±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 238
Total: 238
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Downloads
07: Community Forums
08: Statistics
09: Community Forums
10: Photo Gallery
11: Home
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Photo Gallery
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Home
31: Home
32: Community Forums
33: Home
34: News Archive
35: Home
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: News Archive
40: Home
41: News Archive
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Home
49: Community Forums
50: Home
51: Home
52: Home
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Photo Gallery
56: Home
57: Community Forums
58: Photo Gallery
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Home
65: Home
66: Home
67: News Archive
68: Home
69: Home
70: Home
71: Home
72: Home
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: Home
76: Home
77: Home
78: Home
79: Home
80: Member Screenshots
81: Home
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Home
85: Member Screenshots
86: Community Forums
87: Home
88: Photo Gallery
89: Your Account
90: Member Screenshots
91: Community Forums
92: Photo Gallery
93: Home
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Your Account
99: Home
100: Home
101: Home
102: Home
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Home
107: Home
108: Home
109: Photo Gallery
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Home
113: Photo Gallery
114: News Archive
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Member Screenshots
118: Member Screenshots
119: Photo Gallery
120: Member Screenshots
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: News Archive
125: News Archive
126: Home
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Downloads
135: Home
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Home
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Home
150: Home
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Home
154: Search
155: Member Screenshots
156: Home
157: Member Screenshots
158: Community Forums
159: Home
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Downloads
164: Downloads
165: News
166: Photo Gallery
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Photo Gallery
170: Photo Gallery
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Home
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Home
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: Member Screenshots
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Member Screenshots
186: Community Forums
187: Downloads
188: News Archive
189: Downloads
190: Home
191: Home
192: Home
193: Member Screenshots
194: Community Forums
195: Photo Gallery
196: Member Screenshots
197: Photo Gallery
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Home
203: Community Forums
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Home
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Member Screenshots
211: Downloads
212: Photo Gallery
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: Home
216: Home
217: Member Screenshots
218: Photo Gallery
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Member Screenshots
225: Home
226: Photo Gallery
227: Community Forums
228: Photo Gallery
229: Member Screenshots
230: Home
231: Home
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Home
236: Downloads
237: Home
238: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Sherman at Ft. Knox
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:19 am
Post subject: Sherman at Ft. Knox

I have been going thru many a photo. I havent seen this on any other Shermans. The EZ8 at the Post HQ/Colors, it has a lift ring on the port side of the turret? Does anyone know why it was added and what purpose it serves? I know from Doug K. (and others) the vehicle is still used by the MP's, etc...
SR

Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:28 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman at Ft. Knox

- SHAWN
I have been going thru many a photo. I havent seen this on any other Shermans. The EZ8 at the Post HQ/Colors, it has a lift ring on the port side of the turret? Does anyone know why it was added and what purpose it serves? I know from Doug K. (and others) the vehicle is still used by the MP's, etc...
SR



Shawn,
Do you mean the one on Brooks Field at Ft. Knox? I though it had "Thunderbolt" on it now. Not used by MP's, of course, but is just a parade ground guardian and I think they might still use it for a "retreat gun" in the evenings. Used to have a gas-powered simulator on main gun, but I think this is done "through the tube" now.

Don probably knows a lot more about this vehicle than I....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:54 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman at Ft. Knox

This was present on the early 76mm turrets. The T23 tanks - from which this turret was adapted - had this lug and fittings on the opposite side of the turret. The idea was that a small frame could be mounted in the fittings and anchored on this lug to allow a tank to lift out its own engine, using the turret to pivot it off the side. T26 tanks - including I think the M26 at the museum - had this as well. Anyways, it is believed that the first Sherman 76mm turrets were actually left over T23 castings and thus included this lug.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:38 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman at Ft. Knox

Kurt do you happen to have a photo? I havent seen this particular ring on any turret-- prototype or production turrets. It isnt present on the starboard side of the same Sherman. It isn't on the M26 either indoors or outdoors at the museum. ????



Yes, Doug, that is the one.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
DanFong
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman at Ft. Knox

Here's a picture of an M4A3w76 of the 9th AD in Korbecke, Germany 1945 and it has one of the earlier 76mm turrets with the extra lifting eye. This style of turret shows up in a fair number of WW2 pics.


Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman at Ft. Knox

There are others in existence. See my Picasa album at;
picasaweb.google.com/gebinder01

Go to the album "M4A3 Shermans in Nebraska", then page down to the M4A3E8 in Tecumseh, NE for a batch of photos.

Gary
Back to top
View user's profile
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 3:13 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman at Ft. Knox

Shawn:

I found photos of the M26 outside the museum. It doesn't have the fittings, but on the left side of the turret there are two pads where the clevises for the frame would be welded on.

The fittings are shown about 3/4 of the way down this page:

www.ferreamole.it/imag...m26_01.htm

On the right side, in about the same relative position as the Sherman, the anchor lug is welded on.

afvdb.50megs.com/usa/p...rshing.jpg

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman at Ft. Knox

Thanks Kurt, I appreciate this. Please tell me more about this feature on the turret.
I spent the other day looking thru Sherman pics. I found a few, but less than more. I didnt find alot. I found 8, one pic being a FM/TM picture, but no consistancy, the other FM/TM pics didnt have the eyelet. It was more of a puzzle-- not specific to any unit, various battalions had them-- lead me to more assumptions. I generated more questions than I had answers.

I noticed that I only found this turret on the A3 models. I didnt see it on any A1 models. Is it safe to say the origianl contract for the M4A1/76 and the T23 overlapped and the A1's were completed with a "revised" (whatever?) T23 turret? As the contract was renewed and implementation of up-gunning was put into full swing, coupled the cancellation of the T23, the we go back and use the original T23 turrets?
I didnt see this on any M4A1's only on M4A3's, is this an accurate finding?

I only saw it on the turrets that had the split circular loaders hatch.
It isnt even a feature on the M4E6 turret (only 2 produced?).

So with the T23, how many were actually produced? I have a request for 288, where all 288 manufactured (at least the turrets?)? The eyelet isnt a part of the casting, it is a feature added to the casting. How many could have been welded with this feature, etc.?

Are there any photos of this A-frame in use? I take it, it had been a good theory, but it was more cost effective to leave such intended maintenace to the unit's maintenace sections?

(I take all this and a 1.25 and I can buy myself a Coke... that is what one of my professors use to tell us in re: value of her lectures, but back than I think soda's were .50!!!-- "You take what you've just learn and 2 quarters and you can go down to the vending machine and buy yourself a soda")
off topic-- That is the only thing I ever remember from her class too!! I really didnt like her...
SR
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman at Ft. Knox

Kurt,
footnote: the photos I had/have been going through are WW2 photos...
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman at Ft. Knox

The ring was so John Wayne could have this on his key chain Mr. Green

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman at Ft. Knox

"I didnt see this on any M4A1's only on M4A3's, is this an accurate finding?"

I think so. Each plant had it's own subcontracts for parts. PSC - who built the M4A1(76) used USC to make new turrets for them. Detroit Tank Arsenal made the T23 and thus probably already had turrets in house, in the pipeline, or in development (unknown exactly) when they started making M4A3(76)s.

"I only saw it on the turrets that had the split circular loaders hatch."

Yes, and not even all of them. The oval hatch turrets were a different part number.

"So with the T23, how many were actually produced?"

On the Limited Procurement contract, 250, plus a handful of the various prototypes.

"The eyelet isnt a part of the casting, it is a feature added to the casting. How many could have been welded with this feature, etc.?"

All of them -??

"Are there any photos of this A-frame in use?"

Not on a Sherman - the set up was incomplete. There might be one in Hunnicutt's Pershing.

"I take it, it had been a good theory, but it was more cost effective to leave such intended maintenace to the unit's maintenace sections? "

I haven't seen any explanations.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum