±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: sercrets
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6646

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 468
Total: 468
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: CPGlang
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: CPGlang
09: CPGlang
10: Home
11: Photo Gallery
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Home
17: Home
18: Home
19: Community Forums
20: Photo Gallery
21: Community Forums
22: Home
23: Home
24: Photo Gallery
25: Community Forums
26: Home
27: Your Account
28: CPGlang
29: Home
30: Photo Gallery
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Downloads
34: Home
35: Photo Gallery
36: CPGlang
37: CPGlang
38: CPGlang
39: Downloads
40: Community Forums
41: CPGlang
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Downloads
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Your Account
50: Community Forums
51: Photo Gallery
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Downloads
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Downloads
59: Downloads
60: Community Forums
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: Downloads
64: Downloads
65: Downloads
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: CPGlang
69: Downloads
70: Photo Gallery
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: CPGlang
75: Community Forums
76: Photo Gallery
77: News Archive
78: CPGlang
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: Photo Gallery
82: Downloads
83: Home
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Photo Gallery
88: CPGlang
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: CPGlang
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: CPGlang
97: CPGlang
98: Photo Gallery
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Home
102: CPGlang
103: Community Forums
104: Home
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: CPGlang
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Home
118: CPGlang
119: Downloads
120: Photo Gallery
121: Downloads
122: Community Forums
123: Downloads
124: Downloads
125: CPGlang
126: CPGlang
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: CPGlang
130: Home
131: News
132: Home
133: Home
134: Photo Gallery
135: CPGlang
136: Downloads
137: Member Screenshots
138: Community Forums
139: CPGlang
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: CPGlang
143: Home
144: CPGlang
145: Community Forums
146: CPGlang
147: Downloads
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: CPGlang
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: CPGlang
154: Home
155: CPGlang
156: Home
157: News Archive
158: CPGlang
159: Home
160: Community Forums
161: Member Screenshots
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: CPGlang
165: Downloads
166: CPGlang
167: Downloads
168: Your Account
169: Home
170: Downloads
171: Community Forums
172: Your Account
173: Home
174: Home
175: Downloads
176: News
177: Home
178: CPGlang
179: Community Forums
180: Member Screenshots
181: CPGlang
182: Search
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: CPGlang
186: Home
187: CPGlang
188: Photo Gallery
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: CPGlang
193: Downloads
194: CPGlang
195: Downloads
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: CPGlang
202: Home
203: Community Forums
204: Your Account
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Photo Gallery
208: Home
209: CPGlang
210: Photo Gallery
211: Community Forums
212: Home
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: CPGlang
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: CPGlang
220: Photo Gallery
221: Downloads
222: Community Forums
223: Home
224: Community Forums
225: CPGlang
226: Home
227: Home
228: Your Account
229: CPGlang
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: CPGlang
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: CPGlang
241: CPGlang
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: CPGlang
246: Community Forums
247: Photo Gallery
248: CPGlang
249: Community Forums
250: Home
251: Downloads
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: Home
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: CPGlang
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: CPGlang
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Photo Gallery
266: CPGlang
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Home
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Home
273: Your Account
274: Community Forums
275: Home
276: Home
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Home
280: CPGlang
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Home
285: Community Forums
286: CPGlang
287: Community Forums
288: CPGlang
289: CPGlang
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: CPGlang
295: Photo Gallery
296: Home
297: Photo Gallery
298: Community Forums
299: CPGlang
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Home
303: Home
304: Photo Gallery
305: CPGlang
306: Community Forums
307: CPGlang
308: Home
309: Photo Gallery
310: Community Forums
311: CPGlang
312: Home
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Home
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Home
322: Home
323: Your Account
324: Home
325: Community Forums
326: Your Account
327: Photo Gallery
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Photo Gallery
331: Photo Gallery
332: Home
333: Community Forums
334: Home
335: CPGlang
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: CPGlang
342: Home
343: CPGlang
344: Photo Gallery
345: Community Forums
346: CPGlang
347: CPGlang
348: Community Forums
349: CPGlang
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Photo Gallery
353: CPGlang
354: Downloads
355: Photo Gallery
356: CPGlang
357: Home
358: Photo Gallery
359: Photo Gallery
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: CPGlang
363: Community Forums
364: CPGlang
365: Downloads
366: Home
367: Home
368: Home
369: Community Forums
370: CPGlang
371: Member Screenshots
372: Community Forums
373: Your Account
374: CPGlang
375: CPGlang
376: Home
377: CPGlang
378: Community Forums
379: Downloads
380: CPGlang
381: Community Forums
382: Home
383: Home
384: Photo Gallery
385: Home
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Photo Gallery
389: News Archive
390: Home
391: News
392: CPGlang
393: Photo Gallery
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Home
397: Downloads
398: Downloads
399: Downloads
400: Photo Gallery
401: CPGlang
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Photo Gallery
405: Community Forums
406: Home
407: CPGlang
408: Community Forums
409: CPGlang
410: CPGlang
411: CPGlang
412: Community Forums
413: Downloads
414: Downloads
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Home
418: Home
419: Member Screenshots
420: Home
421: Community Forums
422: CPGlang
423: News Archive
424: Community Forums
425: Home
426: CPGlang
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: CPGlang
430: Your Account
431: Downloads
432: Home
433: Home
434: Community Forums
435: Home
436: Member Screenshots
437: Home
438: Community Forums
439: Home
440: Community Forums
441: Photo Gallery
442: Photo Gallery
443: Home
444: Community Forums
445: Photo Gallery
446: Community Forums
447: Photo Gallery
448: Photo Gallery
449: CPGlang
450: Community Forums
451: Home
452: Community Forums
453: Home
454: Community Forums
455: Community Forums
456: News
457: Downloads
458: Photo Gallery
459: Photo Gallery
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Member Screenshots
467: Photo Gallery
468: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:21 pm
Post subject: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

An Indian T-90S



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I like that pattern, but think it's quite a challenge to reproduce it on a 1/35 model..*

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

This may be an stupid question....

However I'm allowed because I'm an civilian, with no military experience Mr. Green

Is this digit camo pattern serious Confused

I can not imagine that this is better then the old style patches, stripes and dots with-out the 90 degree corners Neutral



Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

It's a conspiracy against armor modelers everywhere, I tell ya'...and an outrage!

Here's something I didn't know...dates in U.S. Army to the late '70's experimentally:

www.uniteddynamics.com/dualtex/

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:54 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

- JG300-Ascout

Don might know something about this. Camo on vehicles was something we tested at the Armor Board in the early '70's, but digital was not among them.


HUH ?? Shocked

The only thing close to that was the 'urban camo' scheme the I believe the 'Berlin Bde' tested sometime in the 70's.

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..



http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article47

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

US Army in Europe tested it for a while in the 70's on select units.

Idea is it helps camouflage vehicles/personnel from electronic optics (FLIR/Image intensification). One key aspect is the exemption of Black. From what I understand, black is more detectable on a moving object than any other color, being it doesn't reflect any light and creates a void in the color spectrum. Same theory bounced around when coming up with a way to defeat Laser Range Finders. No reflection, no range. People a lot smarter than me could probably explain all this (Quantum Physics and all Confused ) but it supposedly works when done right.

My argument has always been that it's useless in the field once your covered in dirt/mud/dust and have the plethora of equipment and kit strapped outside. As far as dismounts go, a "Gilly suit" has always been the best for remaining unseen. But that's a bit extreme Mr. Green .

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:22 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Just when you think you've "Maned-Up" enough to tackle the Chieftain camo pattern, this comes along. Confused


- Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I wonder how this is applied. Is it painted directly on the vehicle? Or is it some kind of sheet printed overlay (similar to the 'bodywrap' full vehicle advertising I see on the street these days.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

I dont care for that nasty green... I dont care for any of the digi camo anyway. The theories have all been done before, same horse just of a different color! ha!

The more things change the more they stay the same.

I think much the same as JoeD's comments. In a perfect world and in lab conditions everything will always work.

It all sounds good to some loving general somewhere. (like berets with no-polish boots??)
Shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

You had to bring up Berets,

I was at Riley when we got issued them (Months after the OFFICIAL issue, we were always near the bottom to get things). Told a lot of my troops how miserable they'd be wearing a BLACK piece of wool on their head in the summer. Was asked how I knew and told them I wore one in the Mojave for two years. Give me the good old soft cap or now called "Patrol Cap" any time.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
ChrisC
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:36 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I did an article on the "Dual-Tex" pattern the US tested in the 80's. It was printed in the April 2008 issue of Military Vehicle Magazine.
The pattern was tested at West Point, I have read the test reports and cover them in the article.
If you are unable to locate this back issue of the magazine and are interested, I have a digital copy in my files someplace.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 3:51 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

I think the problem is scale. Those elements are so large that they lose effect. Here is a shot of a Hummer in a vinyl wrap that appears a lot more effective (but an even bigger nightmare for modelers)



_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recceboy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Posts: 172
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 4:20 am
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad...

- Neil_Baumgardner
An Indian T-90S



Neil



Bad case of a TETRIS game gone wrong, Tetris tank......

Anthony
Back to top
View user's profile
WimD.
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 118
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Thu May 13, 2010 1:07 pm
Post subject: Re: If you thought the Chinese digicamo pattern looked bad..

Hi,

Leopard 2 PSO

Digicamo pattern or urban camo?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum