±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 351
Total: 351
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Home
03: Member Screenshots
04: Community Forums
05: Member Screenshots
06: Home
07: Home
08: Community Forums
09: Downloads
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Photo Gallery
16: Home
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: News Archive
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Downloads
26: Community Forums
27: Photo Gallery
28: Photo Gallery
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Community Forums
33: News Archive
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: News Archive
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Member Screenshots
42: Community Forums
43: Home
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: Member Screenshots
50: Home
51: CPGlang
52: Member Screenshots
53: Community Forums
54: Home
55: Community Forums
56: Photo Gallery
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Downloads
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: News Archive
71: Community Forums
72: Your Account
73: Statistics
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Home
85: Home
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Photo Gallery
93: Home
94: Home
95: CPGlang
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Photo Gallery
100: Photo Gallery
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Home
115: Photo Gallery
116: Photo Gallery
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Member Screenshots
123: Photo Gallery
124: Photo Gallery
125: Home
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Home
133: Home
134: Member Screenshots
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Photo Gallery
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: News
147: Home
148: Photo Gallery
149: Home
150: Home
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Home
156: Community Forums
157: News Archive
158: Photo Gallery
159: Home
160: Photo Gallery
161: Home
162: Home
163: Search
164: Home
165: Home
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Photo Gallery
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Home
174: Downloads
175: Photo Gallery
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Home
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Photo Gallery
183: Member Screenshots
184: Community Forums
185: Your Account
186: Photo Gallery
187: Statistics
188: Home
189: Community Forums
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: Community Forums
194: Photo Gallery
195: Home
196: Photo Gallery
197: Photo Gallery
198: Community Forums
199: Downloads
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Photo Gallery
203: Home
204: Community Forums
205: Photo Gallery
206: Photo Gallery
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Downloads
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Your Account
216: Photo Gallery
217: Member Screenshots
218: News
219: Photo Gallery
220: Community Forums
221: Photo Gallery
222: Home
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Photo Gallery
231: Community Forums
232: CPGlang
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Home
236: Home
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Photo Gallery
240: Community Forums
241: Home
242: Home
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: CPGlang
247: Home
248: Home
249: Your Account
250: Community Forums
251: News Archive
252: Photo Gallery
253: Community Forums
254: Photo Gallery
255: Community Forums
256: Home
257: Photo Gallery
258: Member Screenshots
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Photo Gallery
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Photo Gallery
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Member Screenshots
272: Home
273: Downloads
274: Home
275: Photo Gallery
276: Community Forums
277: Member Screenshots
278: Community Forums
279: Home
280: Photo Gallery
281: Member Screenshots
282: Member Screenshots
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: CPGlang
287: Community Forums
288: Photo Gallery
289: Home
290: Home
291: Home
292: Community Forums
293: Statistics
294: Home
295: Photo Gallery
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: Photo Gallery
299: Member Screenshots
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Photo Gallery
303: Downloads
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Photo Gallery
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: Photo Gallery
317: Home
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Downloads
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: CPGlang
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Member Screenshots
328: Home
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Downloads
332: Photo Gallery
333: Member Screenshots
334: Home
335: Community Forums
336: Downloads
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Statistics
343: Downloads
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Downloads
347: Your Account
348: Community Forums
349: Home
350: Community Forums
351: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Question for the Sherman gurus...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:25 am
Post subject: Question for the Sherman gurus...

Apart from the 17 pounder, what are the other (if any) definitive visual characteristics of a "Firefly"? I had thought that the additional flat steel plates in front of the driver and radio/bow gunner were unique to the Firefly, but apparently this is not the case. For Fireflies that had the 17lb. gun changed (or never actually installed) is there a visual cue that says "Yep, that was intended to be, or was at one time, a "Firefly"?

Thx in advance.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:51 am
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

The large box welded to the rear of the turret. Google can be your friend.

www.google.com/images?...25&bih=636
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:56 am
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

They also had a blanked off hull MG mount.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:09 am
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

Thanks, I knew this was the place to ask!

What would constitute "blanked off", since many displays don't have a hull MG mounted. Got an example image of what to look for? I see some Google images of reputed fireflies with varying looking mounts.

I "Googled" the firefly and checked the wiki page, but I think our membership is more reliable, frankly.


Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Tichenor
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 06, 2007
Posts: 461
Location: Antwerp
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 8:44 am
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

Dough

Not a Sherman expert, but I will give it a try.

Firefly's where only build on the M4, M4A1, or M4A4 chassis (I'm counting the M4 Composite as a M4). All where VVSS, dry stowage and 75mm hulls and turrets.
From the outside the box on the rear of the turret (where the radios where mounted in) is a give away, only Firefly's had this modification.

Most of the Firefly's used the bow gunners place as extra stowage for ammunition so there was a plate welded over the bow gun. However this is not 100% true for all Firefly's. Here in Belgium there are some (probably) post war rebuild Firefly's without the cover (the one in Leopoldsburg at the railway station for example).

There is ia different gunshield used on the Firefly's, it has a ring of bolts around the gun.

There shoud be a gun lock at the rear off the hull (left from the center).
Example without the plate but with the gun lock
Firefly with all the stuff on

Michel
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:14 am
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

Thanks, Tichenor...that's a big help! Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
tankbarrell
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 56

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:47 am
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

Fireflies were not built on M4A1.
Back to top
View user's profile
Tichenor
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 06, 2007
Posts: 461
Location: Antwerp
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 10:35 am
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

- tankbarrell
Fireflies were not built on M4A1

Oops indeed not on M4A1.
I explicid posted Composites are M4's, but somewhere in my mind they keep popping up as M4A1's Confused
And that UK Grizzly with fireflyturret is still chasing me Wink
Michel
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
TrevorLarkum
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 1596
Location: Northampton, England
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

As Tichenor says, you have to make a distinction between wartime and post-War Fireflies. Really only wartime conversions were true Fireflies but since the war the Firefly turret has appeared on Shermans that would never have converted during the war - particularly in the armies of Italy and Belgium. Text books and websites will describe the main characteristics - the mantlet, turret, blanked-off MG, etc. - and these can be seen in contemporary wartime pictures. However many (most?) surviving Fireflies will contradict these since they have been converted post-war on whatever convenient chassis were available. Occasionally you will even see a Firefly without a 17pdr turret. So overall the definition of what constitutes a Firefly is complicated.

These are the ones I have so far added to PTC - and probably not one is an original authentic wartime Firefly:

Preserved Sherman Firefly tanks

_________________
Trevor

Dr Trevor Larkum
Preserved Tanks: PreservedTanks.com
Armour Archive: ArmourArchive.co.uk
EVs
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Hanno_Spoelstra
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: 185

PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

- TrevorLarkum
However many (most?) surviving Fireflies will contradict these since they have been converted post-war on whatever convenient chassis were available. Occasionally you will even see a Firefly without a 17pdr turret. So overall the definition of what constitutes a Firefly is complicated.


To keep it simple I would suggest to stick the Firefly label to the wartime conversions.

Those converted post-war I would not designate Fireflies, if only because it is unsure whether they were actually converted and used post-war, or cobbled up from available hulls and turrets to put on display in museums and memorials.

Regards,
Hanno
Back to top
View user's profile
TrevorLarkum
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 1596
Location: Northampton, England
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

Hanno, I would tend to agree. However, most collections don't publicise whether their Firefly is wartime or post-war. I think the best approach is to make a judgement based on what can be seen of the authentic Firefly features - hence the Museo Storico dei Carristi example on that linked page above, even though it doesn't have a 17pdr. There always will be grey areas, however, until collections start publishing (caring about?) the histories of their vehicles.

_________________
Trevor

Dr Trevor Larkum
Preserved Tanks: PreservedTanks.com
Armour Archive: ArmourArchive.co.uk
EVs
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 1:43 am
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

"Blanked off" is something like this:

data3.primeportal.net/...4_of_7.jpg

data.primeportal.net/t...20(17).JPG

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
claude_GILLONO
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 7:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

The loader had a characteristic square turret roof hatch too.
HTH
Back to top
View user's profile
Hanno_Spoelstra
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: 185

PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:37 am
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

- TrevorLarkum
Hanno, I would tend to agree. However, most collections don't publicise whether their Firefly is wartime or post-war. I think the best approach is to make a judgement based on what can be seen of the authentic Firefly features - hence the Museo Storico dei Carristi example on that linked page above, even though it doesn't have a 17pdr. There always will be grey areas, however, until collections start publishing (caring about?) the histories of their vehicles.


Trevor, we don't need curators' descriptions, they are notoriously bad as they don't wear anoraks like we do Laughing

A Firefly has a 17-pounder gun with all the amenities described above. So if someone re-converted a Sherman Firefly into another configuration, then the tank loses the "Firefly" tag (which is a nickname more than a proper designation, anyway).


HTH,
Hanno
Back to top
View user's profile
Massimo_Foti
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 5397
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 11:14 am
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

We are walking a thin line here... Assume, just for the sake of the argument, that we have two tanks, one Sherman V and another Sherman V Firefly. Then an insane curator (without anorak!) swap the turrets among the two tanks, no another mods, just turret swap. Do we still have a "Firefly"? If yes, which of the two can be called Firefly?

Of course this is an extreme, unrealistic scenario, but it forces us to think about it.

From what I can see Trevor's stance is "the hull rules", if the hull came from a Firefly, Trevor will flag it as a Firefly, basically, in the scenario above, he will pick the hull.

Any categorization is, by its very own nature, more or less arbitrary. Since Trevor has the need to apply categories to his database, he has to make choices and enforce some rules.

Other may be facing even harder choices, for example, should we put Fireflies among american or british tanks? There no definitive answer to such a question...

Massimo
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum