±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6646

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 139
Total: 139
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Home
06: CPGlang
07: Community Forums
08: CPGlang
09: Community Forums
10: News Archive
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Photo Gallery
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Home
17: Community Forums
18: Photo Gallery
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Downloads
22: CPGlang
23: Community Forums
24: CPGlang
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Statistics
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: CPGlang
31: Photo Gallery
32: Home
33: CPGlang
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Home
38: Photo Gallery
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Downloads
43: Home
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Home
50: Photo Gallery
51: Home
52: Photo Gallery
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Home
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: CPGlang
59: Community Forums
60: Home
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: Photo Gallery
64: Home
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: Photo Gallery
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Home
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: CPGlang
79: CPGlang
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: News Archive
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Photo Gallery
93: Your Account
94: CPGlang
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: CPGlang
98: Community Forums
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Home
102: Home
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: CPGlang
108: Member Screenshots
109: Community Forums
110: Photo Gallery
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: Home
115: Community Forums
116: Photo Gallery
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: CPGlang
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Downloads
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Statistics
129: Downloads
130: Home
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Home
134: Statistics
135: Home
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
M48 Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Rick_Eshleman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 2011
Posts: 907
Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:48 pm
Post subject: M48 Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.

I was going through Port Deposit, MD and stopped at the VFW to photograph this donation from Aberdeen Proving Ground. It definately was a range target and clearly shows numerous hits. Serial number 1040. Rick


Last edited by Rick_Eshleman on Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:41 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address Photo Gallery
Rick_Eshleman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 2011
Posts: 907
Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:51 pm
Post subject: Re: M48C Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.

More photos.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address Photo Gallery
Costas_TT
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
Posts: 387

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 1:07 am
Post subject: Re: M48C Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.

At first glance, the C on the rear plate seems to confirm that it is indeed an M48C. However, Geoffrey Tillotson mentions that the C was embossed on the right front side of the hull (typo?), while Hunnicutt provides photographic evidence (more here) that ballistically unsound tanks dedicated to the training role were conspicuously marked on the glacis between the headlight guards as NON-BALLISTIC TRAINING TANKS ONLY (variation: TRAINING TANK NON-BALLISTIC). Said welded warning seems to be absent from the tank in your pictures.
Could it be a variation of the M48C marking system, or something else entirely?

_________________
1/72 and 1/76 scale fanatic.


Last edited by Costas_TT on Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:17 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Rick_Eshleman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 2011
Posts: 907
Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:16 am
Post subject: Re: M48C Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.

Costas,
I saw several early M48C tanks at the M88 recovery range(in the 1980's), some had a welded warning, others did not. If you read page 114 "US Military Vehicles, by Fred Crismon "120 early M48's had hulls that were ballistically deficient, and were designated M48C tanks for training only" but not mentioned is did they all have the warning weld on the hull? This Tank is SER 79, so it would fall into the first 120 built, and you're right it has no warning weld. Best way to check this out would be get permission to enter the tank, check data plate. Let me know what you think. Rick
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address Photo Gallery
Costas_TT
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
Posts: 387

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:26 am
Post subject: Re: M48C Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.

All sources mention 120 early production (i.e. Chrysler TC cupola and small driver's hatch) M48s, which doesn't necessarily mean that they were the first 120 tanks produced. Of the three authors (Hunnicutt, Crismon and Tillotson), the latter postulates that mild steel might have been used and the tanks intended for training from the start - obviously contradicting the other two, who clearly mention that these early hulls were "ballistically deficient". The problem is that the specific batch, serial ranges and all, is not identified.
And then there is this:

Note serial number visible under MG cradle and ammo box...

_________________
1/72 and 1/76 scale fanatic.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Costas_TT
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
Posts: 387

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:42 am
Post subject: Re: M48C Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.

BREAKING NEWS: I now have definitive proof that the C in the octagon did not apply to the M48C specifically. We know for a fact that all M48C tanks were retained stateside, correct?
Now, check out this photo of a Greek M48.

Circled in red for convenience.

_________________
1/72 and 1/76 scale fanatic.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Rick_Eshleman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 2011
Posts: 907
Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:47 am
Post subject: Re: M48C Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.

Then there is the Aberdeen Proving Ground "Frankenstein" Tank. I found these all around the base. Ordnance school was great with these. They remove the turret, then later place it onto same model hull, but a different tank! The most prominent example of this was the M60A3 TTS which was displayed in the field during the 1990s!
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address Photo Gallery
Costas_TT
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
Posts: 387

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:57 am
Post subject: Re: M48C Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.

So, Serial Number 79 is an APG Franken-Tank?

_________________
1/72 and 1/76 scale fanatic.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2061
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:26 pm
Post subject: Re: M48C Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.

The "C" inside the octagon is not a designator for M48C or even related to the serial number.

What you have is the foundry's casting number/data for that particular piece they made. The "SER" refers to the series of castings made. So you will find the same number on different tanks. M48's castings were made by numerous foundries and this particular marking belongs to American Steel from East Chicago Indiana from the 1950's. Depending on who made the casting the hull could be in sections welded together or as one piece with the floor plates welded in. The M48C deficiency was in the upper hull by the driver's vision blocks, being the armor was too thin there. Externally the difference between M48 and M48C are none (I haven't found one yet) other than the bead weld warning across the front, since the only correction was in the casting process and it only applies to the hull.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Rick_Eshleman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 2011
Posts: 907
Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:54 pm
Post subject: Re: M48C Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.

It might be a "frankentank", only way to find out would be to check the hull and turret plates to see if they match. I did dig out my M48 files, particularly TM9-500 page 23-26 where it is stated: "The M48C is similar in appearance to the M48. The difference being in the strength of the armored hulls. The M48C is not suitable for combat and is to be used for training purposes only. The letter "C" is embossed in the right front hull meaning the tank is "non-ballistic.". The M48C was also classified as Limited Standard at the time.
I also note page 103 of Hunnicut's book where "120 tanks with ballistically deficient hull castings" is mentioned and the photo mentioning the wording doesn't match the weld metal marking. So maybe some were marked properly and others not? It would be interesting to find out if all were sequentally built 1-120, or if they were just groups erratically produced?
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address Photo Gallery
Costas_TT
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
Posts: 387

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 5:25 pm
Post subject: Re: M48C Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.

The wording originally specified was "NON-BALLISTIC TRAINING TANK ONLY".
The non-matching wording was "TRAINING TANK NON-BALLISTIC", as seen in the photo on the link I posted and the picture in Hunnicutt's book.
And in all the excitement I forgot the difference between serial and casting numbers. Thanks go to Joe for the correction.

_________________
1/72 and 1/76 scale fanatic.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 1:56 am
Post subject: Re: M48C Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.

I got [tank] SN 1040 off the front tow lugs - always the first place to look.

The turret on this tank was also an ASF-C product, unfortunately the serial was obliterated by glancing fragment or projectile hit.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Rick_Eshleman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 2011
Posts: 907
Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA
PostPosted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:48 pm
Post subject: Re: M48 Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.

Kurt,
M48 Tank it is. I couldn't find the SN on front tow hook, but did find it on the rear of the tank. I didn't have time today to climb in to see the manufacture plates, but maybe next trip. I looked all over front for "C" stamping, or weld(none found), so i must be a regular production model. Thanks, Rick
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address Photo Gallery
Rick_Eshleman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 2011
Posts: 907
Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 7:15 pm
Post subject: Re: M48 Medium Tank. Port Deposit, MD.

Since Ser = series, I guess this would mean the M48A1 tank at Oak Orchard, DE has a different SN? I looked at tow lugs and rear left hull but paint is too thick to see any numbers. Photos from the other day. Rick
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum