±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 152
Total: 152
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Member Screenshots
02: Member Screenshots
03: Member Screenshots
04: Home
05: Home
06: Member Screenshots
07: Member Screenshots
08: Community Forums
09: Photo Gallery
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Member Screenshots
13: Member Screenshots
14: Member Screenshots
15: Downloads
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: CPGlang
20: Photo Gallery
21: News
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: CPGlang
26: Member Screenshots
27: Member Screenshots
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Photo Gallery
34: Community Forums
35: Home
36: Photo Gallery
37: Home
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Home
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Member Screenshots
47: Community Forums
48: Member Screenshots
49: Community Forums
50: Member Screenshots
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: CPGlang
54: Community Forums
55: Photo Gallery
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Member Screenshots
59: Photo Gallery
60: Member Screenshots
61: Member Screenshots
62: Home
63: Photo Gallery
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Member Screenshots
67: Member Screenshots
68: Community Forums
69: Home
70: Member Screenshots
71: Member Screenshots
72: Member Screenshots
73: Member Screenshots
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Statistics
78: Home
79: Home
80: Photo Gallery
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: News Archive
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Member Screenshots
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Member Screenshots
95: Home
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Photo Gallery
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: CPGlang
102: Photo Gallery
103: Home
104: CPGlang
105: News
106: Home
107: Member Screenshots
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Photo Gallery
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: CPGlang
117: Community Forums
118: Member Screenshots
119: Member Screenshots
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Home
124: Member Screenshots
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Member Screenshots
128: Member Screenshots
129: Member Screenshots
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Member Screenshots
136: Photo Gallery
137: Community Forums
138: Member Screenshots
139: Community Forums
140: Member Screenshots
141: Community Forums
142: Member Screenshots
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: CPGlang
148: Home
149: CPGlang
150: Home
151: Photo Gallery
152: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
For SFC Button....
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:12 am
Post subject: For SFC Button....

Caution: Soldier persons speaking soldier talk, the way it is.

shock.military.com/Sho...511&page=1
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Tanklord
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 817
Location: Louisiana
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 2:22 pm
Post subject: Re: For SFC Button....

I am not familiar with fire drills for mortars, but these guys appeared to be concerned with only one thing...putting rounds down range! Twisted Evil I bet the safety Nazis would have had a stroke. Way to go Mortars!

_________________
The only thing to do when a son-of-a-bitch looks
cross-eyed at you is to beat the hell out of him right
then and there
Back to top
View user's profile Yahoo Messenger
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:58 am
Post subject: Re: For SFC Button....

Hey Doug, that's some great video and really makes me miss the gun line! The WP and HE mix, (shake and bake) was always my favorite mission. I counted 8rds at charge "0" and 8 rounds at charge "1". Minimum range for a 120mm was 200 meters so they were firing at targets pretty close.
They had pre-determined targets already. These were probably marked by aiming poles as well as marks inside the gun pit walls in case the poles got knocked down, for quick reference/aqusition. They moved the gun to 3 different firing points in rapid order. This means they had rehersed their pre-determined elevation and charges for those points. And more than likely had round "pre-cut" to those charges in case of attack. I doubt the were FPF's, (final protective fires) however.
The opening of the footage must have been taken from inside the FDC, (fire direction center) bunker.
The one soldier complained about his ears and thats no joke. A 120mm round going off at head level within 6 feet of you is on heck of a blast, even with ear plugs or your fingers in your ears at charge 1. We had pits like those in Korea when I was with 1/503rd in 97-98. I understand now that even mach units are doing much more ground-mount missions from FOB's and other bases than from thier tracks. It allows them to quickly fire 360 degree's easier than when they are mounted in tracks and can't fire over the front of the track due to "stop-blocks" in the turn-tables.
I'll have to save this tape for future reference.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:50 am
Post subject: Re: For SFC Button....

char
- SFC_Jeff_Button
Hey Doug, that's some great video and really makes me miss the gun line! The WP and HE mix, (shake and bake) was always my favorite mission. I counted 8rds at charge "0" and 8 rounds at charge "1". Minimum range for a 120mm was 200 meters so they were firing at targets pretty close.
They had pre-determined targets already. These were probably marked by aiming poles as well as marks inside the gun pit walls in case the poles got knocked down, for quick reference/aqusition. They moved the gun to 3 different firing points in rapid order. This means they had rehersed their pre-determined elevation and charges for those points. And more than likely had round "pre-cut" to those charges in case of attack. I doubt the were FPF's, (final protective fires) however.
The opening of the footage must have been taken from inside the FDC, (fire direction center) bunker.
The one soldier complained about his ears and thats no joke. A 120mm round going off at head level within 6 feet of you is on heck of a blast, even with ear plugs or your fingers in your ears at charge 1. We had pits like those in Korea when I was with 1/503rd in 97-98. I understand now that even mach units are doing much more ground-mount missions from FOB's and other bases than from thier tracks. It allows them to quickly fire 360 degree's easier than when they are mounted in tracks and can't fire over the front of the track due to "stop-blocks" in the turn-tables.
I'll have to save this tape for future reference.


Jeff,
not being 11C myself, but having worked with closely, my impression is as yours...situation far less than ideal, but not hypercritical....yet. Had established registration on likely points of attack and were prepared to implement prepared fire positions quickly as needed. Lots of charge 0 and charge 1 for close in threats and had prepositioned likely directions of fire and probably pre-registered so getting steel on target was a rotation and an elevation setting. Not a lot of wasted action...turn, elevate (or depress) and start pumping rounds out until that threat abates. Then, onto the next threat. Seemed well controlled and nobody paniced. Close in threats were being engaged by riflemen so mortar team could execute their plan.

I love it when a plan comes together!
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum