±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: spadgham
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6643

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 141
Total: 141
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: CPGlang
04: CPGlang
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: CPGlang
08: Community Forums
09: Home
10: Home
11: Photo Gallery
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Home
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Member Screenshots
20: CPGlang
21: Community Forums
22: Member Screenshots
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: CPGlang
26: CPGlang
27: CPGlang
28: CPGlang
29: Downloads
30: Photo Gallery
31: Downloads
32: CPGlang
33: Photo Gallery
34: Community Forums
35: News Archive
36: Community Forums
37: CPGlang
38: Downloads
39: Downloads
40: Community Forums
41: CPGlang
42: CPGlang
43: CPGlang
44: Community Forums
45: Photo Gallery
46: Photo Gallery
47: Member Screenshots
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: CPGlang
55: CPGlang
56: Home
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Home
61: Home
62: CPGlang
63: Home
64: Home
65: Community Forums
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Downloads
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: CPGlang
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Downloads
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Downloads
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Photo Gallery
86: Photo Gallery
87: Home
88: Community Forums
89: CPGlang
90: Statistics
91: Community Forums
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Photo Gallery
98: CPGlang
99: CPGlang
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: CPGlang
106: Home
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: CPGlang
110: Home
111: Community Forums
112: Your Account
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Home
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Home
122: CPGlang
123: Photo Gallery
124: Photo Gallery
125: Home
126: CPGlang
127: Community Forums
128: Your Account
129: Community Forums
130: CPGlang
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Photo Gallery
134: Community Forums
135: Home
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Photo Gallery
139: CPGlang
140: Downloads
141: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Royal Artillery Museum #3: Late WWII artillery pieces
A forum dedicated for the discussion of all kinds of artillery topics.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  Artillery Forum

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:38 am
Post subject: Royal Artillery Museum #3: Late WWII artillery pieces

7.2 inch field howitzer







Mk III 5.5 inch field howitzer







7.2 inch Recoilless Rifle







Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Royal Artillery Museum #3: Late WWII artillery pieces

Did anyone notice the mistake in the description of the 7.2" Howitzer? It proves that Americans aren't th eonly ones to get Museum displays wrong Smile

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:18 pm
Post subject: Re: Royal Artillery Museum #3: Late WWII artillery pieces

Uh... You may have to clue me in... Did it have to do with the 8-inch???

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4667
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Royal Artillery Museum #3: Late WWII artillery pieces

Was the 155mm M1 classified as a "howitzer"?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Royal Artillery Museum #3: Late WWII artillery pieces

Well there is a 155mm M1 Howitzer but it ain't the piece that uses that carriage. That was the 155mm M1 Gun which along with the 8" Howitzer formed the Heavy artillery family of pieces.

Follow up quiz. Since each family of pieces contained botth a gun and a howitzer that used a common carriage. Wat was the gun that was paired with the 155mm Howitzer?

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4667
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:37 pm
Post subject: Re: Royal Artillery Museum #3: Late WWII artillery pieces

- bsmart
Well there is a 155mm M1 Howitzer but it ain't the piece that uses that carriage. That was the 155mm M1 Gun which along with the 8" Howitzer formed the Heavy artillery family of pieces.

Follow up quiz. Since each family of pieces contained botth a gun and a howitzer that used a common carriage. Wat was the gun that was paired with the 155mm Howitzer?


Does that mean I get at least partial credit? Laughing I had in mind the 155mm "Long Tom" on that carriage, which I never thought of as a "howitzer".
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:03 am
Post subject: Re: Royal Artillery Museum #3: Late WWII artillery pieces

You get full credit for the original question I was just expanding on the reason for the difference.

Which leaves the second question

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4667
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:31 am
Post subject: Re: Royal Artillery Museum #3: Late WWII artillery pieces

- bsmart
You get full credit for the original question I was just expanding on the reason for the difference.

Which leaves the second question


That's "Mission Creep". You Air Force guys are all alike, ain't cha'?! Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Taranov
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Posts: 344
Location: Moscow, Russia
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 6:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Royal Artillery Museum #3: Late WWII artillery pieces

It's more looks like 8-inch M1 howitzer. Same carriage than Long Tom.
Back to top
View user's profile
armyjunk2
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 22, 2006
Posts: 1416

PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Royal Artillery Museum #3: Late WWII artillery pieces

This is the Brit 7.2 inch BL Field Howitzer MK6 its hard to see it but the last foot or so of the tube is a slightly larger diameter the rest of the tube, not the case with either the US 155mm Gun or 8" Howitzer. This is located at Fort Nelson, Portsmouth. Same US Carriage, 3 different tubes mounted

1


2
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 7:22 am
Post subject: Re: Royal Artillery Museum #3: Late WWII artillery pieces

- Taranov
It's more looks like 8-inch M1 howitzer. Same carriage than Long Tom.


It is the same carriage as the Long Tom, but it isn't an 8" Howitzer. It is more obvious when you see it in person. I saw it at Ft Nelson back in 2000 when I was on a business trip to the UK. Then it was outside at the entrance. walking up to it thinking it was an 8" something didn't look quite right. I couldn't really put my finger on it but the barrel just didn't look right. Once I reaed the plaque I knew why (The mistake refrencing the 155mm Howitzer was there then and I mentioned it to the docent collecting admissions. We see how useful that was Rolling Eyes )

Anyway no one answered the followup question. When I saw Army junk had replied I was figuring he had answered.

The companion piece for the 155 Howitzer was the 4.5" gun. It was a rather mediocre weapon derived from a WWI British weapon. It had only margionally better range than the 155 Howitzer and a small HE charge in each round (It seems that most British HE rounds of that era suffered from that problem. I always figured it had to do with the type of steel they made rounds from which required a thicker casing which reduced the cavity available for the filler charge but that is only a guess based on odd and end pieces of information from sources I no longer remember). 4.5s were deployed but never in great numbers and were replaced either by 155 Howitzers or 155 guns when possible.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
armyjunk2
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 22, 2006
Posts: 1416

PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:15 am
Post subject: Re: Royal Artillery Museum #3: Late WWII artillery pieces

4.5in Field Gun at Fort Sill several more of these displayed in a line on post, maybe 4 or 5
1

2
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  Artillery Forum
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum