±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 310
Total: 310
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: News Archive
04: Community Forums
05: Member Screenshots
06: Home
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Member Screenshots
10: Home
11: News Archive
12: Photo Gallery
13: Home
14: Home
15: Photo Gallery
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: News Archive
29: News Archive
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Home
34: Community Forums
35: Home
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: Photo Gallery
39: Photo Gallery
40: Community Forums
41: Your Account
42: Photo Gallery
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Photo Gallery
47: News Archive
48: Home
49: Home
50: News Archive
51: Member Screenshots
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Member Screenshots
55: Photo Gallery
56: Your Account
57: Member Screenshots
58: Home
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Member Screenshots
63: Member Screenshots
64: Community Forums
65: News Archive
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: Photo Gallery
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Photo Gallery
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: News Archive
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Member Screenshots
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: News Archive
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Downloads
107: News Archive
108: Member Screenshots
109: Photo Gallery
110: Home
111: Home
112: Photo Gallery
113: Home
114: Home
115: Home
116: Home
117: Home
118: Home
119: Home
120: Home
121: Home
122: News Archive
123: Home
124: Home
125: Home
126: Home
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Home
131: Downloads
132: Member Screenshots
133: Home
134: Home
135: Home
136: Photo Gallery
137: Home
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Photo Gallery
141: Home
142: News Archive
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Home
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Photo Gallery
154: Community Forums
155: Home
156: Home
157: Home
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Downloads
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Home
166: Downloads
167: News Archive
168: Home
169: Home
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Photo Gallery
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Contact
179: Community Forums
180: News Archive
181: Photo Gallery
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Your Account
186: Downloads
187: News Archive
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: Community Forums
194: Downloads
195: Community Forums
196: Photo Gallery
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: News
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Photo Gallery
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: News Archive
210: Member Screenshots
211: Home
212: Home
213: Community Forums
214: Photo Gallery
215: Home
216: Downloads
217: Home
218: News
219: Community Forums
220: Photo Gallery
221: Home
222: Community Forums
223: Home
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: Downloads
227: Community Forums
228: Photo Gallery
229: Home
230: Member Screenshots
231: News Archive
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Member Screenshots
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Photo Gallery
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: News
243: Home
244: Photo Gallery
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Photo Gallery
248: Community Forums
249: Member Screenshots
250: Community Forums
251: Home
252: Community Forums
253: News Archive
254: Community Forums
255: Photo Gallery
256: Community Forums
257: Downloads
258: Member Screenshots
259: Downloads
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Your Account
267: Photo Gallery
268: Home
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Downloads
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Member Screenshots
277: Home
278: Member Screenshots
279: Downloads
280: Downloads
281: Photo Gallery
282: Downloads
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Photo Gallery
287: Photo Gallery
288: Member Screenshots
289: Home
290: Photo Gallery
291: Home
292: Photo Gallery
293: Community Forums
294: News Archive
295: Home
296: Home
297: Photo Gallery
298: Community Forums
299: Member Screenshots
300: Home
301: Community Forums
302: Member Screenshots
303: Community Forums
304: Your Account
305: Home
306: Photo Gallery
307: Community Forums
308: Home
309: Home
310: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Grizzly and Sexton Versions
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:33 am
Post subject: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

Is that true that the early Sextons and Grizzlys where based or using parts/chassis of RAMs and where describe as Mk I.

Later it was change and Sextons and Grizzly used Grizzly program and could (Sexton for sure) be describe as Mk II.

I try to explain why one Grizzlys and Sextons have 17 gear main wheels other have 13 gear wheels.

Could I get a help with that.
Back to top
View user's profile
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:21 am
Post subject: Re: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

Hi Rafal,

The first batch of 125 Sexton are based on the Canadian Ram tank
The Ram tank itself was based on the automotive parts of the US M3 Lee
This version got the designation Sexton Mk I

The remaining Sexton vehicle's are based on the Canadian Grizzly tank
The Grizzly was based on the automotive parts of the US M4A1 Sherman
This version got the designation Sexton Mk II

There has not been an version of the Grizzly based on the Ram tank

see also Wikipedia:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...tillery%29

The number of teeth differ because of the different type of track used.
The Grizzly tank used CDP type track that usen an 13 teeth sprocket

see also the following site
there is also an short description of the Grizzly type tank
mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/...Canada.htm


Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

So,

-we should find only CDP tracks on Grizzly tanks

-and we can find both CDP tracks and RAM tracks on Sextons (if I understand correctly).

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 6:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

Sexton IIs had stowage boxes & rails on the rear decks as well IIRC.

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

- the_shadock
-we should find only CDP tracks on Grizzly tanks

-and we can find both CDP tracks and RAM tracks on Sextons (if I understand correctly)


I did some research and it is an little more complicated then that

CDP stands for Canadian Dry pin and was only used and tanks that where build and used by the Canadian troops

However an lot of the Canadian Sexton's Mk II went to the Britsih army and most of these where re-fitted with the Sherman type of tracks

So to keep it simple

- CDP tracks on Grizzly tanks, of which 188 where build and all where used for training purpose

- on the Sexton we could find:
Sexton Mk I : Ram track (M3 Medium) for Canadian and British vehicle's
Sexton Mk II : CDP and Sherman track for British vehicle's
Sexton Mk II : CDP for Canadian vehicle's

To make it realy complicated, at Amersfoort is an Canadian Ram II OP tank (dummy gun) that has Sherman automotive parts
So it also uses Sherman track's



However the Canadian Ram II tank (with the real 75mm gun) uses CDP track

There is more info to be found on tracks at the Sherman Register
web.inter.nl.net/users...k_vvss.htm

And on the Canadian Ram
www.mapleleafup.org/ve...c/ram.html

I'm loosing track Laughing Laughing Laughing

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

- Michel_Krauss

To make it realy complicated, at Amersfoort is an Canadian Ram II OP tank (dummy gun) that has Sherman automotive parts
So it also uses Sherman track's


Michel


Popular misconception but thats a Ram ETT Lit; Evasive Target Tank - the dutch built two and the other is at Bovington


_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 12:39 am
Post subject: Re: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

- JimWeb
Ram ETT Lit; Evasive Target Tank


Jim, I'm willing to believe you

however I have never heard of it and can not even find it....

What is the main difference between the two?
And where can I find some information about it??

Because, the general opinion is that it is an OP version
At least that is what the museum at Amersfoort is telling
And according Bovington the description is "Cruiser tank RAM Mk II" and that is not correct either

If it is realy an Ram ETT Lit; Evasive Target Tank
We also better tell P-O
Because it is listed as an Ram OP in the surviving Canadian & Australian list, just like the one in Bovington

I also found something else...
The one in Bovington is actualy an Dutch vehicle
On the following site, search for vehicle number "CT159418"
www.ramtank.ca/ram_mk2_5.htm

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 12:52 am
Post subject: Re: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

If some one want's to know

The Ram Kangaroo at Mill, The Netherlands
Is based on the Ram Mk I, based on the M3 Medium automotive parts

picture set from P-O Mr. Green
news.webshots.com/albu...0825TvKFmf

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:19 am
Post subject: Re: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

You know, I wondered about that gun on the Amersfoort vehicle when I first saw it...now I understand that it's a dummy gun.

BTW, the drive sprockets on that vehicle do not match, left and right, though both have 13 teeth. Is this usual or did they piece that together with whatever parts were available?

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:36 am
Post subject: Re: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

- Doug_Kibbey
BTW, the drive sprockets on that vehicle do not match, left and right


Thanks for telling, to be honest I never noticed that before

I do not know if this happend very often, however for this vehicle they most likely used what there was on stock

This is what I know about the Dutch armoured force's

It was founded in 1946 after the war
For equipment they recieved equipment thzt was "borrowed" from various British and Canadian vehicle depots in Holland

In total about 150 tanks of all kinds / versions
Most of them where Canadian Ram tanks, however also various type's of Sherman tanks and 57 Firefly's

In 1951 there where 141 listed in service (including 23 Firefly's operational) of which 50% was wreckage
The wreackage was used to keep the other tanks operational Shocked

This situation remained untill 1953 when they where replaced with Centurion tanks

However in 1959 there where still 131 Shermans listed, in various operational conditions

Of these 30 Sherman M4A3 (105) where handed over to the Dutch Royal Marines, most of the remaining Sherman's going to the shooting range

The last Sherman of the Royal Marines was redrawn from service in the seventhies

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

Sherman-type sprockets were fully interchangeable throughout the use of the vehicle, so after a period of use you could see any combination.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Hanno_Spoelstra
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: 185

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

JimWeb wrote:
Popular misconception but thats a Ram ETT Lit; Evasive Target Tank - the dutch built two and the other is at Bovington


Jim, indeed it is a target tank, but they were NOT built by the Dutch. They were part of a batch of forty-four Rams delivered in 1947. Reportedly, four were Command/O.P. tanks, the rest were Ram IIs retrofitted with the British 75mm gun.
Ref. my web: See web.inter.nl.net/users...104/nl.htm

We now know at least two were target training tanks, today many people think they are OP's.

The one at Bovington was at one time called "GIJS" (a Dutch boys name), and was exchanged for a Grizzly.

Hanno
Back to top
View user's profile
Hanno_Spoelstra
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: 185

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

If some one want's to know

The Ram Kangaroo at Mill, The Netherlands
Is based on the Ram Mk I, based on the M3 Medium automotive parts

picture set from P-O
news.webshots.com/albu...0825TvKFmf

Michel


Michel,

The Ram at Mill is a Mk.II, the fact that it is fitted with the earlier bogie style does not make it a Mk.I

The Ram Mk.I had a 2-pdr gun, the Ram Mk.II had a 6-pdr gun. Manufacturing changes are not a unique differentiator between the two marks.

Hanno
Back to top
View user's profile
Hanno_Spoelstra
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: 185

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

In total about 150 tanks of all kinds / versions
Most of them where Canadian Ram tanks, however also various type's of Sherman tanks and 57 Firefly's
[snip]
Of these 30 Sherman M4A3 (105) where handed over to the Dutch Royal Marines, most of the remaining Sherman's going to the shooting range
The last Sherman of the Royal Marines was redrawn from service in the seventhies
Michel


Michel,

Not entirely correct – please see my web page at web.inter.nl.net/users...104/nl.htm

Hanno
Back to top
View user's profile
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Grizzly and Sexton Versions

Hi Hanno,

thanks for telling about the Kangaroo, I will change it in the list


However youre post about the Ram ETT Lit, also leaves an question

- Hanno_Spoelstra
and was exchanged for a Grizzly


Where did the Grizzly tank go Confused Confused Confused

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum