±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 767
Total: 767
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Member Screenshots
02: Member Screenshots
03: Home
04: Member Screenshots
05: Home
06: Home
07: News
08: Photo Gallery
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Statistics
13: Home
14: Home
15: News Archive
16: Member Screenshots
17: Home
18: Photo Gallery
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Member Screenshots
22: Photo Gallery
23: Home
24: Home
25: Member Screenshots
26: Photo Gallery
27: News Archive
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Member Screenshots
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Member Screenshots
35: Home
36: Home
37: Home
38: Photo Gallery
39: Home
40: Member Screenshots
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Photo Gallery
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Member Screenshots
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Member Screenshots
51: Photo Gallery
52: Home
53: Community Forums
54: News Archive
55: Member Screenshots
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Home
59: Photo Gallery
60: Downloads
61: Photo Gallery
62: Member Screenshots
63: Home
64: Photo Gallery
65: Home
66: Home
67: Member Screenshots
68: Photo Gallery
69: Home
70: Member Screenshots
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: Home
76: Home
77: Home
78: Home
79: Home
80: Member Screenshots
81: Community Forums
82: Home
83: Photo Gallery
84: Photo Gallery
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Member Screenshots
88: Photo Gallery
89: Your Account
90: Photo Gallery
91: Photo Gallery
92: Member Screenshots
93: Downloads
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: Downloads
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Member Screenshots
102: Community Forums
103: Photo Gallery
104: Home
105: Photo Gallery
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Downloads
109: Home
110: Home
111: Photo Gallery
112: Community Forums
113: Photo Gallery
114: Member Screenshots
115: News Archive
116: Photo Gallery
117: Community Forums
118: Downloads
119: Photo Gallery
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Photo Gallery
127: Statistics
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Home
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Home
134: Member Screenshots
135: Member Screenshots
136: News Archive
137: Home
138: Photo Gallery
139: Home
140: LinkToUs
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Member Screenshots
146: Member Screenshots
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Member Screenshots
152: Community Forums
153: Photo Gallery
154: Home
155: Home
156: Home
157: Photo Gallery
158: Downloads
159: Downloads
160: Community Forums
161: Downloads
162: Community Forums
163: Member Screenshots
164: Photo Gallery
165: Photo Gallery
166: Home
167: Photo Gallery
168: Home
169: Member Screenshots
170: Photo Gallery
171: Home
172: Member Screenshots
173: Member Screenshots
174: Community Forums
175: News Archive
176: Photo Gallery
177: Community Forums
178: Photo Gallery
179: Home
180: Home
181: Photo Gallery
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Home
186: News Archive
187: Home
188: Home
189: Your Account
190: Community Forums
191: Photo Gallery
192: Home
193: Community Forums
194: Statistics
195: Community Forums
196: Member Screenshots
197: Home
198: Community Forums
199: Member Screenshots
200: Community Forums
201: Member Screenshots
202: Member Screenshots
203: Home
204: Member Screenshots
205: Photo Gallery
206: Photo Gallery
207: Photo Gallery
208: News Archive
209: Home
210: Photo Gallery
211: Community Forums
212: Photo Gallery
213: Home
214: Downloads
215: Member Screenshots
216: Photo Gallery
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Home
220: Member Screenshots
221: Downloads
222: Member Screenshots
223: Downloads
224: Photo Gallery
225: Member Screenshots
226: Home
227: Member Screenshots
228: Home
229: Photo Gallery
230: Member Screenshots
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Home
234: Photo Gallery
235: Member Screenshots
236: Home
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Photo Gallery
240: Member Screenshots
241: Member Screenshots
242: News
243: Photo Gallery
244: Home
245: Member Screenshots
246: Home
247: Home
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Photo Gallery
251: Home
252: Community Forums
253: Your Account
254: Photo Gallery
255: Photo Gallery
256: Home
257: Home
258: Photo Gallery
259: Community Forums
260: Member Screenshots
261: Photo Gallery
262: Home
263: Community Forums
264: Photo Gallery
265: Home
266: Member Screenshots
267: Community Forums
268: Home
269: Community Forums
270: Downloads
271: News
272: Downloads
273: Community Forums
274: Member Screenshots
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Photo Gallery
278: Community Forums
279: Statistics
280: Photo Gallery
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Member Screenshots
284: Photo Gallery
285: Community Forums
286: Downloads
287: Home
288: Photo Gallery
289: Community Forums
290: Photo Gallery
291: Downloads
292: Photo Gallery
293: Downloads
294: Home
295: Photo Gallery
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: Member Screenshots
299: Photo Gallery
300: Member Screenshots
301: Home
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Photo Gallery
306: Community Forums
307: Home
308: News Archive
309: Community Forums
310: Home
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Photo Gallery
314: Downloads
315: Photo Gallery
316: Photo Gallery
317: Community Forums
318: Member Screenshots
319: Downloads
320: Downloads
321: Community Forums
322: Member Screenshots
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Home
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Photo Gallery
333: Home
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Member Screenshots
337: News
338: Photo Gallery
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Member Screenshots
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Photo Gallery
345: Community Forums
346: Photo Gallery
347: Photo Gallery
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Home
352: Statistics
353: Member Screenshots
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: Member Screenshots
357: Downloads
358: Photo Gallery
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Statistics
362: Downloads
363: Downloads
364: Downloads
365: Community Forums
366: Downloads
367: Community Forums
368: Photo Gallery
369: Photo Gallery
370: Photo Gallery
371: Photo Gallery
372: Member Screenshots
373: Community Forums
374: Photo Gallery
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Statistics
378: Community Forums
379: Member Screenshots
380: Community Forums
381: Photo Gallery
382: Photo Gallery
383: Home
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Home
387: Home
388: Home
389: Community Forums
390: Photo Gallery
391: Your Account
392: Community Forums
393: Home
394: Community Forums
395: Home
396: Photo Gallery
397: Member Screenshots
398: Member Screenshots
399: Community Forums
400: Home
401: Photo Gallery
402: Photo Gallery
403: Member Screenshots
404: Photo Gallery
405: Home
406: Member Screenshots
407: Community Forums
408: Photo Gallery
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Home
412: Photo Gallery
413: Community Forums
414: Your Account
415: Community Forums
416: Home
417: Community Forums
418: Photo Gallery
419: Community Forums
420: Home
421: News Archive
422: Photo Gallery
423: Photo Gallery
424: Member Screenshots
425: Home
426: Member Screenshots
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Home
431: Member Screenshots
432: Home
433: Photo Gallery
434: News Archive
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Home
438: Home
439: Photo Gallery
440: Home
441: Home
442: Community Forums
443: Photo Gallery
444: Downloads
445: Home
446: Photo Gallery
447: Community Forums
448: Home
449: Home
450: Home
451: Home
452: Community Forums
453: Photo Gallery
454: Community Forums
455: Photo Gallery
456: Home
457: Home
458: Photo Gallery
459: Downloads
460: Member Screenshots
461: Member Screenshots
462: Community Forums
463: Member Screenshots
464: Member Screenshots
465: Community Forums
466: Home
467: Community Forums
468: Member Screenshots
469: Home
470: Photo Gallery
471: Member Screenshots
472: Home
473: Downloads
474: Member Screenshots
475: Your Account
476: Photo Gallery
477: Member Screenshots
478: Your Account
479: Home
480: News Archive
481: Downloads
482: Home
483: Community Forums
484: Photo Gallery
485: Home
486: Member Screenshots
487: Community Forums
488: Community Forums
489: Community Forums
490: Community Forums
491: Photo Gallery
492: Photo Gallery
493: Home
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Photo Gallery
497: Community Forums
498: Community Forums
499: Community Forums
500: Downloads
501: Photo Gallery
502: Home
503: Photo Gallery
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Home
507: Community Forums
508: Home
509: Home
510: Member Screenshots
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Home
514: Photo Gallery
515: Member Screenshots
516: Community Forums
