±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 242
Total: 242
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: News
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Photo Gallery
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Photo Gallery
13: Member Screenshots
14: Home
15: Your Account
16: Home
17: Downloads
18: Photo Gallery
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Photo Gallery
22: Community Forums
23: Photo Gallery
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Photo Gallery
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Downloads
38: Home
39: Home
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Home
44: Home
45: News Archive
46: Home
47: Home
48: Home
49: Member Screenshots
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: News
53: Member Screenshots
54: Member Screenshots
55: Community Forums
56: Home
57: Community Forums
58: Photo Gallery
59: Home
60: Home
61: Home
62: Home
63: Your Account
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Downloads
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: News
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Photo Gallery
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Statistics
83: Home
84: Photo Gallery
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Photo Gallery
90: Photo Gallery
91: Member Screenshots
92: Community Forums
93: Home
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Downloads
97: Community Forums
98: Photo Gallery
99: Home
100: Photo Gallery
101: Photo Gallery
102: Downloads
103: Downloads
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Photo Gallery
109: Community Forums
110: Member Screenshots
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Home
116: Member Screenshots
117: Community Forums
118: Photo Gallery
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Your Account
122: News Archive
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Photo Gallery
128: Home
129: Home
130: Downloads
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Home
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Your Account
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Photo Gallery
140: Home
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Your Account
147: News Archive
148: Photo Gallery
149: Home
150: Home
151: Photo Gallery
152: Home
153: Home
154: Home
155: Member Screenshots
156: Member Screenshots
157: News Archive
158: Home
159: Home
160: Home
161: Home
162: Home
163: Member Screenshots
164: Statistics
165: Member Screenshots
166: Home
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Home
170: Home
171: Downloads
172: Home
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Photo Gallery
176: Home
177: Your Account
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Photo Gallery
182: Member Screenshots
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Photo Gallery
188: Community Forums
189: Member Screenshots
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Your Account
193: Home
194: Home
195: Community Forums
196: Photo Gallery
197: Photo Gallery
198: Community Forums
199: Downloads
200: Community Forums
201: Your Account
202: Photo Gallery
203: Home
204: Community Forums
205: Your Account
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Member Screenshots
210: Community Forums
211: Photo Gallery
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Home
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Home
219: Photo Gallery
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: News
223: Photo Gallery
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Home
230: Community Forums
231: Photo Gallery
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Photo Gallery
238: Your Account
239: Community Forums
240: Photo Gallery
241: Community Forums
242: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:02 pm
Post subject: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

Apparently a LAV replacement... So much for the old Expeditionary Family of Fighting Vehicles (EFFV - not to be confused with the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle EFV) that was to replace the Corps' Abrams & LAVs...

But I cant help wonder if this might be a crack in the EFV program's armor? Especially the reference to being used by infantry battalions? Perhaps they will back away from using Amtracs once you cross the beach and go to more traditional APCs? And so much for the Marines saying C-130 deployability was pointless for them...

In fact, this brief (slides 33-43) say the AAV doctrine will be used as the basis for the MPC:
www.mccdc.usmc.mil/fea.../Gap_9.ppt

"USMC doctrine for its existing personnel carrier, the AAV, can serve as a waypoint in the the development of MPC doctrine."

Looks like from other documents they plan to equip 6 infantry battalions with the MPC:
www.dtic.mil/descripti...06623M.pdf

Looks like some of the usual Piranha & LAV candidates are being considered...

Neil


contracting.tacom.army...pc/mpc.htm

Marine Personnel Carrier

Program Synopsis

This website has been established to provide information on the Marine Personnel Carrier (MPC). Strategic Planning Guidance (SPG) directed the Marine Corps to propose an appropriate mix of ground combat vehicles to support irregular warfare (IW) operations. The MPC program is an outgrowth of the Ground Mobility Initiative that answers the SPG tasking.

The MPC will possess a balance between performance, protection and payload and embody the following attributes:
- Scalable ballistic and mine protection
- Capacity for 2 crew and 10 passengers
- Operational and tactical mobility equivalent to the Light Armored Reconnaissance (LAR) Battalion
- C-130 aircraft transportability

The MPC will increase Infantry Battalion protected mobility and LAR Battalion striking power. It will also serve as a balanced expeditionary armored personnel carrier optimized for IW, but effective across the range of military operations.
The MPC is a family of approximately 500 vehicles that provide the following mission capabilities:
- Personnel Carrier
- Vehicle recovery and repair
- Logistics and resupply
- Command and control
- Weapon overwatch

This is the first posting related to the MPC program. Check back frequently as updated information will be posted as it becomes available.
Back to top
View user's profile
buglerbilly
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 147

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:05 am
Post subject: Re: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

Marines, for their part, are not only purchasing MRAP in large numbers but they also intend to acquire a new armored personnel carrier. The so-called Marine personnel carrier, or MPC, is not part of JLTV but rather a stopgap for the troubled Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle. The Corps had planned on buying as many as 1,000 EFVs, which are tracked armored vehicles that run on the ground and in the water. But the program may not survive the latest round of cost overruns and performance failures. Marine officials asked to redirect some of its EFV funds to a new personnel carrier. The goal is to buy 600 vehicles between 2012 and 2016, said Conant. The Corps is considering buying an upgraded version of its light armored vehicle or possibly the same Stryker personnel carriers that the Army currently operates.

“We don’t need to buy top-end stuff to survive,� Conant said. The MPC would give Marines a “cheap solution� while the EFV sorts out its troubles. At the same time, it would give the Corps a much needed fast combat vehicle before JLTV arrives, said Conant.


Taken from an article in NDM on JLTV and linked to another discussion on MRAP....................See links below.............

www.nationaldefensemag...ehicle.htm

www.nationaldefensemag...ration.htm

Regards,

BUG
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2008 10:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

I saw a Lockheed Martin - Patria AMV headed south on I-95 as I was driving back to DC. Unfortunately it was raining, and it was headed the other way, so I didnt get any pics - but I'm very sure it was an AMV sans turret. Very distinctive headlights.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patria_AMV

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 3:56 am
Post subject: Re: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

Neil

Got an unexpected surprize today. A good look at the AVB,....TALK ABOUT COOL!!

Photos to follow

D
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 9:53 am
Post subject: Re: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

AVB???

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 3:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

Excuse me ...ABV




Assault Breeching Vehicle

Photos pending

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 11:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

Where's the 165mm Demolition Gun (or equivelent) ??????

Still no replacement for that CEV capability. Looks like they used the M1A1 cupola so at least the TC can fire the .50 buttoned up. Can't wait for the rest of the pictures.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 11:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Interesting new requirement - "Marine Personnel Carrier"

Ssshhh... There's a conspiracy theory that abounds regarding the absence of 165mm guns on M728 CEVs on display... Not for ABV technically though...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum