±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 595
Total: 595
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Home
04: Home
05: Photo Gallery
06: Photo Gallery
07: Home
08: Photo Gallery
09: Home
10: Photo Gallery
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Home
14: Home
15: Home
16: Home
17: Photo Gallery
18: Home
19: Home
20: Home
21: Home
22: Home
23: Home
24: Photo Gallery
25: Home
26: Home
27: Home
28: Home
29: Home
30: Home
31: Home
32: Home
33: Photo Gallery
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Photo Gallery
38: Photo Gallery
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Home
42: Photo Gallery
43: Community Forums
44: Statistics
45: Home
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: Photo Gallery
49: Photo Gallery
50: Photo Gallery
51: Home
52: Home
53: Photo Gallery
54: Home
55: Home
56: Member Screenshots
57: Home
58: Home
59: Home
60: Home
61: Community Forums
62: Home
63: Home
64: Home
65: Home
66: Home
67: Home
68: Photo Gallery
69: Photo Gallery
70: Home
71: Downloads
72: Photo Gallery
73: Photo Gallery
74: Member Screenshots
75: Home
76: Home
77: Home
78: Member Screenshots
79: Home
80: Home
81: Home
82: Photo Gallery
83: Home
84: Home
85: Photo Gallery
86: Home
87: Home
88: Downloads
89: Home
90: Photo Gallery
91: Downloads
92: Member Screenshots
93: Community Forums
94: Photo Gallery
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Community Forums
98: Home
99: Photo Gallery
100: Community Forums
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Member Screenshots
104: Home
105: Member Screenshots
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Home
109: Member Screenshots
110: Home
111: Home
112: Home
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Home
118: Home
119: Photo Gallery
120: Photo Gallery
121: Photo Gallery
122: Photo Gallery
123: Community Forums
124: Photo Gallery
125: Home
126: Home
127: Home
128: Home
129: Member Screenshots
130: Home
131: Home
132: Home
133: Photo Gallery
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Statistics
138: Photo Gallery
139: Photo Gallery
140: Home
141: Photo Gallery
142: Member Screenshots
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Photo Gallery
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Photo Gallery
150: Photo Gallery
151: Photo Gallery
152: Community Forums
153: Home
154: Home
155: Home
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Photo Gallery
164: Community Forums
165: Home
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Home
169: Photo Gallery
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Photo Gallery
173: Photo Gallery
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Home
178: Home
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Member Screenshots
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Home
186: Downloads
187: Home
188: Photo Gallery
189: Home
190: Home
191: Home
192: Home
193: Photo Gallery
194: Home
195: Photo Gallery
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Photo Gallery
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Photo Gallery
206: Community Forums
207: Home
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Photo Gallery
211: Photo Gallery
212: Member Screenshots
213: Photo Gallery
214: Home
215: Photo Gallery
216: Home
217: Home
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: News Archive
222: Home
223: Home
224: Home
225: Home
226: Photo Gallery
227: Community Forums
228: News Archive
229: Photo Gallery
230: Home
231: Downloads
232: Member Screenshots
233: Home
234: Photo Gallery
235: Photo Gallery
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Home
239: Community Forums
240: Home
241: Home
242: Home
243: Community Forums
244: Downloads
245: Statistics
246: Home
247: Home
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Home
251: Downloads
252: Downloads
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Photo Gallery
258: Home
259: Photo Gallery
260: Photo Gallery
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Home
266: Community Forums
267: News Archive
268: Home
269: Photo Gallery
270: Home
271: Photo Gallery
272: Photo Gallery
273: Home
274: Home
275: Photo Gallery
276: Photo Gallery
277: Home
278: Photo Gallery
279: Photo Gallery
280: Home
281: Photo Gallery
282: Photo Gallery
283: Downloads
284: Home
285: Photo Gallery
286: Home
287: Home
288: Community Forums
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: Home
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Home
295: Home
296: Home
297: Downloads
298: Home
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Home
302: Member Screenshots
303: Photo Gallery
304: Home
305: Home
306: Home
307: Statistics
308: Member Screenshots
309: Home
310: Home
311: Community Forums
312: Home
313: Photo Gallery
314: Community Forums
315: Home
316: Photo Gallery
317: Community Forums
318: Home
319: Home
320: Home
321: Home
322: Community Forums
323: Photo Gallery
324: Home
325: Home
326: Downloads
327: Home
328: Home
329: Home
330: Photo Gallery
331: Home
332: News Archive
333: Community Forums
334: Home
335: Home
336: Member Screenshots
337: Photo Gallery
338: Home
339: Community Forums
340: News Archive
341: Home
342: Photo Gallery
343: Home
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Statistics
347: Home
348: Home
349: Photo Gallery
350: Photo Gallery
351: Photo Gallery
352: Home
353: Community Forums
354: Home
355: Home
356: Home
357: Photo Gallery
358: Home
359: Photo Gallery
360: News Archive
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Home
364: Photo Gallery
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Statistics
368: Home
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Home
372: Photo Gallery
373: Home
374: Member Screenshots
375: Photo Gallery
376: Home
377: Home
378: Downloads
379: Member Screenshots
380: Home
381: Photo Gallery
382: Home
383: Home
384: Home
385: Home
386: Home
387: Home
388: Photo Gallery
389: Home
390: Home
391: Home
392: Home
393: Home
394: Home
395: Community Forums
396: Member Screenshots
397: Community Forums
398: Home
399: Home
400: Home
401: Community Forums
402: Home
403: Statistics
404: Home
405: Home
406: Community Forums
407: Photo Gallery
408: Home
409: Statistics
410: Community Forums
411: Photo Gallery
412: Community Forums
413: Home
414: Home
415: Photo Gallery
416: Community Forums
417: Home
418: Home
419: Community Forums
420: Member Screenshots
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Photo Gallery
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Downloads
430: Home
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Home
434: News Archive
435: Photo Gallery
436: Community Forums
437: Home
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Photo Gallery
441: Home
442: Community Forums
443: Member Screenshots
444: Home
445: Home
446: Photo Gallery
447: Photo Gallery
448: Home
449: Community Forums
450: Photo Gallery
451: Community Forums
452: Community Forums
453: Photo Gallery
454: Community Forums
455: Photo Gallery
456: Community Forums
457: Home
458: Home
459: Home
460: Member Screenshots
461: Photo Gallery
462: Photo Gallery
463: Photo Gallery
464: Photo Gallery
465: Photo Gallery
466: Home
467: Home
468: Community Forums
469: Photo Gallery
470: Photo Gallery
471: Community Forums
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Home
475: Home
476: Photo Gallery
477: Community Forums
478: Community Forums
479: Home
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Statistics
483: Community Forums
484: Home
485: Photo Gallery
486: Community Forums
487: Home
488: Photo Gallery
489: Home
490: Home
491: Home
492: Downloads
493: Home
494: Home
495: Community Forums
496: Home
497: Community Forums
498: Home
499: Community Forums
500: Photo Gallery
501: Home
502: Member Screenshots
503: Statistics
504: Home
505: Home
506: Home
507: Home
508: Community Forums
509: Photo Gallery
510: Downloads
511: Photo Gallery
512: Community Forums
513: Home
514: Photo Gallery
515: Home
516: Home
517: Home
518: Member Screenshots
519: Photo Gallery
520: Member Screenshots
521: Photo Gallery
522: Community Forums
523: Home
524: Community Forums
525: Home
526: Home
527: Home
528: Photo Gallery
529: Community Forums
530: Home
531: Downloads
532: Member Screenshots
533: Photo Gallery
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Home
538: Community Forums
539: Member Screenshots
540: Photo Gallery
541: Home
542: Home
543: Photo Gallery
544: Community Forums
545: Downloads
546: Home
547: Community Forums
548: Home
549: Member Screenshots
550: Community Forums
551: Home
552: Home
553: Downloads
554: Photo Gallery
555: Photo Gallery
556: Photo Gallery
557: Community Forums
558: Community Forums
559: Home
560: Community Forums
561: Downloads
562: Home
563: Photo Gallery
564: Photo Gallery
565: Home
566: Downloads
567: Home
568: Home
569: Home
570: Photo Gallery
571: Home
572: Downloads
573: Community Forums
574: Member Screenshots
575: Home
576: Home
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Photo Gallery
580: Community Forums
581: Home
582: Downloads
583: Photo Gallery
584: Home
585: Home
586: Photo Gallery
587: Home
588: Photo Gallery
589: Community Forums
590: Downloads
591: Home
592: Member Screenshots
593: Member Screenshots
594: Photo Gallery
595: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
M113 #1?????
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:12 am
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

- bsmart
I'm gpoing to disagree with you here. "Quantity has a quality all it's own"

Within a class of weapons the ability to deploy enough items so that it is effective is important. The Sherman/T34 v Panther is a very good example of this. While neither one can match the Panther one on one they were able to compete because both could be produced in volume and deployed and supported so that they were always available in useful quantities while Panthers were never available in enough quantity to keep the units up to strength


The question is whether the qantity factor reflects qualities of the vehicle (ease of manufacture) or the production system building it. I'd guess that the US tank plants could build Panthers at about the same rate as they could build Shermans and vice-versa.

cbo
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:51 pm
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

- clausb

The question is whether the qantity factor reflects qualities of the vehicle (ease of manufacture) or the production system building it. I'd guess that the US tank plants could build Panthers at about the same rate as they could build Shermans and vice-versa.

cbo


I'm not sure about that. From what I've read there were many parts of the panther that were desiigned to be 'massaged' into place. Also much of it was assembed as piecework.

The Sherman during it's development was worked over by automotive production engineers to tweak it for high volume series production. Everything from parts standardization to having a well developed 'Change Order' system for introducing changes to the production line had been well developed by the high volume production system used by the American automobile industry.

The big difference between the American and the European tank production was that The Americans decided that 35 ton tanks could be built on a true assembly line like passenger cars instead of by heavy engineering firms that were used to building locomotives and other heavy equipment.

It would have been interesting to see what a 'production engineered Panther' would have looked like after the American assembly line specialists had gotten done with it. It would also be interesting to see what a Panther fitted with some of the advanced features of the Sherman would have been (Like the constant speed hydraulic turret drive) but it would have been a much different beast that the standard Panther

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:18 pm
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

- bsmart
I'm not sure about that. From what I've read there were many parts of the panther that were desiigned to be 'massaged' into place. Also much of it was assembed as piecework.

The Sherman during it's development was worked over by automotive production engineers to tweak it for high volume series production. Everything from parts standardization to having a well developed 'Change Order' system for introducing changes to the production line had been well developed by the high volume production system used by the American automobile industry.

The big difference between the American and the European tank production was that The Americans decided that 35 ton tanks could be built on a true assembly line like passenger cars instead of by heavy engineering firms that were used to building locomotives and other heavy equipment.


You could be right about the design not being as fit for massproduction as the Sherman, but it seems that it was a good deal better than for earlier German tanks (which may not say much Smile )

I think the bottom line is that the number and types of parts that goes into a WWII tank of a given size are about the same. It needs an engine, transmission, armoured hull etc. What really governs output is access to rawmaterials, machinery, manpower etc. And here Germany was lagging behind the US. Add to that the fact that US plants, transport, etc. wasn'øt bombed every other day. In the bigger picture, improving the design for production may make some gain, but it cannot do much to change the basic production system and its flaws.

It would have been interesting to see what a 'production engineered Panther' would have looked like after the American assembly line specialists had gotten done with it. It would also be interesting to see what a Panther fitted with some of the advanced features of the Sherman would have been (Like the constant speed hydraulic turret drive) but it would have been a much different beast that the standard Panther


I think one problem would be that the Germans did not have the materials needed to make some of the features of the Sherman. The Sherman turret traverse, for example, used an electric motor for power and that togetherwith the required wiring might not have fitted well with Germanys precarious raw material situation. The mechanical-hydraulic system used in the Panther and Tiger used only steel.

cbo
Back to top
View user's profile
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 2:37 am
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

hello roy,
it may not seem like much, but much respect to you and doug for serving on/in the track. thank you. my dads war photos dont paint a nice combat picture of the track. i think there must be alot of comparisons of the M4 in WW2 to the M113 in Nam.
when i called it a frig, i mean cause it was made by FMC (Food Machinery Corp., they made refrigators){M2/M3 also made by FMC}. i work in an aluminum fab shop and i wouldnt place AL between myself and bullets no how (unless it is moved by pratt & whitney).
it justed seems that good praise and all, that the, say "bad" qualities as told by my dad, by roy, by doug, others combat vets, hang heavy over that track thus hindering it being that close to the top of the list. you had to sandbag the interior, you woudnt ride inside (let alone fight from inside it-- ifv??), you wouldnt hang your limps inside or outside of the thing, you pretty much just rode on top... (please, please forgive me, but this doesnt make me feel confident in this thing). all of the pics dad has from nam that show damaged tracks, it isnt like they were lost in a european armored conflict. (they were lost to some of the best light infantry the world has seen).
we took AL plate out to the range, it dont stop .308, .223, unless you stack it up pretty thick... we spaced it (hell, that made it worse). it melts much more so than steel...

the M2/M3 is AL with steel plates hanging all over it...
arent the improved armor upgrades for the current M113 basically along the same lines?
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:37 pm
Post subject: Re: M113 #1?????

Hi Shawn! Hi Folks!

The following post is done in the spirt of showing those who may not know there is more to the story.
Before I started hanging out here, I have a VERY bad impression of the Sherman tank during it's use in NWE. Thanks to others who have pointed out facts I didn't think about before, I now feel that tank was the right vehicle, for the right time, and POSSIBLE the best that could be fielded at that time.

- SHAWN

my dads war photos dont paint a nice combat picture of the track.


How's this Shawn for a bad picture? All four of us survived hitting a large land mine. I think my right gunner died later of pneumonia in a hospital on Oklinawa. My right gunner/Platoon Leader was returned to the field after a check up and an overnight stay at the 93rd Evac Hospital, my driver returned to the field after a month of light duty. I returned to duty after three months of light duty.


There is more to the story than bad pictures. What counts (to me anyway) is the number of people who survived after their AFV has been hit by something. In the case of my first ACAV, most of that damage happiened AFTER we were able to get out of and off of it.

Look at a picture of an Iraqi T72 that has been burned out (like my 1st ACAV) with it's turret blown off. One has to ask, was the crew able to get out after the first hit and before the secondary fire set off the remaining main gun ammo? Both pictures show you a burn out and total destoryed AFV. However they do not tell the story of the crew. It's the crew that counts, not the vehicle and how well it does or does not survive a hit.

- SHAWN

when i called it a frig, i mean cause it was made by FMC (Food Machinery Corp., they made refrigators){M2/M3 also made by FMC}. i work in an aluminum fab shop and i wouldnt place AL between myself and bullets no how (unless it is moved by pratt & whitney).


Don't forget, FMC also made the LVTP7/AAV7. I have never heard the armored vehicle department of FMC call "Frig" before.
Anyway, I am sure that the AFV plant was not the same one that made refrigators.

- SHAWN

it justed seems that good praise and all, that the, say "bad" qualities as told by my dad, by roy, by doug, others combat vets, hang heavy over that track thus hindering it being that close to the top of the list.


Name something, anything that is prefect.

- SHAWN

you had to sandbag the interior,


Not very crew did that. You could if you wanted to but there was no unit SOP requiring it. Nether one of my two ACAVs where sandbaged. In the case of the first one, sandbags would NOT have helped due to the size of the mine. That is just like the Sherman crews of WWII who put sandbags on the outside of their tanks just because they thought and hoped it MIGHT help. I for one didn't care for the idea of dirt being driven into my skin by an explosion.

- SHAWN

you woudnt ride inside (let alone fight from inside it-- ifv??)


The driver rode inside. Sure some units modified the driving controls so the driver could set on top of his hatch and above the armor. During my 18 months with the Army, I never saw a M113 modified like that.

As for fighting inside, the M60 gunner's had to get inside to fire their guns.

The difference is what the vehicle is doing.
If moving, the main threat was land mines under the vehicle. (Name a IFV/APC that IS prof against landmines) Therefore the best protection was riding on top the vehicle with both the bottom armor and the top armor between you and that landmine. It's a good thing the M113 had a top that had room for the M60 gunners to ride on top.

When contact was made, the vehicles stopped, ending the threat of land mines. The M60 gunner's then dropped inside the hull to take cover behind the side armor to operate their weapons. The driver of my second AFV came up with an SOP. When he saw a 50 cal ammo fly over the front of the hull, he came up out of his compartment and started firing his M16 to the front of the vehcile. When he saw the lid of a 50 cal ammo can fly over the front of the vehicle, he dropped back down inside. What was that all about? I was reloading the M2. The crew firing weapons while inside the vehicle? Sounds like an IFV to me.

- SHAWN

you wouldnt hang your limps inside or outside of the thing, you pretty much just rode on top...


When the main threat is landmine under a vehicle, you don't hang limps off the side of ANY, let me say that again ANY, AFV. That is not a problem with the vehicle or it's armor, it a problem with the blast wave moving up the side of the AFV that set it off.


- SHAWN

(please, please forgive me, but this doesnt make me feel confident in this thing).


Having never been there, no problem. As one who has had an ACAV blown apart under me, I for one, think very highly of the M113 and the FMC plant that build them.

- SHAWN

all of the pics dad has from nam that show damaged tracks, it isnt like they were lost in a european armored conflict. (they were lost to some of the best light infantry the world has seen).


It was a very good vehicle for the time and the threat is faced. It was used many times to do things it was never build to do. One example, used as a recovery vehicle to tow combat loaded Sheridans, estimated weight 25 tons, using a trailier hitch mounted in an aluminum ramp that was only rated at 7.5 tons for towing. Towed a number of Sheridans, never broke the hitch or the ramp it was mounted in.

- SHAWN

we took AL plate out to the range, it dont stop .308, .223, unless you stack it up pretty thick... we spaced it (hell, that made it worse).


Was that aluminum plate from refrigerators? Or was it 5083 aluminum alloy rolled armored plate?

Get yourself a M113 and shoot at it with your .308 and .223. I think you will find it will stop those rounds because the protection level it was designed for is a bit higher that those rounds.

- SHAWN

it melts much more so than steel...


True. So what?
No body is going to stay inside a burning AFV if it is at all possble to get out. The melting happiens long after the crew is out or dead, so it's doesn't matter one way or the other. This is just another one of those 'IT'S BAD' claims that has no merit in the real world of crew survival.

- SHAWN

the M2/M3 is AL with steel plates hanging all over it...
arent the improved armor upgrades for the current M113 basically along the same lines


Yes, the Bradleys and the M113s (the few that are being used) have been upgraded with steel armor.

You are however forgetting the threats that the original designs were layed out for, the threats in Vietnam that most M113s faced, and the current threats the vehicles face today. They are not the same and upgrades that help protect the crews against the current types of threat have been added.

Shawn, you feel the M113 is not a good vehicle. OK what would you suggest the U.S. Army have used during Vietnam in place of the M113? Keep in mind that the Army had no plans to use the M113 in Vietnam to start with.

Maybe the Army could have used the USMC's LVTP5s. That was about the only other Infantry carrier in the inventory at that time and they were made out of steel and not aluminum armor. Asks Older Top, I am sure he can tell a bunch of good and possible even more bad stories about those steel boxes.

Again, I say, I might not rate it as the best IFV/APC ever, but it would be very close.

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum