Skip to main Skip to content Skip to menu

Com-Central.net

`±`Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

`±`User Info-big

Welcome Anonymous

Membership:

Latest: HighestAce

New Today: 0

New Yesterday: 0

Overall: 6648

People Online:

Members: 0

Visitors: 1910

Total: 1910

Who Is Where:

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!

Forum FAQ

Moderators

char bis
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.

Forum Index › AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

jtrowbridge5
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 234

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:56 pm Post subject: char bis
this may be helpful for anyone thinking of the new tamiya kit coming later this year dennis community.webshots.com...ity=dZGEbE

Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:17 am Post subject: Re: char bis
Hi Folks! The PMMS site, under New Kits, Tamiya section has a photo of some of the trees and photos of some assembled kits. Looks a bit like something I would like to pick up. Sgt, Scouts Out! _________________ "You can never have too much reconnaissance." General G.S. Patton Jr.

Jinx
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 186
Location: Canada

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 5:27 pm Post subject: Re: char bis
Something i have been wondering about for some time about this vehicle. Why is the barrel of the 75mm gun so heavy? It's not like it's a high velocity weapon, or anything. Is it because the barrel is so short? Any ideas?

Tom_Willoughby
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 13

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:59 pm Post subject: Re: char bis
I wasn't too interested at first but after seeing the kit pictures I may get one. Its one of those unusual tanks. I heard that the Lee concept came from this tank. Tom W.

bsmart
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:53 pm Post subject: Re: char bis
I don't think the M-3 Grant Lee came from this design. The M-3 was done because the U.S. did not have enough machine tool capability to build 69" Turret rings which were needed to accept a 75mm gun. As an interim measure the 75mm was hull mounted to get some capable tanks produced while machine tool capability was increased _________________ Bob Smart ([email protected])

Tom_Willoughby
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 13

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:36 am Post subject: Re: char bis
I was referring to the idea of the main gun in the hull with a rotating turret with the secondary gun. It might have give the Lee designers a pattern or general layout since they could not put the 75 in the turret due to the limits at the time. You have to admit there is a similarity in concept though the execution is different. Tom W.

bsmart
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:23 pm
Post subject: Re: char bis

In the Char there was a 'spilt responsibility' with the Hull mounted gun being primarily an anti-infantry weapon and the turret mounted gun as the primary anti-tank weapon. I think in the M-3 the hull mounted gun was the primary weapon for all uses and only put in the hull because it wouldn't fit in the turret, with every intent of moving it to the turret as soon as possible.

I think the Char had more in common with the old 'Land Battleship' concept of the Vickers Independent and the Soviet T28 with different weapons (each in their own turret) provided for different roles and all working seperately.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])

mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:20 pm
Post subject: Re: char bis

I think the Lee/Char Bis connection has come down as 'recieved wisdom' from the old Crow & Icks era. Not to say that the statement's not correct but I doubt that its been documented in the modern war by an unclassified War Office memo or the like.

We got lots of 'recieved wisdom' from back then that turned out to be iffy, from the cast hull Firefly to the wartime use of "Achilles", "Wolverine", "Jackson", etc. etc.

Forum Index › AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1

All times are GMT - 6 Hours

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Com-Central.net

Select Language

Login

`±`Recent Visitors

`±`User Info-big

Com-Central.net

Select Language

Login

±Recent Visitors

±User Info-big

`±`Recent Visitors

`±`User Info-big