±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 379
Total: 379
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Your Account
08: Home
09: Home
10: Photo Gallery
11: Home
12: Home
13: Photo Gallery
14: Home
15: Home
16: Home
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Photo Gallery
20: Community Forums
21: Home
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Member Screenshots
26: CPGlang
27: CPGlang
28: Community Forums
29: Photo Gallery
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Home
34: Home
35: Home
36: Downloads
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: Home
40: Home
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Home
46: Photo Gallery
47: Home
48: Home
49: Downloads
50: Downloads
51: CPGlang
52: Your Account
53: Community Forums
54: Your Account
55: Your Account
56: Your Account
57: Photo Gallery
58: Home
59: Home
60: Home
61: CPGlang
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Photo Gallery
65: Photo Gallery
66: Photo Gallery
67: Home
68: Home
69: Community Forums
70: Photo Gallery
71: Community Forums
72: Photo Gallery
73: Photo Gallery
74: Community Forums
75: Home
76: Home
77: Photo Gallery
78: Your Account
79: Your Account
80: Home
81: Your Account
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Downloads
87: Your Account
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: CPGlang
91: CPGlang
92: CPGlang
93: Photo Gallery
94: Home
95: Home
96: Home
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Home
100: CPGlang
101: Home
102: Home
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Member Screenshots
106: Community Forums
107: Photo Gallery
108: Your Account
109: CPGlang
110: Home
111: Home
112: Your Account
113: Community Forums
114: Home
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: CPGlang
118: Community Forums
119: Your Account
120: Photo Gallery
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Photo Gallery
124: Downloads
125: Home
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Home
131: Home
132: Photo Gallery
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Home
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Your Account
140: Photo Gallery
141: Home
142: Home
143: Photo Gallery
144: Home
145: Home
146: Home
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Your Account
156: Community Forums
157: Your Account
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Home
164: Home
165: Home
166: Photo Gallery
167: Home
168: Home
169: Home
170: Your Account
171: Home
172: Home
173: Photo Gallery
174: Photo Gallery
175: Community Forums
176: Photo Gallery
177: Community Forums
178: Photo Gallery
179: Home
180: Photo Gallery
181: Home
182: CPGlang
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Photo Gallery
186: Your Account
187: Photo Gallery
188: Home
189: Community Forums
190: Member Screenshots
191: Photo Gallery
192: Home
193: Photo Gallery
194: Your Account
195: Home
196: Photo Gallery
197: Community Forums
198: Photo Gallery
199: Photo Gallery
200: Photo Gallery
201: Home
202: Community Forums
203: Home
204: Your Account
205: Photo Gallery
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Home
211: Photo Gallery
212: Photo Gallery
213: Photo Gallery
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Member Screenshots
217: Downloads
218: Community Forums
219: Home
220: Home
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Home
225: Downloads
226: Downloads
227: Home
228: Home
229: Downloads
230: Your Account
231: Your Account
232: Your Account
233: Home
234: Home
235: Community Forums
236: Your Account
237: Your Account
238: Member Screenshots
239: Your Account
240: Photo Gallery
241: Your Account
242: Home
243: Community Forums
244: Home
245: Statistics
246: Home
247: CPGlang
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Your Account
253: Home
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: Home
257: Home
258: Home
259: Home
260: Your Account
261: Downloads
262: Home
263: Downloads
264: Home
265: Photo Gallery
266: Home
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Photo Gallery
272: Home
273: Home
274: Home
275: Home
276: Home
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Photo Gallery
280: Home
281: Community Forums
282: Home
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Member Screenshots
288: CPGlang
289: Photo Gallery
290: Photo Gallery
291: Home
292: Home
293: Home
294: Your Account
295: Downloads
296: Downloads
297: Home
298: Home
299: Home
300: Home
301: Community Forums
302: Home
303: Community Forums
304: Photo Gallery
305: Community Forums
306: Photo Gallery
307: Home
308: CPGlang
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Home
312: Home
313: Community Forums
314: Photo Gallery
315: Home
316: Home
317: Home
318: Your Account
319: Community Forums
320: Home
321: Home
322: Home
323: Downloads
324: Community Forums
325: Photo Gallery
326: Photo Gallery
327: Search
328: Home
329: Community Forums
330: CPGlang
331: Your Account
332: Community Forums
333: Photo Gallery
334: Home
335: Member Screenshots
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Photo Gallery
339: CPGlang
340: Home
341: Community Forums
342: Photo Gallery
343: Home
344: Photo Gallery
345: Your Account
346: Downloads
347: CPGlang
348: Community Forums
349: Home
350: Community Forums
351: CPGlang
352: Photo Gallery
353: Downloads
354: Home
355: Home
356: Home
357: Home
358: Community Forums
359: Home
360: Community Forums
361: Member Screenshots
362: Home
363: Home
364: Home
365: Community Forums
366: Home
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Community Forums
370: Photo Gallery
371: Photo Gallery
372: Your Account
373: Community Forums
374: Home
375: Photo Gallery
376: Community Forums
377: Home
378: Home
379: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM 66 Tank Proposal
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:51 pm
Post subject: XM 66 Tank Proposal

This is a 'spin-off' Vehicle from the T95 Program.



Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting - You say it was a spinoff of teh T95 program. Where does this fit in the M60A2 genisis? The picture looks like an M6A1E1 or M60A2. Could it be that the Army decided that it would be easier to get the program survive by either giving it a new designator (XM66) or developing it as a member of the M60 family

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

It does have a strange hull. While it has the shape and fenders of a M60, it has 5 return rollers.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

The turret is similiar to the T95 test bed at the LST buiding.
(NOTE: The 20mm gun is removed, but mount location is obvious)





This is around the time of the M60A2 development.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting if any alternative armament options were considered for XM 66 or M60A2 at the initial development (60s), later they considered 120 mm US and British guns, as well as M68.
Back to top
View user's profile
Harold_Biondo
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2021
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

- Joe_D
XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.


If this was referring to the tank that is in Armada Michigan, that is not in fact the XM66D (or A, in this case) turret, it is the T95S turret. S standing for Shillelagh. There was some cross-pollination going on between the M60A2 and T95 programs. The actual description of the XM66D does not match up with the T95 turret. The tank in Armada was built from the beginning on the M48 chassis, according to the original work order for it I found in the archives. The T95 and M60 hulls with T95S turrets were separate individuals entirely, since three T95S turrets were built, according to Hunnicut.
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:


_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Joe! Thanks for checking in. With regard to the test rig shown in Don's old post...do you know if MICOM was using that or a similar rig? Was any firing done at Redstone or if part of a MICOM operation, perfomed exclusively at White Sands? I've been trying to establish what platform was being used in the tests that were referred to by MICOM reps at a 1969 meeting at Ft. Knox. They assiduously avoided any use of or comment on Shillelagh launches involving an actual Sheridan. There are two tests in particular I'm interested in: First was a "shoot-off" between Shillelagh and M60A1. Second was a series of Missile Readiness firings they cited to anybody who would listen....503 missiles, 91% successful hit rate. It was a lie and 162 of those missiles were not even fired.
I'd love to know if this was the rig likely in use?
Best regards,
D.

- Joe_D
Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Doug,

I can say for certainty that the M48/T95 rig wasn't used for those tests. Anything else I'd have to unpack some boxes to find the info. Give me some time and eventually I'll be back on a normal routine. Right now I'm way to busy.

Nice to hear from you.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2066
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Doug,

Sorry for the long overdue reply. Checked my library and came up with this conclusion. In 1969 there were a very limited amount of M60A1E2's available. 300 were in storage until a satisfactory scavenge system was approved and implemented along with a plethora of other issues. The few available (approximately 14) were distributed between Knox, Aberdeen, Detroit, and Redstone, being used to develop/fix issues with the stabilization system, recoil mechanism, CBSS, FCS, and laser. The M551 was plentiful and capable of conducting these firings. It is highly unlikely they would have diverted any M60A1E2's for a test the M551 could just as satisfactorily conduct. If I find anything else to nail this down, I'll post it.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum