the Patton Museum Foundation. It was then signed over to the Army.

My impression, correct or not, is that the new National Armor and Cavalry Museum at Benning will have to be built the same way, through donations collected by the National Armor and Cavalry Museum Foundation. See link.

www.armorcavalrymuseum.org/

I don't think that any public funds, except for staff salaries, building maintenance and the land it will be built on, will be used.

Garry


Which amounts to quite a burn for the people/organizations who donated thinking they were funding a legacy institution only to see the major part of it relocated. I wonder how many of them will be eager to donate again to support the re-creation of facility they thought was paid for?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Garry_Redmon
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 398
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

That's a good point Doug. It's going to be a tough sell for the Patton Museum Foundation to get more donations to "stay in business" so to speak. The current infrastructure improvements to the building are being funded by Accessions Command and Fort Knox and I hope they continue to financially support the museum when it is needed.

Garry

_________________
armorfortheages.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

- Garry_Redmon

My impression, correct or not, is that the new National Armor and Cavalry Museum at Benning will have to be built the same way, through donations collected by the National Armor and Cavalry Museum Foundation. See link.

[SNIP]

I don't think that any public funds, except for staff salaries, building maintenance and the land it will be built on, will be used.



Garry, if that's the case, I dont know what the $32 million in the FY11 MILCON request for a "Museum Operations Support Building" at Fort Benning is for - particularly the part below: "This project is required to provide an adequate, secure storage area and training facility for US Army owned artifacts related to relocation of the Armor School to Fort Benning, GA. This facility will serve as a historical knowledge base for the evolution of armor and weapons systems that can be used as part of the Maneuver Center’s training curriculum."

See page 141 here comptroller.defense.go...011_c1.pdf

The details are on page No. 115 here asafm.army.mil/Documen...fh-hoa.pdf

ITEM UM (M/E) QUANTITY UNIT COST COST ($000)
PRIMARY FACILITY 2 3 , 1 7 3
Museum Operations Support Bldg m2 (SF) 9,848 ( 106,000) 2,167 (21,338)
Special Foundations LS -- -- (488)
IDS Installation LS -- -- (71)
EMCS Connections LS -- -- (196)
SDD and EPAct05 LS -- -- (436)
Total from Continuation page (644)
SUPPORTING FACILITIES 4 , 9 7 4
Electric Service LS -- -- (374)
Water, Sewer, Gas LS -- -- (232)
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters LS -- -- (1,014)
Storm Drainage LS -- -- (402)
Site Imp( 2,811) Demo( ) LS -- -- (2,811)
Information Systems LS -- -- (81)
Antiterrorism Measures LS -- -- (60)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST 28,147
C O N T I N G E N C Y ( 5 . 0 0 % ) 1,407
SUBTOTAL 29,554
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (5.70%) 1,685
D E S I G N / B U I L D - D E S I G N C O S T 1,182
TOTAL REQUEST 32,421
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED) 32,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP ()
10 . Description of Proposed Construction
Construct a climate controlled storage facility with high bay. Project will
include museum operations support building, intrusion detection system (IDS) installation, energy monitoring and control system (EMCS) connections, antiterrorism measures and buildng information
systems. Supporting facilities include: water, sewer, and natural gas
services, parking, curbs and gutters, security lighting, exterior
communications, fire protection, storm sewer system, sidewalks, site
preparation, erosion control/grassing, landscaping, signage, cultural and
wetland mitigation at the site. Provide necessary antiterrorism measures.
Heating and air conditioning will be provided by self contained units.
Comprehensive building and furnishings related interior design services are required. Access for persons with disabilities will be provided. Sustainable Design and Development (SDD) and Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct05) features will be provided. Air Conditioning (Estimated 1,319 kWr/375 Tons).

9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
Unit Cost
Item UM (M/E) QUANTITY COST ($000)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
Antiterrorism Measures LS -- -- (436)
B u i l d i n g I n f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m s L S - - - - (208 )
Total 644

REQUIREMENT: This project is required to provide an adequate, secure storage area and training facility for US Army owned artifacts related to relocation of the Armor School to Fort Benning, GA. This facility will serve as a historical knowledge base for the evolution of armor and weapons systems that can be used as part of the Maneuver Center’s training curriculum.

CURRENT SITUATION: Currently, there are no existing facilities on Fort
Benning that can be utilized to accommodate relocation of these systems to the
installation.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: If this project is not provided, there will be no
facilities at Fort Benning to receive, store, and maintain Army artifacts that
are to be sent to Fort Benning.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been explored during project development. This project is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available for use by other components. A parametric cost estimate based upon project engineering design was used to develop this budget estimate. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.

A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
( a ) D a t e D e s i g n S t a r t e d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . APR 2008
( b ) P e r c e n t C o m p l e t e A s O f J a n u a r y 2 0 1 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.00
( c ) D a t e 3 5 % D e s i g n e d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MAR 2011
( d ) D a t e D e s i g n C o m p l e t e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MAY 2011
( e ) P a r a m e t r i c C o s t E s t i m a t i n g U s e d t o D e v e l o p C o s t s YES
(f) Type of Design Contract: Design-build
(a) Standard or Definitive Design: NO
(3) Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e): ($000)
( a ) P r o d u c t i o n o f P l a n s a n d S p e c i f i c a t i o n s . . . . . . . . . . 762
( b ) A l l O t h e r D e s i g n C o s t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 457
( c ) T o t a l D e s i g n C o s t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,219
( d ) C o n t r a c t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 762
( e ) I n - h o u s e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 457
( 4 ) C o n s t r u c t i o n C o n t r a c t A w a r d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JAN 2011
( 5 ) C o n s t r u c t i o n S t a r t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MAR 2011
( 6 ) C o n s t r u c t i o n C o m p l e t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SEP 2012
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 1:28 am
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

I spoke to a Congressional staffer on the subject this afternoon:

Bad News: This House Appropriations Committee proposal may well stand... If it gets to the Senate, they can basically only vote it up or down. Museum funding could not be put back in because that would be considered an "earmark," which they have done away with... If that happens, and the President signs it, no FY11 funding for the new museums. But, we could see the funding in the FY12 appropriations (or FY13, etc).

Good News: The small silver lining is that there are people aware of this issue on the Capitol. I was surprised how familiar he was with the subject... Apparently this has been discussed by various Congressmen (or their staff), which was further surprising to me...

So I will continue to watch this and see what happens. At the same time, I'm going to start asking questions about what the public can do...

Side Comment: Basically, the funding for the museums was requested at the worst possible time - in the transition from the control of Congress from the Democrats to the Republicans. If it has been in the FY10 request, construction would likely be underway now... Unfortunately, the Army waited until the end of the BRAC period (all BRAC moves are supposed to be done by the end of FY11) to request the museum funding...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Garry_Redmon
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 398
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:18 am
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

Like I said, it's my impression, correct or not. This impression comes from unsubstantiated rumors and such floating around. Wink

The NACM Foundation says on their site that the museum will cost $50 million and on another page says $75 million and that part of that money will be from donations. It also says that the foundation is prepared to raise the entire funding if needed. With the deficit reduction plans flying around, possible cuts to entitlements being proposed, I just don't know.

Maybe one reason that some Congress critters are aware of the museum funding comes from the local, state and federal denizens in that region of Georgia wanting what they thought they would be getting by now . . . a huge tourist draw.

Don't get me wrong, I really, really do hope that the appropriation is approved and a new museum is built as quick as possible. Sand Hill is not an appropriate place to store historic vehicles. My two cents.

Garry

_________________
armorfortheages.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
vagabond
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 05, 2009
Posts: 1388
Location: Constantly moving across US
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:26 am
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

Neil,

Please let us know what we can to do to try to get this addressed.
I'll be glad to write/call Congressmen and anyone else that it might help to contact.

Maybe we can even talk the powers that be into building facilities with decent lighting - speaking as a member of the Photography Lobby!
Back to top
View user's profile
Massimo_Foti
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 5397
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 9:49 am
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

By the time the buildings will be ready our cameras will work just fine at ISO 6400. Camera makers will work faster than the public administrations Smile

Massimo
Back to top
View user's profile
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 1:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

I think Bob Smart's initials cover the whole situation completely

_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
ShermanWasRight
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Posts: 165
Location: Central Ohio/Northern Kentucky
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 5:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

- vagabond
Neil,

Please let us know what we can to do to try to get this addressed.
I'll be glad to write/call Congressmen and anyone else that it might help to contact.

Maybe we can even talk the powers that be into building facilities with decent lighting - speaking as a member of the Photography Lobby!


tell that to the USAF museum (ba-zing)
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 10:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Not Good: House Proposed FY11 MILCON Museum Cuts

- vagabond
Neil,

Please let us know what we can to do to try to get this addressed.
I'll be glad to write/call Congressmen and anyone else that it might help to contact.

Maybe we can even talk the powers that be into building facilities with decent lighting - speaking as a member of the Photography Lobby!


VB,
Thanks for your thoughts - glad to hear that. I am starting to think it's time for some sort of action on this, perhaps even an organization or foundation of some sort (FYI, the old Ordnance Museum Foundation has recharted itself as the "Aberdeen Military Museum Foundation" to support the new APG Museum). I'm starting to float this idea with several people...

If and when anything comes of this, I will definitely let everyone know.

FYI, one more bit of news I just learned, is that the museum funding did not make it into the FY11 authorization (which was already passed) - so unfortunately it looks like its a bit of a dead issue for this fiscal year... FY12, etc is the big question now...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum