±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 324
Total: 324
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Your Account
02: Home
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Member Screenshots
06: Photo Gallery
07: Community Forums
08: Downloads
09: News Archive
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Downloads
13: Community Forums
14: News Archive
15: Community Forums
16: Home
17: Photo Gallery
18: Member Screenshots
19: Community Forums
20: Member Screenshots
21: Community Forums
22: Member Screenshots
23: News Archive
24: News Archive
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: News
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: News Archive
33: Community Forums
34: Statistics
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Member Screenshots
42: Home
43: News Archive
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Member Screenshots
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Member Screenshots
52: Home
53: Community Forums
54: Photo Gallery
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Home
61: Home
62: Downloads
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Statistics
67: Community Forums
68: Member Screenshots
69: Community Forums
70: Downloads
71: Community Forums
72: Member Screenshots
73: Home
74: Home
75: Home
76: Community Forums
77: Member Screenshots
78: Community Forums
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Member Screenshots
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Home
89: Home
90: Photo Gallery
91: Downloads
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Photo Gallery
97: News Archive
98: Downloads
99: Community Forums
100: Downloads
101: News Archive
102: Home
103: News Archive
104: Home
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: Community Forums
108: Member Screenshots
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Home
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Member Screenshots
116: Downloads
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Home
120: Community Forums
121: Member Screenshots
122: Member Screenshots
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Member Screenshots
126: Photo Gallery
127: Community Forums
128: Photo Gallery
129: Home
130: News Archive
131: Community Forums
132: Photo Gallery
133: Member Screenshots
134: Member Screenshots
135: News Archive
136: Home
137: Home
138: Member Screenshots
139: Photo Gallery
140: Community Forums
141: Member Screenshots
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: News Archive
145: Member Screenshots
146: Member Screenshots
147: Home
148: Photo Gallery
149: Photo Gallery
150: Downloads
151: Photo Gallery
152: Community Forums
153: Photo Gallery
154: Community Forums
155: Member Screenshots
156: Photo Gallery
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Member Screenshots
160: Member Screenshots
161: Home
162: Your Account
163: Community Forums
164: News Archive
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Member Screenshots
172: Community Forums
173: Member Screenshots
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: News Archive
177: Downloads
178: Member Screenshots
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: News Archive
184: News Archive
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Home
189: Home
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: News Archive
196: Member Screenshots
197: Member Screenshots
198: Home
199: Downloads
200: Member Screenshots
201: Member Screenshots
202: News Archive
203: Home
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: Photo Gallery
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Member Screenshots
214: News Archive
215: Community Forums
216: News Archive
217: News Archive
218: Member Screenshots
219: Photo Gallery
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Member Screenshots
223: Home
224: Home
225: News Archive
226: Member Screenshots
227: Statistics
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Downloads
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Home
234: News Archive
235: Statistics
236: Member Screenshots
237: News Archive
238: Member Screenshots
239: Photo Gallery
240: Photo Gallery
241: Member Screenshots
242: Home
243: Home
244: Photo Gallery
245: Community Forums
246: Photo Gallery
247: News Archive
248: Home
249: Downloads
250: Member Screenshots
251: Community Forums
252: Member Screenshots
253: Photo Gallery
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Photo Gallery
261: Community Forums
262: Member Screenshots
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Member Screenshots
266: Community Forums
267: Home
268: Home
269: Home
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: Photo Gallery
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Member Screenshots
276: Home
277: Community Forums
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Member Screenshots
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Downloads
284: News Archive
285: Downloads
286: Community Forums
287: Home
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Member Screenshots
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Member Screenshots
297: News Archive
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: News Archive
301: Member Screenshots
302: Community Forums
303: Member Screenshots
304: Home
305: Home
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Member Screenshots
310: Member Screenshots
311: Member Screenshots
312: Community Forums
313: Photo Gallery
314: Member Screenshots
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Downloads
320: Community Forums
321: Member Screenshots
322: News Archive
323: Photo Gallery
324: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Question for the Sherman gurus...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Hanno_Spoelstra
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: 185

PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

The line is thin but clearly visible in my opinion: the starting point is the gun. Firefly is a popular name for the Sherman tanks converted with a 17-pdr AT gun. So, if no 17-pdr gun, the Sherman is not a Firefly.

Of course Trevor can use any set of rules to categorize his database. After people start swapping hulls, turrets, guns, engines, in my database I simple refer to those hodgepodge tanks as "Sherman", as they are nothing more than that. And for many people it is enough to see "a Sherman tank".

Hanno
Back to top
View user's profile
Massimo_Foti
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 5397
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

- Hanno_Spoelstra
So, if no 17-pdr gun, the Sherman is not a Firefly.


What about an original 17-pdr gun turret on top of an hull that spots none of the Firefly's unique features, like the revised ammo storage?
Back to top
View user's profile
Hanno_Spoelstra
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: 185

PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

- Massimo_Foti
What about an original 17-pdr gun turret on top of an hull that spots none of the Firefly's unique features, like the revised ammo storage?


That I would describe as "a Sherman" Wink

As a curator I would place a sign describing of which components this Sherman was made up of, and why. I would definitely not label this as a "Sherman Firefly" but a M4A(x) Medium Tank with a Firefly turret, or even, a turret with 17-pdr gun.
Back to top
View user's profile
Massimo_Foti
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 5397
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

- Hanno_Spoelstra
That I would describe as "a Sherman" Wink


You can't have it that easy, you know Laughing


- Hanno_Spoelstra
As a curator I would place a sign describing of which components this Sherman was made up of, and why.


These days we are lucky if we can identify "which", "why" often remains a question without an answer, just like the tank in "Museo Carristi". We know that after WW II the Italian Army assembled Shermans out of anything available. At one point some turrets were used for fortifications. Later spare hulls were mixed with other turrets just for display/preservation purposes (most likely the case for the Sherman in Bologna).

Again, my point is that any categorization is arbitrary, but categorization are a necessity, so we have to live with the trade-off.

Massimo

PS You still have to tell me if a Sherman Firefly should be considered american or british Mr. Green
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

Actually, the thrust of my original question: "For Fireflies that had the 17lb. gun changed (or never actually installed) is there a visual cue that says "Yep, that was intended to be, or was at one time, a "Firefly"?"

...was intended to help me distinguish all other Shermans that had been modified from Fireflies that had been modified...so the presence or absence of the 17 pounder in later years is not what I was hoping to have as a criteria. In particular, I'm trying to distinguish between Argentina's many "repotenciados" many, if not most of which originated as Fireflies. For the ones that didn't have that origin, I'm wondering how one would tell.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Massimo_Foti
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 5397
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:41 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

That was indeed an interesting question Doug. But we failed to resist the temptation to side-track the thread... Sorry

Massimo
Back to top
View user's profile
Massimo_Foti
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 5397
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

Back to Doug's question. The original discussion around the Sherman in Rome was lost during a server crash here. But some comments are still available on Trevor's website and could help:
preservedtanks.com/Pro...4&Select=4

Massimo
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 7:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

- Massimo_Foti
That was indeed an interesting question Doug. But we failed to resist the temptation to side-track the thread... Sorry

Massimo


Dangerous thread swerves are just an everyday hazard at the DG. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
TrevorLarkum
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 1596
Location: Northampton, England
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 10:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

- Hanno_Spoelstra
Trevor, we don't need curators' descriptions, they are notoriously bad as they don't wear anoraks like we do :lol:


True, but my point is that museums need to start caring about provenance, and that means starting with the serial number and researching a vehicle's history. It shouldn't be us doing their job for them. If it was an aircraft you can be sure they'd make more effort.


- Hanno_Spoelstra
A Firefly has a 17-pounder gun with all the amenities described above. So if someone re-converted a Sherman Firefly into another configuration, then the tank loses the "Firefly" tag (which is a nickname more than a proper designation, anyway).


To me the 'someone' is key. If a collector or re-enactor puts a Firefly turret on a standard Sherman I will record it as a standard Sherman, with a Firefly turret. If however the Italian or Belgian army puts a Firefly turret on a standard Sherman and it serves in that configuration then I record it as a Firefly (but an Italian or Belgian one, not a British one).


- Massimo_Foti

From what I can see Trevor's stance is "the hull rules", if the hull came from a Firefly, Trevor will flag it as a Firefly, basically, in the scenario above, he will pick the hull.


All other things being equal, yes that is correct. Hence the tanks I have recorded as Fireflies even though they no longer have a Firefly turret or 17pdr. However, that can be trumped (see the previous paragraph) - if a tank has served in an army as a Firefly (a Firefly turret on a different hull) then it's a Firefly. Even the first British Fireflies didn't have all the characteristics we now consider to indicate a Firefly, but they were Fireflies nonetheless.

Increasingly the best answer I am finding is to make clearer categories. Once I have more examples of a tank in the database I can make finer distinctions. In this case I will likely create categories for British, Italian and Belgian Fireflies, and the text will explain the characteristics in this case. For example, I am just getting to the point where I have started to do this with the M47 Patton with its Italian Service section.


- Massimo_Foti
Other may be facing even harder choices, for example, should we put Fireflies among american or british tanks? There no definitive answer to such a question...


This was a hard choice for me at one time and I agonised over it. I now absolutely define a tank by the nationality of its hull design, and have never regretted that move. For me the Firefly comes under Sherman tanks, which are under American tanks:

Preserved American Tanks: Volume 2

There are sections there for Fireflies, Ishermans, FL10s, etc. Having experience of writing about tank development it has become for me the only choice. When writing about the Firefly you need to have described the history and development of the Sherman, much less relevant is the history of British tanks. At first glance it may appear to throw up anomalies (e.g. the US M1917 and Soviet KS are in a chapter with the FT), but it very quickly makes perfect sense. My only regret is that I didn't follow it absolutely when I wrote Preserved German Tanks, and included the Hetzer, Marder I, etc. Now they would come under Czechoslovak and French tanks respectively.

_________________
Trevor

Dr Trevor Larkum
Preserved Tanks: PreservedTanks.com
Armour Archive: ArmourArchive.co.uk
EVs
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Tichenor
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 06, 2007
Posts: 461
Location: Antwerp
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

- Trevor
Once I have more examples of a tank in the database I can make finer distinctions. In this case I will likely create categories for British, Italian and Belgian Fireflies, and the text will explain the characteristics in this case.


This is going to be a hard nut to crack. As far as I know all the Firefly's in Belgium are original British build exempt maybe two ( the one in Leopoldsburg and a hull in Brasschaat). But even then there is no proof they where actualy rebuild after the war here in Belgium. But I have to say, some of the monuments here in Belgium are fore sure a mix of hulls and turrets (Hechtel, Hermeton-sur-meusse, Clermont, Mopertingen).

Michel
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
TrevorLarkum
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 1596
Location: Northampton, England
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Question for the Sherman gurus...

If so, I'll classify them as British and make note of differences and exceptions. I look forward to writing up Belgium - I had a lot of fun in my youth cycling round and visiting old tanks - but it won't be for some time yet.

_________________
Trevor

Dr Trevor Larkum
Preserved Tanks: PreservedTanks.com
Armour Archive: ArmourArchive.co.uk
EVs
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum