±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big

Welcome Anonymous


Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6646

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 138
Total: 138
Who Is Where:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Downloads
06: CPGlang
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: CPGlang
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Home
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Photo Gallery
17: Community Forums
18: CPGlang
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: CPGlang
22: Community Forums
23: CPGlang
24: Community Forums
25: CPGlang
26: Home
27: Photo Gallery
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: CPGlang
31: CPGlang
32: Community Forums
33: Statistics
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Photo Gallery
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Photo Gallery
42: Downloads
43: Home
44: Downloads
45: Home
46: Photo Gallery
47: CPGlang
48: Community Forums
49: CPGlang
50: Home
51: Member Screenshots
52: Community Forums
53: CPGlang
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: CPGlang
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: CPGlang
71: Home
72: Community Forums
73: Photo Gallery
74: Community Forums
75: CPGlang
76: CPGlang
77: Community Forums
78: CPGlang
79: Community Forums
80: CPGlang
81: Photo Gallery
82: Home
83: CPGlang
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: CPGlang
87: Community Forums
88: CPGlang
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: CPGlang
94: CPGlang
95: Community Forums
96: CPGlang
97: Community Forums
98: Home
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Search
102: Community Forums
103: CPGlang
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: CPGlang
107: Home
108: Downloads
109: CPGlang
110: Community Forums
111: CPGlang
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: CPGlang
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: CPGlang
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: CPGlang
123: Home
124: Home
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: Home
130: CPGlang
131: Community Forums
132: Photo Gallery
133: Downloads
134: CPGlang
135: Member Screenshots
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Dual Duelling DDR2 AMD Motherboards :: Archived
Resolve issues with your computer problems here or read about the latest computer parts and information.
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  Hardware

Topic Archived View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Posts: 6993
Location: Central Illinois, USA
PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 10:59 am
Post subject: Dual Duelling DDR2 AMD Motherboards

These two boards can crunch some numbers... Wink

ExtremeTech has a very interesting article/comparison of two of the newest AMD boards out, the Foxconn C51XEM2AA and the ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe!

Dual Duelling DDR2 AMD Motherboards
By Loyd Case

AMD officially launched its Socket AM2 Athlon 64 CPUs on May 23. The new processors sport a new memory controller, which fully supports DDR2/800 for dual core and DDR2/667 for single core. Since the CPU now has a different, 940-pin socket, new motherboards and new core logic are needed. First out of the chute are motherboards using Nvidia's recently announced Nforce 500 series chipsets. Gamers and performance enthusiasts will cotton to the Nforce 590 core logic. In addition to supporting Nvidia's SLI (scalable link interface) technology for dual graphics cards, the 590 offers an unusual degree of tweakability.

Today, we take a close look at a pair of boards based on the Nforce 590 SLI� Foxconn's C51XEM2AA and the ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe, Wireless Edition. One is specifically designed for users who like to hot-rod their systems and wring out every last possible clock cycle. The other is more mainstream (and slightly less overclocker friendly) but no less potent. Think of one as a Dodge Viper and the other as a BMW M5, if you will...

The Foxconn C51XEM2AA motherboard is considerably less refined than most of its competition. The chipset fan is noisy, the memory slots are a little too close to the CPU socket and the other amenities are often blocked by a fully loaded set of expansion cards. The BIOS, however, is an overclocker's wet dream, offering every conceivable tweaking option. Paradoxically, it's easier to overclock than the ASUS board, due to the clever way it uses SLI Ready memory. Of course, if you don't have SLI Ready DDR2, then overclocking can be a real chore.

Users who build their own systems, but are unlikely to overclock, should consider the ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe. Similarly, anyone wanting to build a relatively quiet system will definitely want the ASUS board. The overall design of the hardware itself is refined and laid out for easy installation and maintenance. Our only real quibble about the layout is that we wish the PCIe X4 slot wasn't blocked by a double-wide graphics card. The inclusion of Wi-Fi is a neat bonus, but not absolutely necessary.

Great article! To read it all: Click HERE!

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 255

PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Dual Duelling DDR2 AMD Motherboards


These two boards can crunch some numbers...

ExtremeTech has a very interesting article/comparison of two of the newest AMD boards out, the Foxconn C51XEM2AA and the ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe!

thanx for posting that, that said I would seriously doubt whether buying in to the Athlon 64 940 is a good idea, in that Intel has a a new dual core chip which will be released shortly and one of the magazines said that it absolutely blows away the top end dual core Athlon 64s and I think it would be best to hold on till Intel release their new chip!

the following is taken from

Versus Intel, has AMD's day of reckoning arrived? Posted by David Berlind @ 6:18 am


So last Friday when I saw the first set of independent benchmark results pitting a mid-end Intel E6600 "Conroe" 2.4 GHz CPU (due next month) against the just released flagship extreme edition AMD FX-62 CPU, I started wondering if AMD worst nightmare was coming true. Intel's ~$250 E6600 CPU annihilated AMD's ~$1000 Extreme Edition AM2 based FX-62! This effectively means that AMD's flagship desktop performance CPU will be obsolete by the end of next month when Intel [releases] the CPUs codenamed Conroe. The 2.4 GHz Conroe E6600 CPU is a 65 watt part while Intel's Extreme Edition Conroe CPU will operate at 2.93 GHz and still be 40 watts lower than AMD's FX-62 which runs at 120 watt TPD. AMD's power advantage over Intel's current Pentium 4 NetBurst architecture just vanished in to thin air with the introduction of Intel's Core 2 architecture next month.

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  Hardware
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours

Archive Revive
This is an archived topic - your reply will not be appended here.
Instead, a new topic will be generated in the active forum.
The new topic will provide a reference link to this archived topic.