517: Your Account
518: Member Screenshots
519: Community Forums
520: Photo Gallery
521: Community Forums
522: Member Screenshots
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Member Screenshots
527: News Archive
528: Statistics
529: Home
530: Your Account
531: Home
532: Your Account
533: Community Forums
534: Home
535: Photo Gallery
536: Photo Gallery
537: Downloads
538: Photo Gallery
539: Photo Gallery
540: Photo Gallery
541: Home
542: Community Forums
543: Community Forums
544: Community Forums
545: Community Forums
546: Photo Gallery
547: Downloads
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Member Screenshots
553: Community Forums
554: Community Forums
555: Photo Gallery
556: Member Screenshots
557: Community Forums
558: Home
559: Photo Gallery
560: Member Screenshots
561: Community Forums
562: Photo Gallery
563: Downloads
564: Downloads
565: Member Screenshots
566: Photo Gallery
567: Community Forums
568: Member Screenshots
569: Home
570: Community Forums
571: Community Forums
572: Home
573: Community Forums
574: Member Screenshots
575: Community Forums
576: Community Forums
577: Downloads
578: Community Forums
579: Downloads
580: Home
581: News
582: Community Forums
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: Community Forums
587: Community Forums
588: Community Forums
589: Photo Gallery
590: Member Screenshots
591: Member Screenshots
592: Photo Gallery
593: Community Forums
594: Member Screenshots
595: Home
596: Photo Gallery
597: Home
598: Community Forums
599: Member Screenshots
600: Photo Gallery
601: Community Forums
602: Community Forums
603: Photo Gallery
604: Home
605: Community Forums
606: Home
607: Statistics
608: Photo Gallery
609: Member Screenshots
610: Member Screenshots
611: Community Forums
612: Downloads
613: Member Screenshots
614: Community Forums
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Home
618: Photo Gallery
619: Community Forums
620: Your Account
621: Photo Gallery
622: Community Forums
623: Photo Gallery
624: Community Forums
625: Community Forums
626: Member Screenshots
627: Photo Gallery
628: Community Forums
629: Community Forums
630: Your Account
631: Community Forums
632: Home
633: Photo Gallery
634: Community Forums
635: Home
636: Home
637: Home
638: Home
639: Community Forums
640: Community Forums
641: Community Forums
642: Community Forums
643: Your Account
644: Photo Gallery
645: Community Forums
646: Community Forums
647: Member Screenshots
648: Community Forums
649: Home
650: Photo Gallery
651: Home
652: Home
653: Community Forums
654: Community Forums
655: Member Screenshots
656: Community Forums
657: Member Screenshots
658: Home
659: Photo Gallery
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Downloads
663: Statistics
664: Downloads
665: Community Forums
666: Member Screenshots
667: Community Forums
668: Member Screenshots
669: Home
670: Downloads
671: Photo Gallery
672: Photo Gallery
673: Photo Gallery
674: Your Account
675: Photo Gallery
676: Photo Gallery
677: Photo Gallery
678: Member Screenshots
679: Home
680: Community Forums
681: Home
682: Home
683: Statistics
684: Home
685: Member Screenshots
686: Community Forums
687: Member Screenshots
688: Home
689: Community Forums
690: Statistics
691: Photo Gallery
692: Community Forums
693: Statistics
694: Home
695: Downloads
696: Your Account
697: Community Forums
698: Community Forums
699: Home
700: Community Forums
701: Community Forums
702: Home
703: Home
704: Photo Gallery
705: Home
706: Photo Gallery
707: Photo Gallery
708: Home
709: Downloads
710: Home
711: Photo Gallery
712: Community Forums
713: Member Screenshots
714: Home
715: Community Forums
716: Home
717: Community Forums
718: Member Screenshots
719: Community Forums
720: Photo Gallery
721: Home
722: Photo Gallery
723: Home
724: Home
725: Member Screenshots
726: Statistics
727: Home
728: Photo Gallery
729: Downloads
730: Community Forums
731: Home
732: Photo Gallery
733: Photo Gallery
734: Community Forums
735: Photo Gallery
736: Downloads
737: Home
738: News
739: Home
740: Home
741: Photo Gallery
742: Community Forums
743: Photo Gallery
744: Community Forums
745: Statistics
746: Home
747: Photo Gallery
748: Photo Gallery
749: Community Forums
750: Community Forums
751: Home
752: Home
753: Home
754: Photo Gallery
755: Photo Gallery
756: Member Screenshots
757: Home
758: Community Forums
759: Downloads
760: Downloads
761: Home
762: Home
763: Community Forums
764: Home
765: Home
766: Home
767: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Sherman Firefly
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:58 pm
Post subject: Sherman Firefly

Hi folks

I'm reading an book (yes I'm already old enough to know what that is) called "Sherman at war"

And in the book they dicuss the history of the Sherman and it's variants, including the British 17pdr (Firefly) version

At the end of the Firefly description it tells that there are records showing that the US army had, at 1 point during WW2, about 100 Sherman's armed with British 17pdr available

Also that it is not clear what has happened to these tanks after the war

Does some of you know more about this story?

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 10:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Rolling Eyes Michel, how old are you?

I've never heard of such a thing called "a book"...

P-O

26 y-o

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

35 years and 3 month's young Cool

An book is an bunch of printed e-mails however both sides of the paper is used Laughing

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

This is the only information I know about them
freespace.virgin.net/s...usnew.html
and it's little.
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:20 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

I wonder if any of these were among the stock of "Fireflys" acquired by Argentina and upgraded as "repotendiados" or if all of those vehicles came from exclusively European stocks (which had been my understanding)?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

These tanks probably went immediately from the depot to surplus. The unit(s) that were undergoing conversion training to the 17-pounder were probably told to immediately turn in their vehicles. The 17 poounder project was stopped just as the ETOUSA was near to having operational Fireflys, but since the gun with its associated parts and ammo were non-standard they were dropped like a hot rock. I imagine that the US Army "Fireflys" were either scrapped or merged into the stocks of tanks that were provided to European armies. The primary features seem to be the US vision cupola for the commander and a variation in the radio box design. There have been questions about any use of HVSS or wet stowage hulls. Otherwise a "US" M4 with 17 pounder would be functionally like the British ones. THe M4A3s would have been unique, but except for a possible one found on a firing range, there haven't been any sightings of an M4A3 "Firefly".
Back to top
View user's profile
warddw
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Mark Hayward's book on the sherman firefly has some documented US usage in Italy - recommended - a good read exclusively devoted to the firefly...

Back to top
View user's profile
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Hi folks,

thanks all, for the info

Concerning the dropping of the 17pdr because of being non-standard in the US army... Rolling Eyes

Indeed it woud make more sense developing an complete new 76mm gun with new ammo for the 76mm Sherman Twisted Evil
Instead of using an proven gun design

For what I could find about the history of the Firefly there was another main reason the US army did not want to use the 17pdr gun

Concerning teh book about the Firefly, I have that
It's an the pile of books, still to read

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss
Hi folks,

thanks all, for the info

Concerning the dropping of the 17pdr because of being non-standard in the US army... Rolling Eyes

. . .

For what I could find about the history of the Firefly there was another main reason the US army did not want to use the 17pdr gun

. . .

Michel


Michel - I'm curious, what was the other reason the U.S. did not want to use the 17pdr? Or am I reading something into your comment that isn't there

The reasons I have heard over the years (And I'm not saying which I believe, I'm just listing theone I remember being suggested)

1) Supply constraints - All possible production was being used by the British units. A variation of this is that even if there were enough guns 17pdr ammo was a constant shortage item

2) Command did not see the need for a more powerful gun

3) The very poor performance of 17pdr HE ammo

4) NIH [ Not Invented Here ]

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Bob,

the ones you listed are the ones I know also, only in an different line-up

1) NIH [ Not Invented Here ] (especially true with-in some locations of US army command)

2) Command did not see the need for a more powerful gun
The "more" powerful 76mm was developed for the Sherman, so there was need for an more powerful gun according some one's idea.
Also certain part of command thought there there was no need because there was an special branche in the US army called the tank destroyers.


3) Supply constraints - All possible production was being used by the British units. A variation of this is that even if there were enough guns 17pdr ammo was a constant shortage item

The US industry made ammunition and all kinds of other stuff for the British army
The US air force had the (British) Rolce-Royce Merlin engine made in license to put them in the P-51 Mustang
The navy copied the (British) all steel flight deck on the aircraft carriers to replace the wooden fligth decks
The US army could not copy the 17pdr design...........
Confused

4) The very poor performance of 17pdr HE ammo
The 76mm gun was developed to deal with the German Pz 5 and Pz 6 armour
Also the 76mm HE ammo wasn't know in the service for it's good performance either
In the field the 75mm was prefered for HE because of it's better performance


Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2068
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:24 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

I think between the tanks not being fielded in time for ETO and the need for commonality after the War these tanks were destined for surplus.

Commonality for the 75mm and 76mm would not be a problem since US wartime production of this ammo would last a long time after hostilities ceased. We have (more like had) an amazing capability to produce large amounts of munitions during the war. Once peacetime kicked in everything ceased and munitions were stockpiled. I was still firing WWII manufactured API and API-T in Iraq for my .50 cal back in 2007. With the 17pdr a new production line would be needed and since the war ended why continue making ammo when you don't really need it. I imagine this would have been a major factor in it's demise

The M26 was coming on line and the Army had pretty much decided the 90mm was the gun of choice for tanks. So much so that when they made the higher velocity 90mm for the M47 they made sure it could still fire the older rounds but tapered the newer rounds near the forcing cone to prevent their accidental use in the older tanks.

Fielding a new gun in peacetime is not that hard, having ample munitions for it is another story. When the M60 came on line there was a serious shortage of 105mm ammo for her. This led to the M48A3 not receiving the 105mm gun. Priority for 105mm was in Europe to counter the T55 and T62's. They figured the 90mm was plenty for other areas, and were proven correct in Vietnam.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:51 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Michel
I wasn't putting them in any particular order but going with your order

1) There is no way NIH can be discussed or defended it is a 'religious issue'.

2) Tank Destroyers are a doctrine issue separate from the weapon issue itself. It does play into the discussion but I'm going to avoid it just because I don't even want to try to justify the decision based on it. Yes it had an affect. Given the overall offensive role of the U.S. Army in NW Europe it could be considered a flawed doctrine. But if the U.S. had been tasked with a primary defensive role (As the Germans were at the time) it may not have been seen that way. I believe the doctrine that had tank battalions outside the Infantry division structure and only attached them 'as needed' (Which ended up being almost all the time) was at least as much of a doctrinal flaw that can be laid back at the feet of Gen McNair as the TD doctrine can.

3) Yes the U.S,. did supply a lot of ammunition to the British. But except for small arms ammo I believe the great majority was for American spec weapons. The lead time was fairly extensive. The best example of ammo interchangability is the 6pdr/57mm which was used in both armies in large numbers. I believe it took over a year for the 6pdr gun to be put in production in the U.S. as the 57 mm. A lot of that time was spent changing detail drawings to American Standards that could be released to US manufacturers for production use.

The Merlin engine had the same issue in being set up for U.S. production. There were enough differences in the Rolls Royce and Packard engines that Lancaster bombers were given different Mark numbers based on the engines installed and engines from the different manufacturing pools could not be interchanged.

The difference I see with the 17pdr is the time frame that some 17pdr proponents think the adoption could have been made in. Given the time it would have taken to adopt the 17pdr as a standard there were two other solutions coming along. Th e76mm in the short and mid term and the 90mm gun tank in the long term. I think if the effort had been put into rushing an increase in 90mm gun production and adapting the T23 turret to handle it, or pushing the T26 turret forward faster and installing it on the Sherman there would have been no discussion of a 17pdr Sherman for the U.S. Army.

The steel flight deck was adopted for other reasons (Jet exhausts) If you mean the armored flight deck we will have to move that to a different forum. I believe that argument makes the Sherman discussion look simple and straight forward. Rolling Eyes

4) I used to have a comparison of the various HE rounds (It was from a message on the old AFV news) Yes the 75mm was the best the 76mm was less effective and the 17pdr was at least twice that far below the 76mm. Only when the tank gun is stepped up to the 90mm did a tank gun equal or exceed the 75mm
In my amateur opinion I see the difference as being directly related to the muzzle velocity of the gun. As the MV increased it was necessary to increase the thickness of the shell wall to handle the increased stresses. This cuts the size of the HE filler down. Some people will say 'so what the higher MV makes it a better AT round. The problem comes when the uses the tanks were put to is examined. While tanks had to be prepared to fight other tanks they spent most of their time fighting non-tank targets where HE was the preferred round. Even the British didn't use the 17pdr in all tanks in a unit.

I have also heard that there was another problem with the 17pdr in the Sherman. I remember reading that the 17pdr had some elevation restrictions in teh Sherman and could not be fired at 'certain elevations' because the gun could not recoil the full way at those elevations (I seem to remember that it was at elevations where the turret ring interfered with the full recoil)

I was curious if you had some other factors that I hadn't heard of over the years

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Hi Bob,

I thought you had them in an particular order, so.. Mr. Green

1) concerning the NIH I have to agree on that, there are an lot of people who already tried to discuss or defend that

2) I mentioned the TD branch because that was an reason to block an capable AT gun in the Sherman. If they had put the 17pdr or 90mm in an Sherman it would have made the TD branch an sort of ... obsolete

3) Concenring the ammo, if I remember correcty the US also produced bigger ammo then only small arms ammo
For sure the US produced the fuzes used for British artillery shells, according British spec's
They also produced ammo for non-US spec small arms, for an example the US .303 rifle ammo was made for the Bren MG. However because it was not according British spec, the cartridges got bended and they got stuck in the MG. After this the US .303 cartridge was only allowed to be used for the British Lee-Enfield rifles

I only mentioned the Merlin engine and the metal Wink flight deck to illustrate the fact that they where willing to incorporated already existing better solutions, instead of inventing something new

4) Concerning the performance of the HE rounds. The 76mm was primarily developed for dealing with the armour of the German Pz 5 and Pz 6 tanks. The performance of the HE round was not the main reason to develope an new 76mm gun.
The 76mm was based on an 76mm AA gun with an high MV. They redesigned the cartridge to make it suitable for handling it inside an tank turret, however keeping the same performance as the AA round. After the first protoype's they decided to shorten the barrel, because it was sticking to far out Shocked
However with the shortening of the barrel the AT performance of the gun dropped, because the MV dropped

Concerning the 17pdr breech sticking out to far, that was only true on the first versions. Latter versions had an redesigned shorter breech.
The British had one 17pdr armed Sherman on every four tanks, so they had the HE performance and the AT performance combined

About the MV of an shell to knock-out an enemy tank
There are 2 type's of shell suited to take an tank out;
1) it has an high MV, giving it high impact energy
2) the shell is big enough, no matter what type of shell it is. The Russian 152mm HE shell of the ISU-152 was big enough to take out an German Pz 5 or Pz 6, only because of it's size

Nothing new to ad Wink

Nice such an discussion, should we do more often


Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 12:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Some interesting side points

Yes we produced fuses to British specs. In fact my mother in law worked in a factory in Elkton MD that produced fuses. They hated it when they did fuses destined for British stocks. They had quotas and when doing British spec fuses it took much longer to produce the same number of fuses.

I don't think it was a case of the TD branch blocking the good gun in the Sherman. I think it was a case of once the TD doctrine was established it was impossible at the highest levels to justify the better gun

Armor Branch Officer - We need a better gun to kill German tanks
Staff Officer - You aren't supposed to be killing tanks, that is the job of TDs
A O - but sometimes we run across German tanks
S O - Then call for TD support
A O - (shaking head) The Germans won't wait for the TDs to show up, They kill our tanks and move on

I just had an interesting thought
Actually deployment of the Firefly was actually just taking the TD doctrine down to the platoon/troop level. If the U.S. had made a tank platoon two M36 TDs and three 75mm Shermans you would have the same thing as the British had without having to add a new weapon to the system.

and yes big shells have a capability all their own. Beldon Cooper mentions using M12 self propelled 155mm guns as AT weapons. In that case you had large caliber and high MV Shocked

And yes I like discussions like this. We used to have them more often , maybe they will come back

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Massimo_Foti
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 5397
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Actually deployment of the Firefly was actually just taking the TD doctrine down to the platoon/troop level. If the U.S. had made a tank platoon two M36 TDs and three 75mm Shermans you would have the same thing as the British had without having to add a new weapon to the system.

In post-war years, once a larger amount of tanks was available, the italian army tried to mix Shermans with 17pdr and 76mm with Shermans with 105mm at the smaller unit level possible. I guess they came to similar conclusions
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 5
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum